135
Emergency Response in Chemical Casualties: System Approach to Effective Hospital Preparedness

Emergency Responses in Chemical Casualties

  • Upload
    taem

  • View
    2.387

  • Download
    3

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

taem core lecture nov 2009

Citation preview

Page 1: Emergency Responses in Chemical Casualties

Emergency Response in Chemical Casualties:System Approach to Effective Hospital

Preparedness

Page 2: Emergency Responses in Chemical Casualties

Objectives• Lessons Learned & Event Characteristics

• Incident Response Requirements

• Scene Safety

• Medical Management of Hazmat Victims

– Primary Survey & Resuscitation

– Decontamination

– Hazmat Patient Assessment

– Poisoning Treatment Paradigm

• Antidote and chemical stockpile

• Chemical protective clothing

• Hazmat traing trends

• Summary

Page 3: Emergency Responses in Chemical Casualties

Lessons Learned From Coaminated Casualties Incidents

Page 4: Emergency Responses in Chemical Casualties

INCIDENTS

EMERGENCY INCIDENT TIMELINES

RESPONSESPOTENTIAL CASUALTIES

- Flood

- Chemical

-Tornado

-Earthquake

-Hurricane

-Explosives

Tens ofMillions

Thousands

Hundreds

Tens

HoursMinutes

Seconds Days

MonthsWeeks

- NuclearMillions

(contagious)

(non-contagious)

- Biological

- Radio-logical

Everyday Life

- Accidents- First Aid- Rescue- Fire- Police

First Response

- Explosives

Criminal Terrorism

- Bomb Squad

- Flood- Earthquake- Hurricane- Tornado

Natural Disasters

- Search & Rescue- Sustainment- Medical Triage- Temp Morgue

State-Fed Escalation

- Chemical- Biological- Nuclear- Radiological

Super Terrorism

- Evacuation- Containment- Decontamination- Quarantine- Vaccination- Antidotes- Detoxification

Warfare Type Ops

Escalation

<991130v30>

Emergency Management Consequence Timelines

Page 5: Emergency Responses in Chemical Casualties

Bhopal Disaster3 Dec.1984

8,000 died300,000 injured

Page 6: Emergency Responses in Chemical Casualties

Tokyo March 20, 1995• 5,500 People Exposed• 3,227 Went to Hospital• 550 Transported Via

EMS• Essentially no

Decontamination of Patients

Page 7: Emergency Responses in Chemical Casualties

SARIN Clip

Page 8: Emergency Responses in Chemical Casualties

October 26, 2002

•50 Chechen rebels, storm Moscow’sHouse of Culture Theatre during aperformance of Nord-Ost, taking 700hostages. The rebels demand Russianwithdrawal from Chechnya, and threatento kill the hostages if demands are not met.

•After three days of fruitless negotiationsan unknown gas, meant to incapacitate therebels, is released in the theatre. Most ofthe rebels and 116 hostages die.

What kind of gas was released? …

Page 9: Emergency Responses in Chemical Casualties

Event Characteristics

• Most Victims are Exposed to Vapor• No warning• Victims Will Not Wait In Line to Decon.• Most Decontamination Needs to be Done

at the Hospital Not the Scene • Mass Disaster Response Occurs With

Local Resources

Page 10: Emergency Responses in Chemical Casualties

Event Characteristics

• Agent will likely be unknown• Dry Decontamination Suitable for Most• Only 10%-15% of Patients Via EMS• Emergency Department Resources Limited

Page 11: Emergency Responses in Chemical Casualties

Most Common Fatal Injuries

– Trauma (65%)

– Thermal burns (16%)

– Respiratory irritation with airway obstruction

&/or respiratory failure (10%)

– Chemical burns (6%)

– Other causes (3%)

Hazardous Substances Emergency Events Surveillance (HSEES)

Page 12: Emergency Responses in Chemical Casualties

What is wrong with the patient

• Physical Trauma• Exposure to Chemical HAZMAT

– Inhalation• Most common

– Skin & mucous membranes• Common

– Ingestion & Injection• Unlikely

• Toxicity – Local– Systemic

Page 13: Emergency Responses in Chemical Casualties

The World Of Chemical Agents

• The vast majority of HazMat incidents resulting in the contamination of people involve common industrial chemical agents.

