Transcript

Review ArticlePhotoacoustic Spectroscopy in the Optical Characterization ofFoodstuff: A Review

Claudia Hernandez-Aguilar ,1 Arturo Domınguez-Pacheco,1 Alfredo Cruz-Orea ,2

and Rumen Ivanov3

1Programa en Ingenierıa de Sistemas-SBAAM, SEPI-ESIME, Instituto Politecnico Nacional-ESIME Zacatenco,Col. Lindavista. 07738, Ciudad de Mexico, Mexico2Departamento de Fısica, CINVESTAV–IPN, A. P. 14-740. 07360, Ciudad de Mexico, Mexico3Unidad Academica de Fısica, Universidad Autonoma de Zacatecas, A.P. 580, Zacatecas, Mexico

Correspondence should be addressed to Claudia Hernandez-Aguilar; [email protected]

Received 24 June 2018; Revised 25 October 2018; Accepted 18 November 2018; Published 13 January 2019

Academic Editor: Johannes Kiefer

Copyright © 2019 Claudia Hernandez-Aguilar et al. .is is an open access article distributed under the Creative CommonsAttribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in anymedium, provided the original work isproperly cited.

In this review, the application of the photoacustic spectroscopy (PAS) is presented as an option to evaluate the quality offood. .is technique is a type of spectroscopy based on photothermal phenomena, which allow spectroscopic studies.According to the literature review, it was found that its application is increasing in several countries. Spectroscopic studiescarried out by employing PAS in the food industry include, among others, fruit, vegetables, condiments, grains, legumes,flours, “tortillas,” milk, water, eggs, etc. Additionally, this technique has been used to evaluate adulterated, irradiated, andcontaminated food and so on. .e literature review has shown the applicability of PAS to one of the problems of the realworld, i.e., food quality assessment. .erefore, PAS can contribute in the future with a wide potential for new applications inthe food agroindustry.

1. Introduction

One of the problems worldwide is the quality and quantity offood. In developing countries, this is even more evident,causing several chronic diseases such as cancer and mal-nutrition, according to Hernandez et al. [1]. .erefore, thedevelopment of technologies to improve global food pro-duction is necessary since one of the main challenges of ourtime is to feed a growing worldwide population [2–6]. In thisorder of ideas, it is also mandatory to develop technologiesthat evaluate food quality, before the direct impact that theyhave on population’s health and consequently on theirquality of life. Several authors and public health pro-fessionals indicate a relationship between dietary behaviourand the food quality associated with the risk of some cancersand other existing chronic diseases [7, 8]. In this sense, thequality of the food is very important; in the case of cancerdiseases, a close relationship between the diet and the

different types of cancers has been reported [9–11]. Cancer,among other factors, could be due to the intake of com-pounds in food that initiate or promote it. .e food and itssubstances which are consumed provide the nutritionalsupport for an organism and help for the disease prevention.However, sometimes they increase chemical substances, andinstead of helping, they damage the organism [8]. .ishighlights the need for a greater level of food control: equalin quantity and quality (i.e., sometimes foodstuff containsboth substances that harm and benefit human health. .at isto say, to evaluate food in order to avoid consuming con-taminated or degraded food (chemically or biologically) andto promote the consumption of food rich in phytonutrients(increasing the proposals for food integrated with superfoodand/or fibre), etc. .is, among other aspects, is relevant tothe prevention of diseases [12]. In food production chain, itis known that contamination and/or degradation can occurat any stage due to contaminants: environmental,

HindawiJournal of SpectroscopyVolume 2019, Article ID 5920948, 34 pageshttps://doi.org/10.1155/2019/5920948

agricultural, or incorporated during some agroindustrialprocess or storage [13]. On the one hand, it is essential to beaware of not consuming food that exceeds allowed limits ofmycotoxins, nitrates, and nitrites, harmful fats, addition ofpreservatives, dyes, or sugar solutions. On the other hand, itis essential to consume food that provides health benefits,such as super-food, cholesterol free, rich source of proteins,minerals, iron, etc. Food rich in phytochemical may play animportant role in the reduction of mortality. For theaforementioned facts, the need of a rapid and reliablequantification of compounds in food that contains disease-preventing constituents or food constituents that cause themis urgent, as it is recognized by the food processing industry[14].

.en, the development of technologies that support theevaluation of food quality every day becomes more relevant,due to the increase of diseases. Among the technologies forfood analysis and determination of compounds, the pho-tothermal techniques stand out. In particular, photoacousticspectroscopy (PAS) is considered by some authors as a“green” technology for the food analysis [15], i.e., a methodwith less chemical waste and a minimal sample amount anda nondestructive technique [16]. PAS has some additionalcharacteristics such as the fact that it does not require ex-traction or sample preparation and it does not use solvents,among others [17]..e reduction or elimination of the use ofsolvents is very important. For example, in the process ofmanufacturing, the use and disposal of chemical productsand many toxic materials that are dangerous to humans andto the environment are frequent. In fact, these techniques arepromising because they can be carried out by nondestructiveanalysis and without the use of solvents [15].

Currently, PAS technique, thanks to the technologicaladvances, could be a convenient option to be incorporatedin the agrofood industry, for example, in food qualityassessment systems, with diverse specific applications(according to production systems and specific food ofeach case). PAS technique allows to obtain optical qual-ities of food, depending on its colour, which is the mostuseful parameter in the agrofood industry since qualityand food flavours are closely associated with its colour[18]. .erefore, our objective is to perform a literaturereview of PAS applications in the food characterizationfrom its origin to recent advances. In this way, it will bepossible to know the current state, what has been done andwhat still needs to be done to reach the application of it inthe real world. .e PAS experimental setup continues tobe optimized and focused on the specific problems of thereal world where it could serve as a supportive technique,in order to improve and have attainable techniques for theevaluation of food quality and their respective control inthe production process. It is one of the great worries ofhumanity, both to increase the food production and totake care of its quality, being this a key element in thedevelopment and life quality of societies.

1.1. Era before Photoacoustic Spectroscopy in Agriculture andFood. Isaac Newton in 1666, using a prism, observed and

recorded the dispersion of white (visible) light into itsconstituent colours [19] to describe the colours of therainbow. He used the word “spectrum” for the first time inhistory. More than 100 years later, in 1802, Hyde Wollastonexpanded Newton’s earlier observation by showing thatsunlight possesses discrete bands of light, rather than acontinuous spectrum. Wollaston became one of the mostfamous scientists for his observations of dark lines in thesolar spectrum, which eventually led to the discovery of theSun elements. In 1814, Fraunhofer discovered over 500bands of sunlight, afterward called “Fraunhofer lines.” In1859, Kirchoff and Bunsen invented the spectroscope [20],and they were the ones who developed the chemical analysisby using spectral lines [21, 22].

1.2. Photoacoustic Spectroscopy History. .e photoacoustic(PA) effect was discovered, according to Rosencwaig [23,24], by Tyndall, Rontgen, and Alexander Graham Bell, in1881. Bell was working together with Charles SummerTainter in the photophone. Bell discovered that selenium(and other solid materials) emits a sound when illuminatedby a modulated light, which was achieved by passing itthrough a rotating disk with holes. Bell, using the spec-trophotometer, discovered that the emitted sound intensitydepends on the wavelength or colour of the incident lightand that therefore the effect should be attributed to anoptical absorption process [25].

Fifty years after its discovery, the PA effect was used ingas studies. It has ever since become a well-establishedtechnique for gas analysis and was well understood [26]with some applications also in environmental and foodareas. However, the PA’s effect in solids was apparentlyignored for 90 years until 1973, when Rosencwaig began hisstudy of the PA effect in solids. Probably, this delay was dueto the lack of sensitive sound detectors and high-power lightsources [27].

.e first photoacoustic spectra obtained by Rosencwaigwere specifically of carbon-black, powder of Cr2O3 (nor-malized), a Cr2O3 crystal, rhodamine-B in a glycerol solu-tion, and rhodamine-B powder [24]. Photoacousticspectroscopy as a new tool for solid research was presentedby Rosencwaig [27]. Since that time, he pointed out the mainadvantages of photoacoustic spectroscopy, paraphrasinghim: “.e principal advantage of photoacoustic spectros-copy is that it enables to obtain similar spectra on any type ofsolid or semisolid material, whether it be crystalline, powder,amorphous, smear, gel, etc. Furthermore, since only theabsorbed light is converted to sound, light scattering (a veryserious problem when dealing with many solid materials byconventional spectroscopic techniques) presents no diffi-culties in PAS.” In this sense, the PAS applications weredivided under three main headings: bulk, surface, and de-excitation studies.

Also, pioneer applications of PAS in biology were madeby Rosencwaig [27]. He obtained the photoacoustic spectraof smears of whole blood, of red blood cells freed fromplasma, and of haemoglobin extracted from red blood cells,using the spectral region from 200 to 800 nm. Also, PAS

2 Journal of Spectroscopy

spectra of guinea pig epidermis (250–650 nm) in differentconditions were obtained. He also reported a block diagramof single-beam photoacoustic spectrometer with digitaldata acquisition, integrated by: Xe Lamp, monochromator,chopper, photoacoustic cell, lock-in amplifier, voltagefrequency converter, and multichannel analyzer. .e firstcommercial spectrometer (Model 6001) was manufacturedin 1980 by Princeton Applied Research Corporation[26, 28].

Other results were obtained with dried solids containingseveral other hemoproteins, including both soluble ones,such as cytochrome c and insoluble or membrane-boundones such as cytochrome P-450. Further experimentsshowed that it is possible to identify absorbing substances(including some drugs) in dried urine samples (e.g., drops ofurine over the filter paper)[28].

Regarding the area of the agrofood industry, the firstphotoacoustic spectra in plants were obtained in flowers byHarshbarger and Robin [29] among others.

1.3. Applications of PAS. Spectroscopy is the study of theinteraction of electromagnetic radiation with atoms andmolecules to provide qualitative and quantitative chemicaland physical (structural) information, that is containedwithin the wavelength or frequency spectrum of energy thatis either absorbed or emitted [30]. According to Sunandana[31]; Photoacoustic spectroscopy (PAS), the oldest form ofphotothermal techniques, is a type of spectroscopy and itsname “photoacoustic” (PA) generally implies a particulartechnique or mechanism of detecting and measuring theoptical absorption of opaque and diffuse materials, amongothers. .e basic principle of photothermal spectroscopy isthe detection of heat produced in a sample due to non-radiative de-excitation processes resulting from the ab-sorption of intensity-modulated light (wave of pulsed light)by the sample..us, according to its basic principle, the PAShas been applied in Biology, Biophysics, Physics, Medicine,and in the Agrofood areas [32], rescuing an old technologyfor today’s needs.

Bicanic [14] mentioned that PAS is a sort of spectroscopy,nondestructive based on photothermal phenomena, whichallows spectroscopic studies. .e basic configuration uses Xelamps, mainly in the UV-VIS range. .is conventional con-figuration has been applied to the foodstuff analysis (obtainingPA spectra, as a function of wavelength) including plants,seeds, etc. Among the foodstuff that have been investigated byusing PAS are grains and legumes (Zea mays L., Triticum,Hordeum vulgare, Phaseolus vulgaris L., and coffee), vegetables(spinach, lettuce, Raphanus sativus L., Solanum lycopersicumL., and Capsicum annuum), marine vegetables (algae andphytoplankton), fruit (açai, cupuaçu, Brazil nut, persimmon,mango, and strawberries), other liquids or semiliquid food(e.g., milk, water, juice, mustard, and ketchup), flours (maize,wheat, soybeans, peas, white bread flour, and rye), “tortillas”(maize (white and blue), wheat flour (integral or not integral),maize and “nopal,” linseed and “nopal,” etc.), condiments(turmeric and “chile pasilla”), powder (gelatins, curry, andcacao), food with coloring additives, etc. Furthermore,

adulterated food and fortified food, among others, have beenanalysed by using PAS technique.

.e first PA spectra (in plants or food) were obtained inblack-eyed susan petals, red rose petals, green leaf, andchloroplast of lettuce, marine algae, and spinach[27, 28, 29, 33, 34], among others. Harshbarger and Robin[30] reported photoacoustic spectra (PA or optoacoustic) offlower petals. With regard to susan blackeyed petals, theauthors obtained an optical absorbance spectral band cor-responding to carotenoids and another band in the ultra-violet region, related to the content of flavonol glucosides..e photoacoustic spectrum of a rose petal had two max-imums, at 530 and 340 nm; the first maxima is due to cyanineabsorbance in the flower, and the second one must be due tosome other ultraviolet-absorbing compound in the petal.

Meanwhile, Rosencwaig showed photoacoustic spec-trum of an intact green leaf with all the optical charac-teristics of leaf chloroplasts, including Soret’s peak(420 nm), carotenoids (450–550 nm), and chlorophylls(600–700 nm) bands. He points out that PAS can be usedto observe secondary metabolites. Species of air-driedmarine algae were also evaluated by Rosencwaig andHall [32]. .e authors showed that PAS can be used toestimate the amount of certain metabolites, and they alsosuggested that PAS could reduce the amount of materialrequired for the screening of such substances (since ex-traction procedures generally require more material) andthat it can greatly reduce the time required for theidentification of plant components. Adams et al. [34]studied spinach leaf, where he demonstrated that themajor absorbing components in the spinach were thechlorophylls. .e chlorophylls are similar to the hemo-proteins; they contain a porphyrin ring, this being che-lated to magnesium at the ring centre. .en, the techniqueallowed it to be useful to determine quickly and easily thespinach components, directly and only using a small pieceof spinach (10mm), in the spectral region from 250 to700 nm, finding spectral peaks at 450 and 650 nm. Otherphotoacoustic spectra were also obtained, in the initial eraof photoacoustic applications for this purpose, in coty-ledons, Raphanus pigments, Tradescantia leaves, etc.[35–37].

Since the initial PAS applications in agriculture andfood until now, different spectral regions have been used,from ultraviolet to far infrared, including UV (200–400 nm), visible light (400–700 nm), and near infraredradiation (750–1100 nm). Also, it is important to take intoaccount the lamp power, and there are several studies thatindicate that the optimal Xe lamp power ranges from 300to 1600W.

