Environmental Monitoring Report...Environmental Monitoring Report # Annual Report (January – December 2018) April 2019 Indonesia: Neighborhood Upgrading and Shelter Project – Phase

Environmental Monitoring Report

# Annual Report (January – December 2018)

April 2019

Indonesia: Neighborhood Upgrading and Shelter

Project – Phase 2

Prepared by the Directorate General of Human Settlements, Ministry of Public Works and

Housing for the Republic of Indonesia and the Asian Development Bank.

CURRENCY EQUIVALENTS (as of 30 April 2019)

Currency unit – rupiah currency name in lowercase (RP) Rp 1.00 = $ 0.00007

$1.00 = Rp 14,215

ABBREVIATIONS

ADB – Asian Development Bank APBD – Anggaran Pendapatan dan Belanja Daerah (Regional

Budget Income and Expenditure) DGHS – Directorate General of Human Settlements

NOTE

(i) The fiscal year (FY) of the Government of Indonesia and its agencies ends on 31 December. FY before a calendar year denotes the year in which the fiscal year ends, e.g., FY2011 ends on 31 December 2011.

(ii) In this report, "$" refers to United States dollars

This environmental monitoring report is a document of the borrower. The views expressed herein do not necessarily represent those of ADB's Board of Directors, Management, or staff, and may be preliminary in nature.

In preparing any country program or strategy, financing any project, or by making any designation of or reference to a particular territory or geographic area in this document, the Asian Development Bank does not intend to make any judgments as to the legal or other status of any territory or area.

__________________________________________________________________________

0

ANNUAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING REPORT 2018

1

Table of Contents

Table of Contents ............................................................................................................................ 1

List of Appendices ........................................................................................................................... 2

List of Tables ................................................................................................................................. 3

List of Figures ................................................................................................................................. 3

ABBREVIATIONS ........................................................................................................................... 4

CHAPTER 1. INTRODUCTION ...................................................................................................... 5

CHAPTER 2. KEY PROJECT ACTIVITIES AND PROGRESS .................................................... 7

2.1. Community Contracts .............................................................................................................. 7

2.2. Complex Civil Work Contracts ................................................................................................ 9

2.3. New Site Development (NSD) ............................................................................................... 11

CHAPTER 3. ENVIRONMENTAL MITIGATION AND MONITORING STATUS ......................... 15

3.1. Requirements of Environmental Safeguards ........................................................................ 15

3.2. Key Roles and Responsibilities ............................................................................................. 15

3.3. Community Contracts ............................................................................................................ 18

3.4. Complex Civil Work Contracts .............................................................................................. 20

3.5. New Site Development Contracts ......................................................................................... 20

CHAPTER 4. PUBLIC CONSULTATION AND DISCUSSION .................................................... 22

CHAPTER 5. INFORMATION DISCLOSURE ............................................................................. 24

CHAPTER 6. GRIEVANCE REDRESS MECHANISM ................................................................ 25

CHAPTER 7. PROJECT STAFFING AND CAPACITY BUILDING ............................................. 27

CHAPTER 8. KEY ISSUES AND CORRECTIVE ACTIONS ....................................................... 29

CHAPTER 9. CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS ..................................................... 32

APPENDICES ............................................................................................................................... 34


2

List of Appendices

Appendix 1. List of SPPL of Community Contracts ................................................................. 35

Appendix 2. Evidences of Mitigation Measures in Semarang and Makassar ........................ 36

Appendix 3. List of SPPL of Complex Civil Work Contracts ................................................... 38

Appendix 4. Environmental Screening and Assessment for Batua Community Work

Package, Makassar City .................................................................................... 39

Appendix 5. Evidences of Public Consultation for Community Contract in Batua

Neighborhood, Makassar City ............................................................................ 50

Appendix 6. Evidences of Public Consultation for Complex Civil Work in Tambakrejo

Neighborhood, Semarang City ........................................................................... 54

Appendix 7. Evidences of Training of Trainers Workshop ...................................................... 57

Appendix 8. Evidences of Mid-Term Review Workshop ......................................................... 64

Appendix 9. Evidences of the Year-End Review Workshop ................................................... 70

Appendix 10. Evidences of the Year-End National Coordinating Meeting ............................... 76

Appendix 11. Picture of Ad-Hoc Meeting Between DGHS and NMC at NMC Office, Jakarta

(June 2018) ........................................................................................................ 82

Appendix 12. Picture of field checking by PPK of Semarang City in Mangkang Wetan

Neighborhood (27 August 2018) ........................................................................ 83

Appendix 13. An Example of O&M Mechanism in Bontorannu, Makassar .............................. 84

Appendix 14. O&M Mechanism has been formulated in the Major’s Decree on NSD’s Management Board of Palopo ........................................................................ 86

Appendix 15. An Example of RMC Safeguard Specialist’s QPR .............................................. 90

Appendix 16. An Example of Approved Community Contract SPPL of 2017 from Beting Kuala

Kapias Neighborhood, Tanjung Balai City ......................................................... 92

Appendix 17. An Example of Approved Complex Civil Works SPPL of 2017 and its related

Environmental Permit Act from Bone District .................................................... 95


3

List of Tables

Table 1. Community Contracts Awarded in 2018 ....................................................................... 8

Table 2. Complex Civil Works Contracts Awarded in 2018 ...................................................... 10

Table 3. Agency and Community Organization Responsibilities .............................................. 15

Table 4. The Status of UKL-UPL and IEE of New Site Development ...................................... 21

Table 5. Key Issues and the Corrective Actions ....................................................................... 29

List of Figures

Figure 1. NUSP-2 Project Location ............................................................................................. 5

Figure 2. Construction of Drainage Channel in Kelurahan Cipocok Jaya (Serang City)........... 7

Figure 3. Construction of Concrete Road in Kelurahan Sungai Pelunggut (Batam City) ........... 7

Figure 4. Asphalt Road Constructed at Kelurahan Kandang Panjang (Pekalongan City) ......... 9

Figure 5. Drainage Channel Constructed at Kelurahan Kabil (Batam City) ............................. 10

Figure 6. Work Completed in Purirano NSD, Kendari City ....................................................... 11

Figure 7. Work Completed in Sampoddo NSD, Palopo City..................................................... 12

Figure 8. Work Progress in Jatiwangi NSD, Bima City ............................................................. 13

Figure 9. Work Progress in Handil Berkat Makmur NSD, Kapuas District ............................... 14

Figure 10. Dissemination Posters of NUSP-2 Project.............................................................. 24

Figure 11. Grievance Redress Mechanism ............................................................................... 25

Figure 12. Information Disclosure for GRM ............................................................................... 26


4

ABBREVIATIONS

ADB Asian Development Bank

AP Affected People

CA Community Advisor

CAP Community Action Plan

CC City Coordinator

CIO Community Implementing Organization (or BKM Badan Keswadayaan

Masyarakat)

CPMU Central Project Management Unit

DGHS Directorate General of Housing Settlements

DLH Dinas Lingkungan Hidup (Environmental Agency)

EA Executing Agency

EARF Environmental Review and Assessment Framework

EIA Environmental Impact Assessment

EMP Environmental Management Plan

EMS Environmental Management System

FY Fiscal Year

GRC Grievance Redress Committee

GRM Grievance Redress Mechanism

IEE Initial Environmental Examination

IPAL Instalasi Pengolahan Air Limbah (Communal Wastewater Treatment Plant)

KPP Kelompok Pemanfaat dan Pemelihara (Operation and Maintenance Group)

KSM Kelompok Swadaya Masyarakat (Community Self-Help Group)

LCO Local Coordinating Office

MDG Millennium Development Goals

MPWH Ministry of Public Work and Housing

Muskel Musyawarah Kelurahan (neighborhood assembly meeting)

NMC National Management Consultant

NSD New Site Development

NUSP-2 Neighborhood Upgrading and Shelter Project Phase 2

O&M Operation and Maintenance

PIP Pengembangan Infrastruktur Permukiman (Settlement Infrastructure

Development)

PIU Project Implementing Unit (Satker or Satuan Kerja)

PMU

PPK

Project Management Unit

Pejabat Pembuat Komitmen (Commitment Officer)

RAB Rencana Anggaran Belanja (Budget Planning)

RMC Regional Management Consultant

Satker Satuan Kerja (Project Implementing Unit)

SKS Survey Kampung Sendiri or Community Self Survey

SPPL Surat Pernyataan Kesanggupan Pengelolaan dan Pemantauan Lingkungan

(Statement Letter for Environmental Management and Monitoring)

TIPP Tim Inti Perencanaan Partisipatif (Core Team for Participatory Planning)

