Upload
michael-levine-clark
View
553
Download
0
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
Electronic Resources & Libraries. Austin, Texas. February 28, 2011.
Citation preview
E L E C T R O N I C R E S O U R C E S & L I B R A R I E SA U S T I N, T E XA S
F E B R UA RY 2 8 , 2 0 1 1
M I C H A E L L E V I N E - C L A R KC O L L E C T I O N S L I B R A R I A NU N I V E R S I T Y O F D E N V E R
M I C H A E L . L E V I N E - C L A R K @ D U. E D U
The Right Data for the Right Audience: Strategies for Effective Communication
asd
The Right Way?
It depends Audience Context Format
Collection Use Data
Renovation Must move 500,000 volumes offsite
350,000+ monographs = 24,000 linear feet 100,000+ serial volumes =16,000 linear feet
Unused Monographs
Discipline Titles Linear Feet
Humanities 69,109 4,607
Sciences 68,178 4,545
Social Sciences 212,712 14,180
Total 350,000 23,333
Stakeholders
Data for: Me Selectors Dean Provost/Chancellor Trustees Faculty
Humanities Social Sciences Sciences
Students Architects Catalogers Stacks Maintenance
Faculty
Reassurance 70% of monographs will remain in the library Nothing with a record of circulation to storage Differences by discipline Detailed explanations as needed
70%
30%
Monographs
PenroseStorage
Humanities Faculty
Pre-1950 monographs Vs. pre-2000 monographs in the sciences
No record of circulationWe’ll bring anything back
Architects
Planning data Linear feet Reasons don’t matter
Data for Architects – In Linear Feet
Administration
Justification for keeping material in library 70% of monographs medium/high-use
Sample use data 150-200,000 circulations annually Reminder about importance of paper collections Reminder about importance of browsing Reminder of value faculty place in collections
Board of Trustees
Justification for storage facility 30% of monographs low use
Not defined Education about need for paper collections Education about importance of browsing
Thank You