57
MultiFocusing© Technology Marianne Rauch-Davies, Ph.D. David Schwartz

General presentation july2012

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

general presentation July2012

Citation preview

Page 1: General presentation july2012

MultiFocusing© TechnologyMarianne Rauch-Davies, Ph.D.David Schwartz

Page 2: General presentation july2012

Contents

• MultiFocusing© theory

• MultiFocusing© vs. conventional processing

• Diffraction

Page 3: General presentation july2012

Conventional PSTM MultiFocusing© Post-STM

The Image is the message……

Page 4: General presentation july2012

MultiFocusing imagingNMO/time and depth migration imaging

Wave front parameters analysis

Stacking Velocity analysis

Pre-stack seismic data

MultiFocusing© CMP

Page 5: General presentation july2012

Real geology is not simple

Page 6: General presentation july2012

MultiFocusing© theory

Page 7: General presentation july2012

Common Reflection / Depth Point Stacking

SHOTS RECEIVERS

REFLECTOR

COMMON REFLECTING POINT

2

220 V

xtt

Conventional stack

Page 8: General presentation july2012

v+

+

+

vv

vv

v

vv

+

+

+

Shot coordinate

Rec

eive

r co

ordi

nate

++ +

++

+

++

Normal move out equation is valid when only traces with equal distance to shot and receiver are stacked within a CDP gather (red)

CMP position

CMP traces

MF traces++

Conventional stack

Page 9: General presentation july2012

MultiFocusing time correction formula is valid for arbitrary subsurface structure and for arbitrary source-receiver configurations

0

22 sin2)(

V

RXXRR ss

0

22 sin2)(

V

RXXRR rr

source and receiver positions

are the radii of curvature of the wavefronts

rs XandX

is the emergence angle of the normal ray

),,( CEECRE RRR

),,,,( 0 rsCRE XXXR focusing parameter

MultiFocusing move-out correction

Page 10: General presentation july2012

CRE Radius & CEE Radius and emergence angle bX0

βО

D

Rcee

О

X0

β

Rcre

Rcre – radius of curvature of common reflection elementRcee – radius of curvature of reflected surface

2D MultiFocusing – 3 parameters

Page 11: General presentation july2012

3D MultiFocusing - 8 parameters

Page 12: General presentation july2012

The MF sums the data along the MF stacking surface

MF stacking surface

MultiFocusing stack

Page 13: General presentation july2012

v

+

+ ++

v

+

vv

vv

v

vv

++

Shot coordinate

Rec

eive

r co

ordi

nate

++ +

++

+

++

+ CMP tracesMF traces+

CMP position

+

+

++

+

+++++

+ + + ++

+

++

+++

Normal move out equation is valid when only traces with equal distance to shot and receiver are stacked within a CDP gather.Nearby traces (green) can not be used but are utilized by our MultiFocusing™ methodology.

MultiFocusing stack

Page 14: General presentation july2012

X0Xi

t0-Δt

t0

t0+Δt

TIM

E

Rcre β

Wavefront

z0

z0-Δz

z0+ΔzX0

Reflector

Xi

X

DE

PT

H

Velocity corridor picking

Page 15: General presentation july2012

Conventional stacksp1 sp2 sp3 sp4 sp5

sp1 sp2 sp3 sp4 sp5

Page 16: General presentation july2012

Geomage MultiFocusing stacksp1 sp2 sp3 sp4 sp5

sp1 sp2 sp3 sp4 sp5

Page 17: General presentation july2012

Synthetic horizontal reflector

Rugged Topography – synthetic example

Page 18: General presentation july2012

Conventional

MultiFocusing©

Rugged Topography – real data

Page 19: General presentation july2012

Anisotropy study begins with scanning for 5 parameters

MultiFocusing anisotropy

Page 20: General presentation july2012

V Slow V Fast V Azimuth

Anisotropy attributes

Page 21: General presentation july2012

Anisotropy cubes

Page 22: General presentation july2012

Enhanced Pre-Stack Gathers

Page 23: General presentation july2012

The MF sums the data along the green surface. The partial MF sums the data around the specified point (point A). The partial MF is shown in red coincides locally with the MF stacking surface.