UKL-UPL Upaya Pengelolaan Lingkungan – Upaya Pemantauan Lingkungan

(Environmental Management Effort - Environmental Monitoring Effort

Document)


5

CHAPTER 1. INTRODUCTION

1. Project Background. The Neighborhood Upgrading and Shelter Project – Phase 2

(NUSP-2) is aimed to upgrade basic public infrastructure in slum settlements, and contribute

to meeting Millennium Development Goal (MDG) targets for achieving significant improvement

in the lives of slum dwellers (MDG target 7D) and halving the proportion of urban households

without sustainable access to safe drinking water and basic sanitation (MDG target 7C).1 The

NUSP-2 also contributes to the implementation of Cities without Slums Program launched by

the Indonesian Government.2

2. The NUSP-2 is an ADB-funded project, particularly upgrading and/or developing basic

infrastructure and facilities for selected slum areas at 99 neighborhoods (kelurahan). These

neighborhoods are distributed in 20 districts (kabupaten) and municipalities (kota) located

across Sumatra, Java, Kalimantan, Sulawesi, Nusa Tenggara and Maluku Islands as shown

in Figure 1. The executing agency of the NUSP-2 is the Directorate General of Human

Settlements (Direktorat Jenderal Cipta Karya) of the Ministry of Public Works and Housing

(MPWH).

Figure 1. NUSP-2 Project Location

1 The 2015 MDG target for the proportion of the urban population living in slums is 6%; in 2011, 12.6% of the

urban population lived in slums. The 2015 MDG target for the proportion of households with sustainable access to an improved water source is 75.5%; in 2011, 40.5% of urban households had access to an improved water source, 72.5% had access to basic sanitation. The proportion of households with access to safe water and basic sanitation in slum areas is assumed to be much lower.

2 The Cities without Slums Program is incorporated in the National Long-Term Development Plan, 2005–2025. It aims to reduce slum areas in cities by 2025 by promoting concerted initiatives by the central and local governments, private sector, and civil society.

Tanjung

Balai

Bengkulu

Serang

Sukabumi

Semarang

Pasuruan

Bima

Tanjung

Jabung Barat

Kapuas

Bandar

Lampung

Makassar

Kendari

Ambon

Batam

Palembang

Banjarmasin

Pekalongan

Palangkaraya

Bone

Palopo


6

3. The NUSP-2 assists the local governments in upgrading and/or developing basic

infrastructure and facilities at selected neighborhoods in order to achieve the following: Output

1: Institutional capacities for managing pro-poor urban development strengthened; Output 2:

Infrastructure in slum neighborhoods upgraded; and Output 3: New settlements for poor

families established.

4. There are seven types of infrastructures and facilities built under the NUSP-2, among

others, construction of road, bridge, basic sanitation facilities, and communal wastewater

treatment plant; installation of clean water supply and street lighting; and provision of

municipal solid waste handling facility and transportation as well as basic fire-fighting

equipment.

5. Objective and Scope of the Monitoring Report. This Annual Environmental

Monitoring Report is developed by NMC Safeguard Team/Project Management Unit of the

NUSP-2 to describe the project activities and environmental safeguards implementation in

2018. This report describes the compliance status of environmental mitigation and monitoring

conducted against the EARF requirements. Further, corrective actions identified in the ADB

Review Mission in 2018, if any, are elaborated in this report to improve compliance in the

upcoming year.


7

CHAPTER 2. KEY PROJECT ACTIVITIES AND PROGRESS

6. This chapter summarizes key project activities and progress associated with the

NUSP-2 implementation in 2018. These include the community and complex civil work

contracts awarded as well as the construction of neighborhood infrastructure and facilities to

be constructed as part of the New Site Development (NSD) during the reporting period.

2.1. Community Contracts

7. In 2018 the NUSP-2 awarded 215 community contracts (skala lingkungan) in 99

neighborhoods/kelurahans for neighborhood upgrading civil works to local Community

Implementation Organizations (CIO or Badan Keswadayaan Masyarakat/BKM). Construction

works that are considered technically modest and can be conducted by the community without

using specialized or heavy equipment qualify for the community-typed contracts mentioned

earlier. Figure 2 (Construction of Drainage Channel in Kelurahan Cipocok Jaya, Serang City)

and Figure 3 (Construction of Concrete Road in Kelurahan Sungai Pelunggut, Batam City)

are examples of the construction works awarded under the community contract scheme.

Figure 2. Construction of Drainage Channel in Kelurahan Cipocok Jaya (Serang City)

Figure 3. Construction of Concrete Road in Kelurahan Sungai Pelunggut (Batam City)


8

Table 1 provides information on 215 community contracts awarded in 2018 as part of the

NUSP-2 implementation at 20 cities or districts throughout Indonesia.

Table 1. Community Contracts Awarded in 2018

No City/District (Province)

Number of

Neighborhoods

Involved

Construction and/or Installation Conducted

1 Tanjung Balai City

(North Sumatra Province)

5 Drainage channel, purchase of garbage collector

vehicle, concrete road, green open space, public

toilet, retaining wall and street lighting.

2 Tanjung Jabung Barat

District (Jambi Province)

4 Drainage channel, concrete road and installation of

box culvert.

3 Palembang City

(South Sumatra Province)

10 Concrete road, drainage channel, concrete bridge,

street lighting, installation of clean water pipeline and

purchase of garbage collector vehicle.

4 Bengkulu City

(Bengkulu Province)

6 Drainage channel, concrete road, street lighting,

purchase of garbage collector and retaining wall.

5 Bandar Lampung City

(Lampung Province)

10 Paved and concrete road, drainage channel,

floodgate, culvert, solid waste collection area,

purchase of garbage collector vehicle, street lighting,

installation of plat deucker, green open space, public

toilet, retaining wall and installation of clean water

pipeline.

6 Batam City

(Riau Islands Province)

5 Drainage channel and concrete road.

7 Sukabumi City

(West Java Province)

4 Communal septic tank and waste water treatment,

paved road, drainage channel, public toilet, street

lighting, green open space, installation of plat

deucker, culvert, purchase of garbage collector and

installation of clean water pipeline.

8 Semarang City (Central

Java Province)

11 Paved road, drainage channel, solid waste collection

area, street lighting, purchase of garbage collector,

concrete bridge, communal septic tank and public

toilet.

9 Pekalongan City

(Central Java Province)

6 Purchase of garbage collector, culvert, paved road,

drainage channel, retaining wall, installation of clean

water pipeline, street lighting and green open space.

10 Pasuruan City

(East Java Province)

5 Paved road, communal septic tank, drainage channel

and purchase of garbage collector vehicle.

11 Serang City

(Banten Province)

4 Concrete and paved road, drainage channel, solid

waste collection area, public toilet, bore well, retaining

wall, communal waste water treatment plant and

culvert.

12 Kapuas District (Central

Kalimantan Province)

3 Concrete road, wooden trails road, drainage channel,

green open space and public toilet.

13 Palangkaraya City (Central


4 Wooden trails road, concrete road, drainage channel,

purchase of garbage collector and communal septic

tank.

14 Banjarmasin City (South


2 Drainage channel, concrete road, public toilet,

communal septic tank and solid waste collection area.

15 Bima City (West Nusa

Tenggara Province)

3 Concrete and paved road, drainage channel,

installation of plat deucker, street lighting, solid waste

collection area, purchase of garbage collector and


9

No City/District (Province)

Number of

Neighborhoods

Involved

Construction and/or Installation Conducted

green open space.

16 Bone City (South Sulawesi

Province)

2 Concrete, paved and wooden trails road and drainage

channel.

17 Makassar City (South

Sulawesi Province)

5 Drainage channel, paved and concrete road, concrete

bridge, communal waste water treatment plant, green

open space and purchase of garbage collector.

18 Palopo City

(South Sulawesi Province)

3 Drainage channel, street lighting, green open space

and concrete road.

19 Kendari City

(South East Sulawesi)

4 Solid waste collection area, concrete and paved road,

drainage channel, concrete bridge, purchase of

garbage collector, green open space and street

lighting.

20 Ambon City

(Maluku Province)

3 Concrete road, drainage channel, installation of plat

deucker, retaining wall, purchase of garbage collector

and solid waste collection area.

Source: NUSP-2 Infrastructure (2018).

2.2. Complex Civil Work Contracts

8. The complex civil work contracts are awarded to companies (instead of community

groups) through bidding process, particularly for construction works involving multiple

neighborhoods and specific materials and heavy and/or specialized equipment that may need

to be mobilized from other areas. In 2018 NUSP-2 awarded complex civil work contracts for

constructing facilities and infrastructure in 8 (eight) cites or districts in Indonesia. On the next

page the Figure 4 shows the Asphalt Road Construction at Kelurahan Kandang Panjang

(Pekalongan City) and Figure 5 shows the Drainage Channel Constructed at Kelurahan Kabil

(Batam City) that have been constructed under the complex civil work contract.

