17
MOOS-IvP Questionnaire Results March 2016 Edition Funded by Office of Naval Research and Battelle

Results MOOS-IvP Questionnaireoceanai.mit.edu/moos-ivp/docs/survey_results.pdf · Pacman Yum Yast Emerge Other 2 (4.3%) 8 (17%) 7 (14.9%) 9 (19.1%) 20 25 15 5 (10.6%) 2 (4.3%) 10

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    5

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Results MOOS-IvP Questionnaireoceanai.mit.edu/moos-ivp/docs/survey_results.pdf · Pacman Yum Yast Emerge Other 2 (4.3%) 8 (17%) 7 (14.9%) 9 (19.1%) 20 25 15 5 (10.6%) 2 (4.3%) 10

MOOS-IvP Questionnaire ResultsMarch 2016 EditionFunded by Office of Naval Research and Battelle

Page 2: Results MOOS-IvP Questionnaireoceanai.mit.edu/moos-ivp/docs/survey_results.pdf · Pacman Yum Yast Emerge Other 2 (4.3%) 8 (17%) 7 (14.9%) 9 (19.1%) 20 25 15 5 (10.6%) 2 (4.3%) 10

62MOOS-IvP users responded

2

Page 3: Results MOOS-IvP Questionnaireoceanai.mit.edu/moos-ivp/docs/survey_results.pdf · Pacman Yum Yast Emerge Other 2 (4.3%) 8 (17%) 7 (14.9%) 9 (19.1%) 20 25 15 5 (10.6%) 2 (4.3%) 10

55%Use fresh code from the SVN trunk!

28% use the latest release (15.5) and 16% use earlier releases.

3

Page 4: Results MOOS-IvP Questionnaireoceanai.mit.edu/moos-ivp/docs/survey_results.pdf · Pacman Yum Yast Emerge Other 2 (4.3%) 8 (17%) 7 (14.9%) 9 (19.1%) 20 25 15 5 (10.6%) 2 (4.3%) 10

More that 50% of the users switch to a new release within the first month. 4

Page 5: Results MOOS-IvP Questionnaireoceanai.mit.edu/moos-ivp/docs/survey_results.pdf · Pacman Yum Yast Emerge Other 2 (4.3%) 8 (17%) 7 (14.9%) 9 (19.1%) 20 25 15 5 (10.6%) 2 (4.3%) 10

50% of the users update MOOS-IvP every month. 5

Page 6: Results MOOS-IvP Questionnaireoceanai.mit.edu/moos-ivp/docs/survey_results.pdf · Pacman Yum Yast Emerge Other 2 (4.3%) 8 (17%) 7 (14.9%) 9 (19.1%) 20 25 15 5 (10.6%) 2 (4.3%) 10

6

82% prefer to move to git.

Page 7: Results MOOS-IvP Questionnaireoceanai.mit.edu/moos-ivp/docs/survey_results.pdf · Pacman Yum Yast Emerge Other 2 (4.3%) 8 (17%) 7 (14.9%) 9 (19.1%) 20 25 15 5 (10.6%) 2 (4.3%) 10

52.4% answered that they are willing to contribute if a Pull Request system is in place. 7

Page 8: Results MOOS-IvP Questionnaireoceanai.mit.edu/moos-ivp/docs/survey_results.pdf · Pacman Yum Yast Emerge Other 2 (4.3%) 8 (17%) 7 (14.9%) 9 (19.1%) 20 25 15 5 (10.6%) 2 (4.3%) 10

8

98.4% are interested in having an issue tracker.

Page 9: Results MOOS-IvP Questionnaireoceanai.mit.edu/moos-ivp/docs/survey_results.pdf · Pacman Yum Yast Emerge Other 2 (4.3%) 8 (17%) 7 (14.9%) 9 (19.1%) 20 25 15 5 (10.6%) 2 (4.3%) 10

Only 32.8% of users do not automatically test their software. 9

Page 10: Results MOOS-IvP Questionnaireoceanai.mit.edu/moos-ivp/docs/survey_results.pdf · Pacman Yum Yast Emerge Other 2 (4.3%) 8 (17%) 7 (14.9%) 9 (19.1%) 20 25 15 5 (10.6%) 2 (4.3%) 10

Iver 2 is the most used platform in the MOOS-IvP community. 10

Page 11: Results MOOS-IvP Questionnaireoceanai.mit.edu/moos-ivp/docs/survey_results.pdf · Pacman Yum Yast Emerge Other 2 (4.3%) 8 (17%) 7 (14.9%) 9 (19.1%) 20 25 15 5 (10.6%) 2 (4.3%) 10

x86-64 is the most popular architecture. 11

Page 12: Results MOOS-IvP Questionnaireoceanai.mit.edu/moos-ivp/docs/survey_results.pdf · Pacman Yum Yast Emerge Other 2 (4.3%) 8 (17%) 7 (14.9%) 9 (19.1%) 20 25 15 5 (10.6%) 2 (4.3%) 10

Most users rely on Ubuntu.

12

Page 13: Results MOOS-IvP Questionnaireoceanai.mit.edu/moos-ivp/docs/survey_results.pdf · Pacman Yum Yast Emerge Other 2 (4.3%) 8 (17%) 7 (14.9%) 9 (19.1%) 20 25 15 5 (10.6%) 2 (4.3%) 10

GCC is the most popular architecture. 13

Page 14: Results MOOS-IvP Questionnaireoceanai.mit.edu/moos-ivp/docs/survey_results.pdf · Pacman Yum Yast Emerge Other 2 (4.3%) 8 (17%) 7 (14.9%) 9 (19.1%) 20 25 15 5 (10.6%) 2 (4.3%) 10

57.7% of users would like to have MOOS-IvP supported by their package manager. 14

Page 15: Results MOOS-IvP Questionnaireoceanai.mit.edu/moos-ivp/docs/survey_results.pdf · Pacman Yum Yast Emerge Other 2 (4.3%) 8 (17%) 7 (14.9%) 9 (19.1%) 20 25 15 5 (10.6%) 2 (4.3%) 10

Aptitude is the most common package manager between the users. 15

Page 16: Results MOOS-IvP Questionnaireoceanai.mit.edu/moos-ivp/docs/survey_results.pdf · Pacman Yum Yast Emerge Other 2 (4.3%) 8 (17%) 7 (14.9%) 9 (19.1%) 20 25 15 5 (10.6%) 2 (4.3%) 10

Users’ background 16

Page 17: Results MOOS-IvP Questionnaireoceanai.mit.edu/moos-ivp/docs/survey_results.pdf · Pacman Yum Yast Emerge Other 2 (4.3%) 8 (17%) 7 (14.9%) 9 (19.1%) 20 25 15 5 (10.6%) 2 (4.3%) 10

Thank you all for your answers!See you soon on moos-ivp.org

17