Upload
cnbc
View
218
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
7/30/2019 CNBC Fed Survey - April 30, 2013
1/38
CNBC Fed Survey April 30, 2013Page 1 of 38
FED SURVEYApril 30, 2013
These survey results represent the opinions 46 of the nations top money managers, investment
strategists, and professional economists.
They responded to CNBCs invitation to participate in our online survey. Their responses were collecte
on April 25-26, 2013. Participants were not required to answer every question.
Results are also shown for identical questions in earlier surveys.
This is not intended to be a scientific poll and its results should not be extrapolated beyond those whodid accept our invitation.
1.For all of 2013 and for all of 2014 (and only in 2014), what isthe total amount of additional asset purchases the Federal
Reserve will have made?
$858.8
$917.0
$936.6
$370.6
$0 $200 $400 $600 $800 $1,000 $1,200 $1,40
2013
2014
Billions
January 29 March 19 April 30
7/30/2019 CNBC Fed Survey - April 30, 2013
2/38
CNBC Fed Survey April 30, 2013Page 2 of 38
FED SURVEYApril 30, 2013
2.What mix of Treasuries vs. mortgage-backed securities do youexpect the Federal Reserve to purchase?
52.2% 51.5% 53.3%
47.8% 48.5%46.7%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
January 29 March 19 April 30
Survey Dates
Treasuries MBS
7/30/2019 CNBC Fed Survey - April 30, 2013
3/38
7/30/2019 CNBC Fed Survey - April 30, 2013
4/38
CNBC Fed Survey April 30, 2013Page 4 of 38
FED SURVEYApril 30, 2013
4.The Federal Reserve will:
22%
76%
2%
8%
89%
4%4%
94%
2%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
End its purchases in asingle month
Gradually reduce (taper)its purchases
Don't know/unsure
January 29 March 19 April 30
7/30/2019 CNBC Fed Survey - April 30, 2013
5/38
CNBC Fed Survey April 30, 2013Page 5 of 38
FED SURVEYApril 30, 2013
(For those who believed the Fed will taper) In what month do
you expect the Fed to begin tapering its purchases?
0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
January 29 March 19 April 30
Averages
Jan. 29:Dec 2013
March 19:Jan 2014
April 30:Feb 2014
7/30/2019 CNBC Fed Survey - April 30, 2013
6/38
CNBC Fed Survey April 30, 2013Page 6 of 38
FED SURVEYApril 30, 2013
5.At what unemployment/inflation rate will the Fed halt its assepurchases?
6.5%6.8% 6.7%
6.4%
3.4%
2.6% 2.6% 2.7%
0%
1%
2%
3%
4%
5%
6%
7%
December 11, 2012 January 29, 2013 March 19, 2013 April 30, 2013
Survey Dates
Unemployment Inflation
7/30/2019 CNBC Fed Survey - April 30, 2013
7/38
CNBC Fed Survey April 30, 2013Page 7 of 38
FED SURVEYApril 30, 2013
6.When it comes to how you think the Fed will exit from itscurrent monetary policy, do you believe it WILL:
4%6%
29%
53%
8%
4%
9%
26%
54%
7%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
Sell Treasuriesonly
Sell MBS only Sell both Not sell anyassets at all
Don'tknow/unsure
March 19 April 30
7/30/2019 CNBC Fed Survey - April 30, 2013
8/38
CNBC Fed Survey April 30, 2013Page 8 of 38
FED SURVEYApril 30, 2013
When it comes to how you think the Fed will exit from its curren
monetary policy, do you believe it SHOULD:
6%
2%
41%
37%
14%
7%
9%
35%
37%
13%
0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
30%
35%
40%
45%
Sell Treasuriesonly
Sell MBS only Sell both Not sell anyassets at all
Don'tknow/unsure
March 19 April 30
7/30/2019 CNBC Fed Survey - April 30, 2013
9/38
CNBC Fed Survey April 30, 2013Page 9 of 38
FED SURVEYApril 30, 2013
7.When it comes to the Feds use of economic targetsspecifically:
38%
48%
10%
4%
45%
28% 28%
0%
41% 41%
15%
2%0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
The Fed is clear The Fed could be
more clear
The Fed is not clear
at all
Don't know/unsure
January 29 March 19 April 30
7/30/2019 CNBC Fed Survey - April 30, 2013
10/38
CNBC Fed Survey April 30, 2013Page 10 of 38
FED SURVEYApril 30, 2013
Comments on Question 7:
Dean Baker, Center for Economic and Policy Research: The Fed has been very clear as to what iwill look at. It is keeping options open since it does not know exactly what the future will look like.