• The study of all potential sources of contamination are best supported by looking at these chemicals in a categorical system.

Page 14: Emergency Responses in Chemical Casualties

Agents Categories

1. Industrial Chemicals. 2. Chemical Warfare Agents. 3. Biological Warfare Agents. 4. Radiological Materials.

Page 15: Emergency Responses in Chemical Casualties

Incident Response Requirements

• Protect patients, staff, and facility• Rapid decon• Expert informations• Surge capacity• Some specialized expertise

Page 16: Emergency Responses in Chemical Casualties

Hospital Preparedness

•Medicare

•Manage care

Page 17: Emergency Responses in Chemical Casualties

Reasonable ≠ Adequate

“Best possible care for victimswhile not compromising the safetyhospital staff and current patients”

Page 18: Emergency Responses in Chemical Casualties

Hospital Plan

• Cost effective• Simple as possible• Minimized manpower• Immediate availability• Rapid patient processing

Page 19: Emergency Responses in Chemical Casualties

Scene SafetyHot, Warm and Cold zones

Hot ZoneContaminated area

Need PPE

Warm ZoneContamination

reduction

Cold ZoneNormal function

You will be here. Public Health does not usually

decontaminate or function in the hot zone

Page 20: Emergency Responses in Chemical Casualties

Zone rules

Hot ZoneContaminated area

Need PPE

Warm ZoneContamination

reduction

Cold ZoneNormal function

Control access to zones

Temporary

Morgue

Very limited treatment before decontamination

Isolate cadavers

Decontamination direction No back flow!!

Page 21: Emergency Responses in Chemical Casualties

Medical Management of Hazmat Victims

• Primary Survey & Resuscitation

• Decontamination

• Hazmat Patient Assessment

• Poisoning Treatment Paradigm

Page 22: Emergency Responses in Chemical Casualties

Primary Survey & Resuscitation: The Basics

• Airway with cervical spine control

• Breathing

• Circulation

• Disability (nervous system)

• Exposure with environmental control

Page 23: Emergency Responses in Chemical Casualties

“The process of removing or neutralizing surface contaminants thathave accumulated on personnel and equipment.”

Decontamination

Page 24: Emergency Responses in Chemical Casualties

Chemical Victim Triage

High Priority for Decontamination: • Victims closest to point of release and reporting exposure. • Victims showing some evidence of contamination on clothing or skin. • Victims demonstrating serious symptoms.

Medium Priority for Decontamination: • Victims not as close to point of release, and who have minimal

evidence of contamination on clothing or skin. • Victims who are mildly symptomatic.

Low Priority for Decontamination: • Victims who are far away from point of release. • Victims who have no verified contamination. • Victims who are asymptomatic.

Page 25: Emergency Responses in Chemical Casualties

Urgency for Medical Care

Low risk for secondary contaminationCritically illFocus on Treatment

High risk for secondary contaminationCritically illSimultaneous decontamination and treatment

Low risk for secondary contaminationMild or no illnessDecontamination not needed

High risk for secondary contaminationMild or no illnessDecontamination before treatment

Triage Urgency for decontamination

Page 26: Emergency Responses in Chemical Casualties

General Principles

• Decontaminate victims as soon as possible.• Disrobing is decontamination; head to toe, more

removal is better.• Water flushing generally is the best mass

decontamination method.• After a known exposure to a liquid chemical

agent, emergency responders should be decontaminated as soon as possible to avoid serious effects.

