Safe, robust, cost-effective solutions for the nearshore LNG market

© Terminale GNL Adriatico S.r.l.

2 |

Proven Solutions, Innovative ApproachAs the search for oil and gas takes energy companies to some of the world’s most remote and inhospitable places, they are challenged to find new solutions for developing these valuable resources. For LNG plants being constructed in nearshore regions, one of the most innovative, cost effective and proven solutions is concrete gravity base structures (GBS). Now, the world’s leaders in LNG and concrete GBS have come together to create a safe, robust, reliable GBS LNG solution – the experts at KBR/Kvaerner.

A Partnership of StrengthsA global engineering and construction contractor, KBR is a pioneer in offshore oil and gas and LNG. Drawing on its 70-year offshore heritage and 40 years of experience as an LNG contractor responsible for one-third of the world’s operating capacity, KBR has the specialized knowledge, tools and skills to develop and lead projects to successful completion – whether offshore, onshore or nearshore.

Kvaerner is the world leader in marine concrete structures for oil and gas field developments with a portfolio that includes EPCI for the world’s first offshore terminal for LNG receiving and regasification – the Adriatic LNG regas facility, offshore Italy. Tested and continuously refined over the past 40 years, Kvaerner’s gravity base structures are the most proven and dependable solutions available today.

This strategic relationship ensures the most cost effective, lowest risk and safest GBS LNG solution in the marketplace.

KBR and Kvaerner are aligned in their belief that all incidents can be prevented. KBR’s Zero Harm: Courage to Care and Kvaerner’s Just Care programs emphasize personal responsibility and commit-ment to health, safety, security and the environment.

+

=

A leading EPC company withextensive experience in designing,

constructing and start-up of LNG plants.

Integrated Team Execution Approach

Developing safe, robust and cost-effective concrete GBS LNG solutions.

A leading EPCI company withextensive oil and gas platformexperience, including specialist

in concrete solutions.

Concrete gravity base structuresLNG topsides facilities

| 3

Adriatic LNG regasification facility, Offshore Italy

© Terminale GNL Adriatico S.r.l.

4 |

Why Concrete GBS LNG?Concrete gravity based structures offer many advantages over conventional LNG developments in remote offshore and nearshore regions.

Stable – Held in place on the seabed by its own gravity rather than pilings, concrete GBS maintains stability in locations with difficult soil conditions, high winds, waves, ice loads and even earthquakes

Robust – Eminently suited for LNG processing facilities due to their ability to withstand extreme cryogenic temperatures and for application in ice-fested arctic waters

Prebuilt – Can be constructed and commissioned in a hospitable dry dock environment where skilled labor is plentiful before being towed to its nearshore permanent location

Low Environmental Impact – Compared to land based LNG plants, minimal soil disturbance, little to no onshore infrastructure and no shipping channel required

Lower Cost – Constructed of one of the most economical, lowest maintenance materials available, concrete GBS LNG is also cheaper to build because it eliminates the need for both dredging and jetty construction and reduces labor costs typically incurred from accomodation camps and transportation

Lower Risk – Based on proven technologies in use for over 40 years and constructed in a controlled, dry dock environment, concrete GBS LNG delivers lower risk with a high degree of execution certainty relative to HSSE, productivity, cost and schedule

Improved Project Feasibility – Ability to optimize overall authorities’ approval processes over onshore plants

Nearshore Arctic LNG concept allows for construction of a complete LNG facility to be built at a cost-effective site and then towed to the final location.

| 5

The benefits of concrete GBS LNG are especially relevant in arctic regions where a large portion of the world’s unproduced oil and gas resources are located.

■■ Limited exposure of construction personnel to extreme weather

■■ Lower risk with a high degree of execution certainty■■ Lower impact on environmentally vulnerable

arctic environments■■ Eliminates expensive foundation work■■ Minimal to no dredging required for ship access■■ Concrete material very suitable for arctic conditions■■ Ice resistant designs■■ Ability to fabricate offsite and tow, avoiding local restrictions