Lou Brien, DRW Trading Group: I think the Fed should more clearly state that it is not completely
clear to them how they will react to economic data in regards to their quantitative easing programs. Imore likely they will know it when they see it but it is not likely they will know it before then.
Robert Brusca, Fact and Opinion Economics: Targets? Thresholds? Triggers?
Stephen Gallagher, Societe Generale: Fed has clearly stated 6.5%, but risks credibility if they tie
falling unemployment to technical factors later on.
Hugh Johnson, Hugh Johnson Advisors: There are two important components of Federal Reserve
policy. The first is the target for the federal funds rate, which is unlikely to change until 2015 even
though (a) the unemployment rate should be at or near 6.5% Q4 2014 and the outlook for 2015inflation should be near 2.5% Q4 2014. The second component is QE (asset purchases). My expectatiis that, depending on economic variables, the process of "tapering" asset purchases could begin in
September 2013 and essentially lead toward the end of QE mid-2014.
Alan Kral, Trevor Stewart Burton & Jacobsen: The Fed can justify anything it wants at any time.
William Larkin, Cabot Money Management: Targets change as economic conditions shift.
Guy LeBas, Janney Montgomery Scott: It's hard to trust an economic target, when the Fed, in the
same day as issuing a target, also qualified it heavily.
Donald Luskin, Trend Macrolytics: The targets are a sham. They create the illusion of precision in
regime of total discretion.
Rob Morgan, Fulcrum Securities: The Fed is clear in its use of economic targets. I'm just not sure
they are wise in using economic targets.
Joel Naroff, Naroff Economic Advisors: The Fed needs to make it clearer that 6.5% is a soft, not a
hard, target. A rapid decline to the target could and should lead to a quicker ending of the policy.
Phil Orlando, Federated Investors: The Fed should make clear that its inflation and unemploymentargets are more directly tied to their fed funds target rate decision, rather than their "QE to Infinity"
asset-purchase decision, which appears to be more qualitative in nature.
James Paulsen, Wells Capital Management: I think the Fed builds unrealistic expectations publicl
basing its future policies on a specific variable and thereby exposes the economy and the financialmarkets to an abrupt and unexpected shift in policy when economic conditions warrant a response evthough "specific preordained variables" have not yet reached critical levels. The Fed would be better
served by sticking to more generalized commentary as to how their policies are being guided, e.g.
7/30/2019 CNBC Fed Survey - April 30, 2013
11/38
CNBC Fed Survey April 30, 2013Page 11 of 38
FED SURVEYApril 30, 2013
inflation pressures, speed of growth and degree of resource slack or output gap and not be more
specific than that.
Chris Rupkey, Bank of Tokyo-Mitsubishi: Clear when it should not be. This is art, not science.
John Ryding, RDQ Economics: The Fed is ambiguous in (i) describing the 6 1/2% unemployment ra
and the 2 1/2% inflation rate as thresholds rather than triggers and the description of 'balanced'response. Also, unemployment is an actual variable but inflation is a forecast over 1-2 years. In
addition, the Fed has also said it will look at a range of labor market indicators. What happens ifunemployment falls to 6 1/4% because of falling labor market participation? Will the Fed look at U-6?The employment-population ratio?
Ellen Zentner, Nomura: The challenge at this point is twofold. The views of FOMC participants appevery diverse. That is evident in the discussion of prospects for LSPAs. In addition, what constitutes t
"outlook for the labor market" is relatively complex. This makes it difficult for the committee to send clear signal about the most immediate issue, i.e., the likely course of the current LSPA program.
7/30/2019 CNBC Fed Survey - April 30, 2013
12/38
CNBC Fed Survey April 30, 2013Page 12 of 38
FED SURVEYApril 30, 2013
8.Do you believe further quantitative easing can help lower theunemployment rate?
