Panel 1A Jaana REMES

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • 7/31/2019 Panel 1A Jaana REMES

    1/14

    LAN-ZZV476-20060302-17254-ZZV

    CONFIDENTIAL

    Document

    Date

    This report is solely for the use of client personnel. No part of it may becirculated, quoted, or reproduced for distribution outside the client

    organization without prior written approval from McKinsey & Company.This material was used by McKinsey & Company during an oralpresentation; it is not a complete record of the discussion.

    Working DraftLast Modified 3/23/2006 3:49:38 PM Pacific Standard Time

    Printed 3/22/2006 11:04:52 AM Pacific Standard Time

    McKinsey Global Institute

    CONFIDENTIAL

    FDI and TechnologyAbsorption

    Jaana RemesMcKinsey Global Institute

    This report is solely for the use of client personnel. No part of it may becirculated, quoted, or reproduced for distribution outside the clientorganisation without prior written approval from McKinsey & Company.

    This material was used by McKinsey & Company during an oralpresentation; it is not a complete record of the discussion.

  • 7/31/2019 Panel 1A Jaana REMES

    2/14

    LAN-ZZV476-20060302-17254-ZZV

    2

    Unit of measure

    * Footnote

    Source: Source

    WorkingDraft-LastM

    odified3/23/2

    0063:4

    9:38PM

    Printed3/22/200611:0

    4:52AM

    * Based on estimates from OECD 2000 segmentation of total FDI (developed and developing countries);excludes resource seeking FDI (e.g., for petroleum)Source: OECD; McKinsey Global Institute; WDI

    MULTINATIONAL COMPANY INVESTMENT HAS INCREASED

    RAPIDLY IN THE PAST DECADE

    Inflows

    $ Billions

    Main drivers Liberalization and

    privatization

    Decline in transport andcommunication cost

    300

    250

    200

    150

    100

    50

    0

    1980 1982 1984 1986 1988 1990 1992 1994 1996 1998 2000 2002

  • 7/31/2019 Panel 1A Jaana REMES

    3/14

    LAN-ZZV476-20060302-17254-ZZV

    3

    Unit of measure

    * Footnote

    Source: Source

    WorkingDraft-LastM

    odified3/23/2

    0063:4

    9:38PM

    Printed3/22/200611:0

    4:52AM

    Auto

    Consumer

    electronics

    Food retail

    Retail banking

    IT/BPO*

    China India Mexico Brazil

    A BROAD FACT BASE PROVIDES RANGE OF INSIGHTS

    * Information technology/business process offshoring (IT/BPO); completed individual case studies for IT and BPO,thus bringing the total studies completed to 14

  • 7/31/2019 Panel 1A Jaana REMES

    4/14

    LAN-ZZV476-20060302-17254-ZZV

    4

    Unit of measure

    * Footnote

    Source: Source

    WorkingDraft-LastM

    odified3/23/2

    0063:4

    9:38PM

    Printed3/22/200611:0

    4:52AM

    MOST ECONOMIES CLEARLY BENEFIT FROM FOREIGN INVESTMENT

    * BPO** ITSource: McKinsey Global Institute

    Positiveor very

    positive

    impact in

    13 out of

    14 cases

    across

    sectors

    Verypositive

    Positive

    Neutral

    Negative

    Pure market-seeking Tariff-jumping Efficiency-seeking

    Motive for entry

    OverallFDI

    Impact

    *

    * *

  • 7/31/2019 Panel 1A Jaana REMES

    5/14

    LAN-ZZV476-20060302-17254-ZZV

    5

    Unit of measure

    * Footnote

    Source: Source

    WorkingDraft-LastM

    odified3/23/2

    0063:4

    9:38PM

    Printed3/22/200611:0

    4:52AM

    WE FOUND SOUND ECONOMIC FOUNDATION TO BE KEY, WHILE

    INVESTMENT POLICIES WERE INEFFECTIVE AND EVEN HARMFUL

    * TRIMs = trade-related investment measures

    Impact from FDI

    Economic foundations

    Macroeconomic stability

    Competition

    Enforcement Infrastructure

    Investment policies

    Incentives

    Import barriers

    TRIMs*

    LAN ZZV476 20060302 17254

  • 7/31/2019 Panel 1A Jaana REMES

    6/14

    LAN-ZZV476-20060302-17254-ZZV

    6

    Unit of measure

    * Footnote

    Source: Source

    WorkingDraft-LastM

    odified3/23/20063:4

    9:38PM

    Printed3/22/200611:0

    4:52AM

    Increased FDI impact

    FOUNDATIONS FOR ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT ARE CRITICAL

