1
It’s just over a year since the Perth-based group ERG sold its telecoms and manufacturing businesses in order to concentrate on supplying large-scale smart card systems. An early indication of the company’s new, single-minded approach was the purchase in February 2001 of Motorola’s stake in the ERG Motorola alliance for A$46 million. At A$ 299 million, revenues for the 2001 financial year were down by 28% against the previous year; the company had to concentrate on getting the mass transit automated fare collection (AFC) projects already in hand — in Rome, San Francisco and Singapore — up and running. All three projects should be using AFC systems provided by ERG in early 2002. Next step is to put the finishing touches to AFC systems in Sydney and in Seattle; meanwhile work is beginning on new AFC projects in Bordeaux, Gothenburg and the Rhein-Ruhr region of Germany. And, as evidenced by the company’s successful Seattle tender, ERG has not been impeded in the US market by severing its formal links with Motorola. Strategy ERG is one of those rare companies where the senior executives spell out to investors in straight- forward language what they are trying to achieve. At the AGM investors were told that the long- term strategy is to build up a level of recurring (‘annuity’) revenue and to build asset values. This can be achieved through investments in consortia and other companies or through the structures developed to manage the out-sourced smart card fare collection systems, such as on the west coast of North America. “By developing recurring revenue streams,” said chief financial officer Michael Slater, “the actual asset or vehicle that creates that income will in turn have a considerably enhanced value…” Chief executive officer Peter Fogarty then spelt out the group’s objectives. The aim, he said, is to win contracts in as many cities around the world as possible for integrated transit-based smart card projects. Once the contract has been won, ERG should then be in a position to exploit the card base and the infrastructure that it has put in place. Portfolio ERG can now claim to have a portfolio of smart card technologies and products that is only rivalled by those of SchlumbergerSema and Gemplus. This portfolio consists of the MASS (contactless) transit technology (previously co-licensed with Moto- rola); Proton’s (contact) card payment and identity technology; and the Venus Platform just acquired from Motorola (This Issue, p. 1) — Venus which is the only dual interface (contact/contactless) smart card that supports ERG’s transit application and the Proton technology. As part of the acquisition of Proton, ERG has negotiated long-term contracts with the Belgian banks (Banksys), the Dutch banks (Interpay) and American Express. These contracts should underpin Proton’s performance over the next 5-7 years. And the other benefit of the deal with Proton (whose business has been rooted in supplying the financial sector) is that the Proton has relationships with some 500 banks and financial organizations, participates in the major smart standards bodies and immediately produces recurring revenue. Profits However, the path ahead is not entirely smooth. Analysts like to see profits (from the sort of deals that ERG has been making) flowing in at a faster rate than ERG can deliver. “The reality is that the investments are long- term and take 2-4 years to build,” Fogarty told investors. “We invest considerable sums in the infrastructure and that uses cash – raised specifically for this purpose. “At an appropriate point in time we expect to be able todemonstrate the true value of the infra- structure we have built. That infrastructure consists of core hardware and software and sophis- ticated communication networks. The operating contracts we have [will] then generate long-term recurring revenue, where revenue increases over their life and costs proportionately reduce. “The returns over the life of the contract are good and improve as other applications or systems are added. It is similar to investing in road toll infrastructure – where the investment is up-front and the returns are over many years, weighted to the back end. “We remain committed to the transit sector and see it as the core area of growth for our business.” Revenues So for the immediate future, revenue and profit from project sales will continue to be pulled down by the costs of establishing the operating companies. Peter Fogarty estimates that it will take at least another 12-24 months before full revenue is being earned from Gothenburg, Manchester, Rome and San Francisco. The contracts being negotiated in Sydney and Seattle are not expected to generate full revenue for at least a further 2-3 years. But by 2004 he expects the level of recurring revenue to exceed $300 million, which is greater than the total AFC and card revenue in 2001. “In all of these projects we are seeing increasing demand to add additional applications, such as parking, tolling and retail [point-of-sale purchasing]. This is the case in Australia, Rome, San Francisco and the United Kingdom.” “Our objective is to be the leading provider of technology to the smart card sector globally and by doing so to produce superior returns to shareholders.” Contact Shannon Yujnovich at ERG Group, Tel: +61 8 9273 1210, email: www.erggroup.com 12 Card Technology Today January 2002 ERG’s plan for success Gemplus and SchlumbergerSema make more smart cards than anyone else. But ERG from Western Australia is bidding to take a place alongside the two European leaders as one of the world’s major providers of smart card-based systems. feature Eighteen months at ERG Terminated alliance with Motorola. Acquired Proton World for $100 million plus. Acquired American Express, Banksys, Interpay and Visa International as shareholders. Acquired rights to Motorola Venus technology. Entered agreements for licensing core technology in Germany and the Netherlands. Won tenders in Bordeaux, Gothenburg, Oslo, Seattle and Sydney with a total estimated value of over $700 million. Completed alliances with Interpay (the Dutch Banks), NRMA and Transurban. Delivered Rome, San Francisco and Singapore projects. Acquired Sema’s interest in PCL, the UK multi-modal transit operation.

ERG’s plan for success

  • View
    217

  • Download
    2

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: ERG’s plan for success

It’s just over a year since the Perth-based groupERG sold its telecoms and manufacturingbusinesses in order to concentrate on supplyinglarge-scale smart card systems. An earlyindication of the company’s new, single-mindedapproach was the purchase in February 2001 ofMotorola’s stake in the ERG Motorola alliancefor A$46 million.