36%37%
34%
21%
28%
59% 59% 58%
69%
65%
5% 4%
8%10%
7%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
Sept 12, 2012 Dec 11 Jan 29, 2013 March 19 April 30
Survey Dates
Yes No Don't know/unsure
7/30/2019 CNBC Fed Survey - April 30, 2013
13/38
CNBC Fed Survey April 30, 2013Page 13 of 38
FED SURVEYApril 30, 2013
Do you believe further quantitative easing can help mortgage
rates?
59%
54%
44%
46%
33%
42%
48%
44%
9%
4%
8%
11%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
Dec 11, 2012 Jan 29, 2013 March 19 April 30
Survey Dates
Yes No Don't know/unsure
7/30/2019 CNBC Fed Survey - April 30, 2013
14/38
CNBC Fed Survey April 30, 2013Page 14 of 38
FED SURVEYApril 30, 2013
Do you believe further quantitative easing can help lower bond
yields?
58%
47%
44%
54%
30%
47%48%
35%
13%
6%8%
11%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
December 11, 2012 January 29, 2013 March 19 April 30
Survey Dates
Yes No Don't know/unsure
7/30/2019 CNBC Fed Survey - April 30, 2013
15/38
CNBC Fed Survey April 30, 2013Page 15 of 38
FED SURVEYApril 30, 2013
Do you believe further quantitative easing can help increase
stock prices?
69%
75%
83%
20%17%
9%
10%8% 9%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
January 29, 2013 March 19 April 30Survey Dates
Yes No Don't know/unsure
7/30/2019 CNBC Fed Survey - April 30, 2013
16/38
CNBC Fed Survey April 30, 2013Page 16 of 38
FED SURVEYApril 30, 2013
9.Since September 2012, market functioning in the governmentbond market has:
0%
19%
60%
15%
2%
4%
0%
11%
65%
15%
2%
7%
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70%
Improved a lot
Improved somewhat
Stayed the same
Worsened somewhat
Worsened a lot
Don't know/unsure
March 19 April 30
7/30/2019 CNBC Fed Survey - April 30, 2013
17/38
CNBC Fed Survey April 30, 2013Page 17 of 38
FED SURVEYApril 30, 2013
Since September 2012, market liquidity in the government
bond market has:
0%
29%
48%
15%
4%
4%
4%
17%
52%
17%
2%
7%
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60%
Improved a lot
Improved somewhat
Stayed the same
Worsened somewhat
Worsened a lot
Don't know/unsure
March 19 April 30
7/30/2019 CNBC Fed Survey - April 30, 2013
18/38
CNBC Fed Survey April 30, 2013Page 18 of 38
FED SURVEYApril 30, 2013
10.Since September 2012, market functioning in the mortgage-backed security market market has:
4%
31%
29%
20%
2%
14%
2%
22%
39%
20%
4%
13%
0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% 35% 40% 45%
Improved a lot
Improved somewhat
Stayed the same
Worsened somewhat
Worsened a lot
Don't know/unsure
March 19 April 30
7/30/2019 CNBC Fed Survey - April 30, 2013
19/38
CNBC Fed Survey April 30, 2013Page 19 of 38
FED SURVEYApril 30, 2013
Since September 2012, market liquidity in the mortgage-
backed security market market has:
4%
21%
40%
19%
0%
15%
2%
28%
28%
22%
7%
13%
0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% 35% 40% 45%
Improved a lot
Improved somewhat
Stayed the same
Worsened somewhat
Worsened a lot
Don't know/unsure
March 19 April 30
7/30/2019 CNBC Fed Survey - April 30, 2013
20/38
CNBC Fed Survey April 30, 2013Page 20 of 38
FED SURVEYApril 30, 2013
11.When it comes to the debate over the U.S. debt ceiling,Congress will:
86%
8%6%
92%
4% 4%
89%
4%7%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
Increase the debt ceilingevery time it is reached
this year
Refuse at some point thisyear to raise it
Don't know/unsure
January 29 March 19 April 30
7/30/2019 CNBC Fed Survey - April 30, 2013
21/38
CNBC Fed Survey April 30, 2013Page 21 of 38
FED SURVEYApril 30, 2013
12.When it comes to the Sequester, Congress should:
Comments on changing the makeup of spending cuts:
Replace the sequester with a Bowles-Simpson-type formula for reducing government spendingover an extended period of time.
The sequester = political dysfunction = activist Fed Give president discretion to target cuts. Carefully target where the cuts are to be made. If you think that mindless cutting of the budget is good, this is your policy.
