Upload
kelly-rogers
View
214
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Measured Progress ©2011
Guide to the Smarter Balanced IT ArchitectureConnecticut Assessment Forum
August 14, 2012
2012
• Smarter Balanced Update• IT Architecture Project Overview• Defining the Architecture – Period A• Governance and Implementation – Period B• Architecture Summary Report• Technical Standards for Interoperability• Q & A
Agenda
Measured Progress ©2011
Smarter Balanced Update
Measured Progress ©2011
IT Architecture Project Overview
2012
• The Approach: This is larger than any single company agenda; it requires an open and collaborative approach
• The Team: We have assembled a Collaborative with:o The thought leadership (industry, academia, industry
associations & individual contributors) to ensure the vision is grounded in assessment and education best practices
o The technical capability to deliver• The Process: Experienced and Agile; sustainability via a
community approach • The Goals: Open, Flexible, Standards Based, and
Componentized
Overview of Smarter Balanced Architecture Initiative
2012
Assessment Lifecycle
ContentDevelopment
Pre-TestAdministration
TestAdministration
Scoring
Reporting
Post-TestAdministration
• Content and data reviews• Test form construction• Field testing• Item banking & statistics• Content exchange /
interoperability
•Planning & blueprinting•Item types•Content development & universal design•Learning standard alignment
• Administration planning & scheduling
• Registration, assignment,• Form sampling• Online infrastructure
readiness assessment• Pre-session planning
(paper / online) & setup• Alternate form
assignment
• Test form delivery• Platform (paper, online,
mobile) presentation• Item content & tools• Adaptive testing• Response collection• Proctoring controls• Form content security• Desktop security• Accessibility• Testing anomalies
• Computer scoring• Professional scoring• Algorithmic (AI) scoring• Portfolio scoring• Sub test / strand scoring
• Attemptedness• Performance levels• Scaling / norming• Growth scores• Range finding
• Individual reporting• Diagnostic reporting• Informing & personalizing
instruction• Performance on
standards• Dashboard / summary
reporting• Aggregation / disaggregation• Exchanging results / data
• Psychometric analysis• Equating• Score tables - scaling, norming• Performance levels / cut
scores• Field test analysis• Aligning results with
curriculum / instruction• Program and teacher
effectiveness
2012
Project Approach
Goals and Capabilities
Drivers and Tradeoffs
Scenario Mapping
Detailed Architecture Reqs
Conceptual Models
Logical Models
Consolidate Library
Validate Architecture
Define Arch Review Process
Execute Architecture Governance Model
User Personas
Analysis Envisioning and Decomposition
Validation and Documentation
Governance and OSS Strategy
Execution
Scenarios
Define OSS Mgmt Process
0-3 Weeks 3-7 Weeks 7-10 Weeks 10-12 Weeks Jan 2012 -> Ongoing
Assist Vendor Selection and Oversight
Monitor OSS Development Activities
Coordinate QA Activities
Technology Models
2012
Team
Measured Progress ©2011
Defining the Architecture – Period A
2012
Process
• Workshops
• Showcases
• Reviews
• Final Deliverables
Measured Progress ©2011
Governance and Implementation– Period B
2012
Governance Structure
• Executive Committee
• Architecture Review Board
• Architecture Core Team
• Extended Architecture Team
2012
Governance Processes
Measured Progress ©2011
Architecture Summary Report
2012
Architecture Overview
Architecture Summary Report available at:http://www.smarterbalanced.org/smarter-balanced-assessments/technology/
Title: Assessment System Architecture and Technology Phase 1 Report
Measured Progress ©2011
Technical Standards for Interoperability
2012
Standards Groups
• CEDS
• IMS Global
• SIFA
• AIF
2012
Assessment Interoperability Framework
Measured Progress ©2011
Question and Answer