Figure 4. Asphalt Road Constructed at Kelurahan Kandang Panjang (Pekalongan City)


10

Figure 5. Drainage Channel Constructed at Kelurahan Kabil (Batam City)

9. The types of community facilities and infrastructure in 2018 under the complex civil

works contracts (skala kawasan) have been constructed or installed through 9 packages

distributed in 8 cities/districts and presented in the following table.

Table 2. Complex Civil Works Contracts Awarded in 2018

No City/District (Province) Construction and/or Installation Conducted

1 Kelurahan Kabil, Batam City (Riau Islands

Province).

Paved and concrete road and drainage channel.

2 Kelurahan Sawah Lebar, Bengkulu City

(Bengkulu Province)

Drainage channel and asphalt road.

3 Kelurahan Kandang Panjang, Pekalongan City


Asphalt road, green open space, drainage channel

and installation of box culvert.

4 Kelurahan Tambakrejo, Semarang City


Drainage channel, solid waste collection area and

road.

5 Kelurahan Selat Dalam, Kapuas District

(Central Kalimantan Province)

Retaining wall, green open space, concrete bridge,

construction of archway and street lighting

6 Kelurahan Batua, Makassar City (South

Sulawesi Province)

Paved road and drainage channel.

7 Kelurahan Borong, Makassar City (South

Sulawesi Province)

Paved road and drainage channel.

8 Kelurahan Batu Merah, Ambon City (Maluku

Province)

Installation of clean water pipelines, drainage channel

and concrete road.

9 Kelurahan Dara and Jatibaru, Bima City (West

Nusa Tenggara Province)

Asphalt road and drainage channel.

Source: NUSP-2 Infrastructure (2018).

10. The implementation of 1 (one) complex civil work package in Kelurahan Tambakrejo

Semarang City was delayed due to : (i) the replacement of the government official (Satker and

Commitment Officer or Pejabat Pembuat Komitmen/PPK), and (ii) the design stressing on

collaboration approach with the board for river management (Balai Besar Wilayah

Sungai/BBWS). The BBWS is responsible for the river normalization and construction of

retaining wall using concrete sheet pile; whereas the NUSP-2 project is responsible for the

construction of roads along the retaining wall. The road construction process will be started


11

once the retaining wall is completed. These processes caused insufficient time of

implementation during 2018. Thus, this work package in Semarang City is managed through

multi-year contract which will be completed in April 2019.

2.3. New Site Development (NSD)

11. For the NSD progress, the Initial Environmental Examination (IEE) of Purirano NSD in

Kendari City and Sampoddo NSD in Palopo City have been endorsed by ADB on 12 March

2018 (for Purirano NSD) and 26 April 2018 (for Sampoddo NSD). The Purirano NSD

infrastructure construction contract has been started in May 2018, and Sampoddo NSD in July

2018, and are now completed. The pictures of construction work process can be seen in

Figure 6 (Work Completed in Purirano NSD, Kendari City) and Figure 7 (Work Completed in

Sampoddo NSD, Palopo City).

Figure 6. Work Completed in Purirano NSD, Kendari City


12

Figure 7. Work Completed in Sampoddo NSD, Palopo City

12. The IEE of Jatiwangi NSD in Bima City and the NSD Handil Berkat Makmur in Kapuas

District have been reviewed and approved by ADB on 11 September 2018 (for Jatiwangi

NSD) and 13 November 2018 (for Handil Berkat Makmur NSD). The Jatiwangi NSD

infrastructure construction contract has been started in October 2018, and Handil Berkat

Makmur NSD in November 2018 and both are now progressing. The pictures of construction

work process can be seen in Figure 8 (Work Progress in Jatiwangi NSD, Bima City) and

Figure 9 (Work Progress in Handil Berkat Makmur NSD, Kapuas District).


13

Figure 8. Work Progress in Jatiwangi NSD, Bima City


14

Figure 9. Work Progress in Handil Berkat Makmur NSD, Kapuas District


15

CHAPTER 3. ENVIRONMENTAL MITIGATION AND MONITORING STATUS

3.1. Requirements of Environmental Safeguards

13. According to the ADB’s Safeguard Policy Statement (2009), the NUSP-2 is classified

as the Category B Project, i.e. the project could have some adverse environmental impacts,

but of lesser degree or significance than those in category A, but the impacts are site specific

and can be readily addressed through common mitigation measures. The NUSP-2 creates

positive impacts on the environment and improves the wellbeing of the community through

alleviation of slum areas in emerging cities in Indonesia.

14. The Environmental Assessment and Review Framework (EARF) document has been

prepared in 2014, and it provides screening procedure and checklist to review environmental

implications of the infrastructure and facility to be constructed as part of the NUSP-2. The

EARF requires that:

• An initial environmental examination (IEE) document according to the ADB requirement is

prepared and endorsed by DGHS and ADB as part of the new site development (NSD)

proposal; and

• Environmental Mitigation and Monitoring Plan (UKL-UPL) or Statement Letter to Conduct

Environmental Mitigation and Monitoring (SPPL) is prepared and endorsed by DGHS

according to the Ministry of Environment Regulations No. 5/2012 on Types of Activities

and/or Projects Requiring Environmental Impact Assessment (AMDAL) and No. 16/2012

on the Guidance for the Preparation of Environmental Documents; and Ministry of Public

Work Regulation No. 10/PRT/M/2008 on Types of Activities and/or Projects in the Public

Work Sector Subject to be Completed with the Environmental Management Effort-

Environmental Monitoring Effort (UKL-UPL) document.

3.2. Key Roles and Responsibilities

15. Table 3 summarizes the key roles and responsibilities of the executing and

implementing agencies as well as community organizations involved in the implementation of

the NUSP-2 including their respective environmental responsibilities. Related evidences as

some examples on the undertaking of these roles and activities, particularly at the city/district

level, Community Implementing Organization (CIO), and neighborhood level are provided in

the appendices.

Table 3. Agency and Community Organization Responsibilities

Institutions and Responsibilities

Activities and Status Compliance

Directorate General of Housing Settlement (Executing Agency)

• Overall coordination,

supervision,

monitoring.

The coordination, supervision and monitoring by the

PMU/EA were mostly done through workshops,

coordinating and review meetings, in which safeguard

issues were discussed, including collecting evidences.

These events were also a means of capacity building for

the RMC Technical Assistants, CC, and CAs. Some

supervision meetings were conducted on ad hoc basis

and on the sites.

Complied


16



• Preparation and

submission of

quarterly progress and

evaluation reports.

In 2018 the PMU submitted 4 quarterly progress and

evaluation reports to ADB (QPR 1 January – March; QPR

2 April – June; QPR 3 July - September; QPR 4 October –

December).

Complied

• Prepare guidelines for

the environmental due

diligence and

monitoring of

environmental

management plan.

The DGHS had published a Technical Guideline on Social

and Environmental Management in September 2016. Up

till 2018, the City Satker, CCs and CAs has been using

this guideline for reference to implement and monitor the

environmental and social safeguard components through

screening using forms of checklists and templates

provided.

Complied

Public Works (Local Coordinating Officer) at City or District Level

• Provide overall

coordination,

supervision,

monitoring and

approval of

neighborhood

proposals including

environmental

checklists.

In all 20 cities, the LCO at the Local Planning Agency

oversees the overall implementation of NUSP-2

intervention, including approval of the neighborhood

proposals. The supervision and monitoring by the LCO

and City Satker conducted through the finalization process

of the Community Action Plan (CAP).

Complied

• Prepare quarterly

progress reports

including

environmental.

The LCO provided inputs to the PMU on the quarterly

progress reports of the NUSP-2 intervention. Some

reports included monitoring on infrastructure progress on

50% and on 100%, which were also uploaded in

Management Information System (MIS).

Complied

• Provide technical

support to community

advisors and

BKMs/CIOs.

The technical support provided by LCO through

consultation and coordination when the Badan

Keswadayaan Masyarakat (BKM or Commuity

Implementing Organization/CIO) presents their CAP.

Along the process of construction, the Local Public Work

Agency was reviewing, controlling and improving the

works as part of technical support, coaching and

empowerment.

Complied

• Carry out

environmental due

diligence.

• For the community contract, the environmental due

diligence was carried out using the environmental

screening checklist. Subsequently, this information is

utilized to develop the SPPL for submission to the Local

Environmental Agency.

