Upload
jeeva-nantham
View
1.610
Download
7
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
if u need send request in comment
Citation preview
A STUDY ON IMPACT OF MARKETING STRATEGY ON CONSUMER BEHAVIOR WITH REFERENCE TO AIRCEL
By
JEEVANANTHAM M
Reg. No. 1016301
Of
SRI SAI RAM INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY
A PROJECT REPORT
Submitted to the faculty of Management Studies
In partial fulfillment of the requirements
For the award of the degree of
MASTER OF BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION
ANNA UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY
CHENNAI 600 113
AUGUST 2011
BONAFIDE CERTIFICATE
This is to certify that summer project report title “A STUDY ON IMPACT OF
MARKETING STRATEGY ON CONSUMER BEHAVIOR WITH REFERENCE TO
AIRCEL” is the bonafide work of “JEEVANANTHAM M” (Reg. No. 1016301) carried
out the research under my supervision. Certified further, that the best of my knowledge the
work reported here is done not part of any other project report or dissertation on the basis of
which a degree or award was conferred on earlier occasion on this or any other candidate.
GUDIE HOD
SENTHILNATHAN. C.R. SELVAKUMAR. V
DECLARATION
I, JEEVANANTHAM.M, hereby declare that the summer training report, entitled
“A STUDY ON IMPACT OF MARKETING STRATEGY ON CONSUMER BEHAVIOR
WITH REFERENCE TO AIRCEL”, submitted to the Anna University of Technology
Chennai in Partial fulfillment of the requirement for the award of the degree of MASTER OF
BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION is record of original and independent research work done by
me during July 2011 to August 2011 under the supervision and guidance of
Mr. C.R. Senthilnathan, Assistant Professor, Department of Management Studies, and it has
not formed the basis for the degree or other similar title to any candidate of any University.
JEEVANANATHAM M
ABSTRACT
The project has been undertaken with a view to study consumer behavior with
reference to AIRCEL, leading mobile provider. This study is intended to help AIRCEL
decide upon the steps to be taken care for marketing strategy so that the growth of the
company keeps on improving. Also assess the factors responsible for customer service in
AIRCEL.
Primary data have been used for analysis. However, secondary source have yielded
preliminary information. I have used random sampling for our project survey. Care was taken
that the respondents were as diversified as possible. A sample size of 200 respondents was
taken from various places in Madurai city.
Research conducted was descriptive in nature. Descriptive research helped us to
develop the concept to clearly establish priorities, to divulge adequate information which
helps us in decision making and thus essential for making the study a success. A structured
questionnaire was used to obtain required information and to assess the customer satisfaction
level, Consumer behavior and to find the ways through which the company can come up to
the expectation of customer so that the optimum satisfaction level can be achieved.
The statistical tools used for research are chi-square test and percentage analysis.
Based on these tests analyses were made and findings, suggestions were given.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
I have deep urge to record my gratitude of the helping hands, since helping hands
constitute to the successful completion of my research work.
First and foremost, I sincerely thank My Parents for their cooperation,
encouragement and helping hands.
I am grateful to God Almighty who has showered His blessings on us without whom
the training would not have been a successful one.
I am indebted to our chairman MJF. LN. LEO MUTHU, for providing excellent
environment and infrastructure at SRI SAI RAM INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY,
Chennai.
I express my heartfelt gratitude to our Principal Dr. K. PALANI KUMAR, Director
Prof. V.R. RAJAMANICKAM, who has provided all the required facilities to do this
project.
I dedicate my thanks and highly indebted to my guide
Mr. C.R. SENTHILNATHAN, Associate Professor, and all other faculty members of
Department of Management Studies, for their constant encouragement and invaluable
guidance throughout my study.
I also thank Dr. K. MARAN, Director, Department of Management Studies, for
extending his help whenever needed and would like to thank our Head of Department
Mr. V. SELVAKUMAR, for his continuous support throughout this project.
I wish to express my deep gratitude and sincere thanks to Mr. Kalyan Krishnan,
Mr. Chetan Kumar, Mr. Ravi Sankar, AIRCEL LTD, MADURAI, for his invaluable
help, untiring patience, timely suggestion, and constant encouragement throughout the project
work.
Last but not least, I also extend my hearty thanks to the Respondents, My friends
and other Good Heartens for helping me directly or indirectly in the fruitful completion of
my project.
