44
The Age of Footage: Total Video Access and the Cinematic Imagination

The Age Of Footage

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: The Age Of Footage

The Age of Footage:Total Video Access and the Cinematic Imagination

Page 2: The Age Of Footage

The Story So Far

• The development of the Hollywood system.• The formal properties of Hollywood film.• The development of film styles.• The shifts between eras; reflection of social

anxieties. (Right and Left cycles).• Postmodernity and intertextuality. (style

influenced by cultural accrual)• Shifts in audiences.

Page 3: The Age Of Footage

In Tonight’s Episode

• Hollywood: 2007.• A Tour of Copy Protection Mania. - HD-DVD / Blu-Ray - DVD - VHS• Film Piracy and Film Culture.• Relationships Between Technology and Film

Form.• Internet Screen Aesthetics.

Page 4: The Age Of Footage

Hollywood: 2007

Star System: Corporatization of stars and their agencies means that all aspects of star image are financially controlled and equipped.

As cameras follow stars everywhere, they are ‘stars’ everywhere – especially in private.

Page 5: The Age Of Footage
Page 6: The Age Of Footage
Page 7: The Age Of Footage
Page 8: The Age Of Footage

“Cui Bono?”Who profits?

“We have no obligation to make history. We have no obligation to make art. We have no obligation to make a statement. To make money is our only objective.”

— Michael Eisner, CEO, The Walt Disney Co.

Page 9: The Age Of Footage

More money at stake=

More risks=

Insurance=

More control

Page 10: The Age Of Footage

Is Hollywood's biggest money-maker:

a) Movies?b) DVDs?c) Television?

d) Merchandise?

Page 11: The Age Of Footage

Hollywood: 2007

Page 12: The Age Of Footage

“Once upon a time—before the TV and VCR—studios earned virtually all their profits from a single source: the theater's box office. Nowadays, in the new Hollywood, the world box office is a money loser: In 2004, the studios lost an estimated $2.22 billion on the $7.4 billion they took in from the box office.”

- Hollywood's Profits, Demystified: The real El Dorado is TV, By Edward Jay Epstein

Page 13: The Age Of Footage

“The simple fact is that the studios pay more to alert potential audiences via advertising and to get movie prints into theaters than they get back from those who buy tickets.”

Page 14: The Age Of Footage

• “Consider, for example, Warner Bros.' movie The Negotiator, with Samuel L.

Jackson and Kevin Spacey. It was efficiently produced for $43.5 million, scored a world box office of $88 million, and appeared to be a modest success. In fact, Warner Bros.

collected only $36.74 million from its theatrical release after it had paid check-

conversion and other collection costs, the theaters had taken their cut, and the MPA

had deducted its fee.”

Page 15: The Age Of Footage

“Meanwhile, to corral that audience, Warner Bros.' advertising bill was $40.28 million, and its bill for prints, trailers, dubbing, customs, and shipping was another $12.32 million. So, after the movie finished its theater run, without even considering the cost of making the movie, Warner Bros. had lost $13 million. Why? For every dollar Warner Bros. got back from the box office, it shelled out about $1.40 in expenses, which was about average, if not slightly above par, for studio movies.”

Page 16: The Age Of Footage

“Fifty-nine percent of this immense $17.7 billion of revenue from television licensing comes from America, which is not surprising, considering that on an average day fewer than 2 percent of Americans go to movie theaters, while more than 90 percent watch something at home on TV. And without these profits from TV, no Hollywood studio could survive.”

Page 17: The Age Of Footage

Cui Bono?

Page 18: The Age Of Footage
Page 19: The Age Of Footage

Once, studios ran all aspects of film viewership.

The last 10-15 years have seen a total reassertion – not collapse – of the Hollywood system.

This is due to ‘vertical integration’ and openly monopolistic practices.

Page 20: The Age Of Footage

In 2006, the six major movie conglomerates combined for 91.6% of the North American market; the two mini-majors were almost exactly half as successful as their 1986 counterparts, sharing 6.1%; and all of the remaining independent companies split a pool amounting to 2.3%.

Page 21: The Age Of Footage

Copy Protection Mania

Page 22: The Age Of Footage

• The CD/DVD/Blu-Ray/HD-DVD technology has not changed a great deal since 1969; it is continually sold as advanced precisely because it is not.

• Sony, Phillips, Hitachi, Matsushita (Panasonic), Mitsubishi, Pioneer, Thomson, and Time Warner own “DVD” – even making money from blank discs.

• The new formats exist not to give us anything new, but to redistribute the power relations between these companies. Ie, Laserdisc.