25%
33%
17%
21%
4%
35%
33%
20%
9%
4%
0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
30%
35%
40%
Continue withthe current
spending cuts
Continue withthe current
level of thespending cuts,but change the
makeup
Reduce theamount of
spending cuts
Increase theamount of
spending cuts
Don'tknow/unsure
March 19 April 30
7/30/2019 CNBC Fed Survey - April 30, 2013
22/38
CNBC Fed Survey April 30, 2013Page 22 of 38
FED SURVEYApril 30, 2013
Congress and the White House are seemingly incapable of negotiating a more effective spendincut strategy than sequestration, so sequestration has become "a good thing."
You don't seem to understand what is happening here. Congress DIDN'T "INCREASE" the debtceiling in January. It SUSPENDED it. Huge difference.
Every stakeholder has a different belief in what should be cut, so choosing specific cuts is aprocess that would be mired in debate. Across the board cuts, while less than ideal for all
involved, are the only evident way to short-circuit that debate. We need to have a 10-year plan to dramatically reduce deficit spending. The sequester was w
too small of an amount. We need to get serious. Fix entitlements, instead of the sequester related to defense and non-defense discretionary
spending.
Provide more flexibility regarding how the sequester is implemented. The makeup of Congress is what needs changing; the budget process should emphasize what i
best for the entire country, not to place blame in a highly partisan manner.
The government could easily allow the FAA to more efficiently allocate the cuts with FAR lessdisruption to travel. The U.S. runs a risk of over tightening fiscal policy. This mornings report on GDP highlights th
aspect. Overall, real GDP was up 2.5%...but real GDP excluding government (private GDP) ro4%! In the last two quarters, real private investment and consumption have risen at 3.7% an
3.3% annual rates respectively while overall real GDP has only risen 0.4% and 2.5%. The mathing holding back U.S. growth is the "Government!" Moreover, the emergency to balancegovernment is no longer an emergency. The deficit to GDP ratio was about 10.5% in 2009 an
is now close to 6%. The deficit as a percentage of GDP has been declining by more than 1% ayear in this recovery all on its own due to the invisible hand of Adam Smith. At this rate, with12 to 24 months the deficit as a percentage of GDP will fall below 5% at which point it may we
be less than the rate of nominal GDP, implying that the debt/GDP ratio (which everyone is so
worried about) will peak and begin to decline all on its own. The government should stand dow
and allow the invisible hand to continue dealing with the deficit. One of the biggest risks to theconomy right now is that government cutbacks become too extreme and cause the economy
stall. Let's stop the public cuts and allow the economy to grow at the speed that "private activiis growing, which is about 3.5% to 4%.
Someone has to explain to them very slowly that they are just slowing growth and increasingunemployment.
Prioritize the cuts within each agency rather than implement across-the-board same percentagcuts.
Congress should provide flexibility to the administration on the makeup. More targeted cuts including tax expenditures; shift more to out-years when the economy is
healthier.
The administration messed up badly with the FAA by creating an unnecessary problem with fligdelays to show that the sequester hurts. The House and Senate took almost instant action to sdown the administration and give the FAA flexibility to not cut controllers. So keep the sequestbut give departments flexibility to make cuts. THEN TACKLE ENTITLEMENTS!
Give agencies more flexibility to reallocate cuts within departments. Some prioritizing is needed.
7/30/2019 CNBC Fed Survey - April 30, 2013
23/38
CNBC Fed Survey April 30, 2013Page 23 of 38
FED SURVEYApril 30, 2013
13.What impact, if any, do you believe recent revenueincreases/the Sequester will have on U.S. GDP this year?
Note: We did not ask about the Sequester in the January 29 survey.