JEEVANANTHAM M
TABLE OF CONTENTS
ABSTRACT i
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT ii
LIST OF TABLES v
LIST OF FIGURES ix
CHAPTER TITLE PAGE NO
I
1. INTRODUCTION 1
1.1 Industry profile 7
1.2 Company profile 13
1.3 Problem Statement 16
1.4 Need and significance of study 17
1.5 Scope of the study 18
1.6 Objectives of the study 19
1.7 Review of literature 20
1.8 Research methodology 22
1.8.1 Research Design 22
1.8.2 Sample area 22
1.8.3 Sample size 22
1.8.4 Sampling design 22
1.8.5 Research Instrument 23
1.8.6 Data collection method 23
1.8.7 Statistical Tools 24
1.9 Limitations 27
II
2. DATA ANALYSIS & INTERPRETATION
2.1 Percentage Analysis 28
2.2 Statistical Analysis 83
2.2.1 Chi Square Test 83
2.2.2 Friedman Test 90
III
3. SUMMARY OF FINDINGS
3.1 Findings 92
3.2 Suggestions 95
3.3 Conclusion 96
APPENDIX
REFERENCES 97
QUESTIONNAIRE 98
LIST OF TABLES
S.NO TITLE PAGE NO
2.1.1 Gender of the respondents 28
2.1.2 Age of the respondents 29
2.1.3 Qualification of the respondents 30
2.1.4 Occupation of the respondents 31
2.1.5 Type of mobile service 32
2.1.6 Service provider for the respondents 33
2.1.7 Years if using service provider by the Respondents 34
2.1.8 Way by which service provider is chosen 35
2.1.9 Expenditure for Mobile Recharge or Mobile Bill 36
2.1.10 Likeness features in Aircel 37
2.1.11 Preference in Aircel Connection 38
2.1.12 Satisfaction level of Aircel Rate cutters 39
2.1.13 Services used in Aircel – Pocket Internet 40
2.1.14 Services used in Aircel – Blyk on Aircel 41
2.1.15 Services used in Aircel – Dialer Tune 42
2.1.16 Services used in Aircel – 3G 43
2.1.17 Services used in Aircel – Missed call 44
2.1.18 Services used in Aircel – SMS Pack 45
2.1.19 Services used in Aircel – Rate Cutters 46
2.1.20 Services used in Aircel – Nothing 47
2.1.21 Problems faced in Aircel - Network Coverage 48
2.1.22 Problems faced in Aircel - Value Added Services 49
2.1.23 Problems faced in Aircel - Network Clarity 50
2.1.24 Problems faced in Aircel - Changing Tariff 51
2.1.25 Problems faced in Aircel - Customer Service 52
2.1.26 Satisfaction with Customer Care service 53
2.1.27 Likeness of Ads by Respondents 54
2.1.28 Services used other than call 55
2.1.29 Rating of Network Providers - Aircel 56
2.1.30 Rating of Network Providers - Airtel 57
2.1.31 Rating of Network Providers - Vodafone 58
2.1.32 Rating of Network Providers - TATA Docomo 59
2.1.33 Rating of Network Providers - Reliance 60
2.1.34 Rating of Network Providers - MTS 61
2.1.35 Rating of Network Providers - BSNL 62
2.1.36 Rating of 3G Service – Aircel 63
2.1.37 Rating of 3G Service – Airtel 64
2.1.38 Rating of 3G Service – Vodafone 65
2.1.39 Rating of 3G Service – TATA Docomo 66
2.1.40 Rating of 3G Service – Reliance 67
2.1.41 Rating of 3G Service – BSNL 68
2.1.42 Awareness of Aircel Dongle 69
2.1.43 Awareness of iPhone 70
2.1.44 Awareness of Blackberry 71
2.1.45 Awareness of Other Handset offers 72
2.1.46 Rating of Data cards - Aircel 73
2.1.47 Rating of Data cards - Airtel 74
2.1.48 Rating of Data cards - Vodafone 75
2.1.49 Rating of Data cards – TATA Docomo or TATA Photon 76
2.1.50 Rating of Data cards - Reliance 77
2.1.51 Rating of Data cards - MTS 78
2.1.52 Rating of Data cards - BSNL 79
2.1.53 Likeness to change service provider 80
2.1.54 Reason to change the Service Provider 81
2.1.55 Change of Service Provider 82
2.1.56 Reason for non use of the Aircel services 83
LIST OF FIGURES
S.NO TITLE PAGE NO
2.1.1 Gender of the respondents 28
2.1.2 Age of the respondents 29
2.1.3 Qualification of the respondents 30
2.1.4 Occupation of the respondents 31
2.1.5 Type of mobile service 32
2.1.6 Service provider for the respondents 33
2.1.7 Years if using service provider by the Respondents 34
2.1.8 Way by which service provider is chosen 35
2.1.9 Expenditure for Mobile Recharge or Mobile Bill 36
2.1.10 Likeness features in Aircel 37
2.1.11 Preference in Aircel Connection 38
2.1.12 Satisfaction level of Aircel Rate cutters 39
2.1.13 Services used in Aircel – Pocket Internet 40
2.1.14 Services used in Aircel – Blyk on Aircel 41
2.1.15 Services used in Aircel – Dialer Tune 42
2.1.16 Services used in Aircel – 3G 43
2.1.17 Services used in Aircel – Missed call 44
2.1.18 Services used in Aircel – SMS Pack 45
2.1.19 Services used in Aircel – Rate Cutters 46
2.1.20 Services used in Aircel – Nothing 47
2.1.21 Problems faced in Aircel - Network Coverage 48