Page 27: Emergency Responses in Chemical Casualties

Decontamination Site Selection

• Outside!• Level impermeable surfaced area• Up wind• Water supply/collection• Illuminated• Ingress and Egress routes

Page 28: Emergency Responses in Chemical Casualties

Layout of Hospital Decontamination Zone

Page 29: Emergency Responses in Chemical Casualties

Decontamination Station 2 lines

Page 30: Emergency Responses in Chemical Casualties

Decontamination Station 3 lines

Page 31: Emergency Responses in Chemical Casualties

Suggested Cut-Out Procedures (Non-ambulatory Patient’s Clothing)

Page 32: Emergency Responses in Chemical Casualties

Ideal Decontaminants

• Neutralize all Agents• Safe• Easy to use• Available• Rapid acting• No toxic end products• Affordable• No irritability

Page 33: Emergency Responses in Chemical Casualties

Dry Decontamination• Remove clothing/personal effects –

85% decon performed by this step• Vapor or no exposure• Removal of clothing• Modesty concerns• Requires large amounts of

disposable clothing• Clothing disposition

Page 34: Emergency Responses in Chemical Casualties

Wet Ambulatory Decontamination

Requires only one or two personnel to perform, primarily supervisory roleAt least one person should be medically trainedMay be quicker than non-ambulatory process, should utilize about the same amount of solutionFocus on non-clothed/exposed areasDecon wounds and bandage before entering shower (occlusive dressing)

Page 35: Emergency Responses in Chemical Casualties

Wound Decontamination

Page 36: Emergency Responses in Chemical Casualties

Wet Ambulatory Decontamination

• Remove clothing/personal effects• Decontaminate from head down

– Lean head back to avoid runoff ineyes

• Encourage careful scrubbing of warm,moist regions – axilla, groin, etc.

• Rinse thoroughly, copious water

Page 37: Emergency Responses in Chemical Casualties

Wet Ambulatory Decontamination

• Once decontaminated, patientmoves to cold zone staging area

• Re-clothed• Status monitored until

transport available

Page 38: Emergency Responses in Chemical Casualties
Page 39: Emergency Responses in Chemical Casualties

Do not need to decon if itcan be confirmed that patient:

• Never in contaminated area• Without signs and symptoms of exposure

Page 40: Emergency Responses in Chemical Casualties

Litter Wet Decontamination

• Requires minimum of 2-4 persons per patient• 10 to 20 minutes per patient• Average resources per patient: 35 – 50 gallons• Decontamination solutions:

– Water and Detergent– Hypochlorite 0.5% and 5% (do not use in eye,

open head or abd wounds, must be made daily)• Scrape off visible contamination

Page 41: Emergency Responses in Chemical Casualties

Litter Wet Decontamination

• Decontaminate with copious decontaminating fluid• Transfer to clean stretcher• Monitor patient and move to clean area

Page 42: Emergency Responses in Chemical Casualties

Litter Wet Decontamination

• Non-ambulatory patients displaying serious signs and symptoms

• Rapid decontamination• 5-10 minutes per patient

Page 43: Emergency Responses in Chemical Casualties

Skin Decon: Special Areas

• Commonly ignored during decon• Including

– Scalp– Body hair– Genitalia– Skin creases & folds– Hands– Feet– Nails

Page 44: Emergency Responses in Chemical Casualties

CORRIDORDECONTAMINATION

• The simplest solution• The nozzles are set at low pressure and high

volume so as not to inflict damage but which maximize the amount of water each victim is exposed to.

Page 45: Emergency Responses in Chemical Casualties

SPRINKLER HEADDECONTAMINATION

• water delivered at 500 gallons a minute• If the victim remains in the shower for 3

seconds on average, and assuming the person is exposed to 50% of the water

• 500 gals./minute = 8 gals/second• 8 gals./second × 3 seconds = 24 gals.• 24 gals. × 50% = 12 gals.

Page 46: Emergency Responses in Chemical Casualties
Page 47: Emergency Responses in Chemical Casualties
Page 48: Emergency Responses in Chemical Casualties
Page 49: Emergency Responses in Chemical Casualties

Other Field-Expedient Water Decontamination Methods

• should not overlook existing facilities whenidentifying means for rapid decontaminationmethods.

• although water damage to a facility might occur,the necessity of saving lives would justify theactivation of overhead fire sprinklers for use asshowers.

