View
238
Download
0
Category
Preview:
DESCRIPTION
3 Adequate Yearly Progress The Basics Based on English-language arts (ELA) and mathematics separately All students held to same high academic standards Goal: 100% proficiency by
Citation preview
No Child Left Behind
California’s Definition of Adequate Yearly Progress
(AYP)
July 2003
2
Adequate Yearly Progress
• Basics of AYP• Components of AYP• Reporting Timeline
3
Adequate Yearly Progress The Basics• Based on English-language arts
(ELA) and mathematics separately
• All students held to same high academic standards
• Goal: 100% proficiency by 2013-14
4
• Achievement of ELA and math Annual Measurable Objectives (AMOs): percent proficient or above
• 95% participation rate
• API for all schools
• Graduation rate for high schools
Adequate Yearly Progress Components
5
AMOsin ELA and
Math
95% Participation
Rate
API
Graduation rate
AA YY PP
6
Goals & Annual Measurable Objectives
Apply to All• Schools
(including alternative and charter schools)• Districts• Numerically significant student
subgroups within schools and districts (ethnic, socioeconomically disadvantaged, English learners, students with disabilities)
7
Annual Measurable Objectives (AMOs)
Elementary and Middle Schools
• California Standards Tests (CSTs) in ELA and Math
• California Alternate Performance Assessment (CAPA)
8
Annual Measurable Objectives (AMOs)
High Schools
• Grade 10 California High School Exit Exam (CAHSEE)
• California Alternate Performance Assessment (CAPA)
9
CAHSEE Cut Scores for NCLB(High Schools Only)
English-Language Arts
• Proficient or above = 387 or above• Not Proficient = Below 387
NOTE: Cut scores are independent of the CAHSEE pass score which will remain unchanged.
10
CAHSEE Cut Scores for NCLB(High Schools Only)
Math
• Proficient or above = 373 or above• Not Proficient = Below 373
NOTE: Cut scores are independent of the CAHSEE pass score which will remain unchanged.
11
Different AMOs• Elementary schools, middle
schools, and elementary school districts
• High schools and high school districts with grades 9-12
• Unified districts and high school districts with grades 7 and/or 8 (based on a rounded average of #1 and #2 above)
12
2003 AMOs for Schools2003 AMOs for Schools
ELA MathElementary or Middle School
13.6% 16.0%
High School 11.2% 9.6%
13
2003 AMOs for Districts2003 AMOs for DistrictsELA Math
Elementary School District
13.6% 16.0%
High School District(Grades 9-12)
11.2% 9.6%
Unified or High School District (Grades 7-12)
12.0% 12.8%
14
89.2%
100.0%
78.4%
35.2%46.0%
56.8%67.6%
13.6%24.4%
0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%
100%
2001-2
002
2002-2
003
2003-2
004
2004-2
005
2005-2
006
2006-2
007
2007-2
008
2008-2
009
2009-2
010
2010-2
011
2011-2
012
2012-2
013
2013-2
014
AMOs
English-language arts Elementary and Middle Schools Elementary Districts
15
Participation Rates• 95% required on any
assessment used for AYP under NCLB.
• The remaining 5% is the maximum allowable percentage of non-participants, including students who are exempted from testing at parental request.
16
Additional Indicators• The API as the “other”
indicator for all grades• API above the “status bar,” OR• Show growth of at least one point
• Graduation rate an additional indicator for high schools only
• Demonstrate a one-tenth of a percent increase up to 100%
17
The API ‘Status Bar’Defining Progress on the API as the Additional Indicator
770740
710
680
650
620
800
560 590
500
550
600
650
700
750
800
2001
-02
2002
-03
2003
-04
2004
-05
2005
-06
2006
-07
2007
-08
2008
-09
2009
-10
2010
-2011
2011
-2012
2012
-2013
2013
-2014
API
Sco
re
18
Graduation Rate
Progress
National Center for Educational Statistics (NCES) four-year completion rate.
Increase of one-tenth of one percent per year until the school reaches 100%
19
2003 Reporting Timeline
2002 Base
2002 Base
AYP Report
AYP Report
Decem
ber
Decem
ber
2003 Final
2003 Final
AYP Report
AYP Report
Augus
t 15
Augus
t 15
July
22
July
22
Octobe
r
Octobe
r
2003 Growth
2003 Growth
API Report
API Report
2003 AYP
2003 AYP Report
Report
Sept
embe
r
Sept
embe
r
Novem
ber
Novem
ber
20
2002 AYP Base Report• Starting points for each school
and district.• CDE will post on the Internet on
July 22, 2003.• Districts and schools may
determine whether they are at risk for not meeting AYP criteria when the 2003 report is released in August.
21
2003 AYP Reports• CDE will post 2003 AYP reports
on the Internet on August 15, 2003.
• Reports will include the “percent proficient” and participation rates based on 2003 testing data.
• Will be used to identify districts and schools that are not making AYP for 2003.
Recommended