2.1.22 Problems faced in Aircel - Value Added Services 49
2.1.23 Problems faced in Aircel - Network Clarity 50
2.1.24 Problems faced in Aircel - Changing Tariff 51
2.1.25 Problems faced in Aircel - Customer Service 52
2.1.26 Satisfaction with Customer Care service 53
2.1.27 Likeness of Ads by Respondents 54
2.1.28 Services used other than call 55
2.1.29 Rating of Network Providers - Aircel 56
2.1.30 Rating of Network Providers - Airtel 57
2.1.31 Rating of Network Providers - Vodafone 58
2.1.32 Rating of Network Providers - TATA Docomo 59
2.1.33 Rating of Network Providers - Reliance 60
2.1.34 Rating of Network Providers - MTS 61
2.1.35 Rating of Network Providers - BSNL 62
2.1.36 Rating of 3G Service – Aircel 63
2.1.37 Rating of 3G Service – Airtel 64
2.1.38 Rating of 3G Service – Vodafone 65
2.1.39 Rating of 3G Service – TATA Docomo 66
2.1.40 Rating of 3G Service – Reliance 67
2.1.41 Rating of 3G Service – BSNL 68
2.1.42 Awareness of Aircel Dongle 69
2.1.43 Awareness of iPhone 70
2.1.44 Awareness of Blackberry 71
2.1.45 Awareness of Other Handset offers 72
2.1.46 Rating of Data cards - Aircel 73
2.1.47 Rating of Data cards - Airtel 74
2.1.48 Rating of Data cards - Vodafone 75
2.1.49 Rating of Data cards – TATA Docomo or TATA Photon 76
2.1.50 Rating of Data cards - Reliance 77
2.1.51 Rating of Data cards - MTS 78
2.1.52 Rating of Data cards - BSNL 79
2.1.53 Likeness to change service provider 80
2.1.54 Reason to change the Service Provider 81
2.1.55 Change of Service Provider 82
2.1.56 Reason for non use of the Aircel services 83
CHAPTER - I INTRODUCTION
1
CHAPTER -I
1. INTRODUCTION
Introduction:
The Indian telecommunication markets since the beginning of the 1997s has brought
about significant changes in the communication industry. The mobile telephone market has
changed dramatically over the past 5-6 years in INDIA.
Mobiles have become so popular that many people use their handset as their only phone
and rarely use a landline.
Consumer Behaviour and Related concepts
Consumer behaviour is the study of when, why, how, and where people do or do not buy
a product. It blends elements from psychology, sociology, social anthropology and economics. It
attempts to understand the buyer decision making process, both individually and in groups. It
studies characteristics of individual consumers such as demographics and behavioural variables
in an attempt to understand people's wants. It also tries to assess influences on
the consumer from groups such as family, friends, reference groups, and society in general.
Customer behaviour study is based on consumer buying behaviour, with the customer
playing the three distinct roles of user, payer and buyer. Relationship marketing is an influential
asset for customer behaviour analysis as it has a keen interest in the re-discovery of the true
meaning of marketing through the re-affirmation of the importance of the customer or buyer. A
greater importance is also placed on consumer retention, customer relationship management,
personalisation, customisation and one-to-one marketing. Social functions can be categorized
into social choice and welfare functions.
2
Each method for vote counting is assumed as social function but if Arrow’s possibility
theorem is used for a social function, social welfare function is achieved. Some specifications of
the social functions are ecisiveness, neutrality, anonymity, monotonicity,
unanimity, homogeneity and weak and strong Pareto optimality. No social choice function meets
these requirements in an ordinal scale simultaneously. The most important characteristic of a
social function is identification of the interactive effect of alternatives and creating a logical
relation with the ranks. Marketing provides services in order to satisfy customers. With that in
mind, the productive system is considered from its beginning at the production level, to the end
of the cycle, the consumer (Kioumarsi et al., 2009).
“The study of consumer behaviour focuses on how individuals make decisions to spend
their available resources (time, money, efforts) on consumption related items. That includes what
they buy, why they buy it, when they buy it, where they buy it, how often they buy it, and how
often they use it”.
There are a number of reasons for researching for consumer behaviour like segmentation,
target market selection, positioning, and product/service decision, pricing decision, distribution
and promotion decision.