Page 50: Emergency Responses in Chemical Casualties

Other Field-Expedient Water Decontamination Methods

• wade and wash in water sources such as publicfountains, chlorinated swimming pools, swimmingareas, etc., provides an effective, high-volume decontechnique.

• Car washes with hand-held wands should also beconsidered. Water used for decontamination inlifesaving operations should be properly handledand disposed of in compliance with environmentaland health regulations, whenever possible.

Page 51: Emergency Responses in Chemical Casualties
Page 52: Emergency Responses in Chemical Casualties

Hazmat & Children

Page 53: Emergency Responses in Chemical Casualties

Children: Not “Small Adults”

• Anatomical/ physiological differences• Vital signs vary with age• Smaller, shorter stature

– lower “breathing zones”

• Higher minute volume• Less intravascular volume reserve

Page 54: Emergency Responses in Chemical Casualties

Uniquely Vulnerable

• Greater body surface area to weight ratio• Increased skin permeability• More pliable skeleton• Weight is critical in determination of:

– drug dosages– fluid requirements– equipment sizes

Page 55: Emergency Responses in Chemical Casualties

Example:Decontamination of Children

• Must be done with high-volume, low-pressure,heated water systems

• Must be designed for decontamination of allages and types of children

• All protocols and guidance must address:– Water temperature and pressure– Nonambulatory children– Children with special health care needs– Clothing for after decontamination

Page 58: Emergency Responses in Chemical Casualties

From a Child’s Perspective?

Page 59: Emergency Responses in Chemical Casualties
Page 60: Emergency Responses in Chemical Casualties

Operations Set-up• Arrival Point

– Staffed by Animal Control Staff and oneveterinary tech in appropriate PPE

– Personnel arriving for decontamination with pets willbe relieved of the animal

– Animals will be evaluated for injuries and extent ofcontamination

– Animal will be tranquilized (if necessary) for handlingand decontamination, or will be euthanized if injuriesare too severe

– Disposable leash will be placed on animal and movedto the gross decontamination area

Page 61: Emergency Responses in Chemical Casualties

Operations Set-up• Gross Decontamination Area

– Staffed by Animal Control personnel in appropriatePPE

– All collars and tags removed and discarded– Animal washed with soap and water solution and rinsed– Leash is again removed after the gross decon and

discarded– Animal wrapped in large blanket or towel to prevent

environmental exposure– Clean leash will be placed on animal prior to transfer to

second decontamination area

Page 62: Emergency Responses in Chemical Casualties

Operations Set-up• Second Decontamination Area

– Staffed with two Animal Control staff– Leash and blanket or towel removed, discarded– Animal sprayed with soap and water solution– Clean leash and blanket placed on animal for transport to

third decontamination area

Page 63: Emergency Responses in Chemical Casualties

Operations Set-up

• Third Decontamination Area– Staffed with two Animal Control staff– Leash and blanket removed, discarded– Animal rinsed with clean water, wrapped in new blanket– New leash will be placed on the animal

Page 64: Emergency Responses in Chemical Casualties

• Clean Area– Decontamination identification tags placed on animal– Animal evaluated by veterinarian and Animal Control staff– Wounds will be treated or animal will be transported to veterinary

clinic for further treatment– Animals reunited with owners if possible– Unclaimed animals transported to Animal Shelter or other

shelter facilities• Photo of animal displayed at scene

– Contaminated deceased animals will be placed in appropriatecontainer at site

• Container will be left in hot zone for mitigation contractor

Operations Set-up

Page 65: Emergency Responses in Chemical Casualties

Planning for Decontamination Washwater

• Decon washwater is an issue that has gained prominence in the last couple of years

• Hospital washwater only one possible source

Page 66: Emergency Responses in Chemical Casualties

In the real world• Hospitals required to plan for rapid influx of

victims in mass-contamination incident– Increased numbers, may not be deconned prior

to arrival, contaminant unknown or unusual

• May need to rapidly perform emergency mass decontamination – life saving, personnel/facility protection

Page 67: Emergency Responses in Chemical Casualties

In the real world• Capacity for mass decon limited in most

hospitals (a few victims) • Proper on-site washwater management

identified as barrier– containment ~ 90% of cost – may not solve problem anyway

Page 68: Emergency Responses in Chemical Casualties

What is the Problem?