    Macroeconomicstability

    Precondition for MNC investmentand FDI impact

    Competitiveenvironment

    Competition most powerful factordriving FDI impact

    Legalenforcement

    Informality reduced FDI impactand sector performance

    Infrastructure Important enabling condition for

    FDI impact

    LAN ZZV476 20060302 17254

  • 7/31/2019 Panel 1A Jaana REMES

    7/14

    LAN-ZZV476-20060302-17254-ZZV

    7

    Unit of measure

    * Footnote

    Source: Source

    WorkingDraft-LastM

    odified3/23/20063:4

    9:38PM

    Printed3/22/200611:0

    4:52AM

    * Actual cars and employment (not adjusted)

    Source: MGI; McKinse Global Institute; team anal sis

    Labor productivityEquivalent cars per equivalent employee; indexed to 1992-93 (100)

    35684

    144

    38

    156

    100

    Productivityin 1992-93

    Productivityin 1999-2000

    Improve-ments atHM

    Exit ofPAL

    Indirect impact of FDI

    driven by competition

    Entry ofnewplayers

    Direct impact

    of FDI

    Less productivethan Maruti mainly

    due to lower scale

    and utilizationIncreased

    automation,

    innovations in

    OFT and supplier-

    related initiatives

    Improve-ments atMaruti

    Auto India

    IN INDIAN AUTO SECTOR, LARGEST FDI IMPACT CAME THROUGH

    INCREASED COMPETITION

    LAN ZZV476 20060302 17254

  • 7/31/2019 Panel 1A Jaana REMES

    8/14

    LAN-ZZV476-20060302-17254-ZZV

    8

    Unit of measure

    * Footnote

    Source: Source

    WorkingDraft-LastM

    odified3/23/20063:4

    9:38PM

    Printed3/22/200611:0

    4:52AM

    IN MEXICAN FOOD RETAIL, WALMART ENTRY LED OTHERS

    TO IMPROVE SUPPLY CHAIN EFFICIENCY

    * Share of total sales distributed through centers not updated

    Source: Annual reports

    20

    30

    75

    40

    28

    5

    85Wal-Mart*

    Comercial

    Mexicana

    Gigante

    Soriana

    Number of distributioncenters in 2001

    Share of total sales distributed

    through centers (2001 vs. 2005)Percent

    12

    4

    7

    6

    Regional player in

    more developed

    Northern Mexico

    ROUGHESTIMATES

    60

    58

    80

    Between 1996-2001,WalMart labor

    productivity grew by

    2% annually, while it

    declined by 2%

    annually in the rest of

    the modern sector

    LAN-ZZV476-20060302-17254-

  • 7/31/2019 Panel 1A Jaana REMES

    9/14

    LAN ZZV476 20060302 17254ZZV

    9

    Unit of measure

    * Footnote

    Source: Source

    WorkingDraft-LastM

    odified3/23/20063:4

    9:38PM

    Printed3/22/200611:0

    4:52AM

    IN BRAZILIAN FOOD RETAIL, PRODUCTIVITY INCREASES BUT PROFITS

    EVAPORATE WHEN AN INFORMAL RETAILER IS ACQUIRED BY A LARGE

    FORMAL RETAILER

    * Gross margin per employee hour

    Note: 1) See next page for more detail on causes for observed changes. 2) Margins based on netsalesSource: ABRAS; PNAD; store visits; interviews; McKinsey