Model of consumer decision making process is helpful to understand the consumer
behaviour. It shows how the external and internal factors influence the consumer attitude
formation and attitude change. The model reflects cognitive (or problem solving) consumer and,
to some degree emotional consumer.
Consumer Satisfaction
Consumer satisfaction and acceptance are often considered in the literature to be
closely linked yet these are distinct concepts. Satisfaction is the fulfillment and
gratification of the need for a stated good or service, here, water.
3
Consumer Acceptance
Acceptance describes consumer willingness to receive and/or to tolerate. For
example, a customer might accept the occurrence of a certain number of yearly supply
interruptions given a certain price. Consumer acceptance and satisfaction are related, as
the first is a precursor of the latter. However, despite the fact that satisfaction and
acceptance can be thought of as lying on a continuum, acceptance does not automatically
lead to satisfaction. Weighing needs or preferences against provided product or service
attributes results in the balance of satisfaction pointing in a negative or positive direction,
depending on whether interests are conflicting or corresponding. This determines the way
in which people evaluate companies' or utilities' performance. Only when a consumer's
needs for a stated good or service are met, i.e. when the service provided corresponds
with their preferences, will they feel satisfied. Customer satisfaction can be enhanced
when their needs are met (in terms of both quality and quantity) and accord with their
preferences. At the other end of this dimension, where the service provided conflicts with
the prevailing needs or preferences, customers may experience feelings of dissatisfaction.
Acceptance is also used in the literature to mean an affirmative answer to a proposal.
The distinction is subtle but there are occasions where consumers might not agree
to a proposal yet accept the subsequent service in the sense of tolerating it.
Consumer Concerns
These are expressed anxieties or unease over an object broadly defined (e.g.
discoloured tap water or a proposal to change the water pricing structure).
Consumer Preferences
This is used primarily to mean an option that has the greatest anticipated value
among a number of options. This is an economic definition and does not tap into
'wishes' or `dreams' (for e.g. that safe drinking water was free, that there should be world
peace) but for all practical purposes is an appropriate definition. Preference and
4
acceptance can in certain circumstances mean the same thing but it is useful to keep the
distinction in mind with preference tending to indicate choices among neutral or more valued
options with acceptance indicating a willingness to tolerate the status quo or some less
desirable option.
Consumer Expectations
The distinction between expectations and preferences is often blurred though the
concepts are distinct. Expectation is used in three slightly differing senses in the
literature. One is the act of expecting or looking forward – a belief about what will happen
in the future. Most consumers in Europe expect that clean and safe water will come out of
their taps the next time they turn them on. A related but more technical use of expectation
is to denote a more formal estimation of the probability of an event occurring. These first two
definitions can be distinguished from preference in that preferences refer to some desired
state and, as in the above definition, imply that more than one state is possible and that
there are some options. Unfortunately expectation is also used more loosely to mean a
requirement or demand for something and in this sense is a kind of strong preference.
When reading the literature it is important to ascertain which definition is being used.
Consumer Awareness
Consumer awareness is the level of knowledge about, in this case, water which
includes the water company, regulatory framework, supply system and service, or the water
itself. In most research the adequacy or otherwise of this awareness is anchored against the
service provider or regulator's perspective on the supply. Where consumer awareness does
not equate with this industry perspective this is often termed a consumer (mis)perception.
However, it should be noted that there is a distinction between holding factually incorrect
knowledge about the supply system (for e.g. that the water comes from a river when it
comes from an aquifer) and differing perspectives on, say, the safety of the supply. In the
latter example assessments of safety are judgements made under uncertainty about the future and
thus have a legitimately contestable truth status. What is acceptably safe is a matter of judgment
5
(potentially based on 'good science' but a judgment under uncertainty nonetheless) and may or
may not be a 'mis-perception';
Risk Perception
This is a term used rather loosely in the literature to mean the level of risk associated
with exposure to a hazard. Unfortunately a 'risk' is often used to mean the specific
hazard itself rather than a formal risk which is a combined assessment of the
likelihood and magnitude of harm that may occur as a result of exposure to the hazard.
In section 3 we discuss this concept further.
Consumer Attitudes
An attitude is a positive or negative evaluation of a social object or action. A
'social object' in the present context might mean the water company, water regulations,
supply system and service, or the water itself. Many theories of attitudes (e.g. the well-
known theory of planned behaviour, Ajzen, 1985) have attitude as a factor
involved in determining behavioral choices however there is considerable continuing
debate about when, and in what circumstances, attitudes are important determinants of
behaviour. An attitude toward something should thus not be taken to imply that
attitude- consistent behaviour will automatically follow.