-0.61%
-0.32%-0.40%
-0.28%-0.20%
-2.0%
-1.5%
-1.0%
-0.5%
0.0%Revenue Increases The Sequester
January 29 March 19 April 30
7/30/2019 CNBC Fed Survey - April 30, 2013
24/38
CNBC Fed Survey April 30, 2013Page 24 of 38
FED SURVEYApril 30, 2013
14.When it comes to the budget deficit, the United States:
80%
16%
4%
0%
67%
25%
4% 4%
52%
39%
9%
0%0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
Should urgentlyenact a plan that
puts it on a path
toward asustainable budget
deficit
Has at least acouple of years
before it must enact
such a plan
Does not need toenact a plan that
puts it on a path
toward asustainable budget
deficit
Don't know/unsure
January 29 March 19 April 30
7/30/2019 CNBC Fed Survey - April 30, 2013
25/38
CNBC Fed Survey April 30, 2013Page 25 of 38
FED SURVEYApril 30, 2013
15.When it comes to Europe, do you believe the lack of a currencrisis mentality is:
30%
62%
8%
29%
64%
8%
36%
64%
0%0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
A sign of real progress Only temporary Don't know/unsure
January 29 March 19 April 30
7/30/2019 CNBC Fed Survey - April 30, 2013
26/38
CNBC Fed Survey April 30, 2013Page 26 of 38
FED SURVEYApril 30, 2013
16.The recent decline in the price of gold is mostly the result of:
Other responses:
Slower global economic growth Many things Lower inflation and global economic
expectations
Latest chapter in secular commoditydecline that began in 2011
Possible Cyprus selling Technical factors Lower inflation/lower risk Combination of all above Strong dollar and rumor regarding
Cyprus liquidation
Fear of central bank sales Momentum trading Cyprus' gold sales may have been a
preview of what other, larger, central
banks may do
BOJ policy Freak of nature sell-off Concerns over a movement toward larg
active sellers
Large European Central Bank forced sa
15.6% 15.6%
24.4%
35.6%
8.9%
0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
30%
35%
40%
Lower inflationexpectations
Less concernabout global
risk
Popping of aprice bubble
Other Don'tknow/unsure
7/30/2019 CNBC Fed Survey - April 30, 2013
27/38
CNBC Fed Survey April 30, 2013Page 27 of 38
FED SURVEYApril 30, 2013
17.Twelve months from now the price of gold will be:
2%
33%
22%
33%
0%
9%
0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
30%
35%
Much lower Lower About thesame
Higher Much higher Don'tknow/unsure
7/30/2019 CNBC Fed Survey - April 30, 2013
28/38
CNBC Fed Survey April 30, 2013Page 28 of 38
FED SURVEYApril 30, 2013
18.Which one of two of the following do you think are the bestinvestments right now? (Respondents could chose up to twochoices.)
Other responses:
Non-agency mortgage backed securities Commodities all except gold Long Nikkei, short yen EM local debt Industrial commodities Developing economy equities
73%
62%
4%
4%
7%
7%
13%
4%
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80%
Stocks
Real estate
Gold
U.S. Treasury bonds
Savings accounts and other cashinstruments
Corporate bonds
Other
Don't know/unsure
7/30/2019 CNBC Fed Survey - April 30, 2013
29/38
CNBC Fed Survey April 30, 2013Page 29 of 38
FED SURVEYApril 30, 2013
19.Where do you expect the S&P 500 stock index will be on ?
1451
14971480
1505
1539
15771547
1589
1612
1,350
1,400
1,450
1,500
1,550
1,600
1,650
July 31 2012 Sept 12 Dec 11 Jan 29 2013 March 19 April 30
Survey Dates
June 30, 2013 December 31, 2013
7/30/2019 CNBC Fed Survey - April 30, 2013
30/38
CNBC Fed Survey April 30, 2013Page 30 of 38
FED SURVEYApril 30, 2013
20.What do you expect the yield on the 10-year Treasury notewill be on ?
1.98%2.06%
1.90%
2.09% 2.09%
1.83%
2.31% 2.35%
2.10%
0.0%
0.5%
1.0%
1.5%
2.0%
2.5%
3.0%
July 31 2012 Sept 12 Dec 11 Jan 29 2013 March 19 April 30
Survey Dates
June 30, 2013 December 31, 2013
7/30/2019 CNBC Fed Survey - April 30, 2013
31/38
CNBC Fed Survey April 30, 2013Page 31 of 38
FED SURVEYApril 30, 2013
21.What is your forecast for the year-over-year percentagechange in real U.S. GDP for ?
+2.6%
+2.7%
+2.6%
+2.3%
+2.2%
+1.9%
+2.1% +2.1% +2.1%
+2.6%+2.6% +2.6%
0.0%
0.5%
1.0%
1.5%
2.0%
2.5%
3.0%
January23,
2012
March16
April 24 July 31 Sept 12 Dec 11 Jan 29,2013
Mar 19 April 30
Survey Dates
2013 2014
7/30/2019 CNBC Fed Survey - April 30, 2013
32/38
CNBC Fed Survey April 30, 2013Page 32 of 38
FED SURVEYApril 30, 2013
22.When do you think the FOMC will first increase the fed fundsrate and when will it make its first planned decrease in the sizof its balance sheet?