Copy Protection Mania

Page 23: The Age Of Footage
Page 24: The Age Of Footage

Two things emerge from these phases of inter-corporate rivalry:

1. The corporations will eventually be forced to accept the model that profits them the least.

2. The public flocks to the technology which gives them the most control.

Laserdisc Vs. MMCD / DVD

VHS vs. Beta

Page 25: The Age Of Footage

“Cui Bono?”

Page 26: The Age Of Footage

VHS and DVD use “Macrovision” to make sure only a television, not a second recorder, was getting the signal.

This meant, in theory, that the only thing you could do with a film is watch it…

in theory.

Page 27: The Age Of Footage

“Macrovision” is/was incredibly easy to get around. VHS tapes were being pirated before people could even buy

VCRs. Macrovision security on DVD was no better.

(Macrovision still gets big Hollywood bucks to sell the same crap.)

Page 28: The Age Of Footage

DVDs also have a little thing called CSS:“Content Scrambling System”

This scrambles and reduces the DVD signal, putting it through a code.

Page 29: The Age Of Footage

• It was cracked by teenagers ……. In two weeks.

Turns out computers are designed to crack codes!

Page 30: The Age Of Footage

540 people have been sued over the use of DVD cracking.2044 people have been sued – and 14 jailed – for DVD piracy.

Page 31: The Age Of Footage

More money at stake=

More risks=

Insurance=

More control

Page 32: The Age Of Footage

FUN FACT: We are bound by

American law on copyright.

You can be deported to America.

Page 33: The Age Of Footage

Sucks to be this guy.

“For his crimes as the lynchpin of a criminal gang illegally reproducing and distributing pirated software, computer games, music and videos over the internet, he is staring at a five-year stretch in a US prison when he is sentenced next month.” – The Australian, March 12, 2007

FUN FACT: He has never been to America. Nor is he related to an American.

Page 34: The Age Of Footage

“40% of all Western market film piracy occurs in New York.”

“70% of all Western market film piracy occurs in Canadian urban centres.”

- MPAA Global Piracy Report, March 2007

Page 35: The Age Of Footage

Copy Protection Mania

Billions has been spent on copy protection of media.

The failure of these measures is absolute and total.

More than two thirds of people globally who watch Hollywood product (American TV, DVD, Film, Cable) do so through piracy. [est. of May 2006]

Page 36: The Age Of Footage

Copy Protection ManiaWhat began as a fight for VCRs to have a ‘record’ button has become the biggest threat to the Hollywood system in its history – including television; the fight which it lost.

“There is no future in which bits will get harder to copy. Instead of spending billions on technologies that attack paying customers, the studios should be confronting that reality and figuring out how to make a living in a world where copying will get easier and easier. They're like blacksmiths meeting to figure out how to protect the horseshoe racket by sabotaging railroads.

The railroad is coming. The tracks have been laid right through the studio gates. It's time to get out of the horseshoe business. “ - http://www.boingboing.net (May 17)

Page 37: The Age Of Footage

HD-DVD / Blu-RayThe new systems which are being pushed to consumers

have also been broken. By teenagers.Within weeks.

09-f9-11-02-9d-74-e3-5b-d8-41-56-c5-63-56-88-c0

Page 38: The Age Of Footage

We have seen how television affects film and vice-versa.

Can the internet affect film aesthetics?

Internet Aesthetics And Film

Page 39: The Age Of Footage

1. Speed of ReceptionFilms are available online, to download, within days of their release – sometimes before.

‘Word of mouth’ means a film’s financial future can be ruined by that pesky force, taste.

Also, the ability of producers to manage suspense and surprise endings has changed.

Page 40: The Age Of Footage
Page 41: The Age Of Footage

Dan Harries, “Watching The Internet”

“The movie screen, the home television screen, and the computer screen retain their separate locations, yet the types of images you see on them are losing their medium-based specificity.” - Anne Frieberg

“Because digital media potentially incorporates all

previous media, it no longer makes sense to think in specific terms.” - Henry Jenkins

Page 42: The Age Of Footage

Programs like Quicktime and sites like Youtube have a similar technological basis; they are not great at showing fast motion and produce ‘blocks’ (like in the videos you’ve seen).

Also – webcam/phone technologies are producing a lot more close-ups across media.

But…..Internet Aesthetics

Page 43: The Age Of Footage

Minisodes

Seeing the “24” success and the time we spend online is outweighing television time, Sony Pictures is releasing (June) ‘minisodes’ – episodes of their old material cut down to 5 minutes.

Page 44: The Age Of Footage

Goodluck with your final essays!