• For the complex civil work contract, the SPPL is

prepared by City Satker and contractor assisted by the

CCs.

• For the NSD, IEE and UKL-UPL are prepared for

ADB/DGHS endorsement and local government

respectively.

The list of SPPL and IEE prepared in 2018 is included in

Appendix 1, 2, and 4. There are 215 community

contracts, 9 complex civil works and 4 NSDs.

• Complied

• Complied

• Complied


17



• Monitor the

implementation of the

environmental

management plan.

The LCO has been monitoring the implementation of

environmental management plan in ad-hoc basis.

Complied

Environmental Agency at City or District Level (Dinas Lingkungan Hidup/DLH)

• Provide guidance on

environmental

checklists.

The Environmental Agencies used the checklists provided

in the Technical Guidelines mentioned above as the

reference for issuing the approval for SPPL document for

each CAP.

Complied

• Coordinate with

community advisors to

conduct site visits to

validate the

screening/assessment

results.

The Environmental Agencies conducted site visits to

validate the environmental screening results on 0% point

of infrastructure during the community meeting, and

validate monitoring results on 50% and 100% of

infrastructure progress to verify the requirement of budget

disbursement.

Complied

• Review the

engineering design

and environmental

checklists and provide

permit for construction

of a deep well.

There is no deep well constructed as part of the NUSP-2

in 2018.

Not applicable

• Conduct random

checking during

construction and after

completion to inspect

environmental

procedures and

impacts.

Random checking was done by the Environmental

Agencies during construction and after completion to also

make sure of infrastructure quality and gave technical

inputs for improvement where needed.

Complied

Health Agency at City or District Level

• Test collected water

quality samples to

determine if collected

water sources meet

the drinking water

standards.

This water testing was not conducted, as most of the

clean water source for the NSD sites will be supplied from

treated water from the municipal water company (known

as Perusahaan Daerah Air Minum or PDAM).

Not applicable

Community Implementation Organization (CIO)

• Responsible for

establishing project

implementation units.

The CIO established the project implementing units in the

form of community self-help group (Kelompok Swadaya

Masyarakat or KSM) to implement the NUSP-2 activities.

Complied

• Responsible for

conducting

environmental

checklists assisted by

community

advisors/safeguard

specialist.

The CIO, assisted by the CA and CC, conducted

environmental screening by visual inspection and review

of the CAP using the checklist forms included in the

Technical Guideline for Social and Environmental

Management (2016).

Complied

• Formulate O & M

mechanisms.

The O&M mechanism was formulated during finalization

of the CAP. At the same time the CIO established the

Complied


18



O&M group (Kelompok Pemanfaat dan Pemelihara/KPP)

to be responsible for maintenance of the neighborhood

facility and infrastructure constructed. Later on, the KPP

groups were empowered through O&M training between

July-August 2018 for each city.

• Responsible for

monitoring

construction activities

and conducting

inspection for

completed

interventions.

CIOs together with respective PPK monitored and

evaluated the activities when construction achieved 50%

and 100% progress, and made necessary intervention or

improvement based on the results. The monitoring results

then were uploaded into the NUSP-2 website/SIM.

Complied

• Disclose, on the

neighborhood board,

neighborhood

proposals and

contracts including

environmental

checklists.

The discussion to develop and finalize the neighborhood

proposals was conducted through series of neighborhood

discussion (musyawarah kelurahan/Muskel II - III).

However, the proposals, contracts, and checklists were

not disclosed on the neighborhood board.

Partially

complied

• Responsible for taking

any negative feedback

related to site,

construction, and

operation from other

neighborhood

members and

organizing meetings to

solve problems.

This responsibility was conducted through those series of

neighborhood discussions (Muskel IV - V), women group

meetings (Rembug Khusus Perempuan), and other ad-

hoc meetings to take-up feedbacks and complains from

other neighborhood members.

Complied

• Responsible for

reporting

environmental

monitoring to LCOs

The environmental monitoring is reported using the Form

SG-5 completed with the minutes of meeting of the

monitoring at 50% and 100% of construction progress.

The minutes and pictures of this activity were uploaded

into the NUSP-2 website/MIS and included in the

Technical and Financial Report (Laporan Pertanggung-

Jawaban/LPJ) after completion of infrastructure.

Complied

3.3. Community Contracts

16. Environmental Mitigation. For every community contract package, prior to

construction the CIO prepared a Community Action Plan (CAP) including the environmental

and social screening using the forms/checklists provided in the NUSP-2 Technical Guidelines

on Social and Environmental Management. Based on this Technical Guidelines, there are 5

types of forms/checklists that should be applied along the project for each type of

infrastructure. The first form (SG-1 form) is for the negative list screening. The second (SG-2)

is for identifying both social and environmental impacts, and the third (SG-3) is for analyzing

those potential impacts and related mitigation actions to cope with the impacts. The SG-4 is to

provide a recapitulation of those screening results, while the SG-5 is for monitoring the


19

process at the point of 0%, 50% and 100% of construction work progress. Examples of the

use of these forms of SG-1 till SG-5 are shown in Appendix 4.

17. Assisted by the Community Adviser (CA), the CIO conducted neighborhood meeting

(Musyawarah Kelurahan or Muskel III) to disseminate the screening result and discuss the

CAP. The results of the environmental and social screening were incorporated into the SPPL

that was subsequently submitted to the local environmental agency (Dinas Lingkungan

Hidup/DLH) for registration. The SPPL contains identified potential environmental impacts and

measures to mitigate these impacts during the construction work. The total of SPPL

formulated for slum upgrading through community contract in 2018 was 215 packages. The

list of SPPL submitted for the community contract activities is presented in Appendix 1.

18. As of end of December 2018, almost all of community contracts in the first, second and

third cycle had completed their SPPL documents, except those from the Semarang City which

are still in the registration process at the Investment and One Stop Services Office (Dinas

Penanaman Modal dan Pelayanan Terpadu Satu Pintu) due to many bureaucracy

requirements.

19. Some mitigation measures mentioned in the SPPL to cope with environmental impacts

usually were: water spraying for dust suppression; covering the construction materials using

tarpaulin; stockpiling the construction materials properly on the road side; putting the warning

signboard around the construction works; and providing the workers with personnel protective

equipment. The documentation pictures of these mitigation measures are provided in the

Appendix 2.

20. Environmental Monitoring. The CA/CIO visually monitored the implementation of the

mitigation measures to make sure that they complied with the SPPL during the project up to

hand over to the Local Coordinating Office (LCO) and subsequently to the local community as

the beneficiary of the NUSP-2. They monitored the progress of infrastructure being built by

visual inspection and made some documentation pictures of the progress on 0%; 50% and

100%, and filled up the form of SG-5. These processes were being uploaded into the website

of Management Information System through application by the CA. The City Coordinator

would check the uploaded files and gave approval. Subsequently, the Safeguard Specialists

at the Regional Management Consultant (RMC of west, central and east regions) collected

and reviewed the status of the process, made some analysis and recapitulation to be reported

to the Safeguard Team of NMC. The NMC incorporated this report into the quarterly and

annually reports and submitted to ADB.

21. In general, the monitoring results on community contract packages in 2018 showed

that most of the mitigation measures were properly applied by the KSM as committed in the

SPPL documents. Since the scale of subproject was manageable by the communities

themselves, the impacts were not too hard to cope with. For this is the third years of the

project implementation, the KSM have becoming more experienced in applying the

environmental safeguard. However, the key issue here was that communities were still not

used to properly make good quality records or documentation on what they have done.


20

3.4. Complex Civil Work Contracts

22. Environmental Mitigation. Based on the initial screening using the form of SG-1-3, all

of the complex civil work contracts in 2018 required the SPPL document, not the UKL-UPL.

The environmental mitigation implemented for the complex civil work contracts is similar to

that of the community contract in that SPPL, which is required for construction activities of the

neighborhood infrastructure and facilities. The list of SPPL submitted for the community

contract activities is presented in Appendix 3. There were 8 cities/district involved in complex

civil work contracts, but only 1 (Tambakrejo) of Semarang City have not completed the SPPL

documents yet due to bureaucracy obstacles.

23. Similar to the community contract package, some mitigation measures mentioned in

the SPPL document of complex civil works to cope with environmental impacts were: water

spraying for dust suppression; covering the construction materials using tarpaulin; stockpiling

the construction materials properly on the road side; putting the warning signboards around

the construction works; and providing the workers with personnel protective equipment. The

documentation pictures of these mitigation measures are provided in the Appendix 2.