According to the present review on PAS applications infood and plants, from the PA spectrum obtained by PAS, it ispossible to determine concentrations or presence of com-pounds: rutin, red beet (in case of adulterated food), fla-vonoids and flavonols, carotenoids (lycopene, capsanthin,capsorubin, carotene, zeaxanthin, cryptoxanthin, lutein,etc.), basic amino acids (tryptophan, lysine, leucine, phe-nylalanine, etc.), anthocyanins, peroxide, and lead tetra-oxide, among others. Also, by using PAS, it is possible to

Journal of Spectroscopy 3

detect changes in seeds due to induced radiation effects, useof dyes, differences in sanitary qualities, adulterated food,etc. In this sense, for some researchers, PAS is considered asan analytical method.

1.4. PAS Applications in Food and Agrofood Industry.One of the industries which could be benefited by the use ofPAS technology would be the milk industry. Martel et al.[30] carried out measurements by PAS of milk products..ey analysed whole milk, 3.25% fat, skim milk, part skim,milk 2% fat, mild cheddar cheese, aged cheddar cheese, plainyogurt, and strawberry-flavoured yogurt drink. .eir ob-tained spectra were in the ultraviolet region. .ey found astrong absorption peak at 280 nm for all products. For cheesesamples, they observed in the spectra a tail, corresponding tofat presence, from 250 to 260 nm. Photoacoustic signal in-creases when protein concentration increases; the authorsrelate the UV absorbance band with aromatic amino acids(tryptophan, tyrosine, and phenylalanine), as a measure ofprotein content. .ey demonstrated the applicability of PASto study different milk products, highlighting their utility forthe milk industry.

PA spectra of tablets, made out of lyophilized raw milk,showed an absorption peak at 280 nm, corresponding to theabsorption of proteins and a smaller absorbance band in thevisible (400–500 nm) that might be assigned to milk ca-rotenoids. When the tablets were heated, they gradually turnbrown, which contributed to the changes in the PA spectra,appearing to a new band around 335 nm as a consequence ofthe Maillard reactions. .e spectra became broader, to thered side of the spectrum. .is could be the sign of manyother reactions occurring in the sample according toNsoukpog-Kossi et al. [38], demonstrating another possibleutility of the photoacoustic technique.

Another use of PAS in the milk industry has been thepossibility to measure different powdered milk proteinconcentrates, enriched with Fe in the form of ferrogluconateat different concentrations. Doka et al. [39] obtained PAspectra, in these powdered samples, as a function of fer-rogluconate concentration, obtaining an increase in thephotoacoustic signal in the UV spectral region. .e peaks, at348, 380, and 552 nm, varied depending on the Fe con-centration, resulting in a nonlinear relationship between theferrogluconate content and the PA signal. In this way, theauthors demonstrated that PAS measurements (in the UV-visible range) on milk protein concentrates are capable ofdetermining the Fe content in ferrogluconate form. .isdemonstrates another possible application of PAS. As withthe other applications to detect adulterated milk, it has beenproven useful, for example, to detect skimmed milk adul-terated with whey powder, when analyzing PA spectra at370 nm wavelength [40].

PAS application in milk analysis was also reported inother studies, for example, milk (fresh and oxidized) wasevaluated by using PAS. In these investigations, Doka et al.[41] used fresh whole milk exposed to UV-C radiation andheat. .e PA spectra, obtained by PAS, encompassed thespectral region from 200 to 500 nm. It was reported,

absorption peaks at 290 nm (for all evaluated cases), which isassociated with the presence of aromatic amino acids in themilk powders. Spectral changes, induced by the acceleratedoxidative treatment, were detectable in the 320–360 nmabsorbance band (absorbance changes in this range are dueto the reaction of aldehydes with a variety of amino com-pounds). .e oxidation of whole milk powder and browningprocesses were mutually interrelated (i.e., if the oxidationtook place, then the color of the powder would turn brown)..e authors recommended PAS as a method for routine andrapid assessment of peroxide values in oxidized whole milkpowder.

Another PAS application, useful in foodstuff area, is inthe assessing of induced radiation effects. For example, ir-radiated egg powders were evaluated by PAS, finding twopeaks, corresponding to the absorbance maxima, in theoptical spectrum. One centered at 275 nm, which is relatedwith the aromatic amino acids content in the sample. Whilethe other peak, centered at 480 nm, is related to the presenceof carotenoids. It is interesting that PA signal at 480 nmsuggests a carotenoid decomposition due to the irradiation[42]. In summary, the foodstuff irradiation processes isanother potential area for PAS applications.

On the other hand, the usefulness of PAS has beendemonstrated to identify adulterated samples with leadtetraoxide (also called minium or red lead). Doka et al. [43]obtained the PA spectra of pure paprika, red lead, and alladulterated samples, in the wavelength range from 320 to700 nm. .e normalised PA signal in a wavelength rangefrom 600 to 700 nm was generally lower; a weak signal wasobserved at 670 nm. .e PA signal from pure red lead wassubstantially larger than those obtained from adulteratedsamples. .e PA spectra of the four adulterated samplesshow a peak at 545 nm. In this case, the potential of PAS, as acandidate method for rapid detection of gross amounts ofred lead (Pb304) adulterant, in a ground sweet red paprika,was demonstrated. Although the authors recognize that theperformance of this method was undoubtedly inferior to thatof advanced methods, the PAS method is very practical andrapid in routine situations.

Other food sample types studied by PAS have beenreported by Bicanic et al. [44], who mentioned that PAStechnique could be used to detect red beet, added as acolorant to tomato ketchup. .e associated changes ofcolour, resulting in changes of optical absorbance, weremonitored in the 500 nm region, corresponding to the ab-sorbance maxima of lycopene. Also, Bicanic [14] indicatesthat the argon laser line at 514 nm has been used for lycopenemeasurements because there is a high absorbance of lyco-pene and low interference of betacarotene. It is noteworthythat Bicanic (1943–2018) made a notable contribution tophotoacoustic and photothermal science with numerousapplications in agriculture, environmental science, and foodquality, among other issues [45].

1.5. Grains and Legumes. PA spectra, as a function ofwavelength, allow to obtain information about the sample.Also, it is possible to characterize samples regarding its

4 Journal of Spectroscopy

atomic or molecular composition according to De Oliveiraet al. [17]. In the case of corn grains, Dominguez et al. [46]obtained the PA spectrum of maize, in the 300–800 nmwavelength range. .ey found absorbance bands associatedwith different natural pigments. .is group used white,yellow, and blue maize; in the case of white maize seed, abroad absorbance band was observed in the UV region, from300 to 400 nm, with a signal peak around 360 nm. While forthe yellow and blue maize seeds, the band of PA signaldecays around 435 nm. .is band could be due to thepresence of flavonoids and flavonols. In the case of yellowand blue maize seeds, they have an absorbance band rangingfrom 470 to 540 nm, being this band associated with thepresence of carotenoids. Specifically, for blue maize seed, anabsorbance spectrum ranging from 500–690 nm was ob-served, which is due to the presence of anthocyanins.

Another characteristic of corn seed is its structure type,crystalline or floury. From the photoacoustic signal,Hernandez-Aguilar et al. [47] found the optical absorptioncoefficient (β) and optical penetration length (lβ), as afunction of wavelength. .e floury seed variety had a higherβ value at 650 nm. In this sense, the authors showed that bymeans of the optical absorption coefficient, differences be-tween maize varieties of different structures are observed..e PA signal amplitude is higher for floury seeds. Similarly,significant statistical differences were found in the opticalabsorption coefficient spectra of white maize seeds (of dif-ferent white), with an absorbance band ranging from 325 to425 nm wavelength. Also, other authors found differencesbetween the spectra of the first derivative obtained from theβ values [48]. Other researches, such as De Oliveira et al.[17], have indicated that the PA signal amplitude is directlyproportional to the concentration of absorbing analytes,where analyte is a component (element, compound, or ion)of analytical interest on a sample. According to Doka et al.[49], PAS could be an analytic technique and also a fast andrelatively cheap technique.

Other authors have used mathematical analysis on thePA signals, such as the first and second derivatives or mobilestandard deviation..is has allowed to distinguish better themaximum peaks of maize grains with different pigmenta-tions, identifying differences of the corn seeds [50]. .e useof derivatives in spectra enhances the identification of dif-ferences among spectra, resolves overlapping bands, andespecially improves the detectability of weaker spectralshoulders. In this sense, PAS could be used in quantitativeanalyses of compounds [16]. Also, photoacoustic spectros-copy is useful to study dyed samples, not only with naturalpigments.

Other studies have pointed out the role of PAS: by usingdifferent light modulation frequencies, it is possible to ex-plore different seed depths, e.g., Hernandez-Aguilar et al.[47] obtained the PA spectra of maize seeds (Zea mays L.) atdifferent frequencies (17, 30, and 50Hz). .ey comparedthese spectra with the ones obtained from the phase-resolvedmethod, used to separate the spectra of the seed pericarp andendosperm. Also, photoacoustic spectra, of separate struc-tural components of the seed, were obtained (pericarp,aleuronal layer, and endosperm) and compared with those

obtained by the phase-resolved method. .e authors in-dicated that the absorbance band from 550 to 750 nm is dueto the anthocyanins in the aleurone layer. So, the PAStechnique has a potential for depth profile analysis oncomplex specimens with different structural componentsand also, through the absorbance bands, to determine theassociated components.

Moreover, PAS has been applied to study wheat, barley,and beans among other grains and legumes, where from PAspectra, it is possible to analyse the differences of thecharacteristic spectra obtained among the evaluated mate-rials. For example, Doka et al. [49] by using PAS in buck-wheat found PA spectra, as a function of wavelength andobserved two absorbance peaks, at 275 and 378 nm, relatedto the protein content and rutin, respectively. PA signalappears to be proportional to the rutin content of thesamples across the entire wavelength range. .us, the au-thors reported that UV-PAS could be an analytical tool forrapid and simple quantification of rutin in buckwheat, andthey found a decrease of the time required for the analysis ofbuckwheat samples when a calibrated curve, of known rutincontent, is used.

Photoacoustic spectrum decreases as a function of thefrequency, and differences are obtained in the spectra of thedeteriorated and nondeteriorated grains. .e authors re-ported lower PA signal in the young seeds when comparedwith the older ones, due to deterioration in the older seedsbecause of the presence of fungi or bacteria during storage..is fact produces dark regions and, as a consequence, ahigher signal, pointing out another possibility of PAS use, toevaluate sanitary quality of grains [51].

1.6. Flours and “Tortilla”. Other potential applications thatsome authors have proposed for PAS are for quality controlin the food processing industry. For example, Favier et al.[52] determined the PA spectra (350–700 nm) of white breadflours, dried pea flour, rye flour, and bread flour. PAStechnique appears to be capable of producing reproduciblespectra of powdered food samples. .e PA spectra of whitebread flours have absorbance bands around 370, 385, and410 nm. For wavelengths above 410 nm, the PA signal de-creases rapidly and drops to a nearly zero amplitude at700 nm. Unlike this, the dried pea flour is the only sort thathas a maximum signal at 410 nm. Soya flour exhibits abroader spectrum, whereas rye flour resembles that of thebread flour and also produced the highest signal of all thesamples. On this basis, the researchers propose PAS as aviable method for the determination of basic amino acidspresent in biological samples.

Doka et al. [53] obtained PA spectra, in the range from250 to 550 nm, of sorghum (Sorghum bicolor L.) grain flour..ey related the PA spectrum with the presence of aromaticamino acids, flavonoids, and phenolic compounds due to theabsorbance peaks located at 285 and 335 nm; they also foundthat the PA signal decreases when the wavelength is in-creased. .e authors indicated that the main advantage ofPAS technique, with respect to a conventional analysismethod, is that it is possible to study directly powdered

Journal of Spectroscopy 5

samples, i.e., as they are, without sample preparation. .isfact greatly reduces the time needed for its analysis. On theother hand, determination of water contents in the wheatflour (soft and hard), corn starch, and potato starch by PASalso have been evaluated [54].

Different types of “tortillas” elaborately corn (white andblue) and wheat flour (integral and not integral)—manuallyprocessed or not, fortified, and/or supplemented with “no-pal,” linseed, “epazote,” and spinach—among others, wereanalysed by PAS. From the photoacoustic signal, it waspossible to obtain the optical absorption coefficient, whichwas decreasing with the increase in wavelength [55]. Ingeneral, photoacoustic spectroscopy is a sensitive technique tocharacterize inhomogeneous materials.

1.7. Fruit, Vegetables, and Condiments. In Brazilian tropicalfruit and vegetables, carotenoids and flavonoids wereidentified by PAS. Biomolecules of β-carotenes and flavo-noids were identified in acerola, pumpkin, broccoli, cabbage,cauliflower, spinach, purple-cabbage, orange tangerine,mango, rucula, and cuite. In addition to the biomolecules ofbeta-carotene and flavonoids, chlorophyll was also found inwatercress and lettuce. Regarding β-carotene, lycopene,lutein, lutein 5, and 6 epoxide were identified in carrots.β-carotene and lycopene were determined at tomato;β-carotene, chlorophyll, and zeaxanthin were found inmaizeleaves; and β-carotene, lycopene, and possible capsanthinwere found in red pepper [56]. Finally, PAS technique cancontribute to select and classify fruit, leaves, and othervegetables according to their phytotherapeutic and nutritiveproperties. Lima and Filho [57] reported that PAS is a rapid,direct, and efficient analytical method in biomaterials,particularly in the promising field of photochemistry andphotobiology.

Other authors have shown the potential of photo-acoustic spectroscopy in the assessment of stages ofmaturity of strawberries using the spectral ratio of an-thocyanin and protein bands. Characteristic bands werefound: a major one at 278 nm, related to proteins, and asecond band around 510 nm attributed to anthocyaninpigments. .e authors highlight that PAS is a non-destructive technique that might be extended to otherhorticultural crops [57].

In this way, PAS is a type of absorption spectroscopy,which allows to obtain optical absorbance spectra, as afunction of wavelength, which provides information aboutthe optical absorbance processes that occur in the sample. Itis also possible to characterize samples regarding its atomicor molecular composition according to De Oliveira et al.[17]. Over the years, different methods have been used forthe analysis of signals by PAS (Table 1): methods of sub-traction, statistical analysis, correlation, variance analysis,derivatives (1 and 2), Gaussian deconvolutions, regressionmodel, multivariable analysis, etc. Using these methods, theextraction of information of the PA signal has been im-proved. Some researchers have validated this by the use ofother conventional techniques such as the UV-Vis spec-trophotometer with an integrating sphere.