    Despite a 32% increase

    in labor productivity* . . .Reals

    9.3

    12.2

    Pre Post

    32%

    Acquisition

    1,460Number ofemployees

    1,095

    Hours

    worked/year/

    employee

    2,328 2,328

    -25%

    . . . the net margin evaporatesPercent

    Pre Post

    4.9

    0.1

    -97%

    180

    163

    Gross sales

    R$ millions

    Net sales

    R$ millions

    Gross margin

    Percent19

    144

    125

    25

    -20%

    -24%

    29%

    0%

    Percent change

    LAN-ZZV476-20060302-17254-

  • 7/31/2019 Panel 1A Jaana REMES

    10/14

    LAN ZZV476 20060302 17254ZZV

    10

    Unit of measure

    * Footnote

    Source: Source

    WorkingDraft-LastM

    odified3/23/20

    063:4

    9:38PM

    Printed3/22/200611:0

    4:52AM

    INVESTMENT POLICIES HAVE NEGATIVE

    AND UNINTENDED CONSEQUENCES

    Incentives Fiscal and administrative cost Reduced productivity Race-to-the-bottom dynamics

    Import barriers Limited competition Protection of low productivity players

    TRIMS Protection of low productivity players Limited flexibility to compete

    Reduced FDI impact

    LAN-ZZV476-20060302-17254-

  • 7/31/2019 Panel 1A Jaana REMES

    11/14

    ZZV

    11

    Unit of measure

    * Footnote

    Source: Source

    WorkingDraft-LastM

    odified3/23/20

    063:4

    9:38PM

    Printed3/22/200611:0

    4:52AM

    INCENTIVES CONTRIBUTED TO CAPACITY BUILD-UP IN BRAZILS

    AUTO SECTOR

    Source: McKinsey Global Institute

    480

    380

    3,000

    1,800

    340

    1995capacity

    Investmentsbased onlong-termgrowthtrends

    2001capacity

    Additionalinvestments,due to greatexpectationsfor futuregrowth

    Collectively, theindustry builtmore than

    double whatwould havebeen expectedunder long-termtrends

    Furtherinvestments,due toincentives,Sweetners,and the raceto grow

    LAN-ZZV476-20060302-17254-

  • 7/31/2019 Panel 1A Jaana REMES

    12/14

    ZZV

    12

    Unit of measure

    * Footnote

    Source: Source

    WorkingDraft-LastM

    odified3/23/20

    063:4

    9:38PM

    Printed3/22/200611:0

    4:52AM

    HIGH TARIFFS LIMIT COMPETITION AND INCREASE PRICES

    IN INDIAS CONSUMER ELECTRONICS SECTOR

    Source: McKinsey CII report

    100

    30

    Average tariff/effective

    rate of protection on

    final goods

    PercentTV example Color TV price breakdown

    Index, international best practice = 100

    Interna-tionalbestpracticeprice

    Importduty onfinishedgood

    Importduty onrawmaterial

    Highermargin

    Inefficiencyin theprocess

    9-12

    8-108-13

    The protectionoffered by import

    duties on domestic

    players finds to

    mask inefficiency

    14

    39

    39

    30

    130Mobile*phones

    PCs

    Refriger-ators

    TVs

    Retailprice

    Includes raw

    material,

    conversion costs

    and margin

    LAN-ZZV476-20060302-17254-ZZV

  • 7/31/2019 Panel 1A Jaana REMES

    13/14

    ZZV

    13

    Unit of measure

    * Footnote

    Source: Source

    WorkingDraft-LastM

    odified3/23/20

    063:4

    9:38PM

    Printed3/22/200611:0

    4:52AM

    WE FOUND SOUND ECONOMIC FOUNDATION TO BE KEY, WHILE

    INVESTMENT POLICIES WERE INEFFECTIVE AND EVEN HARMFUL

    * TRIMs = trade-related investment measures

    Impact from FDI

    Economic foundations

    Macroeconomic stability

    Competition

    Enforcement

    Infrastructure

    Investment policies

    Incentives

    Import barriers

    TRIMs*

    LAN-ZZV476-20060302-17254-ZZV

  • 7/31/2019 Panel 1A Jaana REMES

    14/14

    ZZV

    14

    Unit of measure

    * Footnote

    Source: Source

    WorkingDraft-LastM

    odified3/23/20

    063:4

    9:38PM

    Printed3/22/200611:0

    4:52AM

    www.mckinsey.com/mgi