Consumers and the Public
While discussing definitional clarity it is worth acknowledging that 'the consumer'
is not a representative of a single homogeneous group, 'the public'. Social scientists
prefer to use the term 'publics' to reflect the idea that not all members of 'the public'
share the same goals and values nor have the same relative power status within any
society. A crude example we will return to later is that the poor/unemployed are unable
to pay for some services and it would be a mistake to ignore the importance of this
different status when studying preferences. In the case of water consumption, all
6
members of the population have to consume water from some source but some are the
direct payers of water bills (customers), some pay indirectly (e.g. those living in care
homes, or some forms of rented accommodation) and others are dependents of customers.
These differing groups will have differing relationships with suppliers and may well
have different preference.
7
1.1 INDUSTRY PROFILE
MOBILE INDUSTRY IN INDIA
History of Indian Telecommunications
Started in 1851 when the first operational land lines were laid by the government near
Calcutta (seat of British power). Telephone services were introduced in India in 1881. In 1883
telephone services were merged with the postal system. Indian Radio Telegraph Company (IRT)
was formed in 1923. After independence in 1947, all the foreign telecommunication companies
were nationalized to form the Posts, Telephone and Telegraph (PTT), a monopoly run by the
government's Ministry of Communications. Telecom sector was considered as a strategic service
and the government considered it best to bring under state's control.
The first wind of reforms in telecommunications sector began to flow in 1980s when the
private sector was allowed in telecommunications equipment manufacturing. In 1985,
Department of Telecommunications (DOT) was established. It was an exclusive provider of
domestic and long-distance service that would be its own regulator (separate from the postal
system). In 1986, two wholly government-owned companies were created:
The Videsh Sanchar Nigam Limited (VSNL) for international telecommunications and
Mahanagar Telephone Nigam Limited (MTNL) for service in metropolitan areas.
In 1990s, telecommunications sector benefited from the general opening up of the
economy. Also, examples of telecom revolution in many other countries, which resulted in better
quality of service and lower tariffs, led Indian policy makers to initiate a change process finally
resulting in opening up of telecom services sector for the private sector. National Telecom Policy
(NTP) 1994 was the first attempt to give a comprehensive roadmap for the Indian
telecommunications sector. In 1997, Telecom Regulatory Authority of India (TRAI) was created.
TRAI was formed to act as a regulator to facilitate the growth of the telecom sector. New
National Telecom Policy was adopted in 1999 and cellular services were also launched in the
same year.
8
Telecommunication sector in India can be divided into two segments: Fixed Service
Provider (FSPs), and Cellular Services. Fixed line services consist of basic services, national or
domestic long distance and international long distance services. The state operators (BSNL and
MTNL), account for almost 90 per cent of revenues from basic services. Private sector services
are presently available in selective urban areas, and collectively account for less than 5 per cent
of subscriptions. However, private services focus on the business/corporate sector, and offer
reliable, high- end services, such as leased lines, ISDN, closed user group and
videoconferencing.
Cellular services can be further divided into two categories:
Global System for Mobile Communications (GSM) and Code Division Multiple
Access (CDMA). The GSM sector is dominated by Airtel, Vodfone, Idea Cellular and Aircel,
while the CDMA sector is dominated by Reliance and Tata Indicom. Opening up of international
and domestic long distance telephony services are the major growth drivers for cellular industry.
Cellular operators get substantial revenue from these services, and compensate them for
reduction in tariffs on airtime, which along with rental was the main source of revenue. The
reduction in tariffs for airtime, national long distance, international long distance, and handset
prices has driven demand.
Issues and Challenges of telecom industry
There are various issues surrounding the telecom Industry which pose challenges for the
Industry. These issues arise out of various policy announcements by the regulator which has
resulted in increased competition between the players? If we take a closer look at the issues and
challenges, a majority of them revolve around the most important resource in the telecom
Industry- “SPECTRUM”. Spectrum is a range of electromagnetic radio frequencies used for
transmission of voice, data and images.
9
Telecom operators send and receive frequencies to enable communication between two
phones. Enhancement of subscriber criteria for allocation of additional 2G spectrum the
controversy began when TRAI and DOT’s technical advisory board raised the bar on the
minimum subscriber norms for operators to qualify for additional spectrum. The new subscriber
norms were around three times higher than the existing ones. This move was challenged by GSM
operators in the telecom tribunal. DoT then referred the matter to its technical arm, Telecom
Engineering Centre (TEC), which in its report recommended that the allocation norms should be
hiked between 2-15 times depending on the circle. The Cellular Operators Association Of India,
the body representing all GSM players, said that it would fle yet another petition with the
telecom tribunal challenging the TEC report. Access licence made technology neutral the Govt
also permitted existing universal access service licencees to offer wireless services using either
GSM or CDMA technology. This decision paved way for existing CDMA operators to provide
GSM-based services and vice-versa, subject to the availability of spectrum and payment of the
prescribed fees. 3G spectrum auction to be open to all in another move, the government
announced that 3G spectrum would be auctioned, which would be open to all. This means that
both existing operators and new entrants, whether owned by domestic entrepreneurs or foreign
companies such as AT&T and Deutsche Telekom, who currently do not have presence in India,
would be eligible to bid for 3G spectrum. This view is in contradiction with the Bharti Airtel Ltd
and others we expect the mobile subscriber base for the industry to reach 366 mn by 2012 from
166 mn as on 2007 Telecom Regulatory Authority of India’s (TRAI) recommendation of
allocating 3G spectrum only to existing service licencees. Mobile Number Portability (MNP)
from last quarter of 2008 furthermore, to reduce entry barriers and increase competition, the
Govt. has decided to implement Mobile Number Portability (MNP) in a phased manner. MNP
would give subscribers the freedom to change their existing wireless operator while retaining the
same number. To begin with, MNP would be implemented in the four metros of Mumbai,
Chennai, Delhi, and Kolkatta during the last quarter of 2008.