In general, according to Doka et al. [53], PAS offersseveral advantages over other analytical techniques: it isnondestructive, requires no pre-preparation of the sample,and is applicable to specimens such as powders as well asoptically opaque and gelatinous samples.

Table 1 summarizes the reached progress regarding theapplications of PAS, according to the literature reviewcarried out, from its origin to the last years, as a result ofseveral scientific activities around the world in this area. It ispossible to observe different food types and agriculturalmaterial, which have been evaluated by PAS, using con-ventional instrumentation, to obtain its optical spectra. .emeaning of the different columns is as follows: (0) type ofsample, (1) some characteristics of the experimental con-dition and/or sample preparation, (2) the spectral regionused for the sample investigation, (3) the applied lamppower and/or light modulation frequency, (4) wavelengthsof the absorbance peaks or spectral region, (5) appliedmathematical methods, and finally (6) significant resultsreported in the literature.

Photoacoustic spectroscopy can be said to have beenapplied successfully in foodstuff analysis. Figure 1 shows theregions or absorbance peaks related to compounds(e.g., Figure 1) by photoacoustic spectroscopy, which haveserved to relate the absorbance spectra with these com-pounds. Even for some compounds, through calibrationcurves and mathematical analysis, the concentration of thecompound has been obtained.

PAS using the conventional configuration, xenon lamp,lock-in, photoacoustic cell, chopper, etc. It has been used,since its first applications and up to date, among otherpurposes, to obtain photoacoustic spectra of plants and thenof foodstuff. .ere is evidence of a potential application inthe future, since its use has increased as can be seen inFigure 2. It is possible to observe that, at the beginning of theapplication of PAS in foodstuff and plants, there were fewerscientific reports than those that exist now. According to thepresent literature review, it was found that, in the decade ofthe 70’s, there were only four articles (in this area and inorder to obtain only absorption spectra, the motive of thepresent review), in comparison of the recent included period(2010–2018), where there were 24 articles (considering onlythose analyzed in the summary of applications of photo-acoustic spectroscopy in foodstuff and plants in this review).

It is possible to observe a positive tendency of PASapplications in the foodstuff area, in this particular case, tocharacterize foodstuff through optical absorbance spectra,making calibrations and mathematical analysis of data. It isknown that different photoacoustic configurations havediverse applications in several areas of the knowledge andwith the possibility of being used for the obtaining of spectranot only as a function of wavelength, but as well as a functionof light modulation frequency. It is worth mentioning thatnot only amplitude spectra but also phase ones and signalsdepending on the frequency can be obtained, which wouldlead to the application of other methods and mathematicalanalysis to obtain nonradiative relaxation times and sampledepth analysis [95–100], among other optical and thermalparameters.

6 Journal of Spectroscopy

Tabl

e1:

Summaryof

applications

ofph

otoacoustic

spectroscopy

infood

stuff

andplants.

Specim

enEx

perimental

criterion

Spectral

region

λ(nm)

Source

(pow

er(W

))and

mod

ulationfrequency

(Hz)

Region

orcenters

absorbing(C

A)λ(nm)

Mathematical

analysis

Sign

ificant

finding

s/results

Cou

ntry

Redlettu

ceandchard

seeds

Pieces

offreshfruit

wereused.

250–

750

Xenon

lamp

P�700W

(cho

pper,1

7Hz)

600,

300

Non

e

ByusingPA

S,aged

seeds

invegetablewere

evaluated.

Non

aged

seedsh

adhigh

erβvalues

than

aged

seeds(Pardo

etal.)[58].

Mexico

Acai,cupu

açu,

Brazil

nut,andpersim

mon

Pieces

offreshfruit

wereused.

200–

400

Xearclamp

P�1000

W(cho

pper,3

0Hz)

218.4,

224.6,

227.2,

207.1,

218.4,

etc.

Spectral

deconv

olution

ByusingPA

S,band

peakswerefoun

dcorrespo

ndingto

phenolic

acids:p-

hydroxybenzoic,g

allic,

protocatechu

ic,v

anillic,

cinn

amic,p

-cou

maric,

caffeic,and

ferulic

(Neto

etal.)[59].

Brazil

Persianlim

ejuice

(Citrus

latifolia)

Persianlim

eswere

dividedinto

four

categories:the

high

est

quality

,the

second

-class,

thethird-class,and

waste-class.

300–

800

Xelamp

P�1000

W(cho

pper,1

7Hz)

314,

359,

445,

496,

684

Second

derivativ

e

.elevelo

fph

otoacoustic

signalis

diminish

eddepend

ing

onthequ

ality

oflemon

evaluated.

.elower

quality

correspo

nds

lower

photoacoustic

signallevel..

eband

ofgreatest

absorptio

nfor

lemon

juicewas

foun

dat

300–

400nm

,related

totheflavono

idregion

(Corzo-Ruizet

al.)[60].

Mexico

Chilipasilla

pepp

ers

(Capsicum

annu

umL.)

Chile

pasilla

was

used

dehydrated.

250–

700

Xelamp

P�1000

W(cho

pper,1

7Hz)

265–

400

Non

e

Photoacoustic

signal

increasesa

safunctio

nof

thedehydrationtim

e;the

authorsrelate

the

flavono

idregion

between

265and400nm

(Zendejas-Leal

etal.)

[61].

Mexico

Journal of Spectroscopy 7

Tabl

e1:

Con

tinued.

Specim

enEx

perimental

criterion

Spectral

region

λ(nm)

Source

(pow

er(W

))and

mod

ulationfrequency

(Hz)

Region

orcenters

absorbing(C

A)λ(nm)

Mathematical

analysis

Sign

ificant

finding

s/results

Cou

ntry

Maize

(Zea

maysL.):

White,y

ellow,a

ndblue

Sampleadaptedto

the

cellsiz

e(6mm).

300–

800

Xelamp

P�700W

300–

350

300–

450

300–

460

Varianceanalysisand

leasts

ignificant

difference(LSD

)test

Indicatedaratio

ofthe

absorbance

band

sofeach

maize

evaluated(w

hite,

yello

w,and

blue

colors),

with

compo

nentssuchas

flavono

ids,flavono

ls,caroteno

ids,and

anthocyanins

(Dom

ınguez-Pacheco

etal.)[46].

Mexico

Buckwheat

grainmeal

Who

lemealw

asprepared

from

thegrain.

250–

600

Xelamp

1000

W(cho

pper,1

7Hz)

280,

378

Standard

deviations,

correlation

Usin

gPA

S,itwas

possible

toob

servetwo

absorbentp

eaks

at280

and378nm

relatedto

proteincontenta

ndrutin

,respectively(D

oka

etal.)[49].

Hun

gary

Netherla

nds

Italy

Mushroo

msAgaric

usbrasiliensis

Avolumeof

80mm

3of

each

samplewas

used.

270–1000

Xearclamp

P�1000

W(cho

pper,1

6Hz)

300–

400

475

Multiv

ariate

analysis,

linearcorrelation

Flavon

oids

show

atleast

twoabsorbance

band

s:on

erang

ingfrom

240to

280nm

andanotherfrom

300to

400nm

..e

correlationbetweenthe

PAabsorptio

nspectraof

thesamples

andtheir

totalp

heno

liccontent

was

foun

d..

eph

enolic

contento

fthe

samples

was

linearly

associated

with

itsno

rmalized

PAsig

nala

t475nm

(De

Oliveira

etal.)[17].

Brazil

8 Journal of Spectroscopy

Tabl

e1:

Con

tinued.

Specim

enEx

perimental

criterion

Spectral

region

λ(nm)

Source

(pow

er(W

))and

mod

ulationfrequency

(Hz)

Region

orcenters

absorbing(C

A)λ(nm)

Mathematical

analysis

Sign

ificant

finding

s/results

Cou

ntry

Maize

(Zea

maysL.)

.eseedsused

were

three:crystalline

white

maize,crystallin

eyello

wcorn,a

ndflo

uryblue

maize.

300–

800

Xelamp

P�700W

(cho

pper,1

7Hz)

350

Statistical

analysis

Itwasindicated,them

ain

absorptio

ncenter

was

foun

dat

350nm

ofwavelength,

anditwas

associated

tothe

presence

offlavono

ids

andflavono

ls.At470

nm,

theabsorptio

ncenters

couldbe

dueto

the

presence

ofcaroteno

ids,

andat

650nm

,the

absorptio

ncentersare

associated

mainlywith

thepresence

ofanthocyanins

(Dom

ınguez-Pacheco

etal.)[46].

Mexico

Maize

(Zea

maysL.)

Priorto

thestud

y,the

seed

lotw

asstandardized

insiz

eandcolor.

270–

500

Xelamp

P�700W

(cho

pper,1

7Hz)

350

Statistical

analysis

.eop

tical

absorptio

ncoeffi

cientof

two

grow

ingregion

sin

Mexicowas

foun

dto

have

asim

ilarb

ehaviorin

allg

rains(Rod

rıguez-

Paez

etal.)[62].

Mexico

Maize

(Zea

maysL.)

.eseed

varietiesused

werecrystalline

and

floury.

325–

700

Xelamp

P�700W

(cho

pper,1

7Hz)

350

650

Varianceanalysis

From

theph

otoacoustic

signal,theop

tical

absorptio

ncoeffi

cient(β)

andop

tical

penetration

leng

th(l β),bo

thas

afunctio

nof

the

wavelength,

were

measured,

identifying

differences

betweenthe

flouryandcrystalline

seedsβvalueat

650nm

(Hernand

ez-A

guilaret

al.)[63].

Mexico

Journal of Spectroscopy 9

Tabl

e1:

Con

tinued.

Specim

enEx

perimental

criterion

Spectral

region

λ(nm)

Source

(pow

er(W

))and

mod

ulationfrequency

(Hz)

Region

orcenters

absorbing(C

A)λ(nm)

Mathematical

analysis

Sign

ificant

finding

s/results

Cou

ntry

Maize

seed

(Zea

maysL

.).

eseed

geno

typeshad

bluish

pigm

entatio

n.330–

800

Xelamp

P�1000

W(cho

pper,1

7Hz)

450

Phaseresolved

PAsig

nalp

hase

canbe

used

tocharacterize

layersatdifferent

depths.

.eauthorsrepo

rted

the

optical

absorbance

spectraat

different

light

mod

ulationfrequencies

andcomparedthese

spectrawith

theon

esob

tained

from

theph

ase-

resolved

metho

din

order

toseparate

theop

tical

absorptio

nspectraof

seed

pericarp

and

endo

sperm.A

bsorption

band

intherang

eof

550–

750nm

isattributed

toanthocyanins

inthe

aleurone

layer

(Hernand

ez-A

guilar

etal.)[47].

Mexico

Curcumacurrymustard

.esamples

wereplaced

intheph

otoacoustic

cell

with

outp

reviou

spreparation.

Inthecase

ofmustard,itw

asplaced

onfilterpaper.

280–

700

Xelamp

P�700W

(cho

pper,1

7Hz)

290–

540

318,

345,

and535

Firstderivativ

e

.ecurcum

aand“curry”

have

ahigh

erop

tical

absorbance

spectrum

obtained

byPA

Swhen

comparedto

theop

tical

absorptio

nspectrum

ofmustard

attherang

eof

300to

670nm

..e

maxim

umabsorptio

npeaksin

thesamples

evaluatedfrom

calculatingthefirst

derivativ

eof

the

absorbance

spectrawere

foun

dat

318,

345,

and

535nm

(Hernand

ezet

al.)[64].

Mexico

10 Journal of Spectroscopy

Tabl

e1:

Con

tinued.

Specim

enEx

perimental

criterion

Spectral

region

λ(nm)

Source

(pow

er(W

))and

mod

ulationfrequency

(Hz)

Region

orcenters

absorbing(C

A)λ(nm)

Mathematical

analysis

Sign

ificant

finding

s/results

Cou

ntry

Chilipasilla

pepp

ers

(Capsicum

annu

umL.)

Pasillachili

pepp

ersw

ere

stud

iedin

threedifferent

stages:g

reen,red,and

dried.

300–

800

Xelamp

P�1000

W(cho

pper,1

7Hz)

330,354,

and367

Non

e

.eph

otoacoustic

signal

was

directlyprop

ortio

nal

with

thewavelength.

Absorbancespectra

qualita

tivelyshow

that

thegreenstageisricher

inflavono

idsandthat

decrease

anddegradeas

thepepp

ersripen

(Barrientos-Sotelo

etal.)

[65].

Mexico

Maltin

gbarle

yseeds

.eseedswere

photosensitized

bysoakingthem

foron

eho

urin

methylene

blue.

400–

700

Xenon

lamp

P�700W

(cho

pper,1

7Hz)

575

Statistical

analysis

Byph

otoacoustic

spectroscopy,itis

possible

toob

tain

the

optical

absorptio

ncoeffi

ciento

fbarleyseeds

atdifferent

cond

ition

s:in

naturalc

olor

anddyed

with

methylene

blue.

Also

,itispo

ssible

todefin

etheop

tical

rang

ewhere

thesamples

are

optically

opaque

orop

tically

transparent

(Perez

Reyeset

al.)[66].

Mexico

Maize

grains

(Zea

mays

L.)

Grainswereob

tained

from

thecentralp

artof

theearof

corn

foreach

variety;

blue

maize

and

yello

wmaize

wereused.

325–

800

Xelamp

P�700W

(cho

pper,1

7Hz)

348,

502,623,

671,

etc.

Firstderivativ

e

Both

varietiesshow

distinct

maxim

aabsorptio

npeaks,which

correspo

ndto

zero

values

inthefirstderivativ

eof

β(optical

absorptio

ncoeffi

cient).F

ortheblue

maize

grain,

maxim

umabsorptio

npeakswere

observed

at(348,5

02,

623,

and671)

nm.Inthe

case

oftheyello

wmaize

grain,

maxim

umabsorptio

npeakswere

observed

at392nm

and

505nm

(Molinaet

al.)

[50].

Mexico

Journal of Spectroscopy 11

Tabl

e1:

Con

tinued.