24. Environmental Monitoring. For the complex civil work contracts, the City

Coordinators (CCs) in coordination with LCO were responsible for the day-to-day

environmental monitoring during the construction activities done by the contractor firms. They

monitored the progress of infrastructure being built by visual inspection, and made some

documentation pictures of the progress (0%; 50% and 100%). The SG-5 form, provided in the

Technical Guideline, was used to do the monitoring for both social and environmental

safeguard for each activity. The day-to-day monitoring during the construction activities were

recorded in the logbook.

25. Even though the monitoring result of the complex civil works was generally good, the

key challenge here was the coordination responsibility between the City Satker and the LCO

in monitoring the contractor firm as the developer of infrastructure. The CCs played an

important role in assuring the mitigation measures were taken in place during the construction

process.

3.5. New Site Development Contracts

26. In 2018, the construction of infrastructure and facilities at the four NSD sites in

Kendari, Palopo, and Bima cities and Kapuas District have been commenced and the

environmental mitigation and monitoring have been occurring. The types of infrastructure are

neighborhood road, drainage system, clean water supply, solid waste management system,

landscape, and street lighting. The report of implementation and monitoring of environmental

mitigation will be reported on separate monitoring report of each IEE. The status of IEE

document for the NSD is provided in Table 4 below.


21

Table 4. The Status of UKL-UPL and IEE of New Site Development

No NSD Sites UKL-UPL IEE

1 Purirano NSD –

Kendari City

(Southeast Sulawesi

Province)

• UKL-UPL approval No. 191 year 2016 (dated

29 December 2016), issued by the

Environmental Agency of Kendari City.

• Environmental Permit No. 192 year 2016 (dated

29 December 2016) issued by the same

environmental agency.

Approved by ADB on 12

March 2018

2 Sampoddo NSD –

Palopo City (South

Sulawesi Province)

• UKL-UPL approval No. 660/047/DLH/XII/2017

(dated 16 December 2017) issued by the

Environmental Agency of Palopo City

• Environmental Permit No. 660/48/DLH/XII/2017

(dated 16 December 2017) issued by the same

environmental agency.


April 2018

3 Jatiwangi NSD, Bima

City (West Nusa

Tenggara Province)

• UKL-UPL recommendation No

880/32/DLH/XII/2017 (dated 21 December

2017) issued by the Environmental Agency of

Bima City.

• Environmental Permit No. 435/2018 (dated 15

May 2018) issued by the Major (Walikota) of

Bima City.


September 2018

4 Handil Berkat

Makmur NSD,

Kapuas District

(Central Kalimantan

Province)

• UKL-UPL approval No. 660/364/DLH/X/2017

(dated 18 October 2017) issued by the

Environmental Agency of Kapuas District

• Environmental Permit No. 627/DPMPTSP/ year

2017 (dated 29 December 2017) issued by the

Head (Bupati) of Kapuas District.


November 2018

Source: NSD Technical proposals and copies of UKL-UPL documents from NUSP-2 subprojects 2017.


22

CHAPTER 4. PUBLIC CONSULTATION AND DISCUSSION

27. The NUSP-2 project conducted public consultation as an integral part of the

identification, selection and implementation of neighborhood infrastructure interventions. For

the community contract packages, several stages of neighborhood meetings were conducted

to openly discuss the whole process of development from assessing environmental and social

safeguard checklist, formulating and consolidating the investment plan Into Community Action

Plan (CAP), preparing the construction implementation and selecting the Implementing Unit

(Kelompok Swadaya Masyarakat/KSM). Through these meetings, all community members

and concerned stakeholders would have such forum to raise their complaints to be resolved.

So far, there is no report of any concerns or complaints addressed to the Implementing Units.

28. In 2018, similar to previous years, public consultations and discussions were done

through series of neighborhood meetings (Musyawarah Kelurahan or Muskel) aforementioned

in previous Chapter. As an example of this public consultation and discussion, the CAP

drafting process for a community contract package in Batua neighborhood of Makassar City is

presented in Appendix 5.

29. For the complex civil works, at the pre-construction phase, the City Coordinator (CC)

and City Satker conducted public consultation with the representatives of local communities,

heads of Kelurahan and the contractor firms to discuss the plan for the infrastructure and

identifying potential impacts by screening and reviewing the checklist forms and later

developed the UKL-UPL or SPPL documents based on the screening results. These events

were documented in the minutes of meetings, list of participants, and some pictures, and

uploaded into the NUSP-2 website/MIS by the CCs for public viewers. An example of such

public consultation for complex civil works package in Tambakrejo neighborhood of Semarang

City is presented in Appendix 6. The discussion was about drafting report of initial screening

results using SG-1 till SG-3 forms to be included into the SPPL. The community members and

concerned stakeholders could have used this forum to raise their complaints to be resolved.

So far, there is no report of any concerns or complaints addressed to the related City Satker.

30. As for the NSD sites, at the pre-construction phase, there would be two types of public

consultation. The first one is for disseminating information about the NSD project to the local

communities, potential beneficiaries, and job or business opportunities for the locals, as well

as seeking for local community’s perception on the NSD project. The second one is for discussing and reviewing environmental and social screening checklists to prepare the UKL-

UPL document, which later to be further developed as IEE and social DDR documents. This

event would be attended by potential affected communities, the heads of Kelurahan, related

agencies or stakeholders, the contractor firms, the CC and the sub-specialists (for monitoring

evaluation for NSD implementation) and facilitated by the City Satker.

31. Since the construction works at the four NSD sites have been started, the first public

consultation and dissemination events have also been conducted. In Purirano NSD (Kendari),

it was held at the site (temporary) office on May 11, 2018, attended by 30 participants,

including local community members, the City Satker, the contractor, and the sub-specialist.

Similarly, the public consultation for Sampoddo NSD (Palopo) was held on June 11, 2018 at


23

the site office, attended by the City Satker, the contractor, the technical consultants and the

potential beneficiaries. Whereas in Jatiwangi NSD (Bima), it was held on November 2018,

attended by 14 people of local community members, the City Satker, the contractor and the

sub-specialist. And the public consultation for the Handil Berkat Makmur (Kapuas) was held

on December 12, 2018 in Kelurahan Office of Selat Utara, attended by about 30 participants

from almost the same kind of stakeholders. The results of these events were that the local

communities understood about the NSD planning, and that there were some job or business

potentials in the new site development, and there were some local communities and suppliers

involved in the construction process either as work force or provider of goods and services.


24

CHAPTER 5. INFORMATION DISCLOSURE

32. Information on public consultation, discussion, and neighborhood meetings related to

the implementation of community and complex civil work contracts are documented and

uploaded into the NUSP-2’s website/MIS (www.nusp2.id). However, information related to

monitoring of environmental mitigation measures is lacking.

33. For the NSD, the IEE documents (including the EMP) and the annual environmental

monitoring report are disclosed on ADB’s website and NUSP-2’s websites. The IEE

documents for Purirano and Sampoddo NSDs have been translated into Bahasa Indonesia

and the translation has been shared with the respective LCOs and City Satkers to be made

available to public, including the affected people and interested stakeholders. The IEE

documents for Jatiwangi NSD (Bima) and Handil Makmur Jaya (Kapuas) are still in translation

process into Bahasa Indonesia.

34. The project also published about six posters explaining the NUSP-2 project and one

special poster on NSD. These posters dissemination is another strategy to reach out the

potential beneficiaries. These posters have been distributing gradually in 2016 till 2018 and

mentioning the email address and mobile contact number to redress grievance or complains

from communities. Two of these posters are shown below in Figure 10.

Figure 10. Dissemination Posters of NUSP-2 Project


25

CHAPTER 6. GRIEVANCE REDRESS MECHANISM

35. The NUSP-2 has established a grievance redress mechanism (GRM), which basically

consists of three levels, i.e. at the neighborhood, at the city/district, and at the national levels

as shown in Figure 11 (Grievance Redress Mechanism). This leveling system is expected to

timely address any complaints during project implementation. Local communities or affected

people will have the right to file complaints and/or queries related to disturbance /

environmental impacts due to the project activities.

36. The GRM should handle any complaints and/or queries which emerge during

construction process of the subprojects. Any affected people/party will have the right to file

complaints. It is anticipated that all grievances related to benefits and other assistance will be

resolved at the project level.

37. The procedure for filing complaints and/or grievance during construction is established

as follows:

(i) The complaint will be filed to the Community Implementing Organization (CIO) or Badan

Keswadayaan Masyarakat (BKM) members and local government at the neighborhood

level for an immediate solution when possible;

Figure 11. Grievance Redress Mechanism

(ii) If the problem cannot be solved, the BKM members and local government staff will

facilitate the APs (affected peoples) to submit their complaints to the Projects’ grievance


26

redress committee (GRC) at the district level, and to the national level if needed.