Increase fed funds rate
Decrease balance sheet
(Average response)
Survey Date
December
11, 2012
January 29,
2013
March 19,
2013
April 30,
2013
2013 Q2
Q3
Q4
2014 Q1
Q2
Q3
Q42014
Q42014
Q4
2015 Q12015
Q12015
Q12015
Q12015
Q1
Q22015
Q22015
Q2
Q3
Q4
2016 Q1
Q2
Q3
Q4
2017 or later
7/30/2019 CNBC Fed Survey - April 30, 2013
33/38
CNBC Fed Survey April 30, 2013Page 33 of 38
FED SURVEYApril 30, 2013
24.Where do you expect the fed funds target rate will be on ?
0.41%
0.42%
0.27%
0.20%
0.14%
0.16%0.16%
0.14%
0.16%
0.33%
0.27%
0.21%
0.17%
0.19% 0.19%
0.0%
0.1%
0.1%
0.2%
0.2%
0.3%
0.3%
0.4%
0.4%
0.5%
Jan 232012
Mar 16 Apr 24 Jul 31 Sep 12 Dec 11 Jan 292013
Mar 19 Apr 30
Survey Dates
June 30 2013 Dec 31 2013
7/30/2019 CNBC Fed Survey - April 30, 2013
34/38
CNBC Fed Survey April 30, 2013Page 34 of 38
FED SURVEYApril 30, 2013
25.In the next 12 months, what percent probability do you placeon the U.S. entering recession? (0%=No chance of recession,100%=Certainty of recession)
34.0%
36.1%
25.5%
20.3%
19.1%
20.6%
25.9%
26.0%
28.5%
20.4%
17.6%
18.2%
0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
30%
35%
40%
Aug
11,
2011
Sep
19
Oct
31
Jan
23,
2012
Mar
16
Apr
24
Jul
31
Sep
12
Dec
11
Jan
29,
2013
Mar
19
Apr
30
Survey Dates
7/30/2019 CNBC Fed Survey - April 30, 2013
35/38
CNBC Fed Survey April 30, 2013Page 35 of 38
FED SURVEYApril 30, 2013
26.What is the single biggest threat facing the U.S. economicrecovery?
Other responses: Sharper global economic slowdown Washington Not enough FUTURE deficit
reduction...then jobs
Geopolitical risk Fiscal policy in general
10%
42
20%
0%
2%
0%
2%
6%
6%
12%
0%
10%
29%
12%
0%
4%
2%
0%
10%
16%
16%
2%
20%
31%
20%
2%
0%
2%
2%
2%
9%
11%
0%
0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% 35% 40% 4
European recession/financial crisis
Tax/regulatory policies
Slow job growth
High gasoline prices
Overall inflation
Deflation
Debt ceiling
Too little budget deficit reduction
Too much budget deficit reduction
Other
Don't know/unsure
January 29 March 19 April 30
7/30/2019 CNBC Fed Survey - April 30, 2013
36/38
CNBC Fed Survey April 30, 2013Page 36 of 38
FED SURVEYApril 30, 2013
27.What is your primary area of interest?
Comments:
Robert Brusca, Fact and Opinion Economics: The SNAFU over the air trafficcontrollers tells it all. The president, who should be looking out for our bestinterests, is instead using sequestration where he did not get his way to punish
us so we know that sequestration hurts. Congress is at a log jam. We the peoplehave become expendable, pawns in a big-time game of Republican-Democrat
politics. Were now like Europe, ruled by an elite with its own agenda. We thepeople- what a joke...we the peons is more like it.
Tony Crescenzi, PIMCO: Is Ben Bernanke skipping Jackson Hole in August toinstead go fishing with Steve Liesman?
Mark Elenowitz, TriPoint Global Equities: In 2011, I stated that we believed
the risk of persistent unemployment and other economic headwinds could leadto yet another round of QE. We were the minority but were right. Today in
2013, not much has changed other than a sequestration that is causing harm,debt ceilings that are broken thru, a standoff among politicians, and continued
unemployment. Until all parties focus on a practical solution rather than blameand policies that are not working, this cycle and Fed actions will continue.