10
Classification of Telecommunication services:
Basic services
· Cellular services
· Internet Service Provider (ISP)
The telecom commission was set up by the government of INDIA& notification dated 11 Apirl
1989 with admistrative & financial power of government deal with various aspect of
telecommunication. The entry of private sector in the provision of telecom service a need was
full to have an independent regulatory body the above requirement was indicated in the guideline
issue for entry of private sector in basic telecom service. In 1997 telecom regulation act India
was established in pursuance which was act of parliaments to regulate the service or it amended
by act 2000. Mobiles have become so popular that many people use their handset as their only
phone and rarely use a landline. The de regulation in the INDIA telecommunication markets
since the beginning of the 1997s has brought about significant changes in the communication
industry. Price competition and newly created services the telecommunication industry has
become the largest industry. In recent year, adoption of mobile phone has been exceptionally
rapid in many part of the world and especially in INDIA; mobile phones are almost as common
as wrist watch
11
Industry Analysis
Top 10 mobile Countries
- www.telecomindiaonline.com
Rank Operator Subscribers Month
1 China 730 October
2 India 488.4 October
3 US 276 June
4 Russia 197 June
5 Brazil 159.61 June
6 Indonesia 144.64 March
7 Japan 113.75 August
8 Germany 107.19 June
9 Pakistan 95.55 July
10 Italy 89.43 June
30%
20%12%
8%
7%
6%
5%4% 4% 4%
Top 10 Mobile Countires Subscribers(in Millons)
ChinaIndiaUS RussiaBrazilIndonesiaJapanGermanyPakistanItaly
12
List of Mobile Service Providers and their Market Shares
S.No Operator Subscriber base Market Share 1 Bharti Airtel 146,293,078 21.34%
2 Reliance Communications 119,351,438 17.37%
3 Vodafone 118,038,438 17.08%
4 BSNL 80,739,935 11.31%
5 Tata Teleservices 80,817,298 11.47%
6 Idea 76,023,551 10.84%
7 Aircel 47,519,629 6.64%
8 Unitech 13,748,300 1.05%
9 Loop 3,009,445 0.45%
10 Sistema 7,121,765 0.86%
11 MTNL 5,342,039 0.81%
12 Videocon 5,616,152 0.43%
13 Stel 1,867,060 0.22%
14 Etisalat 70,829 0.01%
15 HFCL Infotel 1,132,477 0.13%
All India 706,691,164 100.00%
Top 10 Mobile Service Providers in India
1 Bharti Airtel
2 Vodafone
3 Idea
4 BSNL
5 Aircel
6 Tata Serviceable
7 Reliance Communications
8 MTNL
9 Unitech
10 Loop
13
14
1.2 COMPANY PROFILE
The Aircel Group is a joint venture between Maxis Communications Berhad of Malaysia
and Apollo Hospital Enterprise Ltd of India, with Maxis Communications holding a majority
stake of 74%. Aircel commenced operations in 1999 and became the leading mobile operator in
Tamil Nadu within 18 months. In December 2003, it launched commercially in Chennai and
quickly established itself as a market leader– a position it has held since. Aircel began its
outward expansion in 2005 and met with unprecedented success in the Eastern frontier circles. It
emerged a market leader in Assam and in the North Eastern provinces within 18 months of
operations. During this period; the company gained a foothold in 9 circles.
The Company has currently gained a momentum in the space of telecom in India post the
allocation of additional spectrum by the Department of Telecom, Govt. of India for 13 new
circles across India. These include Delhi (Metro), Mumbai (Metro), Andhra Pradesh, Gujarat,
Haryana, Karnataka, Kerala, Madhya Pradesh, Maharashtra & Goa, Rajasthan, Punjab, UP
(West) and UP (East). Aircel has won many awards and recognitions. Voice and Data gave
Aircel the highest rating for overall customer satisfaction and network quality in 2006. Aircel
emerged as the top mid-size utility company in Business world’s ‘List of Best Mid-Size
Companies’ in 2007. Additionally, Tele.net recognised Aircel as the best regional operator in
2008.With over 15 million customers in the country, Aircel, the fastest growing telecom
company in India, has revved up plans to become a full-fledged national operator.