Specim

enEx

perimental

criterion

Spectral

region

λ(nm)

Source

(pow

er(W

))and

mod

ulationfrequency

(Hz)

Region

orcenters

absorbing(C

A)λ(nm)

Mathematical

analysis

Sign

ificant

finding

s/results

Cou

ntry

Dutch-processed

cocoa

powder

Gratin

gchocolate

samples

was

theon

lypreparatorystep

requ

ired.

300–

650

Xelamp

P�1000

W(cho

pper,1

7Hz)

Nopeaks

Standard

deviations,

correlation

.eob

tained

spectrum

features

nocharacteristic

peaksin

theinvestigated

wavelengthrang

e..

ere

isatrendof

decreasin

gPA

signalw

ithincreasin

gwavelengthbasedon

the

shapeof

spectrum

(Dok

aet

al.)[67].

Hun

gary,

Netherla

nds

Beans(Ph

aseolusv

ulgaris

L.)

.evarietiesused

were

cultivateddu

ring

the

spring

-sum

mer

agricultu

ralc

yclesof

the

years2002,2

001,

2006,

2002,and

2006

indifferent

region

sof

Mexico

350–

750

Xelamp

P�700W

(cho

pper,1

7Hz)

350–

450

Varianceanalysis

βdecreaseswith

increasin

gwavelength,

beingrepo

rted

the

high

esta

bsorbanceband

inarang

eof

350–

450nm

.Significant

statistical

differences

werefoun

dbetweenthe

photoacoustic

signals

obtained

from

each

varietyof

beansat

408nm

(Sanchez-

Hernand

ezet

al)[68].

Mexico

Maize

(Zea

maysL.)

grains

Cornadjusted

toasiz

e:diam

eter

andthickn

ess

of6and3mm,

respectiv

ely.

325–

800

Xelamp

P�700W

(cho

pper,1

7Hz)

350

Analysis

ofthevariance,

first

derivativ

e

.espectrum

repo

rted

bytheauthorspresented

thehigh

estabsorbance

band

inarang

eof

325–

400nm

(Molina

etal.)[48].

Mexico

Lyop

hilized

apricots

(Prunu

sarmeniaca

L.)

.efruitof

seven

apricots

wereexam

ined

at80

%of

their

commercial

maturity

,andsamplevolumewas

of0.25

cm3 .

—Xelamp

P�1000

W17

Hz

470,

450

Standard

deviations,

correlation

PASappearsto

bethe

mostfavou

rable

techniqu

eto

determ

ine

totalc

arotenoidcontent,

amon

gothers

(Dok

aet

al.)[69].

Hun

gary

Croatia

Netherla

nds

Belgium

12 Journal of Spectroscopy

Tabl

e1:

Con

tinued.

Specim

enEx

perimental

criterion

Spectral

region

λ(nm)

Source

(pow

er(W

))and

mod

ulationfrequency

(Hz)

Region

orcenters

absorbing(C

A)λ(nm)

Mathematical

analysis

Sign

ificant

finding

s/results

Cou

ntry

“Tortillas”

.esamples

were

homogenized

incolor

andsiz

es,o

rderingthe

measurement,samesid

eof

the“tortilla”.

350–

700

Xelamp

P�700W

(cho

pper,1

7Hz)

360–

400

Analysis

ofvariance

and

mod

elof

Paulet

and

Chambron

(1979)

.eauthorsindicate

that

PASwas

able

tofin

dthe

optical

absorptio

ncoeffi

cients

(β)of

colors

ofdifferent

tortillas

from

theph

otoacoustic

signals

amplitu

deandusingthe

RosencwaigandGersho

mod

el.P

ASissim

pleto

use,requ

ires

onlyasm

all

quantityof

samplefor

analysis,

andinvolves

aminim

umpreparation

(Hernand

ezet

al.)[55].

Mexico

Maize

(Zea

maysL.)

.eseedswere

homogenized

interm

sof

size,shape,andcolora

nddimensio

nsadjusted

tothesiz

eof

thePA

cell

(6mm,d

iameter).

320–

700

620–

700

Xelamp

P�700W

andmod

ulated

(cho

pper,1

7Hz)

350–

390

Metilred:

450–

590

Mod

elof

Rosencwaig

andGershotest

Tukey

PASwas

considered

asa

potentiald

iagn

ostic

tool

forthecharacterizatio

nof

theseeds,anditwas

possible

tofin

dthe

optical

absorptio

ncoeffi

cientβformaize

seeds.In

additio

n,conv

entio

nalreflectance

measurements

(obtained

with

theintegrating

sphere)wereperformed

tovalid

atePA

Sabsorptio

nmeasurements..

eresults

show

that

the

absorbance

spectraand

reflectiondataof

thes

eed

samples

are

complem

entary

(Hernand

ez-A

guilar

etal.)[70].

Mexico

Journal of Spectroscopy 13

Tabl

e1:

Con

tinued.

Specim

enEx

perimental

criterion

Spectral

region

λ(nm)

Source

(pow

er(W

))and

mod

ulationfrequency

(Hz)

Region

orcenters

absorbing(C

A)λ(nm)

Mathematical

analysis

Sign

ificant

finding

s/results

Cou

ntry

Coff

eegrains

(adu

lterated)

.ebeanswereroasted

(210

° C)d

uringatim

eof6

to7min..

eadulteratio

nwas

carried

out,adding

beansand

barle

y.

300–

800

Xearclamp

P�1000

W(cho

pper,1

7Hz)

300–

450

700–

800

Derivatives

and

differences

.eph

otoacoustic

techniqu

eallows

spectroscopicstud

iesof

adulteratedcoffeefrom

adirect

analysisof

solid

samplesofcoffeep

owder,

barle

ysoya,and

beans.

Sign

ificant

differences

areob

served,interm

sof

form

,between300and

450nm

,where

the

behaviou

rof

the

carotenesand

β-caroteneschang

easthe

adulterant

(bean)

isadded.

Similarly

,the

region

of700to

800nm

correspo

ndingto

the

absorptio

nofthea

lkaloid

“caff

eine,”isalso

attenu

ated

(Salcedo

etal.)[71].

Colom

bia

Dried

pastas

Pastas

prepared

with

different

amou

ntso

feggs

werestud

ied

400–

550

Xelamp

P�1000

W(cho

pper,1

7Hz)

470

Correlatio

nRe

gressio

n

PAScanbe

prop

osed

asa

new

analytical

tool

fora

rapidscreening/control

ofthetotalc

arotenoid

concentrationin

pastas

(Dok

aet

al.)[72].

Hun

gary,

Netherla

nds

Croatia

14 Journal of Spectroscopy

Tabl

e1:

Con

tinued.

Specim

enEx

perimental

criterion

Spectral

region

λ(nm)

Source

(pow

er(W

))and

mod

ulationfrequency

(Hz)

Region

orcenters

absorbing(C

A)λ(nm)

Mathematical

analysis

Sign

ificant

finding

s/results

Cou

ntry

Dyesin

commercial

prod

ucts:b

rilliantblue

(B),sunset

yello

w(S),

andtartrazine

(T)

Solutio

nsof

gelatin

epo

wder(peach

and

lemon

flavors,d

issolved

inho

twater)andjuice

powder(citrus

fruit

flavor,dissolvedin

water,)wereused.

350–

750

350–

550

350–

600

Xearclamp

P�800W

(cho

pper,2

0Hz)

600–

680

380–

490

430–

540

620,

510,

452

Decon

volutio

nfrom

Gaussian

Photoacoustic

spectroscopy

allowed

the

simultaneou

sdeterm

inationofbrilliant

blue,sun

setyello

w,a

ndtartrazine

asbinary

mixturesin

gelatin

and

juicepo

wders,w

itha

very

good

agreem

ent

betweenthevalues

determ

ined

byusingfirst

derivativ

espectrop

hotometry..

ePA

Stechniqu

ecanbe

appliedforthe

determ

inationof

the

selected

dyes

incommercial

food

prod

ucts

(Coehloet

al.)

[16].

Brazil

Acai(Eu

terpeoleracea)

seeds

C.gloeosporio

ides

fung

us-in

fected

acaiseed

samples

wereused

assm

allp

astilles6mm

indiam

eter

and1mm

inthickn

essto

standardize

itsform

.

250–1000

Xearclamp

P�150W

300–

350

650–

900

Fittothedata

whenthey

wereob

tained

asa

functio

nof

frequency

Differencesbetweenthe

photoacoustic

spectraof

theinfected

seed

were

foun

d.Su

perior

PAspectralcurvewas

forthe

sample(treated),

interm

ediary

PAspectral

curveisforsample(w

ithfung

usscraps),and

inferior

PAspectral

curveisforsample

(fun

gusinfected).

Characteristicsp

eaks

and

band

swereob

served

intherang

efrom

650to

900nm

ascribed

toorganiccompo

unds

with

carboxylates

andam

ines

(fun

ctionalg

roup

s)form

ingthetypical

metabolic

structures

ofthefung

us(Rezende

etal.)[73].

Brazil

Journal of Spectroscopy 15

Tabl

e1:

Con

tinued.

Specim

enEx

perimental

criterion

Spectral

region

λ(nm)

Source

(pow

er(W

))and

mod

ulationfrequency

(Hz)

Region

orcenters

absorbing(C

A)λ(nm)

Mathematical

analysis

Sign

ificant

finding

s/results

Cou

ntry

Maize

(Zea

maysL.)

.eseedsused

wereof

thefollo

wingcolors:

white,y

ellowish

,and

bluish.

600–

710

500–

750

Xelamp

(cho

pper,1

7Hz)

650

Statistical

analysis

PAStechniqu

edemon

stratedto

bea

usefulforthe

stud

yof

the

effects

inliq

uid

chloroph

yllo

fseedling

leaves

which

camefrom

irradiated

maize

seeds.

.ebluish-colored

seed

hadthehigh

estop

tical

absorptio

ncoeffi

cient

andanegativ

elaserlight

respon

se,w

henitwas

treatedbefore

sowing

(Hernand

ez-A

guilar

etal.)[74].

Mexico

Wheat

grains

(Triticum

aestivum

L.)

Wheat

seedsfrom

different

prod

uctiv

ecycles

andmeasuredarea

of4

×6mm

wereused

with

outp

rior

preparation.

350–

800

Xelamp

(cho

pper,1

7Hz)

350

Non

e

Photoacoustic

spectrum

decreasesa

safunctio

nof

thefrequency,

and

differences

areob

tained

inthespectraof

the

deteriorated

and

nond

eterioratedgrain,

where

theauthors

repo

rted

lower

optical

absorptio

nin

theyoun

gseed

whencompared

with

theoldero

nedu

eto

deteriorationin

theolder

seed

becauseof

the

presence

offung

ior

bacteria

during

storage,

andthisfact

prod

uces

dark

region

sand,

asa

consequence,ahigh

erop

tical

absorptio

n(Pacheco

etal.)[51].

Mexico

16 Journal of Spectroscopy

Tabl

e1:

Con

tinued.

Specim

enEx

perimental

criterion

Spectral

region

λ(nm)

Source

(pow

er(W

))and

mod

ulationfrequency

(Hz)

Region

orcenters

absorbing(C

A)λ(nm)

Mathematical

analysis

Sign

ificant

finding

s/results

Cou

ntry

Wheat

Twoseed

cond

ition

swereused:treated

with

methylene

blue

and

untreated.

600–

700

Xelamp

P�1000

W(cho

pper,1

7Hz)

650

Statistical

analysis

.ePA

spectroscopy

was

demon

stratedas

asuita

bletechniqu

eto

stud

ytheop

tical

absorptio

ncoeffi

cientβ

ofwheat

seedswith

and

with

outp

hotosensitizer

(Hernand

ez-A

guilar

etal.)[75].

Mexico

Maize

(Zea

maysL.)

Maize

seedswere

irradiated

byadiod

elaser.

400–

500

Xelamp

P�1000

W(cho

pper,1

7Hz)

471–

478

Statistical

analysis

.ePA

metho

dwas

demon

stratedas

atechniqu

ecapableof

stud

ying

thee

ffectcaused

byirradiation(diode

laserradiatio

nat650nm

)of

maize

seeds.PA

signalswererelatedin

therang

eof

471to

478nm

with

β-carotene

andlutein,the

natural

pigm

ents

presentin

the

seedlin

gleaf

ofmaize

(Hernand

ez-A

guilar

etal.)[76].

Mexico

Coff

eeOrganic

and

conv

entio

nalg

reen

coffeebeanswereused.

300–

800

Xearclamp

P�1000

W432–

718,

725–

740,

743–

772

Derivativesubtraction

andANOVA

Statistical

differences

werefoun

dbetween

certainrang

esof

wavelengthof

thespectra

ofeach

type

ofcoffee..

ePA

Stechniqu

eallowsa

spectroscopicanalysisof

organicop

aque

samples

(Delgado

etal.)[77].

Colom

bia

Water

PAspectrum

were

recorded

underthe

labo

ratory

cond

ition

s(T

�−1

0°C,P

�3.5105

Pa).

200–1100

Xearclamp

P�500W

226,244,289,

302,326,

744,844,

920,974

Non

e

.edistilled

water

istransparentbetweenthe

wavelengths

326to

920nm

..estrong

absorptio

npeak

was

foun

dat

thewavelength

226,

289,

and974nm

(Kapilet

al.)[78].

India

Journal of Spectroscopy 17

Tabl

e1:

Con

tinued.

Specim

enEx

perimental

criterion

Spectral

region

λ(nm)

Source

(pow

er(W

))and

mod

ulationfrequency

(Hz)

Region

orcenters

absorbing(C

A)λ(nm)

Mathematical

analysis

Sign

ificant

finding

s/results

Cou

ntry

Corn(seedlings)

Irradiated

seeds

presow

ingwith

laser

diod

e.600–

700

Xelamp

1000

W(cho

pper,1

7Hz)

650,

680

Statistical

analysis

Sign

ificant

statistical

differences

werefoun

din

theam

plitu

deof

the

photoacoustic

signal

whenseedlin

gleaves

from

irradiated

seeds

weremeasured,

comparing

thepo

ints

correspo

ndingto

chloroph

ylls“a”and“b,”

i.e.,at

680and650nm

(Hernand

ezet

al.)[79].

Mexico

Coff

ee

.ecoffeeroastin

gwas

done

inatemperature

rang

ebetween200and

210°C.

