7
Studies into Obedience: Milgram (1962) How far will people go in the name of obedience?

Studies into Obedience - Milgram

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

 

Citation preview

Page 1: Studies into Obedience - Milgram

Studies into Obedience: Milgram (1962)

How far will people go in the name of

obedience?

Page 2: Studies into Obedience - Milgram

Aim

To investigate how obedient people would be in a situation where following orders would mean breaking participants’ moral codes and harming another person ‘Germans are

different’ hypothesis. Milgram set out to test whether Germans have a basic character flaw which is a readiness to obey authority without question.

Page 3: Studies into Obedience - Milgram

Method 40 male participants aged

20-50 The participant arrives and is

met by the experimenter, a man dressed in a lab coat, and another ‘participant’ (stooge).

The experimenter explains the experiment to both of them – Memory.

The experimenter takes two pieces of paper and places them in a hat. One piece of paper is supposed to say “Teacher”, the other “Learner”.

Participant will always be the Teacher.

Page 4: Studies into Obedience - Milgram

The Task Memory Test If a mistake was

made the Teacher was told to give electric shock to learner

Rising by 15 volts each mistake from 15 volts to 450 volts (fatal).

Page 5: Studies into Obedience - Milgram

The Learner shouted through the wall in pain. Many participants looked stressed and asked

to stop the experiment. They were pressed to continue

› “You must go on”› “The experiment requires you to continue”

After 300 volts the Learner went

silent.

Page 6: Studies into Obedience - Milgram

Results

65% of participants went to 450 volts! 26 of the 40 participants would have

followed orders and killed the stooge for making too many mistakes!

What % of participants do you think would deliver the full (and fatal)

450volt shock?

http://www.youtube.com

Page 7: Studies into Obedience - Milgram

Milgram’s reflections

“The social psychology of this century reveals a major lesson: often it is not so much the kind of person a man is as the kind of situation in which he finds himself that determines how he will act." (1974)