Financial and Operational Performance
Aircel’s contribution to Maxis overall revenue in the first quarter has gone up sharply to
15% as against 10% in the previous quarters, while the contribution to EBITDA went up to 9%
as against 7% a few quarters ago, Maxis said in a communication to investors recently. In value,
Aircel contributed RM 320 million (close to Rs 390 crore) to the group’s turnover of RM 2,157
million (Rs 2,600 crore) in the quarter as against RM 29 million (Rs 38 crore) ie more than 10
times over the previous quarter. Similarly, Aircel’s contribution on EBITDA was around
RM102 million (close to Rs 122 crore) as against group’s EBITDA of RM 1,082 million (Rs
15
1,300 crore), Maxis pointed out. The Indian arm was key to this increase in the group’s both
revenue and EBITDA, the company said further.
Company Strategy
• Aircel entered the mobile market in 1999 and became the leading mobile company in
TamilNadu.
• The operator has a presence in all four metro circles in India.
• The operator is expanding its business and increasing market share through a
combination of growth by increasing capacity on its networks in Chennai, Andhra acquisition as
well as network investment. Aircel is currently Pradesh and Karnataka, while also rolling out
new networks in West Bengal and western Uttar Pradesh.
Products and Services
• Aircel provides 2G services & 3G services using digital GSM technology. We offer
GSM voice and data services in all of the regions in which we currently operate.
• In addition to basic mobile voice telephony services, we offer a wide range of value-
added and data services. These include voicemail, dual SIM card capabilities, missed-call alerts,
SMS, GPRS services and e-mail services. Aircel has roaming arrangements with some 250
international and 46 domestic operators
• Aircel currently offers GSM services across 22 circles including the nine circles in
India.
• It offers pre- and post-paid voice, MMS and internet access services.
• August 1999: Aircel commenced its own market from TamilNadu and all of its 2G
businesses and by the end of 2005; it captures most of the market of India.
• July 2004: The operator launched EDGE services and began talks with TV channels
over content streaming
• July 2005: Aircel launched services in most over part of India.
16
• March 2007: It has been named the 'Most Respected Telecom Company', the 'Best
Mobile Service in the country', and the 'Most Creative and Most Effective Advertiser of the
Year'. It now has operations in 22 circles accounting for 70% of India’s mobile customer base.
Awards and achievements
• Awarded in No. 1 in Customer satisfaction and networking – 2006.
• Best Mid-size companies’ in the Year- 2007 Best Continued Campaign – Aircel.
• TM - ABBY Awards Added Punjab, Haryana, Rajasthan and UP (East) circles to India
operations Acquired ADIL, with operations in Rajastan, UP East and Haryana ‘India’s
most admired Telecom Company' - Business World – IMRB NFO MBL Best Performer
in Customer Satisfaction.
• Won auction for licenses to operate GSM services in Karnataka, Andhra Pradesh and
Chennai Best Regional Operator in India in year-2008.
17
1.3 PROBLEM STATEMENT
The company has more opportunity to capture the market. The cellular service
industry is more competitive than ever before. There is a need to identify the gap between
consumer behavior and company marketing strategy. The findings of this study will be
important to understand the consumer attitude, habits, opinion and their beliefs towards the
product, and the behavior towards the company marketing efforts. The result of the study will
help to make a suitable recommendation for cover the gap between consumer behavior and
the company marketing efforts.
18
1.4 NEED AND SIGNIFICANCE OF STUDY
• Understanding consumer behavior and “knowing customers” is never simple.
Customers may say one thing but do another. They may not be in touch with their deeper
motivations.
• Consumers have more power then ever before.
• Consumers have access more information than ever before.
• There are a number of reasons for researching of consumer behaviour like
segmentation, target market selection, positioning, and product/service decision, pricing
decision, distribution and promotion decision.
19
1.5 SCOPE OF THE STUDY
In recent year, adoption of mobile phone has been exceptionally rapid in many part of
the world and especially in India mobile phones are almost as common as wrist watch. The
Indian telecommunications market is characterized by a small number of large players and a
much more sizeable number of small companies. The mobile industry has become more
competitive. It is necessary to identify the consumer attitude & behavior towards product and
what do they want or needed. The study will be focused on the consumer behavior &
company marketing strategy towards cellular services. The findings of the research will be
helpful to identifying the consumer attitude, behavior, habits to buy a mobile phone and
company practicing. The result of the study will be important to make a marketing strategy
for the future customers to fulfill the company objective.