Arctic Specific Advantages

1975 1980 1985 1990 1995 2015

1976Sonatrach GL2ZAlgeria

1985NWS Trains 1, 2Australia

1979Skikda GL1KAlgeria

1990NWS Train 3Australia

1993Liuhua 11-1 FPSOChina

1995NLNG Trains 1, 2Nigeria

1996Ras Laftan Trains 1, 2Qatar

1997P.T. Badak LNGIndonesia

1997GURF Mid ScaleLNG FPSO

1998Nigeria FLNGChevron

1998Project AzureFull Floating LNG Chain

1998Platform MountedLNG Plant

1998LNG Lin Haulback Conoco

1998Floating LNG Terminal

1998Snøhvit, SacrificialLNG Barge Design

1998GURF Phase IILarge Scale LNG FPSO

2000

2000Malaysia TigaMalaysia

2001SEGAS LNGEgypt

2001NWS Train 4Australia

2001LNG FPSOVanco Namibia

2001Belanak LPG FPSOEPC

2002FLNG Pre-Qualificationsand Studies

2002GBS Mounted LNG TerminalEdison

2002Onboard LNG RegasificationBP

2003GBS LNG StorageAngola LNG

2003Offshore LNGTerminal Topsides

2003Jacket-Mounted Terminal

2003Baja GBS LNG, ChevronTexacoFEED

2003Port Pelican GBS LNG, ChevronTexacoFEED

2003Offshore Floating and GBS LNG

2004GBS Terminal and FSRUProject Aria

2005

2007Skikda New TrainAlgeria

2009Gorgon LNGAustralia

2005Subsea LNGTransfer Studies

2007FLNG Conceptual Studies

2007LNG Ship and Barge Terminal Regas Study

2005Agbami FPSO TopsidesNigeria

2005Yamal LNG, GazpromGBS LNG Study

2008FLNG Pre-FEED Study

2009Pazflor FPSO TopsidesTotal/DSME

2007SnøhvitNorth Norway

2007Bonaparte, HydroGBS LNG Study

2009Adriatic LNG Regasification Facility

2009Scarborough, ExxonMobilGBS LNG Study

2008GVA FLNGHull Studies

1975Frigg CDP1 GBS

1975Brent B GBS

1975Beryl A GBS

1975Frigg 2 GBS

1977Statfjord A GBS

1976Brent D GBS

1982Statfjord B GBS

In ProgressHebron GBS

1984Statfjord C GBS

2010

2011Quad 204 FPSONorth Sea

2012Ichthys LNGAustralia

2010Statoil FLNG Mid-ScaleFeasibility Studies

2015Black Sea FLNGFEED

2015Johan Sverdrup ULQ

2010Höegh FLNG Topsides

2011Statoil FLNG Pre-FEED Study

2012King FLNGPre-FEED

2012(3) ConfidentialFLNG Pre-FEED

2012Bonaparte FLNGPre-FEED

2013North AmericaNear Offshore LNG

2013Nearshore Barge Mounted FLNG Study, Triton

2014Confidential GBS Study

2014OMV FLNG Study

2014Coral South FLNG FEED

1987Gullfaks B GBS

1989Gullfaks C GBS

1993Draugen GBS

1993Troll A GBS

1995Troll A GBS

1997Hibernia GBS

2005Sakhalin 2 LUN A GBS

2005Sakhalin 2 PAB GBS

2012Sakhalin 1 GBS

2012Woodside, Nearshore LNG Technology Study

2013KCS/KBR, Arctic GBS LNGConcept, Generic Study

2010Yamal, ShellGBS LNG Study

2010Middle East, ShellGBS LNG Study

2010Sunrise, WoodsideGBS LNG Appraisal Study

2011Pechora LNG, Pechora LNG/Vostok RafflesGBS LNG Study

In ProgressConfidentialGBS LNG Pre-FEED

KBR ProjectsKBR and Kvaerner Joint Venture

Kvaerner Projects

6 |

The KBR Kvaerner GBS LNG Solution40 + Years, 60 + Related Projects, Groundbreaking GBS LNG Facilities Delivered

KBR Kvaerner’s concrete GBS LNG solution is based on technology, design, construction and installation methods that have been proven over decades. The GBS configuration uses features from Kvaerner’s Adriatic receiving terminal, adapted to resist extreme sea ice and wave loads. The topsides layout is based on KBR’s experience designing onshore LNG plants and offshore FPSOs, as well as studies and FEEDs for near shore and offshore FLNG facilities. Other design elements incorporate well-proven systems for gas treatment, liquefaction and storage. The result is safe, robust, cost-effective solutions for remote arctic and non-arctic regions.