• Is there a problem if decon washwater enters the sanitary sewer system?– Yes– No – Maybe, not enough information….depends on

contaminant type/amount/concentration, exposure potential, impacts to wastewater system or environment, legal concerns

Page 69: Emergency Responses in Chemical Casualties

Plausible Scenario

• Hospital needs to provide urgentdecontamination for large number victims

• Contaminant(s) uncertain or unknown• Decon by disrobing and showering or

flushing with copious amounts of water• Large volume of washwater generated• Capacity to collect and test washwater on-

site overwhelmed

Page 70: Emergency Responses in Chemical Casualties

Quantitative Solution

• Attempted calculation based on plausible“worst-case” scenario

• 2.5 mg VX / victim -- 25% of LD50• VX selected -- low vapor pressure and

relative persistence• 90% removal by disrobing• 10:1 ratio uncontaminated to contaminated

victims

Page 71: Emergency Responses in Chemical Casualties

Quantitative Solution

• 1000 victims x 10 gal/person = 37854 liters• 100 contaminated with 2.5 mg VX = 250 mg• 90% removed with disrobing = 25 mg• 25 mg/37854 L = 0.00066 ppm = 0.66 ppb

at most concentrated point

Page 72: Emergency Responses in Chemical Casualties

Quantitative Solution

• is this (0.66 ppb VX) a problem?• Is this the worst case?• have we considered all down stream issues?• could other contaminants be worse?

Page 73: Emergency Responses in Chemical Casualties

Key Uncertainties

• Scenario Uncertainties –– how many victims total? – at what rate? – how much contamination?– how much water used?– amount of dilution in system?– effects of treatment processes (e.g., retention

time for short-lived radionuclides)

Page 74: Emergency Responses in Chemical Casualties

Key Uncertainties

• Contaminant(s) unknown– Amount (total and concentration)– Behavior/fate– Exposure potential– Toxicity– Treatability– Impacts on people, system, environment

• May not have opportunity to test waste stream forhazardous properties and make treatment ordisposal decisions

Page 75: Emergency Responses in Chemical Casualties

Problem Summary

• Theoretical hazard – nature and magnitudeof downstream risks uncertain

• Hazard-specific assessment not be possibleduring incident

• Decisions must be made rapidly based onlimited, if any, information aboutcontaminants

Page 76: Emergency Responses in Chemical Casualties

Nopparat capacity• 12 Non ambuatory victims per hour• 48 Ambulatory victims per hour• Ability to CPR 6 Pts. at Red Zone• Information services (MSDS)• Chemical (antidote) stockpile in term

of Network ( local, regional )• Level C and PPE• Health surveillance for Decon team

and Hazmat team

Page 77: Emergency Responses in Chemical Casualties

Hazmat Patient Assessment

• Occurs concurrently

• Only once Resuscitated and Stable

• Patient history

• Secondary survey

Page 78: Emergency Responses in Chemical Casualties

Secondary Survey

• Identify poisoning complications

• Recognize preexistent problems

• Assess for trauma & burns

• Recognize toxic syndromes (toxidromes)

Page 79: Emergency Responses in Chemical Casualties

Identify Poisoning Complications• Airway Insufficiency

– Ammonia etc.

• Breathing Insufficiency– Aspiration pneumonitis, Noncardiogenic pulmonary edema– Sarin, Phosgene etc.

