Upload
avel
View
60
Download
4
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
Peer Assistance and Review. Dr. Brenda Delany, Consulting Teacher Gail A. Epps, Instructional Specialist Department of Professional Growth Systems Montgomery County Public School s. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Citation preview
Peer Assistance and Review
Dr. Brenda Delany, Consulting TeacherGail A. Epps, Instructional SpecialistDepartment of Professional Growth
SystemsMontgomery County Public Schools
The best teachers are attracted by a school culture in which teacher evaluation is done with them not to them. Mark Simon, November 2012, Educational Leadership
3
Teacher Support System
Novice and Veteran TeachersNovice and Veteran Teachers
Administration Resource Teacher Staff Development Teacher
Mentors Consulting Teacher Peers
Team Leader Reading Specialist Math and Reading Coaches
Staff Development
Teacher
Peers
Consulting Teacher
Resource Teachers
and Team Leaders
Administration
Math and Reading Coaches
Mentors
Peer, Assistance and Review Program (PAR) Consulting Teachers (CT) Teacher Professional Growth System (TPGS) Montgomery County Education Association (MCEA) Montgomery County Association of Administrators and Principals
(MCAAP) P1 (probationary 1st year) P2 (probationary 2nd year) P3 (probationary 3rd year) WT (weighted) P1X (has prior teaching experience) T1 (tenured 1st year of PAR) T2 (tenured 2nd year of PAR) P1LH (1st year late hire in MCPS) P2LH (2nd year late hire in MCPS) REV (Review) OUT (Support outside of content area) Schools (# of schools that a consulting teacher will visit)
Acronyms
5
The PAR program is a cornerstone of the evaluation
process within the Professional Growth System. Originally proposed by MCEA, PAR represents a
qualitative shift in how the school system supports and evaluates teachers.
MCPS is one of only a handful of school districts nationally where master teachers share responsibility for ensuring that all teachers meet the school system's high performance standards.
The PAR program is run by a joint panel of representatives from MCEA and from the principals' association (MCAAP).
History of PAR in MCPS:Joint Partnership between MCPS and
MCEA
6
Superintendent & Administration and Teacher
Associations were aligned 1998 Development with several stakeholders
Research for Better Teaching, Inc. (RBT) 2000 – 2001 34 Schools 2001 – 2002 91 Schools 2002 – 2003 Full Implementation (200 schools)
History of PAR in MCPS:Joint Partnership between MCPS and
MCEA
7
1: Teachers are committed to students and their learning.2: Teachers know the subjects they teach and how to
teach those subjects to students.3: Teachers are responsible for establishing and managing
student learning in a positive learning environment.4: Teachers continually assess student progress,
analyze the results, and adapt instruction to improve student achievement.
5: Teachers are committed to continuous improvement and professional development.
6: Teachers exhibit a high degree of professionalism.
6 Standards
8
Keys: Collaboration – Association/Management
Implementation Team
P.A.R. Panel
Consulting Teachers
Peer Assistance and Review (P.A.R.)
9
16 members appointed by superintendent
8 teachers recommended by MCEA 8 administrators recommended by MCAAP Co-chairs are the vice-presidents of MCEA and MCAAP
Duties include: Review cases referred to PAR Recruit, select, evaluate CTs Make personnel recommendations to superintendent
return to PGS, additional year of PAR assistance, dismissal (tenured) or nonrenewal (probationary)
What is the PAR Panel?
10
29* Co-leads (2) Coaching All Novice and Underperforming Teachers
* 33 (2013 – 2014)
Consulting Teachers
11
2000 - 2012
4717 of 5517 probationary teachers (85.5%) returned to the Professional Growth Cycle after 1-2 years of support
Support for Probationary Teachers
12
Retaining Quality Teachers
(first 5 years)
United States
50%
MCPS
66⅔%
13
114 of 313 tenured teachers (36.4%) returned to the Professional Growth Cycle after 1-2 years of support
Support for Tenured Teachers2000-2012
14
The PAR Panel has recommended 245 teachers for non-renewal/dismissal from 2000-2012.
From 1996-2000, only 1 teacher was recorded as dismissed due to incompetence.
Non-renewal/Dismissal Data
15
Tota
lWT P1 P1X P2 P3 TI T2 P1L
HP2LH
Rev Out Schools
24 23 21 1 1 1 7 23
Caseload GridSpecial Education
16
Caseload Grid
Total
WT P1 P1X P2 P3 TI T2 P1LH
P2LH
Rev Out Schools
22 23.5
18 3 1 4 16
Elementary
17
Dr. Brenda Delany
Co-lead Consulting Teacher45 West Gude DriveSuite 2400Rockville, Maryland [email protected] 217-5120
Gail EppsProgram Manager, New Teacher Induction45 West Gude DriveSuite 2400Rockville, Maryland [email protected] 217-5137
Contact Information
18
Questions and
Answers