20
CO Excitation Workshop PDR Benchmark Progress

CO Excitation Workshop PDR Benchmark Progress. Starting Point PDR-1 (n=10 3, =10)

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

Starting Point PDR-2 (n=10 3,  =10 5 )

Citation preview

Page 1: CO Excitation Workshop PDR Benchmark Progress. Starting Point PDR-1 (n=10 3,  =10)

CO Excitation Workshop

PDR Benchmark Progress

Page 2: CO Excitation Workshop PDR Benchmark Progress. Starting Point PDR-1 (n=10 3,  =10)

Starting Point PDR-1 (n=103,=10)

Page 3: CO Excitation Workshop PDR Benchmark Progress. Starting Point PDR-1 (n=10 3,  =10)

Starting Point PDR-2 (n=103,=105)

Page 4: CO Excitation Workshop PDR Benchmark Progress. Starting Point PDR-1 (n=10 3,  =10)

Starting Point PDR-3 (n=105.5,=10)

Page 5: CO Excitation Workshop PDR Benchmark Progress. Starting Point PDR-1 (n=10 3,  =10)

Starting Point PDR-4 (n=105.5,=105)

Page 6: CO Excitation Workshop PDR Benchmark Progress. Starting Point PDR-1 (n=10 3,  =10)

Starting Point PDR-5 (n=107,=10)

Page 7: CO Excitation Workshop PDR Benchmark Progress. Starting Point PDR-1 (n=10 3,  =10)

PDR 4, high n, high FUV

Tgas n(CO)

Large model scatter looks scary, but model assumptions were vastly different.

Page 8: CO Excitation Workshop PDR Benchmark Progress. Starting Point PDR-1 (n=10 3,  =10)

Heating/Cooling

Page 9: CO Excitation Workshop PDR Benchmark Progress. Starting Point PDR-1 (n=10 3,  =10)

Heating/Cooling

Page 10: CO Excitation Workshop PDR Benchmark Progress. Starting Point PDR-1 (n=10 3,  =10)

PDR 4, high n, high FUV

Tgas n(CO)

During the workshop we concentrate on the „true“ PDR case #4, and try to understand the differences

Page 11: CO Excitation Workshop PDR Benchmark Progress. Starting Point PDR-1 (n=10 3,  =10)

PDR 4, high n, high FUV

Tgas n(CO)

During the workshop we concentrate on the „true“ PDR case #4, and try to understand the differences

NEW

Page 12: CO Excitation Workshop PDR Benchmark Progress. Starting Point PDR-1 (n=10 3,  =10)

PDR 4, high n, high FUV

Tgas n(CO)

During the workshop we concentrate on the „true“ PDR case #4, and try to understand the differences

NEWPE Heating, H2 formation heatingDust content

Page 13: CO Excitation Workshop PDR Benchmark Progress. Starting Point PDR-1 (n=10 3,  =10)

Starting Point PDR-4 (n=105.5,=105)

Page 14: CO Excitation Workshop PDR Benchmark Progress. Starting Point PDR-1 (n=10 3,  =10)

Starting Point PDR-4 (n=105.5,=105)

NEW

Page 15: CO Excitation Workshop PDR Benchmark Progress. Starting Point PDR-1 (n=10 3,  =10)

Additional Information

Page 16: CO Excitation Workshop PDR Benchmark Progress. Starting Point PDR-1 (n=10 3,  =10)

Additional Information

• Dust temperatures appear consistent

• Temperature range for grain size distributions comparable

• Relatively hot dust throughout the whole cloud!

Page 17: CO Excitation Workshop PDR Benchmark Progress. Starting Point PDR-1 (n=10 3,  =10)

Additional Information

• Major heating through photo-electric heating

• NO PAHs !• Differences remain

(FUV field?, electron density, …)

Page 18: CO Excitation Workshop PDR Benchmark Progress. Starting Point PDR-1 (n=10 3,  =10)

Additional InformationMajor coolants

[OI] gas-grain collisison

Page 19: CO Excitation Workshop PDR Benchmark Progress. Starting Point PDR-1 (n=10 3,  =10)

Additional InformationMajor coolants

[OI] gas-grain collisison

Page 20: CO Excitation Workshop PDR Benchmark Progress. Starting Point PDR-1 (n=10 3,  =10)

Summary

• Given the complexity of the various codes and the vagueness of the benchmark (round 2) specifics the convergence of the results is still remarkable.

• No new major heating/cooling process candidate• Major processes are :– Dust physics– H2 formation– FUV??

• But their details remain to be investigated