Economics41%
Equities24%
Fixed Income
15%
Currencies
2%
Other
17%
7/30/2019 CNBC Fed Survey - April 30, 2013
37/38
CNBC Fed Survey April 30, 2013Page 37 of 38
FED SURVEYApril 30, 2013
Hugh Johnson, Hugh Johnson Advisors: Although there are significant risks(Europe, China, U.S. fiscal policy) none will derail the current bull market-
economic expansion. The most significant risk that we know that faces the U.S.equity markets currently (and it is not a large risk) is valuation. The equity
markets remain 3-4% overvalued or above the level they "should" average inthe current quarter. Additionally, the returns for equities and fixed income are
likely to be subdued between now and end of 2014 (0.2% for fixed; 5.5% forequities total returns). But currently we do not see risks that will derail recovery,
although the debt ceiling issue will again be a factor in September! Summer willbe quiet.
John Kattar, Ardent Asset Advisors: The economy is struggling. The datahave been weak, and continued growth in free reserves is indicative of risk
aversion and lack of credit demand. I now believe an extension of QE into 2014is somewhat more likely than any tapering before year end.
Barry Knapp, Barclays PLC: The portfolio balance effect has been effective inraising stock prices but primarily those with bond-like characteristics. For 1Q13the best performing sectors were the 4 defensives. While this doesn't necessarily
alter the wealth effect it does imply that the policy transmission channel of stockprices boosting business investment won't work as well as would be the case if
share prices were rising due to improving fundamentals.
David Kotok, Cumberland Advisors: Washington policy restrains U.S. growth.Fix Washington and the U.S. economy will soar.
Alan Kral, Trevor Stewart Burton & Jacobsen: Monetary policy has lost itseffectiveness.
Subodh Kumar, Subodh Kumar & Associates: Edict by policymakers like thegovernment or the Fed cannot establish value in capital markets but do risk
distorting them. Investors need to focus on quality of execution by companies
(and governments).
William Larkin, Cabot Money Management: As investors we need to keep inmind that recoveries can often come unexpectedly.
Guy LeBas, Janney Montgomery Scott: With commodities prices falling,there's been greater discussion of disinflation of late. Fed asset purchases canstill be effective in stemming corrosive disinflation, but their ability to stimulate
economic growth is nearing its end.
7/30/2019 CNBC Fed Survey - April 30, 2013
38/38
FED SURVEYApril 30, 2013
Rob Morgan, Fulcrum Securities: The use of economic targets by the Fed is
not wise because if the committee raises rates because a target has beenreached, they are already behind the inflation eight-ball.
Chad Morganlander, Stifel Nicolaus (Washington Crossing Advisors):Unfortunately, the economy has not reached the point of a self-sustainedrecovery. The Federal Reserve will continue easing well beyond street
expectations. Its paramount that we make a transition from a liquidity-inducedrally to an environment with above-trend economic growth.
Joel Naroff, Naroff Economic Advisors: The Fed, by deed if not by word, ismaking it clear that a little extra inflation is not a bad thing.
Chris Rupkey, Bank of Tokyo-Mitsubishi: If the Fed keeps rates down atzero until 2016, there won't be a fixed income market for you to report on, or at
least the number of sales and trading staff needed Street-wide will be cut in
half.
Hank Smith, Haverford Investments: The key for a successful Fed exit lieswith better pro-growth fiscal policy. That won't happen with this administration.
Mark Vitner, Wells Fargo: We see the continued recovery in home sales and
residential construction offsetting the drag from higher taxes, reducedgovernment spending, and the global economic slowdown.
Scott Wren, Wells Fargo Advisors: 1Q earnings results have little to do withthe continuation of the rally we have seen. Reasonable valuations, the Fed'seasy money policies, and the fact that the economy continues to move ahead
are the biggest factors. The market is comfortable with this modestgrowth/modest inflation environment. It also helps in the near term that
"everyone" is waiting for a pullback and some investors are starting to jump into
the market, worried they will miss more upside.
Mark Zandi, Moody's Analytics: The next few months will be uncomfortableas economic growth slows in the face of intensifying fiscal headwinds. But theeconomy will grow strongly next year as the fiscal headwinds fade and thestrength of the private economy is able to shine through.