• Cardiovascular– Bradydysrythmias, Tachydysrythmias, Hypotension, Hypertension

• Disability (nervous system)– Confusion, Agitated delirium, Combativeness, Seizures, Coma

– Weakness, Paralysis, Sarin, etc.• Elimination (liver & kidneys)

Page 80: Emergency Responses in Chemical Casualties

Preexistent Problems• Airway

– Overbite– Small jaw– Big tongue

• Breathing– Asthma– COPD

• Cardiovascular– Coronary Artery

Disease (CAD)– Anemia

• Disability– Epilepsy

• Elimination– Renal failure– Liver failure

Page 81: Emergency Responses in Chemical Casualties

Recognize Toxic Syndromes

• Toxic + syndrome = Toxidrome• 5 fundamental hazmat toxidromes

– Irritant gas– Asphyxiant – Cholinergic– Corrosive– Hydrocarbon & halogenated

hydrocarbon

Page 82: Emergency Responses in Chemical Casualties

Antidotes

• There is no for 99% of Chemicals

• There is only supportive treatment for 99% of Chemicals

• There are standard WHO guidelines for antidotes in an industrial setting, where chemicals enter through lungs or skin

Page 83: Emergency Responses in Chemical Casualties

Only Supportive treatmentNo Antidotes for following

• Ammonia• Chlorine• Hydrogen sulphide• Phosgene• Carbon monoxide• Nitrogen Oxides• Formalin• Acids

Page 84: Emergency Responses in Chemical Casualties
Page 85: Emergency Responses in Chemical Casualties
Page 86: Emergency Responses in Chemical Casualties
Page 87: Emergency Responses in Chemical Casualties
Page 88: Emergency Responses in Chemical Casualties
Page 89: Emergency Responses in Chemical Casualties

Chemical Protective Clothing

Page 90: Emergency Responses in Chemical Casualties

Levels of Protection

Greater Hazard

Higher Burden

Level

A

Level

B

Level

C

Level

D

Page 91: Emergency Responses in Chemical Casualties

Hazmat PPE

• Levels of PPE– A: big suit, big tank– B: little suit, big tank– C: little suit, little mask– D: no suit, no mask

• Level A for entry• Level C for known hazard• Level B or C for unknown?

Page 92: Emergency Responses in Chemical Casualties
Page 93: Emergency Responses in Chemical Casualties

Selecting the Correct Glove

Page 94: Emergency Responses in Chemical Casualties
Page 95: Emergency Responses in Chemical Casualties

MATERIAL of CPC GOOD FOR POOR FOR

Page 96: Emergency Responses in Chemical Casualties

MATERIAL GOOD FOR POOR FOR

Page 97: Emergency Responses in Chemical Casualties

MATERIAL GOOD FOR POOR FOR

Page 98: Emergency Responses in Chemical Casualties

Results of Alternate Protective Clothing Performance Test

ClassificationPossible alternate

material

Defense capability Remarks

Method 204(Blister resistance)

Method 206(Gas resistance)

Military standard (butyl coated texture for

protective clothing)

100 min 200 min Defense ministry standard

Military use Officer’s raincoat 2 min 2 min

Sapper’s raincoat, poncho 7 min 7 min

Disposable protective suit 14 min 14 minTyvek

Civilian useDisposable raincoat 2 min 2 min

Sae-ma-eul raincoat 5 min 5 min

Transparent raincoat 6 min 6 min

Raincoat 11 min 11 min

Gentlemen’s raincoat 10 min 10 min

Sportswear raincoat 17 min 17 min

Page 99: Emergency Responses in Chemical Casualties

Results of Alternate Protective hood/ Overboots/ Protective gloves Performance Test

Classification Possible alternate material

Defense capabilityRemarks

Method 204

(Blister

resistance)

Method 206

(Gas

resistance)

Protective

hood

Military Standard(butyl coated texture for protective

clothing)

30 min 30 min MilitaryStandard

Black plastic bag 2 min 4 min

Supermarket plastic bag 2 min 5 min

Standard garbage bag 6 min 10min

Protective

Gloves

Military Standard 360 min 450 min

Taewha rubber gloves 25 min 50 min

Goeunson rubber gloves 25 min 42 min

Overboots

Military standard 360 min 450 min

Farmer’s boots 100~120 min 210 min

Regular boots 220 min 230 min

Page 100: Emergency Responses in Chemical Casualties

Results of Covers/ Adhesive Tapes Performance Test

Classification

Possible

alternate

material

Defense capability

Remarks

Method 204

(Blister resistance)

