Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
Where Do Driver Behaviour Telemetry Systems Fit in to the Risk Management Process for Commercial Motor Fleets?
Citation preview
Where Do Driver Behaviour Telemetry Systems Fit in to the Risk Management Process for Commercial Motor Fleets?
2
Agenda
•What is driver behaviour telemetry?•Where does driver behaviour telemetry fit into a work-related road risk management programme?
•Key success factors•Practical examples•Summary
3
4
What is driver behaviour telemetry?
•Measurement of:•Braking & Acceleration•Cornering & lane changing•Speed Vs. posted speed limit•Fatigue
•Driver feedback•Standardisation?•Benchmarking
Where does driver behaviour fit into a work-related road risk management programme?
5
6
Organisational
Proven
Theoretical
The risk management process
7
Eliminate
Substitute
Reduce
The risk management process
8
The risk management process
Driver Feedback
Driver Monitoring
9
Key success factors
Who cause crashes?
Managersor
Drivers?
10
Key success factors
•The difference between a private motorist and a fleet driver
•Management
•Culture
11
Practical examples
•Medium Commercial Vehicles, UK based•Visiting customer sites to collect items
•Company A – Driver behaviour telemetry
•Company B – Extensive work-related road risk management programme / proactive management / driver behaviour telemetry
Company A
0
100
200
300
400
Speeding >10mph over the posted limit
12
1 speeding event every 515 miles
Company B
0
500
1,000
1,500
2,000
2,500
36 41 46 51 4 9 14 19 24Week number 2012/3
Speeding >5mph over the posted limit
13
1 speeding event every 944 miles
Company B
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
36 41 46 51 4 9 14 19 24
Vio
lati
on
s p
er
veh
icle
Week number 2012/3
Speeding >5mph over the posted limit
14
Company B
0
100
200
300
400
500
08.09 09.10 10.11 11.12 12.13Insurance Year
Number of collisions
15
Company B
16
17
Case study – Rentokil Initial
• 250 vehicle trail• Based on “good” & “bad”
depots in urban & rural areas
• 1,250 vehicle control group
17
Case study – Rentokil InitialOwn damage incident rate
0.0
1.0
2.0
3.0
4.0
Control
ZFI
18*data from Rentokil Initial
66% reduction
Case study – Rentokil InitialThird Party incident rate
0.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
Control
ZFI
19
Represents a 53% reduction in claims cost
*data from Rentokil Initial
72% reduction
Summary
20
21
Contact details
Andy PricePractice Leader – Europe, Motor FleetZurich Risk Engineering
Email [email protected] +44 (0)7734 336 571
Where Do Driver Behaviour Telemetry Systems Fit in to the Risk Management Process for Commercial Motor Fleets?