510–

775

Halogen

lamp

P�1000

W630and670

Second

derivativ

e

.eam

plitu

deof

thePA

signalc

ontained

several

absorptio

ncenters;in

thiscase,tho

secorrespo

ndingto

the

chloroph

yllp

igments

wereidentifi

ed.T

oidentifythem

more

clearly

,the

criterion

ofthesecond

derivativ

ewas

used

(Delgado

etal.)[80].

Colom

bia

Mexico

Redsorghu

m(Sorghum

bicolorL.)flo

urs

Grainsweresurface-

sterilizedby

washing

and

stirring

them

ina5%

aqueou

ssolutio

nof

sodium

hypo

chlorite,

laterthegrains

were

dried.

250–

550

Xelamp

300W

(cho

pper,1

6Hz)

285,

335

Correlatio

n

PAspectrashow

two

characteristic

band

s:the

first

one(centeredat

285nm

)isdu

eto

arom

atic

aminoacidsin

sorghu

mflo

ur,w

hile

another,closeto

335nm

,isdu

eto

theflavono

ids

andph

enolicsacid

presentinthepericarp

ofsorghu

mflo

ur..

ePA

signald

ecreases

with

increasin

gwavelength

across

theentirespectral

rang

estud

ied(D

oka

etal.)[53].

Hun

gary

Netherla

nds

18 Journal of Spectroscopy

Tabl

e1:

Con

tinued.

Specim

enEx

perimental

criterion

Spectral

region

λ(nm)

Source

(pow

er(W

))and

mod

ulationfrequency

(Hz)

Region

orcenters

absorbing(C

A)λ(nm)

Mathematical

analysis

Sign

ificant

finding

s/results

Cou

ntry

Water,h

exagon

alice,

andsnow

Snow

(surface

hoar)was

prepared

inthe

labo

ratory

byinjecting

warm

moist

airplus

water

vapo

rin

acold

cham

ber.

200–1100

Xearclamp

P�300W

320,

971–

974

Non

e

PAspectrum

ofdistilled

water

show

sastrong

absorbance

inthe

ultravioletUV

region

below

320nm

and

anotherstrong

absorbance

maxim

aat

thewavelengths

971–

974nm

,inthenear

infrared

NIR

region

.Be

tweenthewavelengths

320–

922nm

,distilled

water

istransparent.In

general,theoverallP

Asig

nalstrengthisgreater

iniceas

comparedto

snow

(Kapilet

al.)[81].

India

Mango

Non

e200–

400

Xearclamp

P�1000

W220,

250–

280,

330–

370

Non

e

Indicatedthepresence

ofthreeband

sat∼220,

250–

280and

330–

370nm

ingood

agreem

entwith

conv

entio

nalo

ptical

absorptio

nspectrum

attributed

tothe

flavono

idtype

ofbiom

olecules

called

quercetin

(Lim

aand

Filho)

[56].

Brazil

Wheat

andrice

(patho

gens)

Spores

wereextracted

from

theinfected

seeds.

200–

800

High-pressure

Xelamp

P�300Watt

232,292,372,

552,652,

272,

etc.

Non

e

.eauthorsshow

that

PAspectroscopy

isa

suita

bleno

ndestructiv

etechniqu

efor

distinguish

ingpathogens

ofdifferent

genera

and

species..

istechniqu

eproved

useful

for

differentiald

iagn

osisof

variou

sseed-borne

pathogensof

wheat

and

rice

(Gup

taet

al.)[82].

India

Journal of Spectroscopy 19

Tabl

e1:

Con

tinued.

Specim

enEx

perimental

criterion

Spectral

region

λ(nm)

Source

(pow

er(W

))and

mod

ulationfrequency

(Hz)

Region

orcenters

absorbing(C

A)λ(nm)

Mathematical

analysis

Sign

ificant

finding

s/results

Cou

ntry

Milk

(fresh

andoxidized)

.ewho

lemilk

powder

ofdifferent

compo

sitions

(com

position:

27%

fat,

26%

protein,

5%water,

36%

lactose,and6%

ash)

was

used

andwas

oxidized

byexpo

singitto

UVradiationandheat

inthepresence

ofair.

250–

500

Xelamp

300W

(20Hz)

290

320–

360

Correlatio

n

.eauthorsindicated

that

PASisametho

dfor

routineandrapid

assessmento

fperoxide

valuein

oxidized

who

lemilk

powder.Absorbent

peakswerefoun

dat

290nm

associated

with

thepresence

ofarom

atic

aminoacidsin

themilk

powders.S

pectral

changesby

oxidation

werein

320–

360nm

(Dok

aet

al.)[41].

Hun

gary

Netherla

nds

Pericarp

ofmaize

(Zea

MaysL.)

.emateriale

valuated

was

obtained

ofmaize

grainnixtam

alized.

300–

700

Xelamp

400–

450

Spectrum

differences

.eop

tical

absorbance

spectrareveal

the

presence

offlavono

idsin

thepericarp

which

are

sensitive

totheactio

nof

alkalin

ecook

ingand

which

arecharacterized

byan

absorbance

band

between400and450nm

that

providethe

characteristic

coloring

yello

wish

tothese

biop

olym

ers(H

ernand

ezet

al.)[83].

Mexico

20 Journal of Spectroscopy

Tabl

e1:

Con

tinued.

Specim

enEx

perimental

criterion

Spectral

region

λ(nm)

Source

(pow

er(W

))and

mod

ulationfrequency

(Hz)

Region

orcenters

absorbing(C

A)λ(nm)

Mathematical

analysis

Sign

ificant

finding

s/results

Cou

ntry

Pericarp

ofmaize

(Zea

MaysL.)

Coo

kedcorn

was

used

from

which

thepericarp

was

extractedto

evaluate

it.

300–

700

Xelamp

(cho

pper,1

7Hz)

300–

350

375–

450

Spectrum

differences

Absorbancespectrum

intheregionof300–

800nm

inthesefilmsis

constituted

bythe

superposition

oftwo

absorbentc

enters:o

necorrespo

ndingto

the

absorptio

nin

theUV

region

of300–

350nm

for

cellu

lose

intheepidermis

andtheotherin

the

region

of375–

450nm

correspo

ndingto

the

pigm

ents

presentin

the

pericarp

thataresensitive

toan

alkalin

emedium

(Hernand

ezet

al.)[84].

Mexico

Skim

med

milk

powder

andwheypo

wder

Pure

skim

med

milk

and

wheypo

wders;m

ixtures

weremadeat

5,7.5,

10,

15,a

nd20%.

300–

600

XeLamp

P�450W

Mod

ulationFrequency,

30Hz

370

Subtractioncorrelation

.eun

know

nam

ount

offoreignwheypo

wderc

anthen

bedeterm

ined

from

apreviously

made

calib

ratio

ncurveby

PAS.

So,isu

sefulfor

detection

ofadulteratedmilk

bywheypo

wder(D

oka

etal.)[40].

Hun

gary

Netherla

nds

Pb30

4adulterant

ingrou

ndsw

eetred

paprika

(Capsicum

annu

um)

.eam

ount

ofPb

304in

mixture

was

0.5,1,2,and

2.5g.

320–

700

Xelamp

300W

(cho

pper,5

4Hz)

545

Non

e

Dem

onstratedthat

the

PASas

potential

techniqu

eto

identify

samples

adulteratedwith

lead

tetraoxide

(Dok

aet

al.)[43].

Hun

gary

Netherla

nds

Journal of Spectroscopy 21

Tabl

e1:

Con

tinued.

Specim

enEx

perimental

criterion

Spectral

region

λ(nm)

Source

(pow

er(W

))and

mod

ulationfrequency

(Hz)

Region

orcenters

absorbing(C

A)λ(nm)

Mathematical

analysis

Sign

ificant

finding

s/results

Cou

ntry

Paprika(Capsicum

annu

um)season

ing

prod

ucts

ofpaprika

Pericarpsof

red,

yello

w,

andgreenripe

paprika

weredriedandmade

powderto

beevaluated.

200–

800

Xenon

arclamp

P�1KW

220–

550

540

Histogram

.espectrum

ofyello

wpaprikarevealsin

the

visib

leregion

four

absorptio

ns,twomaxim

aat

411and435nm

and

twoshou

ldersat

abou

t442and483nm

..e

maxim

umat

411nm

can

beattributed

tothe

absorptio

nof

capsorub

in,w

hereas

the

predom

inance

ofthe

yello

w-colored

caroteno

idsin

diverse

concentrations

determ

ines

the

maxim

umat

435nm

(zeaxanthinand

cryptoxanthin)

andthe

absorptio

nat

442nm

(β-carotene,zeaxanthin,

andlutein)..

ered

pigm

entscapsorub

inand

capsanthin

are

respon

sible

forthe

absorptio

nat

540nm

(Vinha

andHaas)

[85].

Germany

Eggs

Eggpo

wders

irradiated

by60Co(0,2.5,5,10,and

20kG

y).

240–

530

Xelamp

300W

(cho

pper,5

6Hz)

275,

480

Correlatio

n

Points

outthatthe

PAS

techniqu

ehas

possibilitiesto

evaluate

thechangesdu

eto

irradiationin

egg

powders

(Dok

aet

al.)

[42].

22 Journal of Spectroscopy

Tabl

e1:

Con

tinued.

Specim

enEx

perimental

criterion

Spectral

region

λ(nm)

Source

(pow

er(W

))and

mod

ulationfrequency

(Hz)

Region

orcenters

absorbing(C

A)λ(nm)

Mathematical

analysis

Sign

ificant

finding

s/results

Cou

ntry

Strawberries

Strawberriesof

different

stages

ofmaturity

were

used

andselected

accordingto

theirsiz

eandcolor,rang

ingfrom

white

(unripe)

todark

red(overripe).

250–

750

Xearclamp

P�1000

W47,1

07,a

nd190Hz

Ligh

tintensity

139W

·m−2

510

278

Fitte

dcurve

.eauthorsdemon

strate

thepo

tentialo

fph

otoacoustic

spectroscopy

inthe

assessmento

fthe

maturity

ofstrawberries

usingthespectralratio

ofanthocyaninandprotein

band

s.Itisworth

notin

gthat

itisadirect

and

nond

estructiv

etechn

ique

thatmight

beextend

edto

otherho

rticulturalc

rops

(Bergevinet

al.)[57].

Canada

Ann

atto

Extracts

ofpigm

ents

wereob

tained

byapplying

soybeanoilo

raceton

eas

solvent.

200–1200

High-pressure

Xearc

lamp

P�1000

W

260

442,

467,

and498

Fitte

dcurve

.eabsorbance

peaksat

442,

467,

and498nm

wereassig

nedto

bixinin

solutio

n,whereas

the

peak

atabou

t260

nmwas

mainlydu

eto

the

absorbance

ofsoybean

oil(HaasandVinha)

[86].

Germany

White

breadflo

ur,rye

flour,soyaflo

ur,and

driedpeaflo

ur

Samples

ofdifferent

coloursw

ereused:w

hite,

yello

w,g

reen,a

ndbrow

n.

350–

700

Xenon

lamp

370,

385,410,

and475

Non

e

Indicateddiscrimination

ofdifferent

floursbased

onorigin,color,a

ndgrainsiz

eisp

ossib

le;they

suggestedits

usefulness

forqu

ality

control

purposes

(Favieret

al.)

[52].

Netherla

nds

Hun

gary

Milk

protein

Milk

protein

concentrates

containing

ferrogluconateat27,136,

1230,and

12000pp

mwereused.

300–

700

Xelamp

P�1600

W(cho

pper,3

0Hz)

348,

380,

and552

Mod

elRo

sencwaigand

Gersho

.eauthors

demon

stratedthat

PAmeasurements

(range

visib

lelight)on

milk

proteinconcentrates

are

capableof

determ

ining

Fecontentintheform

offerrogluconate

(Dok

aet

al.)[39].

Hun

gary

Journal of Spectroscopy 23

Tabl

e1:

Con

tinued.

Specim

enEx

perimental

criterion

Spectral

region

λ(nm)

Source

(pow

er(W

))and

mod

ulationfrequency

(Hz)

Region

orcenters

absorbing(C

A)λ(nm)

Mathematical

analysis

Sign

ificant

finding

s/results

Cou

ntry

Corn(Zea

maysL.)

Specim

enswereexpo

sed

todifferent

concentrations

ofalum

inum

.

350–

800

Xearclamp

P�1000

W20

Hz

680

Non

e

Itwas

foun

dthat

the

mosto

fthe

spectral

differences

liein

the

region

dominated

bythe

chloroph

yllb

and,

with

amaxim

umat

680nm

(Marqu

ezinie

tal.)[87].

Brazil

Bean

plants

(Pha

seolus

vulgarisL.

cv.F

oriG

S)Be

anleaves

weretreated

with

herbicides.

380–

720

High-pressure

Xelamp

P�450W

Mod

ulationfrequencyof

22Hz

475,

675

Statistic

analysis

.eph

otoacoustic

spectrum

ofbean

leaves

was

decreasedwith

the

useof

herbicides.W

hen

theleavesw

ereimmersed

inparaqu

at,the

ratio

oftheph

otoacoustic

signals,

PA67S/PA

475,

decreasedsig

nificantly

.Be

nzon

itrile

anddiuron

also

decreasedthe

intensity

oftheph

oto

acou

stic

spectrum

..e

changesindu

cedby

benzon

itrile

wereless

obviou

sthan

those

indu

cedby

diuron

.(Szigetiet

al.)[88].

Hun

gary

Milk

powder

.ePA

measurements

wereperformed

atroom

temperature

T�298°K.

200–

630

Xelamp

1000

W(cho

pper,2

0–1000

Hz)

280

Non

e

PAspectraof

tabletsof

milk

powdersho

wed

one

peak

at280nm

correspo

ndingto

the

absorptio

nof

proteins

andasm

allerb

andin

the

visib

le(400–5

00nm

)that

might

beassig

nedto

milk

caroteno

ids(N

souk

pog-

Kossiet

al.)[38].

Canada

24 Journal of Spectroscopy

Tabl

e1:

Con

tinued.