Method 206

(Gas resistance)

Covers

Military vehicle

cover1 min Less than 1 min

Agricultural

Vinyl

plastic cover

10 min 12 min

Industrial Vinyl

plastic cover2 min 3 min

Adhesive

Tapes

Transparent

tape100 min Over 240 min

Blue tape 25 min 50 min

Page 101: Emergency Responses in Chemical Casualties

Effect of Overlapping Vinyl Plastic Covers

Classification One layer Double layers Triple layers

Agricultural Vinyl

plastic cover

(thickness: 0.1 mm)

Method 204

(Blister Resistance)10 min 26 min 40 min

Method 206

(Gas Resistance) 12 min 50 min104 min

Industrial Vinyl

plastic cover

(thickness: 0.05 mm)

Method 204

(Blister Resistance)2 min 7 min 14 min

Method 206

(Gas Resistance)

3 min 14min 38 min

Page 102: Emergency Responses in Chemical Casualties

Agricultural Vinyl plastic cover (one layer) addedCover/Raincoats

Classification

One layerDouble layers

Triple layers

Original

material

Vinyl plastic

cover addedOriginal

material

Vinyl Plastic

cover added

Military vehicle

cover1 min 50 min 1 min 20 min

Officer’s raincoat 2 min 33 min 2 min 50 min

Sapper’s

raincoat/ poncho7 min 55 min 14 min 180 min

Gentlemen’s

raincoat4 min 45 min 5 min

68 min

Page 103: Emergency Responses in Chemical Casualties
Page 104: Emergency Responses in Chemical Casualties
Page 105: Emergency Responses in Chemical Casualties

Evatox™ NBC hoods for civiliansBaby Safe Pro Infant Protective Wrap

Page 106: Emergency Responses in Chemical Casualties
Page 107: Emergency Responses in Chemical Casualties

โรงพยาบาลนพรัตนราชธานกีับเครอืข่ายศูนย์พิษแห่งชาติ

Page 108: Emergency Responses in Chemical Casualties
Page 109: Emergency Responses in Chemical Casualties
Page 110: Emergency Responses in Chemical Casualties

โรงพยาบาลนพรัตนราชธานี

โรงพยาบาลล าปาง

โรงพยาบาลขอนแก่น

โรงพยาบาลหาดใหญ่

โรงพยาบาลระยอง

รูปภาพแสดงเครือข่ายศูนย์พิษแห่งชาติ

Page 111: Emergency Responses in Chemical Casualties

ศูนย์พิษวิทยา โรงพยาบาลนพรตันราชธานี

ข้อมูลข่าวสาร

การรักษาพยาบาล

ศูนย์ข้อมูลด้านพิษส าหรับประชาชน

บุคลากรทางการแพทย์

เครือข่าย

การให้ความช่วยเหลือในที่เกิดเหตุ

การรับส่งต่อในกรณีทางวิชาการ

เฝ้าระวังและควบคุม จัดท าข้อมูล GIS น าสถิติภัยหรือโรคจากสารพิษมาวางแผนงาน

Page 112: Emergency Responses in Chemical Casualties

ศูนย์พิษวิทยา โรงพยาบาลนพรตันราชธานี

การฝึกอบรมการซ้อมแผน

การประชุมวิชาการ

การประสานเครือข่ายการจัดประชุมเครือข่ายระดับภูมิภาค

การจัดประชุมเครือข่ายระดับประเทศ

ห้องปฏิบัติการ การประสานเครือข่าย สร้างมาตรฐาน ใช้ทรัพยากรร่วมกัน

Page 113: Emergency Responses in Chemical Casualties

ผลของการจัดประชมุเครือขา่ยระดับภูมภิาค

• อยากให้มีการแบ่งระดับศูนย์พิษ• อยากให้มีนโยบายที่ชัดเจน และ มีการถ่ายทอดให้กบัผู้บริหาร• อยากให้มีการสนับสนุนเรื่องงบประมาณ• ต้องการให้มีการซ้อมแผน• ให้ศูนย์พิษขึ้นกับอาชีวก่อนในชั้นแรก• ผู้ปฏิบัติควรเป็น แพทย์และเจ้าหน้าที่ห้องฉุกเฉิน อาชีวจะให้ข้อมูลด้าน