At A$ 299 million, revenues for the 2001financial year were down by 28% against theprevious year; the company had to concentrateon getting the mass transit automated farecollection (AFC) projects already in hand — inRome, San Francisco and Singapore — up andrunning. All three projects should be using AFCsystems provided by ERG in early 2002.

Next step is to put the finishing touches toAFC systems in Sydney and in Seattle;meanwhile work is beginning on new AFCprojects in Bordeaux, Gothenburg and theRhein-Ruhr region of Germany.

And, as evidenced by the company’s successfulSeattle tender, ERG has not been impeded in the

US market by severing its formal links withMotorola.

StrategyERG is one of those rare companies where thesenior executives spell out to investors in straight-forward language what they are trying to achieve.At the AGM investors were told that the long-term strategy is to build up a level of recurring(‘annuity’) revenue and to build asset values.This can be achieved through investments inconsortia and other companies or through thestructures developed to manage the out-sourcedsmart card fare collection systems, such as on thewest coast of North America.

“By developing recurring revenue streams,” saidchief financial officer Michael Slater, “the actualasset or vehicle that creates that income will inturn have a considerably enhanced value…”

Chief executive officer Peter Fogarty thenspelt out the group’s objectives. The aim, he said,is to win contracts in as many cities around theworld as possible for integrated transit-basedsmart card projects. Once the contract has beenwon, ERG should then be in a position toexploit the card base and the infrastructure thatit has put in place.

PortfolioERG can now claim to have a portfolio of smartcard technologies and products that is only rivalledby those of SchlumbergerSema and Gemplus. Thisportfolio consists of the MASS (contactless) transittechnology (previously co-licensed with Moto-rola); Proton’s (contact) card payment and identitytechnology; and the Venus Platform just acquiredfrom Motorola (This Issue, p. 1) — Venus which isthe only dual interface (contact/contactless) smartcard that supports ERG’s transit application andthe Proton technology.

As part of the acquisition of Proton, ERG hasnegotiated long-term contracts with the Belgianbanks (Banksys), the Dutch banks (Interpay)and American Express. These contracts shouldunderpin Proton’s performance over the next 5-7

years. And the other benefit of the deal withProton (whose business has been rooted insupplying the financial sector) is that the Protonhas relationships with some 500 banks andfinancial organizations, participates in the majorsmart standards bodies and immediatelyproduces recurring revenue.

ProfitsHowever, the path ahead is not entirely smooth.Analysts like to see profits (from the sort of dealsthat ERG has been making) flowing in at a fasterrate than ERG can deliver.

“The reality is that the investments are long-term and take 2-4 years to build,” Fogarty toldinvestors. “We invest considerable sums in theinfrastructure and that uses cash – raisedspecifically for this purpose.

“At an appropriate point in time we expect to beable todemonstrate the true value of the infra-structure we have built. That infrastructureconsists of core hardware and software and sophis-ticated communication networks. The operatingcontracts we have [will] then generate long-termrecurring revenue, where revenue increases overtheir life and costs proportionately reduce.

“The returns over the life of the contract aregood and improve as other applications orsystems are added. It is similar to investing inroad toll infrastructure – where the investmentis up-front and the returns are over many years,weighted to the back end.

“We remain committed to the transit sector andsee it as the core area of growth for our business.”

RevenuesSo for the immediate future, revenue and profitfrom project sales will continue to be pulleddown by the costs of establishing the operatingcompanies.

Peter Fogarty estimates that it will take at leastanother 12-24 months before full revenue is beingearned from Gothenburg, Manchester, Rome andSan Francisco. The contracts being negotiated inSydney and Seattle are not expected to generatefull revenue for at least a further 2-3 years.

But by 2004 he expects the level of recurringrevenue to exceed $300 million, which is greaterthan the total AFC and card revenue in 2001.

“In all of these projects we are seeing increasingdemand to add additional applications, such asparking, tolling and retail [point-of-salepurchasing]. This is the case in Australia, Rome,San Francisco and the United Kingdom.”

“Our objective is to be the leading provider oftechnology to the smart card sector globally andby doing so to produce superior returns toshareholders.”

Contact Shannon Yujnovich at ERG Group, Tel: +61 89273 1210, email: www.erggroup.com

12Card Technology Today January 2002

ERG’s plan forsuccessGemplus and SchlumbergerSema make more smart cards than anyone else. ButERG from Western Australia is bidding to take a place alongside the twoEuropean leaders as one of the world’s major providers of smart card-basedsystems.

feature

Eighteen months at ERG

• Terminated alliance with Motorola.

• Acquired Proton World for $100 million plus.

• Acquired American Express, Banksys,Interpay and Visa International asshareholders.

• Acquired rights to Motorola Venustechnology.

• Entered agreements for licensing coretechnology in Germany and the Netherlands.

• Won tenders in Bordeaux, Gothenburg, Oslo,Seattle and Sydney with a total estimatedvalue of over $700 million.

• Completed alliances with Interpay (the DutchBanks), NRMA and Transurban.

• Delivered Rome, San Francisco and Singaporeprojects.

• Acquired Sema’s interest in PCL, the UKmulti-modal transit operation.

CTT January 2002.qxd 12/20/01 11:10 AM Page 12