Community advisor then will record the complaint and report it to the LCOs. The project

will dedicate a staff at city/district and national levels to be in-charge of handling and

following up on AP’s complaints.

(iii) The members of the GRC should involve the representatives of vulnerable affected

people (i.e. affected women, poor and minority groups) and other affected people along

with relevant government officials who have functional and legal authority. The committee

will then review grievances involving all land acquisition benefits or issues, except for

disputes related to ownership.

(iv) Grievances will be addressed within 2 to 4 weeks from the date of filing the complaints at

the district level and within 8 weeks at the national levels.

38. To disseminate information of the GRM, in 2016 the project had published a guideline

on grievance redress handling mechanism and distributed to all LCO and City Satker. In

addition, the project had also published a poster especially on GRM or PPM (Penanganan

Pengaduan Masyarakat), as shown in Figure 12 below. So far, there was no complaint or

grievance raised by the the community about the NUSP-2 project in 2018.

Figure 12. Information Disclosure for GRM


27

CHAPTER 7. PROJECT STAFFING AND CAPACITY BUILDING

39. The consulting services are provided at the national, regional, city and kelurahan level.

At the national level, a team of consultants assist the CPMU, namely the National

Management Consultant (NMC) based in Jakarta. Part of this NMC, a safeguard specialist

and the two safeguard assistants were recruited to assist the PMU in preparing social and

environmental management guidelines, checking supporting data and documents from the

field in the project’s Management Information System (MIS) website, incorporating

environmental monitoring in the quarterly progress reports and environmental survey results

in the monitoring and evaluation framework, prepare reports on annual environmental

monitoring and prepare the IEE for the NSD proposals.

40. At the regional level, a safeguard specialist was also recruited at each of three

regional management consultant (RMC) teams, based in Palembang (for West Region),

Semarang (Central) and Makassar (East). These RMC safeguard specialists were responsible

for assisting the NMC safeguard team in reviewing environmental monitoring management by

BKMs/CIOs, reviewing the completion of safeguard documents, preparing the environmental

monitoring reports, dissemination of the guidelines, assisting and training the city/district

coordinators and community advisors to review the environmental screening carried out by

BKMs/CIOs.

41. In addition to each NSD subproject, there are four sub-specialists responsible to assist

in day-to-day monitoring and evaluation for the implementation of the NSD. This also includes

assisting the City Satker, the LCO and the related RMC Safeguard Specialists in collecting

data for monitoring the implementation of mitigation measures set forth in the EMP of the IEE.

They are based in the NSD sites of Kendari, Palopo, Bima, and Kapuas.

42. And there are city/district coordinators (CCs) based in 20 cities/districts of the NUSP-2

project, responsible in assisting the city/district Satker (Project Implementing Unit/PIU), the

LCOs, and the community advisors. The CCs also responsible for conducting review and

screening of the environmental and social safeguard checklist using forms of SG-1 till SG-5

provided in the Technical Guidelines of NUSP-2, both for community contracts and complex

civil work packages. Further, they review the completion of necessary safeguard documents,

and review the quality of documentations uploaded by CCs or CIOs/BKMs in the NUSP-2

website/MIS.

43. Under the city/district coordinators (CCs), at the kelurahan level there are Community

Advisors (CAs) who may cover up to 2-3 kelurahans, and responsible for assisting each

BKM/CIO for day-to-day management of the community contract works; facilitating the

establishment of CIO/BKM and user groups; facilitating the preparation of CAPs; providing the

community with technical guidance in book-keeping, documentation and report preparation;

and assisting the user groups in formulating and implementing facility operation and

maintenance. Together with the CCs, the CAs assist the CIO/BKM in reviewing and screening

the environmental and social safeguard checklists. The CAs and CCs also responsible for the

preparation of documentation of each activity and supporting documents as the evidence,


28

such as minutes of meetings, notes, list of participants, pictures, other related documents. The

Technical Guidelines of NUSP-2 also provided various document templates for documentation

purposes. The CAs and CCs were responsible to assist the CIO/BKM to upload all of these

documents and pictures into MIS website of the NUSP-2 project for further monitoring by the

RMC and NMC safeguard specialists for reporting and public disclosure.

44. To improve monitoring quality, in 2018 several capacity buildings were done through

events such as regional coordination meeting, training for trainers, and coaching. Brief

information on each event is described below, whereas the reports proceedings of these

events were documented and compiled at the PMU and NMC offices.

45. In early July 2018 the Safeguard Team joined the NMC’s Capacity Building Team in conducting the Training of Trainers Workshop in Ambhara Hotel, Jakarta, for the CCs and

CAs. The specific module on safeguards was developed especially for the CIO/BKM to

refresh their knowledge and skills on safeguard aspects of the project, as well as to improve

the quality of supporting data for safeguard monitoring reports. Simultaneously, the NMC’s Safeguard Team also held special sessions with the NSD’s sub-specialists to brief them with

the Environmental Management Plan (EMP) for each NSD, so that they can help with the

implementation, monitoring and reporting of the EMP on each NSD site. List of attendance,

invitation letter and pictures of these events can be seen in Appendix 7.

46. In mid-September 2018, the NMC and RMC Safeguard Team joined the NMC-RMC

mid-term review workshop in Semarang to discuss the progress of the projects with all CCs

and CAs. At this event, the safeguard team presented important points as a reminder of

safeguard aspects to be implemented, monitored, reviewed and reported. The safeguard

team also took advantage of this gathering to collect all supporting documents needed for

safeguard reports in 2018. List of attendance, invitation letter and pictures of this workshop

can be seen in Appendix 8.

47. On November 27-30, 2018, the Safeguard Team joined the NMC-RMC year-end

review workshop in Jakarta to evaluate the results of the project with all CCs and CAs, and to

collect all supporting documents needed for safeguard reports in 2018. Later, the Safeguard

Team also joined the year-end National Coordinating Meeting in Yogyakarta on December 18-

21, 2018 to finalize the annual technical and financial reports from each sub-project

conducted at the neighborhood level. List of attendance, invitation letter and pictures can be

seen in Appendix 9 and 10.


29

CHAPTER 8. KEY ISSUES AND CORRECTIVE ACTIONS

48. As the NUSP-2 is a community based driven project, the challenge in implementing

safeguard aspects was that not all community members, particularly the construction workers,

had proper knowledge in implementing the mitigation measures. To address this issue, the

NMC and RMC (particularly CCs and CAs) carried out close monitoring and assistance to the

community in 2018. As the result, most of these measures had been done, and the CIOs were

able to formulate safeguard monitoring reports for each neighborhood, although some of

these reports lacking quality and necessary supporting documents. The CIO’s reports have been submitted to the RMC and NMC and used as the reference in formulating this 2018

AEMR.

49. The corrective actions on the gaps of EMP implementation identified in the 2017

AEMR have been followed up in 2018, and reported in Table 5.

Table 5. Key Issues and the Corrective Actions

No Key Issues / Gaps Corrective Actions PIC & Schedule Status/Progress

up to Dec 2018

1 Lacking documentation

(e.g. minutes of meeting)

on the monitoring and

evaluation of

environmental safeguards

implementation at the

Executing Agency.

Evaluate the

environmental

safeguards

implementation on a

regular basis and

document the results of

this implementation.

PIC: DGHS/NPMU

Schedule: Evaluation

to be conducted

periodically

(monthly).

Completed - The EA

(DGHS) conducted several

ad-hoc and monthly

meetings to monitor and

evaluate the safeguards

implementation. Moreover,

reviews on safeguard

implementations were also

done through workshops

and coordination meetings

(evidences of these events

are included in Appendix 7,

8, 9, 10, and 11).

2 The LCOs (Local Public

Work office) have not

monitored the

implementation of

Environmental

Management Plan (EMP)

associated with the

community and complex

civil work contracts.

PMU (assisted by NMC)

should conduct an

empowering or capacity

building event for the

LCOs to remind them

about this responsibility

PIC: LCO at

respective local

Public Work offices.

Schedule: During

site visits, regional

workshop or other

ad-hoc events in Q4

of 2018 or Q1 of

2019:

Completed – The PMU

empowered the LCOs during

Mid-Term Review Workshop

in Semarang in September

2018 (see Appendix 8). The

PMU also required the LCOs

to carry out field checking

(including evaluation on the

implementation of EMP)

prior to processing the 2nd

term of payment. Evidence

of this activity can be seen in

Appendix 12.

3 The Local Environmental

Agencies (DLH) have not

yet conducted random

checking during


completion to inspect

environmental procedures

and impacts.