พิษ

Page 114: Emergency Responses in Chemical Casualties

ห้องปฏิบัติการ

• มีการประสานเครือข่ายห้องปฏิบัติการ• มีการจัดท ามาตรฐานห้องปฏิบัติการ• มีระบบส่งต่อตัวอย่างเพื่อการตรวจ• ห้องปฏิบัติการควรไปเป็นกลุ่มกับระดับของศูนย์พิษแม่ข่ายของตนเอง

เพื่อง่ายต่อการบริหารจัดการ• ในการประชุมเครือข่ายควรน าเรื่องห้องปฏิบัติการเข้าประชุมด้วย

Page 115: Emergency Responses in Chemical Casualties
Page 116: Emergency Responses in Chemical Casualties
Page 117: Emergency Responses in Chemical Casualties
Page 118: Emergency Responses in Chemical Casualties
Page 119: Emergency Responses in Chemical Casualties
Page 120: Emergency Responses in Chemical Casualties

Common pitfalls in Hazmat Drill

In a drill , hospital personnel treatedpatients without wearing PPE

Page 121: Emergency Responses in Chemical Casualties

Common pitfalls in Hazmat Drill

In a drill, contaminated patients would be sentto a designated hospital, but in reality……

Page 122: Emergency Responses in Chemical Casualties

Overlook the timerequired for actions

Before a drill, responderswear PPE and waited forthe signal.

Page 123: Emergency Responses in Chemical Casualties

Photo credit: Mike Vance, MD

Man dropped bucket of silver paint that splattered onto areas ofbody commonly ignored or forgotten during decon.

Page 124: Emergency Responses in Chemical Casualties

Photo credit: Mike Vance, MD

Can of mace went off in pants pocket & pants not removed in timelymanner.

Page 125: Emergency Responses in Chemical Casualties

Photo credit: Mike Vance, MD

What can happen if genitals are forgotten during decontamination.

Page 126: Emergency Responses in Chemical Casualties

Photo credit: Mike Vance, MD

What can happen if skin folds are forgotten during decon.

Page 127: Emergency Responses in Chemical Casualties

Photo credit: Mike Vance, MD

Close-up of what can happen if skin folds are forgotten during decon.

Page 128: Emergency Responses in Chemical Casualties

Photo credit: Mike Vance, MDWhat can happen if feet are forgotten during decon.

Page 129: Emergency Responses in Chemical Casualties

Eye Decon

• Irrigate exposed, symptomatic eyes immediately & continuously

– Use water or saline •Water is best

–Readily available in large quantity

–Efficient

• Check for & remove contact lenses

Page 130: Emergency Responses in Chemical Casualties

Mild corneal chemical burn Fluorescein indicates corneal burn site Adjacent chemical conjunctivitis

Photo credit: Mike Vance, MD

Page 131: Emergency Responses in Chemical Casualties

Severe corneal chemical burn Opaque cornea Blind eye

Requires cadaver corneal transplantPhoto credit: Mike Vance, MD

Page 132: Emergency Responses in Chemical Casualties

HAZMAT Training Trends

Page 133: Emergency Responses in Chemical Casualties
Page 134: Emergency Responses in Chemical Casualties
Page 135: Emergency Responses in Chemical Casualties

Summary

• Physical removal is BEST decon• Must plan for patient decon at all aspects of care• Decon process is resource intensive and must be

planned and practiced in advanced• Identify and train personnel early• Learn benefits of coordination with medical assets

in your hospital and region

Prior Planning Prevents Poor Performance