Specim

enEx

perimental

criterion

Spectral

region

λ(nm)

Source

(pow

er(W

))and

mod

ulationfrequency

(Hz)

Region

orcenters

absorbing(C

A)λ(nm)

Mathematical

analysis

Sign

ificant

finding

s/results

Cou

ntry

Skim

med

milk

,partly

skim

med

milk

(2%

fat),

who

lemilk

(3.25%

fat),

andothermilk

prod

ucts

Chedd

archeese

was

placed

inthe

photoacoustic

cellin

the

form

ofasm

alld

isc14

mm

indiam

eter

and

1mm

thick.Fo

rthe

other

prod

ucts,a

small

quantitywas

putinfillin

gthecell.

250–

440

Xearclamp

P�1000

W

Fata

bsorptionband

:250–

260proteinpeaks

280

Substractio

nof

spectrum

.eauthors

demon

stratedthe

possibility

ofusing

photoacoustic

spectroscopy

formilk

prod

ucta

nalysis

(Martel

etal.)[30].

Canada

Glycine

max

.esampleused

was

anintactleafcutintheform

ofdiscsof

5mm

diam

eter.

300–

800

Xearclamp

P�1000

Watts

MF

�25

Hz

450,

680

Phase-resolved

Itwas

prop

osed

that

photoacoustic

spectroscopy

isan

impo

rtanttoo

lfor

the

investigationof

insoluble

plantc

ompo

nents..

eauthor

repo

rted

the

spectrum

oftheleaf

with

thecharacteristic

absorbance

band

sof

the

waxycuticle,

caroteno

ids,and

chloroph

yll(Neryet

al.)

[89].

Brazil

Green

coffee

Coff

eebeansfreshly

grou

ndandroastedand

compacted

into

adisk-

shaped

samplecham

ber

intheP

Acellho

lderwere

used.

340–

610

Xelamp

P�400W

30Hz

360nm

Non

e

Photoacoustic

spectroscopy

was

prop

osed

aspo

ssible

nond

estructiv

ealternativeforin

situ

assessmento

fwater-

solublecompo

unds

ingreenor

roastedcoffee

beans(Reiset

al.)[90].

Brazil

Journal of Spectroscopy 25

Tabl

e1:

Con

tinued.

Specim

enEx

perimental

criterion

Spectral

region

λ(nm)

Source

(pow

er(W

))and

mod

ulationfrequency

(Hz)

Region

orcenters

absorbing(C

A)λ(nm)

Mathematical

analysis

Sign

ificant

finding

s/results

Cou

ntry

Seedlin

gsof

maize

mutants

Samples

werecut

immediately

before

placingthem

ina

photoacoustic

cell.

300–

800

Xelamp

P�450W

32Hz

320

Decon

volutio

n

Photoacoustic

spectroscopy

was

prop

osed

asasim

ple,

direct,n

ondestructive

alternativeforbo

thqu

alita

tiveand

quantitativeassessment

ofplantm

utations.Itisa

metho

dim

portanttothe

resourcesa

vailableto

the

plantgeneticist

(Lim

aet

al.)[91].

Brazil

Flow

erpetals

Blue

larkspur

Redpo

ppypetal

Non

e.380–

750

MF

�500Hz

380–

420

and

500–

650

400–

580

Scatteredtransm

ision

Diffusereflectance

Transm

ision

.eresults

indicated

coincidences

inthe

spectraob

tained

with

all

thetechniqu

esused,

coinciding

inallw

iththe

wavelengthof

the

maxim

umpeak

ofthe

signal(Li

etal.)[92].

China

Leaves

(species

ofEu

phorbia)

.etwigsof

theseplants

werecutun

derwater,

washedin

distilled

water,

andtheleaves

weredried

(purplepigm

entatio

nin

leaves).

400–

740

Spectrom

etermod

el6001

(EG

&G)

Mod

ulationfrequency

40Hz

545,

675

Average

.eph

otoacoustic

absorbance

spectra

presentedabsorbent

centersat

545and

675nm

,which

were

relatedto

anthocyanins

andchloroph

ylls

(Veeranjaneyuluand

Das)[93].

India

26 Journal of Spectroscopy

Tabl

e1:

Con

tinued.

Specim

enEx

perimental

criterion

Spectral

region

λ(nm)

Source

(pow

er(W

))and

mod

ulationfrequency

(Hz)

Region

orcenters

absorbing(C

A)λ(nm)

Mathematical

analysis

Sign

ificant

finding

s/results

Cou

ntry

Wheat

lignin

Twigsof

plants

werecut

underwater,w

ashedin

distilled

water,and

the

freshwheat

stem

s(culms)

wereob

tained

from

mature,

presenescent

plants

raise

din

grow

thcham

bers.S

mallsectio

nsof

woo

dandfield-dried

culm

werewashed.

250–

450

Xelamp

P�1000

WMod

ulationfrequency

150Hz

350

Non

e

Itwas

prop

osed

that

photoacoustic

spectroscopy

isan

impo

rtanttool

forthe

investigationof

insoluble

plantcompo

nents.

Absorbanceband

sin

the

300to

400nm

region

may

beattributable

tochem

ically

mod

ified

ordegraded

lignin

compo

nentsresulting

from

naturalaging

ofthe

polymer.C

hemical

mod

ificatio

nof

ligninis

know

nto

occurwhen

ligno

cellu

losic

materials

areexpo

sedto

near-U

Vlight

(Gou

ld)[94].

USA

.

Lettu

ce(chlorop

last

mem

branes)

.echloroplast

suspensio

nwas

adsorbed

oncotto

nwoo

land

measurement.

400–

720

Xearclamp

P�450W

770and72

Hz

580,

680

Normalized

.eauthorsrelatedthe

chlorella

compo

nent

atthewavelengthof

580nm

,and

thehigh

est

absorbance

peak

ofthe

obtained

spectrum

was

foun

dat

680nm

(Cahen

etal.)[33].

Israel

Spinach

Spinachleaf

of10

mm

indiam

eter

werecutand

mou

nted

onthesupp

ort

plate.

250–

700

XeLamp

P�1000

W450,

650

Differentia

tion

.ea

utho

rdem

onstrated

that

themajor

absorbing

compo

nentsin

the

spinacharethe

chloroph

ylls.

.e

chloroph

yllsaresim

ilar

tothehaem

oproteins

andcontainapo

rphyrin

ring

,thisbeingchelated

tomagnesiu

matthering

center

(Adamset

al.)

[34].

England

Journal of Spectroscopy 27

Tabl

e1:

Con

tinued.

Specim

enEx

perimental

criterion

Spectral

region

λ(nm)

Source

(pow

er(W

))and

mod

ulationfrequency

(Hz)

Region

orcenters

absorbing(C

A)λ(nm)

Mathematical

analysis

Sign

ificant

finding

s/results

Cou

ntry

Green

leaf

——

-——

Rosencwaigfoun

dSoret

band

at420nm

,the

caroteno

idband

structurebetween450

and550nm

,and

the

chloroph

yllb

and

between600and700nm

[29].

USA

Marinealgae

——

——

PAScanredu

cethe

amou

ntof

material

requ

ired

andcould

redu

cethetim

erequ

ired

fortheidentifi

catio

nof

plantspecies

(Rosencw

aigandHall)

[32].

Black-eyed

susan

Redrose

petals

—200–

800

XeLamp

P�4200

W340,

530

Non

e

Twomaxim

apeaksare

foun

d:thefirst

isdu

eto

cyanine(530

nm)

absorptio

nin

theflo

wer,

andthesecond

at340nm

isdu

eto

someother

ultraviolet-absorbing

compo

undin

thered

rose

petal.In

the

blackeyedsusan,

thebase

oftheflo

wer

petalisrich

inultraviolet-absorbing

flavano

lglucosid

es..

etechniqu

ecangive

useful

inform

ationabou

tph

otochemistry

(Harshbarger

andRo

bin)

[30].

USA

λ:wavelength;

MF:

mod

ulationfrequency,

CA:centers

absorbing,

P:po

wer,X

e:xeno

n,β:

optical

absorptio

ncoeffi

cient,nm

:nanom

eters,PA

:pho

toacou

stic;P

AS:

photoacoustic

spectroscopy.

28 Journal of Spectroscopy

It has been proven that PAS is a kind of “green tech-nology,” in the sense that it is possible to use it minimizingthe use of solvents, as well as without the need for samplepreparation and using only a small amount thereof. In re-lation to the state of the sample, it is possible to evaluate it insolid, liquid, or powder forms. �e current trend is tocontinue exploring di�erent applications, de�ning theconcentration of foodstu� components, di�erentiating themand evaluating the quality of them in relation to the addedchemicals (harmful) or phytochemicals (favourable to hu-man health) identi�ed at certain wavelengths, depending onthe absorbance centres of the substances contained therein.Application PAS portable systems in the sanitary quality(fungi, mycotoxins, etc.) and safety of foodstu� will berelevant in the coming years.

On the other hand, thanks to technological advances, it ispossible to replace xenon lamps with white light LEDs, RGB,or arrangements of switched LEDs or only LEDs at speci�cwavelengths. Also, the use of laser diodes allows an im-proved function in di�erent PAS applications.

Regarding photoacoustic cells, on the other hand, onewould expect and is already venturing into the creation ofphotoacoustic cells with methodologies for rapid proto-typing as 3D printing. �is will reduce the time of con-struction and particularized designs for di�erent speci�capplications. An important trend, in which some research

groups are already working, is in the replacement of thelock-in through controller cards and a laptop for the ac-quisition of data.

According to the aforementioned, this would lead to theportability of photoacoustic spectroscopy systems and to thecost reduction, making the technique available to interestedpeople, who could have a support system in the evaluation offoodstu� quality, resulting in a better decision for theconsumption of food and impacting people’s quality life,without forgetting the possible incursion of PAS, in theinternet of things, with the advancement in technology.�erefore, PAS can be technologically updated, and in thisway it can be applied to speci�c needs and continue its use,rescuing an old proposal to the new necessities of our time inthe real world. In this sense, it is necessary to be aware of theneed to generate knowledge in this area in a transdisciplinaryperspective, among institutions, researchers, and society, toproduce results in improving the quality of people’s life.

2. Conclusions

According to the present review of the scienti�c literature, itis possible to glimpse the technology of photoacousticspectroscopy, an old technology with ample potential fornew applications in food agroindustry. PAS is an alternativetechnology to face the problem of evaluating food to

900

850

800

750

700

650

600

550

500

450

400

350

300

250

200

Wav

elen

gth

(nm

)

Beta

caro

tene

Zeax

anth

inCr

ypto

xant

hin

Caps

orub

inCa

psan

thin

Ant

hocy

anin

sFl

avon

oid

Lyco

pene

Que

rcet

inPh

enol

ic ac

ids

p-H

ydro

xybe

nzoi

c aci

dG

allic

acid

Prot

ein

Chlo

roph

ylls

Chlo

rella

Caffe

ine

Pero

xide

Soyb

ean

oil

Ferr

oglu

cona

teH

erbi

cide

sLi

gnin

com

pone

nts

Cyan

ine

Cel

lulo

seLe

ad te

troxi

deAl

tern

aria

triti

cina

Helm

inth

ospo

rium

sativ

um

Milk

caro

teno

ids

Rutin

Carb

oxyl

ates

and

amin

esA

rom

atic

amin

o ac

ids

Phen

olic

cont

ent

Caro

teno

ids

Lute

in

232 to 700 nm202 to 900 nm180 to 545 nm

280 to 680 nm300 to 650 nm400 to 752 nm

350 to 752 nm477 to 478 nm478

Figure 1: Peaks or region obtained by photoacoustic spectroscopy in the analysis of some food or plants.

Journal of Spectroscopy 29

consume better quality of foodstu�. Among the main fea-tures of the photoacoustic spectroscopy are the size ofsample required is very small, due to the small volume of thecell; no special sample preparation is required; it reduces thenumber of analysis steps; it is a green method with less use ofchemical substances, and it is nondestructive. Over the time,it has been observed that the applications of photoacousticspectroscopy are increasing in the food area.

Disclosure

�e authors alone are responsible for the content andwriting of the paper.

Conflicts of Interest

�e authors declare that there are no con�icts of interestregarding the publication of this paper.

Acknowledgments

�e authors are grateful for the support of the NationalPolytechnic Institute through the projects SIP, EDI, and

COFFA. Claudia Hernandez-Aguilar thanks the collabora-tion of educational institutions and research centers thathave been allowed to collaborate in research with her formore than ten years: Colegio de Postgraduados-Montecillo,Texcoco, and Cinvestav, through the Department of Physicsin particular to Esther Ayala, for his assistance and supportduring the learning and use of photoacoustic spectroscopy inthe laboratories of Cinvestav, Mexico. �anks are due to allfor sharing the research path towards the transdisciplinarity.�e present research and publication was funded by meansof the projects (SIP 20181534 and SIP 20181645) supportedby the Instituto Politecnico Nacional.

References

[1] C. H. Aguilar, A. Dominguez Pacheco, A. Cruz-Orea,R. Ivanov, C. A. Carballo, and R. Z. Bautista, “Laser inagriculture,” International Agrophysics, vol. 24, no. 4,pp. 407–422, 2010.

[2] FAO, High Level Expert Forum-How to Feed the World in2050, Global agriculture towards 2050, O�ce of the Di-rector, Agricultural Development Economics DivisionEconomic and Social Development Department Viale

Optical absorption coefficient

Optical penetration length

Nonradiactive-relaxation time

Depth profile

Photoacoustic spectrum

+ mathematical analysis

Concentrations or presence of compounds:rutin, red beet, flavonoids and flavonols,

carotenoids (lycopene, capsanthin, capsorubin, carotene,zeaxanthin, cryptoxanthin, lutein, etc.),

basic amino acids (tryptophan, lysine, leucine, phenylalanine, etc.),anthocyanins, peroxide, lead tetroxide, etc.

to detect change due to radiation-induced effects,use of dye, differences in sanitary qualities, adulterated foods, etc.

PAS: photoacoustic spectroscopy

UV (200–400 nm), visible light (400–700 nm), andnear-infrared radiation (750–1100 nm)

Publications by PAS in the food area

1980–1989 1990–1999 2000–2009 2010–20181970–1979Period of time (year-year)

0

5

10

15

20

25

Num

ber o

f pub

licat

ions

Figure 2: Publications per year of PAS technique, to obtain optical absorbance spectra in food, according to the present literature review.