1975 1980 1985 1990 1995 2015

1976Sonatrach GL2ZAlgeria

1985NWS Trains 1, 2Australia

1979Skikda GL1KAlgeria

1990NWS Train 3Australia

1993Liuhua 11-1 FPSOChina

1995NLNG Trains 1, 2Nigeria

1996Ras Laftan Trains 1, 2Qatar

1997P.T. Badak LNGIndonesia

1997GURF Mid ScaleLNG FPSO

1998Nigeria FLNGChevron

1998Project AzureFull Floating LNG Chain

1998Platform MountedLNG Plant

1998LNG Lin Haulback Conoco

1998Floating LNG Terminal

1998Snøhvit, SacrificialLNG Barge Design

1998GURF Phase IILarge Scale LNG FPSO

2000

2000Malaysia TigaMalaysia

2001SEGAS LNGEgypt

2001NWS Train 4Australia

2001LNG FPSOVanco Namibia

2001Belanak LPG FPSOEPC

2002FLNG Pre-Qualificationsand Studies

2002GBS Mounted LNG TerminalEdison

2002Onboard LNG RegasificationBP

2003GBS LNG StorageAngola LNG

2003Offshore LNGTerminal Topsides

2003Jacket-Mounted Terminal

2003Baja GBS LNG, ChevronTexacoFEED

2003Port Pelican GBS LNG, ChevronTexacoFEED

2003Offshore Floating and GBS LNG

2004GBS Terminal and FSRUProject Aria

2005

2007Skikda New TrainAlgeria

2009Gorgon LNGAustralia

2005Subsea LNGTransfer Studies

2007FLNG Conceptual Studies

2007LNG Ship and Barge Terminal Regas Study

2005Agbami FPSO TopsidesNigeria

2005Yamal LNG, GazpromGBS LNG Study

2008FLNG Pre-FEED Study

2009Pazflor FPSO TopsidesTotal/DSME

2007SnøhvitNorth Norway

2007Bonaparte, HydroGBS LNG Study

2009Adriatic LNG Regasification Facility

2009Scarborough, ExxonMobilGBS LNG Study

2008GVA FLNGHull Studies

1975Frigg CDP1 GBS

1975Brent B GBS

1975Beryl A GBS

1975Frigg 2 GBS

1977Statfjord A GBS

1976Brent D GBS

1982Statfjord B GBS

In ProgressHebron GBS

1984Statfjord C GBS

2010

2011Quad 204 FPSONorth Sea

2012Ichthys LNGAustralia

2010Statoil FLNG Mid-ScaleFeasibility Studies

2015Black Sea FLNGFEED

2015Johan Sverdrup ULQ

2010Höegh FLNG Topsides

2011Statoil FLNG Pre-FEED Study

2012King FLNGPre-FEED

2012(3) ConfidentialFLNG Pre-FEED

2012Bonaparte FLNGPre-FEED

2013North AmericaNear Offshore LNG

2013Nearshore Barge Mounted FLNG Study, Triton

2014Confidential GBS Study

2014OMV FLNG Study

2014Coral South FLNG FEED

1987Gullfaks B GBS

1989Gullfaks C GBS

1993Draugen GBS

1993Troll A GBS

1995Troll A GBS

1997Hibernia GBS

2005Sakhalin 2 LUN A GBS

2005Sakhalin 2 PAB GBS

2012Sakhalin 1 GBS

2012Woodside, Nearshore LNG Technology Study

2013KCS/KBR, Arctic GBS LNGConcept, Generic Study

2010Yamal, ShellGBS LNG Study

2010Middle East, ShellGBS LNG Study

2010Sunrise, WoodsideGBS LNG Appraisal Study

2011Pechora LNG, Pechora LNG/Vostok RafflesGBS LNG Study

In ProgressConfidentialGBS LNG Pre-FEED

KBR ProjectsKBR and Kvaerner Joint Venture

Kvaerner Projects

| 7

KBR601 Jefferson StreetHouston, Texas 77002, USA

KBRDucat Place II,Gasheka StreetMoscow 123056, Russia

KBRHill Park Court Springfield Drive Leatherhead KT22 7NL United Kingdom

Kvaerner Oksenøyveien 10, 1366 LysakerNorway

KvaernerGasheka 7 str, office 320Moscow 123056, Russia

KvaernerSuite 305 Atlantic Place215 Water Street St. John’s Newfoundland & LabradorCanada AIC 6C9

www.kbr.com www.kvaerner.com

Nearshore, Harsh Environment GBS LNG Solutions

© Terminale GNL Adriatico S.r.l.