MF stacking surface

A

Enhanced MultiFocusing gathers

Page 24: General presentation july2012

Original Gather MF Enhanced Gather

Enhanced MultiFocusing gathers

Page 25: General presentation july2012

MF Enhanced Gather after MF-MoveOutMF Enhanced Gather

MultiFocusing – enhanced pre-stack gathers

Page 26: General presentation july2012

Original gathers

Page 27: General presentation july2012

MultiFocusing enhanced gathers

Page 28: General presentation july2012

MultiFocusing© vs. conventional processing

Examples around the globe

Page 29: General presentation july2012

• Increases poor signal/noise ratio

• Resolves signal over rugged topography

• Resolves curved reflectors/ dipping events

• Resolves variable velocity

• Azimuth preservation

• Use diffraction to detect natural fracturing

The MultiFocusing method - advantages

Page 30: General presentation july2012

Conventional processing MultiFocusing processing

Reprocessing of vintage seismic data

Page 31: General presentation july2012

Reprocessing of seismic data in foothills

Conventional processing MultiFocusing processing

Page 32: General presentation july2012

Increasing vertical Resolution (~ 25% in frequency bandwidth)

Conventional processing MultiFocusing processing

Page 33: General presentation july2012

Salt body

Salt dome body contouring

Page 34: General presentation july2012

Better multiple attenuation

Page 35: General presentation july2012

PSDM Post stack depth migrated MF

Page 36: General presentation july2012

PSDM Post stack depth migrated MF

Page 37: General presentation july2012

PSDM Post stack depth migrated MF

Depth 3D processing

Page 38: General presentation july2012

Conventional processing MultiFocusing processing

Eastern Europe (fold 32) – 1920 ms

Page 39: General presentation july2012

500 ms

Conventional processing MultiFocusing processing

Page 40: General presentation july2012

600 ms

Conventional processing MultiFocusing processing

Page 41: General presentation july2012

Diffraction

Page 42: General presentation july2012

A diffraction occurs when a wave encounters an obstacle.

In classical physics, the diffraction phenomenon is described as the apparent bending of waves around small obstacles and the spreading out of waves past small openings.

Research suggests that this can be used to map fractures in the sub-surface from seismic.

Wave front

Obstacle

Diffraction - definition

Page 43: General presentation july2012

How do we identify discontinuities?

Page 44: General presentation july2012

X0

О

D

Rcee

О

X0

β

Rcre

β

Reflection interface

MultiFocusing ray scheme

Page 45: General presentation july2012

О

X0

β

Rcre=Rcee

0

22 sin2

V

RXRXR ss 0

22 sin2

V

RXRXR RR

MultiFocusing scheme for diffractions

Page 46: General presentation july2012

Fractures

Numerical model

Page 47: General presentation july2012

Size of fracture: 1 x 0.3 meter

Fracture intensity

Page 48: General presentation july2012

GMF Stack

Page 49: General presentation july2012

GMF Post-STM

Page 50: General presentation july2012

GMF Diffraction Stack

Page 51: General presentation july2012

GMF Diffraction Post-STM

Page 52: General presentation july2012

Offshore 2D – Mediterranean Basin

Geomage MultiFocusing – structure stack

Page 53: General presentation july2012

Offshore 2D - Mediterranean Basin

Geomage MultiFocusing – Diffraction stack

Page 54: General presentation july2012

Offshore 2D - Mediterranean Basin

MultiFocusing – migrated diffraction stack

Page 55: General presentation july2012

Offshore 2D - Mediterranean Basin

MultiFocusing – migrated diffraction stack

Colored on migrated MF stack

Page 56: General presentation july2012

Example – 3D diffraction volume

Page 57: General presentation july2012

Thank You