30 Journal of Spectroscopy

delle Terme di Caracalla, 00153 Rome, Italy, 2009a, http://www.fao.org/fileadmin/templates/wsfs/docs/Issues_papers/HLEF2050_Global_Agriculture.pdf.

[3] FAO, High Level Expert Forum-How to Feed the World in2050, @e technology challenge, Office of the Director, Agri-cultural Development Economics Division Economic andSocial Development Department Viale delle Terme di Car-acalla, 00153 Rome, Italy, 2009b, http://www.fao.org/fileadmin/templates/wsfs/docs/Issues_papers/HLEF2050Technology.pdf.

[4] J. A. Foley, “Can we feed the world and sustain the planet?,”Scientific American, vol. 305, no. 5, pp. 60–65, 2011.

[5] FORESIGHT, El futuro de los alimentos y la agricultura,Resumen ejecutivo. Oficina del Gobierno para la Ciencia,Londres, UK, 2011.

[6] C. M. Pittelkow, X. Liang, B. A. Linquist et al., “Productivitylimits and potentials of the principles of conservation ag-riculture,” Nature, vol. 517, no. 7534, pp. 365–368, 2015.

[7] L. D. Cunningham-Sabo, S. M. Davis, K. M. Koehler et al.,“Food preferences, practices, and cancer-related food andnutrition knowledge of southwestern American Indianyouth,” Cancer: Interdisciplinary, vol. 78, no. 7, pp. 1617–1622, 1996.

[8] M. Wiseman, “.e second world cancer research fund/American institute for cancer research expert report.Food, nutrition, physical activity, and the prevention ofcancer: a global perspective: nutrition society and BAPENmedical symposium on nutrition support in cancer therapy,”Proceedings of the Nutrition Society, vol. 67, no. 3, pp. 253–256, 2008.

[9] L. Torres-Sanchez, M. Galvan-Portillo, S. Lewis et al., “Dietay cancer de mama en Latinoamerica,” Salud publica demexico, vol. 51, pp. s181–s190, 2009.

[10] P. Greenwald, “From carcinogenesis to clinical interventionsfor cancer prevention,” Toxicology, vol. 166, no. 1-2,pp. 37–45, 2001.

[11] I. Palomo, R. Moore-Carrasco, G. Carrasco, P. Villalobos,and L. Guzman, “El consumo de tomates previene eldesarrollo de enfermedades cardiovasculares y cancer:antecedentes epidemiologicos y mecanismos de accion,”Idesia (Arica), vol. 28, no. 3, pp. 121–129, 2010.

[12] A. Sierra and D. Romero, “Contaminacion y degradacion delos alimentos,” Revista Mexicana de Ciencias Polıticas ySociales, vol. 36, no. 146, 1991.

[13] M. E. R. Corredor and B. A. M. De Pascual, Los compuestosquımicos en los alimentos desde la perspectiva de la seguridadalimentaria. Murcia: consejerıa de Sanidad. Direccion Gen-eral de Salud Publica, Servicio de Seguridad Alimentaria yZoonosis. RIMBLAS C prevencion de riesgos, Murcia: con-sejerıa de Sanidad y Consumo. RIVERO, JM (1994), Analisishistorico de los plaguicidas de sıntesis en España, Murcia,Spain, Tercer Sy edition, 2004.

[14] D. D. Bicanic, “On the photoacoustic, photothermal andcolorimetric quantification of carotenoids and other phy-tonutrients in some food: a review,” Journal of MolecularStructure, vol. 993, no. 1–3, pp. 9–14, 2011.

[15] Y. He, L. Tang, X. Wu, X. Hou, and Y. I. Lee, “Spectroscopy:the best way toward green analytical chemistry?,” AppliedSpectroscopy Reviews, vol. 42, no. 2, pp. 119–138, 2007.

[16] T. M. Coelho, E. C. Vidotti, M. C. Rollemberg et al.,“Photoacoustic spectroscopy as a tool for determination offood dyes: comparison with first derivative spectropho-tometry,” Talanta, vol. 81, no. 1-2, pp. 202–220, 2010.

[17] F. M. de Oliveira, J. B. Mokochinski, Y. R. Torres,H. S. D. Santa, and P. P. Gonzalez-Borrero, “Photoacousticspectroscopy applied to the direct detection of bioactivecompounds in Agaricus brasiliensis mycelium,” Journal ofBiological Physics, vol. 44, no. 1, pp. 93–100, 2018.

[18] A. D. Kaur and U. Gupta, “.e review on spectrophoto-metric determination of synthetic food dyes and lakes,” GaziUniversity Journal of Science, vol. 25, no. 3, pp. 579–588,2012.

[19] C. N. Scotter, “Non-destructive spectroscopic techniques forthemeasurement of food quality,” Trends in Food Science andTechnology, vol. 8, no. 9, pp. 285–292, 1997.

[20] P. E. Hockberger, “A history of ultraviolet photobiology forhumans, animals and microorganisms,” Photochemistry andPhotobiology, vol. 76, no. 6, pp. 561–579, 2002.

[21] F. A. James, “.e creation of a Victorian myth: the histo-riography of spectroscopy,” History of Science, vol. 23, no. 1,pp. 1–24, 1985.

[22] M. A. Sutton, “Essay review: spectroscopy, historiographyand myth: the Victorians vindicated,” History of Science,vol. 24, no. 4, pp. 425–433, 1986.

[23] A. Rosencwaig, “Photoacoustic spectroscopy of biologicalmaterials,” Science, vol. 181, no. 4100, pp. 657-658, 1973a.

[24] A. Rosencwaig, “Photoacoustic spectroscopy, new tool forinvestigation of solids,” Analytical Chemistry, vol. 47, no. 6,pp. 592A–604a, 1975.

[25] E. Marın, “Escuchando la luz: breve historia y aplicacionesdel efecto fotoacustico,” Latin-American Journal of PhysicsEducation, vol. 2, no. 2, p. 17, 2008.

[26] E. P. Lai, B. L. Chan, and M. Hadjmohammadi, “Use andapplications of photoacoustic spectroscopy,” Applied Spec-troscopy Reviews, vol. 21, no. 3, pp. 179–210, 1985.

[27] A. Rosencwaig, “Photoacoustic spectroscopy of solids,”Optics Communications, vol. 7, no. 4, pp. 305–308, 1973b.

[28] T. H. Maugh, “Photoacoustic spectroscopy: new uses for anold technique,” Science, vol. 188, no. 4183, pp. 38-39, 1975.

[29] W. R. Harshbarger and M. B. Robin, “Opto-acoustic effect,revival of an old technique for molecular spectroscopy,”Accounts of Chemical Research, vol. 6, no. 10, pp. 329–334,1973.

[30] R. Martel, C. N. N’Soukpoe-Kossi, P. Paquin, andR. M. Leblanc, “Photoacoustic analysis of some milkproducts in ultraviolet and visible light,” Journal of DairyScience, vol. 70, no. 9, pp. 1822–1827, 1987.

[31] C. S. Sunandana, “Physical applications of photoacousticspectroscopy,” Physica Status Solidi (a), vol. 105, no. 1,pp. 11–43, 1988.

[32] A. Rosencwaig and S. S. Hall, “.in-layer, chromatographyand photoacoustic spectrometry,” Analytical Chemistry,vol. 47, no. 3, pp. 548-549, 1975.

[33] D. Cahen, S. Malkin, and E. I. Lerner, “Photoacousticspectroscopy of chloroplast membranes; listening to pho-tosynthesis,” FEBS Letters, vol. 91, no. 2, pp. 339–342, 1978.

[34] M. J. Adams, B. C. Beadle, A. A. King, and G. F. Kirkbright,“Analytical optoacoustic spectrometry. Part II. Ultravioletand visible optoacoustic spectra of some inorganic, bio-chemical and phytochemical samples,” Analyst, vol. 101,no. 1204, pp. 553–561, 1976.

[35] C. Buschmann and H. Prehn, “In vivo studies of radiativeand non-radiative de-excitation processes of pigments inRaphanus seedlings by photoacoustic spectroscopy,”Photobiochemistry and Photobiophysics, vol. 2, pp. 209–215, 1981.

Journal of Spectroscopy 31

[36] C. Buschmann and H. Prehn, “In vivo photoacoustic spectraof raphanus and tradescantia leaves taken at differentchopping frequencies of the excitation light,” Photo-biochemistry and Photobiophysics, vol. 5, pp. 63–69, 1983.

[37] E. P. O’Hara, R. D. Tom, and T. A. Moore, “Determination ofthe in vivo absorption and photosynthetic properties of thelichen acarospora schleicheri using photo acoustic spec-troscopy,” Photochemistry and Photobiology, vol. 38, no. 6,pp. 709–715, 1983.

[38] C. N. N’Soukpoe-Kossi, R. Martel, R. M. Leblanc, andP. Paquin, “Kinetic study of Maillard reactions in milkpowder by photoacoustic spectroscopy,” Journal of Agri-cultural and Food Chemistry, vol. 36, no. 3, pp. 497–501,1988.

[39] O. Doka, J. Kispeter, and A. Lorincz, “Potential value ofphotoacoustic spectroscopy for determining iron content ofmilk protein concentrates,” Journal of Dairy Research,vol. 58, no. 4, pp. 453–460, 1991.

[40] O. Doka, D. Bicanic, and R. Frankhuizen, “Photoacousticstudy of heated binary mixtures containing whey andskimmed-milk powders,” Zeitschrift fur Leb-ensmitteluntersuchung und-Forschung A, vol. 208, no. 1,pp. 1–5, 1999.

[41] O. Doka, Z. Ajtony, D. Bicanic, and R. Koehorst, “Assessingthe extent of degradation in the UV radiation and heat-catalyzed oxidized whole milk powder: the UV photo-acoustic and diffuse reflectance spectroscopies versus theperoxide value,” Applied Spectroscopy, vol. 54, no. 9,pp. 1405–1408, 2000.

[42] O. Doka, J. Kispeter, and D. Bicanic, “.e photoacousticassessment of 60Co irradiation induced effects in eggpowders: results in the uv and visible,” InstrumentationScience and Technology, vol. 25, no. 4, pp. 297–306, 1997.

[43] O. Doka, D. Bicanic, and L. Szollosy, “Rapid and grossscreening for Pb3O4 adulterant in ground sweet red paprikaby means of photoacoustic spectroscopy,” Instrumentationscience and technology, vol. 26, no. 2-3, pp. 203–208, 1998.

[44] D. Bicanic, J. Swarts, S. Luterotti, P. Helander, V. Fogliano,and M. Anese, “Optothermistor as a breakthrough in thequantification of lycopene content of thermally processedtomato-based food: verification versus absorption spectro-photometry and high-performance liquid chromatography,”Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, vol. 53, no. 9,pp. 3295–3299, 2005.

[45] D. Bicanic, inInstrumental Laser Techniques Based on thePhotothermal Phenomena and their Applications for theCharacterization of Food Melanoidins in Food and Health,Vol. 85, Laboratory of Biophysics, Wageningen, Nether-lands, 2003.

[46] A. Domınguez-Pacheco, C. Hernandez-Aguilar, andA. Cruz-Orea, “Photoacoustic determination of non-radiative relaxation time of absorbing centers in maizeseeds,” International Journal of @ermophysics, vol. 38, no. 7,p. 111, 2017.

[47] C. H. Aguilar, A. Domınguez-Pacheco, A. Cruz-Orea, andR. Zepeda-Bautista, “Depth profiles in maize (Zea mays L.)seeds studied by photoacoustic spectroscopy,” InternationalJournal of @ermophysics, vol. 36, no. 5-6, pp. 891–899, 2015.

[48] R. R. Molina, C. H. Aguilar, A. D. Pacheco, A. Cruz-Orea,andM. A. Canseco, “Alternative method to characterize corngrain by means of photoacoustic spectroscopy,” In-ternational Journal of @ermophysics, vol. 34, no. 8-9,pp. 1540–1548, 2013.

[49] O. Doka, A. Brunori, R. Schmidt, D. Bicanic, and G. Vegvari,“Rutin in buckwheat grain meal determined by UV pho-toacoustic spectroscopy and HPLC,”Nova Biotechnologica etChimica, vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 61–67, 2017.

[50] R. R. Molina, C. H. Aguilar, A. D. Pacheco, A. Cruz-Orea,and J. L. Bonilla, “Characterization of maize grains withdifferent pigmentation investigated by photoacoustic spec-troscopy,” International Journal of @ermophysics, vol. 35,no. 9-10, pp. 1933–1939, 2014.

[51] A. D. Pacheco, C. H. Aguilar, A. C. Orea et al., “Evaluation ofwheat and maize seeds by photoacoustic microscopy,” In-ternational Journal of @ermophysics, vol. 30, no. 6,pp. 2036–2043, 2009.

[52] J. P. Favier, J. Buijs, A. Miklos, A. Lorincz, and D. Bicanic,“Photoacoustic characterization of different food samplesPhotoakustische Charakterisierung von verschiedenenLebensmitteln,” Zeitschrift fur Lebensmittel-Untersuchungund Forschung, vol. 199, no. 1, pp. 59–63, 1994.

[53] O. Doka, D. D. Bicanic, M. H. Dicko, and M. A. Slingerland,“Photoacoustic approach to direct determination of the totalphenolic content in red sorghum flours,” Journal of Agri-cultural and Food Chemistry, vol. 52, no. 8, pp. 2133–2136,2004.

[54] R. Takai, K. Kanazawa, K. Murai et al., “.e determination ofwater contents in various powdered food by photoacousticspectroscopy (PAS),” Nippon Shokuhin Kogyo Gakkaishi,vol. 36, no. 3, pp. 189–194, 1989.

[55] C. H. Aguilar, F. A. Dominguez-Pacheco, A. Cruz-Orea et al.,“Optical absorption coefficient of different tortillas byphotoacoustic spectroscopy,” African Journal of Bio-technology, vol. 11, no. 92, pp. 15916–15922, 2012.

[56] R. J. D. S. Lima and J. S. Filho, “Carotenoids and flavonoidsidentification in brazilian tropical fruit and vegetables usingphotoacoustic technique,” Journal de Physique IV (Pro-ceedings), vol. 125, pp. 51–53, 2003.

[57] M. Bergevin, C. N. N’Soukpoe-Kossi, D. Charlebois,R. M. Leblanc, and C. Willemot, “Assessment of strawberrymaturity by photoacoustic spectroscopy,” Applied Spectros-copy, vol. 49, no. 3, pp. 397–399, 1995.