The DLHs should

undertake random

checking during


completion of the

construction works.

PIC: DLHs

Schedule:

During site visits and

ad-hoc events in Q4

of 2018 and Q1 of

2019

Partially achieved - Some

DLHs did this but no

recorded documents

reported. All mitigation

measures and the

monitoring process were

carried out intensively by the

NUSP-2’s consultants along with local governments,

including the DLHs.


30


up to Dec 2018

4 There is no record or

documentation of the O&M

mechanism formula.

The CIO/BKM assisted

by CC and CA should

make the record or

documentation of the

O&M mechanism

formula.

PIC:

• BKM/CIO assisted

by CA/CC for

community

contracts.

• City/District Satker

for complex civil

works and for

NSDs.

Schedule:

• Q4 of 2018 for

community

contracts and

complex civil

works.

• Q4 of 2018 for

Kendari and

Palopo NSD.

• Q1 of 2019 for

Bima and Kapuas

NSD.

Partially achieved - For the

community contracts and

complex civil works, these

had been incorporated into

integral part of the CAP. The

example of O&M mechanism

can be seen in Appendix

13.

For the NSD, the O&M

mechanism has been

formulated in the Major’s Decree on NSD’s Management Board of

Palopo (see Appendix 14),

whereas that for Kendari

NSD is being processed.

5 There is no environmental

safeguard monitoring

report from the RMC to be

incorporated to NMC

annual monitoring report.

The RMC Safeguard

specialists and the CCs

in coordination with City

Satker and LCO should

prepare regular

environmental

monitoring reports

including any

complaints raised

before, during and after

implementation of

construction works.

PIC:

RMC Safeguard

Specialists, CCs in

coordination with

City Satker

Schedule:

Q4 of 2018 and Q1

of 2019

Completed - Each RMC

Safeguard specialist has

submitted four quarterly

progress reports on

safeguard activities within

2018 to the NMC. The

example of the mentioned

report is included in

Appendix 15.

6 Incomplete SPPL, UKL-

UPL and Environmental

Permit for community

contracts in Palembang

City, Tanjung Balai City,

Sukabumi City,

Banjarmasin City and

Kendari City

The RMC Safeguard



Satker should recheck

the process of and

obtain the incomplete

SPPL and UKL-UPL

documents.

PIC: RMC Safeguard

Specialists, related

CCs in coordination

with respective City

Satker of

Palembang, Tanjung

Balai, Sukabumi,

Banjarmasin and

Kendari.

Schedule:

Q4 of 2018

Completed - SPPL, UKL-

UPL & Environmental Permit

for the mentioned

community contracts have

been completed. An

example of SPPL of Tanjung

Balai is included in

Appendix 16.

7 Incomplete SPPL, UKL-


Permit for complex civil

work packages in

Bengkulu City and Bone

City

The RMC Safeguard



Satker and LCO should

recheck the process of

and obtain the

incomplete SPPL, UKL-


Permit documents.

PIC:

RMC Safeguard

Specialists, related

CCs in coordination

with respective City

Satker of Bengkulu

and Bone.

Schedule:

Q4 of 2018

Completed - SPPL, UKL-

UPL & Environmental Permit

for the mentioned

community contracts have

been completed. Examples

of SPPLs and Environmental

Permit of Bone are included

in Appendix 17.


31


up to Dec 2018

8 Twenty four (24) SPPL of

community contracts and

one of complex civil work

in Semarang City are still

in the registration process

due to bureaucracy

obstacles.

The City Satker

acknowledged all

formulated SPPLs and

gave recommendation

for these SPPLs as the

basis for the mitigation

measures, so that the

construction works can

keep proceeding even

though without

recommendation from

the DLH. Thus, the City

Satker took the

responsibility to make

sure that mitigation

measures were

implemented and

monitored and the

construction works were

on schedule.

City Satker

Schedule:

Q1-2019

Partially achieved - As this

online registration process

takes a lot of requirements

and unpredicted long time,

the construction works keep

proceeding with

recommendation from the

City Satker. All construction

works of community

contracts was completed

now. Only one complex civil

work in Tambak Rejo has

been continuing through

multi-years contract and will

be reported in the next

report.


32

CHAPTER 9. CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

50. Conclusions. In 2018, there were a total of 228 subprojects of NUSP-2 conducted in

99 neighborhoods (kelurahan) located in a total 20 cities and districts throughout Indonesia.

These include 215 community contracts (skala lingkungan), 9 complex civil work contracts,

and four 4 New Site Development packages in Kendari, Palopo, Bima cities and Kapuas

District.

51. Based on Environmental Assessment and Review Framework (EARF), the project

implementation is required to comply with several requirements. Paragraph 26 and 28 of the

EARF mentioned the preparation of SPPL and IEE documents for each subproject. There

were 224 subprojects (125 packages of community contract and 9 packages of complex civil

work) that required the SPPL documents; of which 189 SPPLs for community contracts and 8

SPPLs for complex civil works have been registered and accepted by respective

Environmental Agency or related agency. 25 SPPL in Semarang city have not been published

yet. As for the NSD, four IEEs (for Kendari, Palopo, Bima and Kapuas District) have been

formulated and approved by ADB.

52. In addressing the Environmental Assessment and Review Framework requirement, the

NUSP-2 has adopted the screening list mechanism using series of checklist forms (SG 1 – 5)

from which potential impacts of the project/sub-project are identified and mitigated, and these

measures are incorporated into the SPPL, UKL-UPL, and IEE. The monitoring of

environmental mitigation was conducted in a participatory and consultative manner, involving

the related stakeholders particularly the community. Monitoring of environmental mitigation on

the projects/sub-projects implemented has generally improved over the previous year with

regards to the capacity building conducted, completeness and quality of supporting

documents provided for this 2018 monitoring report.

53. As for the responsibility of the agencies and community organizations presented in

Table 3, the only partially complied status is about the proposals, contracts, and checklists

which were not disclosed on the neighborhood boards. However, the process of preparing

these checklists, proposals and contracts were conducted in a participatory and transparent

manner through series of neighborhood meetings.

54. The NUSP-2 is a community-driven development project involving extensive and

transparent neighborhood meetings (Musyawarah Kelurahan) in Q1 of 2018. These meetings

raise community understanding towards the project and gather community’s proposal and agreement on the priority of infrastructure constructed in 2018, as well as on the timeline and

workloads. Subsequently, the construction of infrastructure started in Q2 of 2018. As the

result of this approach, the NUSP-2 did not receive complaints or grievances for the reporting

period of 2018.

55. Some corrective actions for pending or key issues identified in 2017 and 2018 in Table

5 were completed and some are still partially achieved. Those which were completed are:

providing documentation on the monitoring and evaluation of environmental safeguard


33

implementation by the Executing Agencies; empowering the LCOs for monitoring the

implementation of EMP associated with the community contract and complex civil works; each

RMC Safeguard Specialist submitted four QPRs on safeguard activities in 2018 to the NMC;

and providing completed missing SPPLs of community contracts from six cities (Palembang,

Tanjung Balai, Sukabumi, Banjarmasin and Kendari), and of complex civil works from two

cities (Bengkulu and Bone). Those corrective actions which are still partially achieved will be

included in the recommendation below

56. As there are still few challenges to complete the good quality data or to support with

documents required to comply with the EARF, we still need to put more attention on this

discrepancy. It seems that capacity building on safeguard compliance activities through direct

practice still need to be conducted until the end of the project to ensure the sustainability of

the project.

57. Recommendations. Some key issues that need corrective and further actions in 2019

are:

i. The Local Environmental Agencies needs to conduct random checking during and

after completion of the construction works in 2019;

ii. Monitoring the formulation of O&M mechanism for Kendari, Bima and Kapuas NSD

in the Q1 2019;

iii. Monitoring the continuation of multi-years contract in Tambak Rejo neighborhood,

Semarang City (to be reported in the next report);

iv. Monitoring the implementation of safeguard screenings in all planning and

implementation of infrastructure works in 2019; and

v. Monitoring the Environmental Management Plan of IEEs for Bima and Kapuas NSDs

to be reported in separate reports.