[58] G. P. Pardo, A. D. Pacheco, S. A. Tomas, A. Cruz Orea, andC. H. Aguilar, “Characterization of aged lettuce and chardseeds by photothermal techniques,” International Journal of@ermophysics, vol. 39, no. 10, p. 110, 2018.

[59] M. L. Neto, K. L. Agra, J. S. Filho, and F. E. Jorge, “TDDFTcalculations and photoacoustic spectroscopy experimentsused to identify phenolic acid functional biomolecules inBrazilian tropical fruit in natura,” Spectrochimica Acta PartA: Molecular and Biomolecular Spectroscopy, vol. 193,pp. 249–257, 2018.

[60] S. C. Corzo-Ruiz, F. Hernandez-Rosas, M. L. Alvarado-Noguez, J. Hernandez-Rosas, and A. Cruz-Orea, “Photo-acoustic Spectroscopy applied to the juice and rind char-acterization of Citrus latifolia with different quality ofsamples,” Superficies y Vacıo, vol. 31, no. 1, pp. 1–5, 2018.

[61] B. E. Zendejas-Leal, V. R. Barrientos-Sotelo, R. Cano-Casas,M. L. Alvarado-Noguez, J. Hernandez-Rosas, and A. Cruz-Orea, “Photoacoustic monitoring of absorption spectrumduring the dehydration process of pasilla chili pepper,”International Journal of @ermophysics, vol. 39, no. 7, p. 80,2018.

[62] C. L. Rodrıguez-Paez, A. Carballo-Carballo, R. Rico-Molinaet al., “.e optical absorption coefficient of maize grainsinvestigated by photoacoustic spectroscopy,” InternationalJournal of @ermophysics, vol. 38, no. 1, p. 11, 2017.

32 Journal of Spectroscopy

[63] C. H. Aguilar, F. A. D. Pacheco, A. C. Orea, andR. I. Tsonchev, “.ermal effects of laser irradiation on maizeseeds,” International Agrophysics, vol. 29, no. 2, pp. 147–156,2015.

[64] C. H. Aguilar, A. Domınguez-Pacheco, A. Cruz-Orea et al.,“Anticancer food: photoacoustic spectroscopy, the SciTech,”Journal of Science and Technology, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 40–45,2015.

[65] V. R. Barrientos-Sotelo, R. Cano-Casas, A. Cruz-Orea,F. Hernandez-Rosas, and J. Hernandez-Rosas, “Photo-acoustic characterization of green, red and dehydratedCapsicum annuum l. variety pasilla,” Food Biophysics, vol. 10,no. 4, pp. 481–486, 2015.

[66] M. C. Perez Reyes, C. Hernandez-Aguilar, A. Dominguez-Pacheco, A. Cruz-Orea, and E. Moreno Martınez, “.eoptical absorption coefficient of barley seeds investigated byphotoacoustic spectroscopy and their effects by laser Bio-stimulation,” International Journal of @ermophysics, vol. 36,no. 9, pp. 2389–2400, 2015.

[67] O. Doka, D. Bicanic, and R. Kulcsar, “Direct estimate ofcocoa powder content in cakes by colorimetry and photo-acoustic spectroscopy,” International Journal of @ermo-physics, vol. 35, no. 12, pp. 2206–2214, 2014.

[68] G. Sanchez-Hernandez, C. Hernandez-Aguilar,A. Dominguez-Pacheco, A. Cruz-Orea, M. C. J. Perez-Reyes,and E.M.Martinez, “.e optical absorption coefficient of beanseeds investigated using photoacoustic spectroscopy,” In-ternational Journal of @ermophysics, vol. 36, no. 5-6,pp. 835–843, 2015.

[69] O. Doka, E. Pragai, D. Bicanic, R. Kulcsar, and Z. Ajtony,“Colorimetry and photoacoustic spectroscopy as a suitabletool for determination of fat-free cocoa solids in darkchocolates,” European Food Research and Technology,vol. 236, no. 6, pp. 963–968, 2013.

[70] C. H. Aguilar, A. Cruz-Orea, R. Ivanov et al., “.e opticalabsorption coefficient of maize seeds investigated by pho-toacoustic spectroscopy,” Food Biophysics, vol. 6, no. 4,pp. 481–486, 2011.

[71] A. J. G. Salcedo, F. G. Delgado, and F. Z. Rincon, “De-termination of adulterants in ground roasted coffee usingphotoacoustic technique,” Revista Colombiana de Fısica,vol. 44, no. 3, 2012.

[72] O. Doka, D. Bicanic, J. G. Buijnsters, R. Spruijt, S. Luterotti,and G. Vegvari, “Exploiting direct and indirect methods forthe estimation of the total carotenoid concentration in driedpastas,” European Food Research and Technology, vol. 230,no. 6, pp. 813–819, 2010.

[73] D. V. Rezende, O. A. C. Nunes, and A. C. Oliveira, “Pho-toacoustic study of fungal disease of acai (Euterpe oleracea)seeds,” International Journal of @ermophysics, vol. 30, no. 5,pp. 1616–1625, 2009.

[74] C. H. Aguilar, A. Dominguez-Pacheco, A. Cruz-Orea et al.,“Laser irradiation effects on field performance of maize seedgenotypes,” International Agrophysics, vol. 23, pp. 327–332,2009.

[75] C. H. Aguilar, M. Mezzalama, N. Lozano et al., “Opticalabsorption coefficient of laser irradiated wheat seeds de-termined by photoacoustic spectroscopy,” @e EuropeanPhysical Journal Special Topics, vol. 153, no. 1, pp. 519–522,2008.

[76] C. H. Aguilar, A. C. Carballo, A. Cruz-Orea, R. Ivanov, andA. Domınguez-Pacheco, “.e carotenoid content in seed-lings of maize seeds irradiated by a 650 nm diode laser:

qualitative photoacoustic study,” @e European PhysicalJournal Special Topics, vol. 153, no. 1, pp. 515–518, 2008.

[77] F. G. Delgado, F. Z. Rincon, and J. A. O. Vela, “Coffeecertification criterion using the photoacoustic technique,”Microelectronics Journal, vol. 39, no. 11, pp. 1331-1332, 2008.

[78] J. C. Kapil, P. K. Satyawali, and D. N. Sethi, “VIS–NIRovertone bands of snow: photoacoustic spectroscopy,” ColdRegions Science and Technology, vol. 43, no. 3, pp. 164–176,2005.

[79] C. H. Aguilar, A. Cruz-Orea, R. Ivanov, E. S. M. Martınez,and A.Michtchenko, “Photoacoustic spectroscopy applied tothe study of the influence of laser irradiation on corn seeds,”In Journal de Physique IV, (Proceedings), vol. 125, pp. 853–855, 2005.

[80] F. G. Delgado, J. A. Herrera-Cuartas, J. D. Duque-Ocampo,and H. Ariza-Calderon, “Estudio de la pigmentacion de cafeorganico con diferentes grados de humedad usandoespectroscopıa fotoacustica,” Revista Colombiana de Fısica,vol. 37, no. 1, p. 114, 2005.

[81] J. C. Kapil, S. K. Joshi, and A. K. Rai, “In situ photoacousticinvestigations of some optically transparent samples like iceand snow,” Review of Scientific Instruments, vol. 74, no. 7,pp. 3536–3543, 2003.

[82] V. Gupta, A. Kumar, G. K. Garg, and A. K. Rai, “Photo-acoustic spectroscopy for identification and differential di-agnosis of T. indica with other seed-borne pathogens ofwheat and rice,” Instrumentation Science and Technology,vol. 29, no. 4, pp. 283–293, 2001.

[83] R. A. M. Hernandez, A. Calderon, A. Cruz-Orea,F. S. Sinencio, S. A. Tomas, and G. Gonzalez de la Cruz,“Estudio de la influencia del Ca (OH) 2 en las pelıculas depericarpio de maız nixtamalizado mediante tecnicasfototermicas,” Superficies y Vacıo, vol. 8, pp. 80–85, 1999a.

[84] R. A. M. Hernandez, A. Calderon, A. Cruz-Orea,S. A. Tomas, F. S. Sinencio, and G. P. Rodriguez,“Caracterizacion optica de centros absorbentes en pelıculasbiopolimericas obtenidas de pericarpio de maız,” Superficiesy Vacıo, vol. 8, pp. 89–93, 1999b.

[85] C. A. Vinha and U. Haas, “Qualitative and semiquantitativeanalysis of dried fruit and seasoning products of paprikausing photoacoustic spectroscopy,” Journal of Agriculturaland Food Chemistry, vol. 45, no. 4, pp. 1273–1277, 1997.

[86] U. Haas and C. A. Vinha, “Qualitative and semiquantitativeanalysis of annatto and its content in food additives byphotoacoustic spectrometry,” Analyst, vol. 120, no. 2,pp. 351–354, 1995.

[87] M. V. Marquezini, N. Cella, E. C. Silva et al., “Photoacousticassessment of the in vivo genotypical response of corn totoxic Aluminium,”Analyst, vol. 115, no. 3, pp. 341–343, 1990.

[88] Z. Szigeti, E. M. Nagel, C. Buschmann, andH. K. Lichtenthaler, “In vivo photoacoustic spectra ofherbicide-treated bean leaves,” Journal of Plant Physiology,vol. 134, no. 1, pp. 104–109, 1989.

[89] J. W. Nery, O. Pessoa, H. Vargas et al., “Photoacousticspectroscopy for depth-profile analysis and herbicidemonitoring in leaves,” Analyst, vol. 112, no. 11, pp. 1487–1490, 1987.

[90] F. D. A. M. Reis, C. A. S. Lima, O. Pessoa, H. Vargas,J. G. Cortez, and A. M. G. Azevedo, “Water soluble com-ponents in coffee beans: photoacoustic assessment,”,”Journal of Food Science, vol. 51, no. 3, p. 849, 1986.

[91] C. A. Lima, H. Vargas, C. L. Cesar, M. B. Lima, L. M. Prioli,and W. J. Da Silva, “Non-destructive assessment ofchlorophyll-deficient mutants of maize (Zea mays L.) by

Journal of Spectroscopy 33

photoacoustic spectroscopy,” Plant Science, vol. 38, no. 1,pp. 47–51, 1985.

[92] X. Li, K. H. Brucher, W. Gortz, and H. H. Perkampus, “PA-spectroscopic investigation on flower petals,” Le Journal dePhysique Colloques, vol. 44, no. C6, p. 137, 1983.

[93] K. Veeranjaneyulu and V. S. R. Das, ““Photoacousticspectroscopy—leaf absorption spectra,” Journal of Experi-mental Botany, vol. 33, no. 3, pp. 515–519, 1982.

[94] J. M. Gould, “Characterization of lignin in situ by photo-acoustic spectroscopy,” Plant Physiology, vol. 70, no. 5,pp. 1521–1525, 1982.

[95] C. S. Mangolim, C. Moriwaki, A. C. Nogueira et al.,“Curcumin–β-cyclodextrin inclusion complex: stability,solubility, characterisation by FT-IR, FT-Raman, X-raydiffraction and photoacoustic spectroscopy and food ap-plication,” Food Chemistry, vol. 153, pp. 361–370, 2014.

[96] C. Haisch, “Photoacoustic spectroscopy for analyticalmeasurements,” Measurement Science and Technology,vol. 23, no. 1, article 012001, 2011.

[97] T. Schmid, “Photoacoustic spectroscopy for process analy-sis,” Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry, vol. 384, no. 5,pp. 1071–1086, 2006.

[98] A. K. Rai and J. P. Singh, “Perspective of photoacousticspectroscopy in disease diagnosis of plants: a review,” In-strumentation Science and Technology, vol. 31, no. 4,pp. 323–342, 2003.

[99] H. Singh, S. K. Joshi, S. Rathore, T. Joshi, M. G. H. Zaidi, andA. K. Rai, “Optical and thermal properties of Poly bis–phenol-A carbonate: photoacoustic study,” InstrumentationScience and Technology, vol. 31, no. 4, pp. 377–383, 2003.

[100] H. Singh, E. Rojas-Lima, F. A. Dominguez-Pacheco,C. Hernandez-Aguilar, L. M. Hernandez-Simon, and A. Cruz-Orea, “Kolmogorov-Smirnov test for statistical characteriza-tion of photopyroelectric signals obtained from maize seeds,”International Journal of @ermophysics, vol. 40, no. 1, p. 4,2018.

34 Journal of Spectroscopy

TribologyAdvances in

Hindawiwww.hindawi.com Volume 2018

Hindawiwww.hindawi.com Volume 2018

International Journal ofInternational Journal ofPhotoenergy

Hindawiwww.hindawi.com Volume 2018

Journal of

Chemistry

Hindawiwww.hindawi.com Volume 2018

Advances inPhysical Chemistry

Hindawiwww.hindawi.com

Analytical Methods in Chemistry

Journal of

Volume 2018

Bioinorganic Chemistry and ApplicationsHindawiwww.hindawi.com Volume 2018

SpectroscopyInternational Journal of

Hindawiwww.hindawi.com Volume 2018

Hindawi Publishing Corporation http://www.hindawi.com Volume 2013Hindawiwww.hindawi.com

The Scientific World Journal

Volume 2018

Medicinal ChemistryInternational Journal of

Hindawiwww.hindawi.com Volume 2018

NanotechnologyHindawiwww.hindawi.com Volume 2018

Journal of

Applied ChemistryJournal of

Hindawiwww.hindawi.com Volume 2018

Hindawiwww.hindawi.com Volume 2018

Biochemistry Research International

Hindawiwww.hindawi.com Volume 2018

Enzyme Research

Hindawiwww.hindawi.com Volume 2018

Journal of

SpectroscopyAnalytical ChemistryInternational Journal of

Hindawiwww.hindawi.com Volume 2018

MaterialsJournal of

Hindawiwww.hindawi.com Volume 2018

Hindawiwww.hindawi.com Volume 2018

BioMed Research International Electrochemistry

International Journal of

Hindawiwww.hindawi.com Volume 2018

Na

nom

ate

ria

ls

Hindawiwww.hindawi.com Volume 2018

Journal ofNanomaterials

Submit your manuscripts atwww.hindawi.com


Recommended