34

APPENDICES


35

Appendix 1. List of SPPL of Community Contracts

No City / District (Province)

Number of

Neighborhoods

Involved

List of SPPL* for Community Contracts

1 Tanjung Balai city, North

Sumatera

5 All SPPLs are received by DLH on 9 April 2018 (First

Cycle)

All SPPLs are received by DLH on 21 August 2018

(Second and Third Cycle)

2 Tanjung Jabung Barat

District (Jambi Province)


and Second Cycle)

3 Palembang City (South

Sumatra Province)

10 All SPPLs are received by DLH on July and August

(First, Second and Third Cycle)

4 Bengkulu City (Bengkulu

Province)

6 All SPPLs are received by DLH on June (First, Second

and Third Cycle)

5 Bandar Lampung City

(Lampung Province)

10 The SPPL recommendation was issued by DLH on 11

July 2018 (First, Second and Third Cycle)

7 Batam City (Riau Islands

Province)

5 All SPPLs are received by DLH on 20 August 2018


7 Sukabumi City (West

Java Province)

4 All SPPLs are received by DLH (First, Second and

Third Cycle)

8 Semarang City (Central

Java Province)

11 All SPPLs have been provided but not yet gotten

recommendation, as the online process application

takes long time (First, Second and Third Cycle)

9 Pekalongan City (Central

Java Province)

6 All SPPLs are received by DLH (First, Second and

Third Cycle)

10 Pasuruan City (East Java

Province)

5 All SPPLs are received by DLH on 10 April 2018 (First,

Second and Third Cycle)

11 Serang City (Banten

Province)

4 The SPPL recommendation was issued by Investment

and Integrated Services Office on 30 July 2018 (First,


12 Kapuas District (Central


3 All SPPLs are received by DLH (First and Second

Cycle)

13 Palangkaraya City

(Central Kalimantan

Province)

4 All SPPLs are accepted by DLH on 18 May 2018


14 Banjarmasin City (South


2 All SPPLs are received by DLH on 23 March 2018


15 Bima City (West Nusa

Tenggara Province)

3 All SPPLs are received by DLH on 18 May 2018 (First

and Second Cycle)

17 Bone City (South

Sulawesi Province)

2 All SPPLs are received by DLH on 18 April 2018 (First,


17 Makassar City (South

Sulawesi Province)

5 All SPPLs are received by DLH on 18 May 2018 (First,


18 Palopo City (South

Sulawesi Province)


and Second Cycle)

19 Kendari City (South East

Sulawesi)


and Second Cycle)

20 Ambon City (Maluku

Province)


Cycle)

Note: *SPPL – statement letter to conduct environmental management and monitoring.


36

Appendix 2. Evidences of Mitigation Measures in Semarang and Makassar

2.a. Materials covered with tarpaulin in Kelurahan Batua, Makassar

2.b. Road signage in Kelurahan Tambakrejo, Semarang

2.c. Stockpiling the construction materials properly on the road side in Kelurahan

Tambakrejo, Semarang


37

2.d. Construction workers wearing PPE in Kelurahan Batua, Makassar


38

Appendix 3. List of SPPL of Complex Civil Work Contracts

No City/District (Province) Construction and/or Installation

Conducted SPPL for Complex Civil Work

1 Kelurahan Kabil, Batam City

(Riau Islands Province).

Paved and concrete road and

drainage channel.

SPPL receipt No.

0021/DLH/SPPL/M/VIII/2018 and

0022/DLH/SPPL/M/VIII/2018 (dated

20 August 2018) issued by the DLH

of Batam City

2 Kelurahan Sawah Lebar,

Bengkulu City (Bengkulu

Province)

Drainage channel and asphalt road. SPPL receipt No.

660.1/209/RK.SPPL/DLH-II/X/2018

(dated 12 October 2018) issued by

the DLH of Bengkulu City

3 Kelurahan Kandang Panjang,

Pekalongan City (Central Java

Province)

Asphalt road, green open space,

drainage channel and installation of

box culvert.

SPPL is received by DLH of

Pekalongan City on 10 September

2018.

4 Kelurahan Tambakrejo,

Semarang City (Central Java

Province)

Drainage channel, solid waste

collection area and road.

SPPLs have been provided but not

yet gotten recommendation, as the

online process application takes

long time

5 Kelurahan Selat Dalam,

Kapuas District (Central


Retaining wall, green open space,

concrete bridge, construction of

archway and street lighting

SPPL receipt No.

661/098/Reg./DLH/IX/2018 (dated

17 September 2018) issued by the

DLH of Kapuas District

6 Kelurahan Batua, Makassar

City (South Sulawesi Province)

Paved road and drainage channel. SPPL receipt No. 64 (dated 18 May

2018) issued by the DLH of

Makassar City

7 Kelurahan Borong, Makassar

City (South Sulawesi Province)

Paved road and drainage channel. SPPL receipt No. 65 (dated 18 May

2018) issued by the DLH of

Makassar City

8 Kelurahan Batu Merah, Ambon

City (Maluku Province)

Installation of clean water pipelines,

drainage channel and concrete

road.

SPPL receipt No. 660/244a/DLHP,

660/244b/DLHP, 660/244c/DLHP

issued by the DLH of Ambon City

9 Kelurahan Dara and Jatibaru,

Bima City (West Nusa

Tenggara Province)

Asphalt road and drainage channel. SPPL receipt No.

800/21/DLH/IX/2018 (dated 7

September 2018) issued by the

DLH of Bima City

Note: DLH – Local Environmental Agency (Dinas Lingkungan Hidup)


39

Appendix 4. Environmental Screening and Assessment for Batua Community Work

Package, Makassar City

4a. The Use of Form SG-1 to Screen Out Negative Investment List Activities for

Complex Civil Work Packages in Batua, Makassar City


40

17


41

4.b. The Use of Form SG-2 to Identify Social and Environment Impacts


42

17


43

4.c. The Use of Form SG-3 to Identify Potential Negative Impact and Mitigation

Measures for Road and Drainage

17 Juli 2018


44

4.d. The Use of Form SG-5 for Monitoring at 0%, 50% and 100% Progress


45

17


46

4.e. Pictures of Safeguard Monitoring on 0%; 50% and 100% of Road and Drainage

Infrastructure in Batua Neighborhood, Makassar City


47

4.f. SPPL Sample of Community Contract in Bram Itam Kiri Neighborhood, Tanjung

Jabung Barat District


48

4.g. SPPL Sample of Complex Civil Work Contract in Selat Dalam Neighborhood,

Kapuas District


49


50

Appendix 5. Evidences of Public Consultation for Community Contract in Batua

Neighborhood, Makassar City

5.a. Pictures of Public Consultation


51

5.b. Minutes of Meeting of Public Consultation


52


53

5.c. List of Attendance of Public Consultation


54

Appendix 6. Evidences of Public Consultation for Complex Civil Work in Tambakrejo

Neighborhood, Semarang City

6.a. Pictures of Public Consultation


55

6.b. Minutes of Meeting of Public Consultation


56

6.c. List of Attendance of Public Consultation


57

Appendix 7. Evidences of Training of Trainers Workshop

7.a. Invitation Letter


58

7.b. Rundown of Training of Trainers Workshop


59


60


61

7.c. Pictures of Training of Trainers Workshop


62

7.d. List of Attendance of Training of Trainers Workshop


63


64

Appendix 8. Evidences of Mid-Term Review Workshop



65

8.b. Rundown of Mid-Term Review Workshop


66

8.c. Pictures of Mid-Term Review Workshop


67

8.d. List of Attendance of Mid-Term Review Workshop


68


69


70

Appendix 9. Evidences of the Year-End Review Workshop



71

9.b. Rundown of the Year-End Review Workshop


72

9.c. Pictures of the Year-End Review Workshop


73

9.d. List of Attendance of the Year-End Review Workshop


74


75


76

Appendix 10. Evidences of the Year-End National Coordinating Meeting



77

10.b. Rundown of the Year-End National Coordinating Meeting


78

10.c. Pictures of the Year-End National Coordinating Meeting


79

10.d. List of Attendance of the Year-End National Coordinating Meeting


80


81


82

Appendix 11. Picture of Ad-Hoc Meeting Between DGHS and NMC at NMC Office,

Jakarta (June 2018)


83

Appendix 12. Picture of field checking by PPK of Semarang City in Mangkang Wetan

Neighborhood (27 August 2018)


84

Appendix 13. An Example of O&M Mechanism in Bontorannu, Makassar


85


86

Appendix 14. O&M Mechanism has been formulated in the Major’s Decree on NSD’s Management Board of Palopo


87


88


89


90

Appendix 15. An Example of RMC Safeguard Specialist’s QPR


91


92

Appendix 16. An Example of Approved Community Contract SPPL of 2017 from Beting

Kuala Kapias Neighborhood, Tanjung Balai City


93


94


95

Appendix 17. An Example of Approved Complex Civil Works SPPL of 2017 and its

related Environmental Permit Act from Bone District

17.a. SPPL for Bone


96


97

17.b. Environmental Permit Act


98


99


100