20
1.6 OBJECTIVES OF THE STUDY
Objective is to study the consumer behavior towards cellular service. This project
report has been formulated with specialty of behavioral analysis of consumer. By throwing
light on their need for communication, effort has been put on deriving there response towards
communication and its various standards. The aim of project has been to sort out basic things
that consumer seeks while asking new Telecom connection and promising things of Telecom
that makes them reliable consumer.
Objectives To study the problems faced by the respondents with Aircel.
To study customer satisfaction level on Aircel marketing strategy.
To find out the consumer preferences.
To analyses the level of awareness about Aircel product & services.
To study sales, promotion advertisement of Aircel.
To make a suggestions in findings of the study.
21
1.7 REVIEW OF LITERATURE
1. According to Rice (1993), perception is the initiator of behaviour. It can also be seen
as a process of information extraction. Perception is the process by which an individual
selects, organizes, and interprets information inputs to create a meaningful picture (Kotler,
2000). Different people tend to perceive quite differently even when they are exposed to the
same reality. A set of factors, e.g. individual responses, determine an individual’s perception
process and lead to individual differences. The most important is that people’s perceptions
are often more important than the reality in marketing (Kotler, 2000).
2. According to Thorelli et al (1975), the prospective buyer possesses a certain stock of
cognitive content, including his own personality or self-concept, attitudes and opinions both
in general and on specific products, and stored information and past experience. This stock
has been formed as a result of his interaction with his environment over time, and it will help
determine the environment in which he places himself in the future as well as influence his
perceptions of that environment. This stage consists of the physical and cognitive activities
involved in comparing alternatives on the basis of information gathered from external search
above.
3. The study of customer behaviour provides a sound basis for identifying and
understanding the factors that influence consumers purchase on line. Schiffman and Kanuk
(2000) state that the behaviour that consumers display in searching, purchasing, and
evaluating products/services is those that they expect to fulfill their needs.
4. According to Kotler (2000), the consumer arrives at attitudes toward the various
brands through an attribute evaluation procedure and most buyers consider several attributes
in their purchase decision. These attributes used by consumers for evaluation are also called
choice criteria.
5. Jobber (2001) has made a good summary of these choice criteria. In fact, consumers
attempt to optimize the trade-off between product benefits, product costs, the desired personal
utilities and other variables.
22
1.8 RESEARCH METHODOLOGY
It is a way to systematically solve the research problem. It may be understood as a
science of studying how research is done scientifically. In it we study the various steps that
are generally adopted by researchers, in studying our research problem along with the logic
behind it. It is essential for the researchers to know not only the research method technique
but also the methodology.
1.8.1 Research Design:
A research design is the arrangement of conditions for collection and analysis of data
in a manner that aims to combine relevance to the research purpose with economy in
procedure. Descriptive research is used in the preparation of the project. There is some point
and facts which were not found earlier. Hence field study research is used. A descriptive
research technique is also used as we again worked upon those facts which were earlier found
by some other. Our studies were completely descriptive and field study research.
1.8.2 Sample area:
Madurai city
1.8.3 Sample size:
200 Consumers
1.8.4 Sampling design:
The sampling design selected for this study is convenience sampling.
Convenience sampling:
Convenience sampling is method in which samples are drawn at the convenience of
the researcher.
23
1.8.5 Research Instrument:
The research instrument used for collecting data is a structured questionnaire.
Type of questions:
Closed questions: 22
Open ended questions: 2
1.8.6 Data collection method:
Primary Data
Primary data generally means those raw data or data structures that are collected “first
hand” and have not any previous meaningful interpretation. For our Summer Internship
Project Report, We have collected such primary data through face to face interview method
with the help of questionnaire.
Through:
Questionnaire,
Personal interview.
Secondary Data
Secondary data is also used to find some facts regarding company through Internet,
Journals, Books, and Newspapers.
Through:
Companies’ website, Internet.
TOOLS USED
For the project study the tools adopted is questionnaire having five point scale type
questions in which it is measured as Excellent, Very Good, Good, Bad, Very Bad. And Yes
or No type of questions also included also used another five point scale that as highly
Satisfied, Satisfied, Neutral, Dissatisfied, and Highly Dissatisfied. The questionnaire is close-
end and open-end in which Rating scale Semantic differential are used. Also one open-end
question is asked. In which consumer can directly express their expectation or suggestions to
the company.
24
1.8.7 Statistical Tools
• The chi-square test
(Snedecor and Cochran, 1989) is used to test if a sample of data came from a
population with a specific distribution.
An attractive feature of the chi-square goodness-of-fit test is that it can be
applied to any univariate distribution for which you can calculate the cumulative
distribution function. The chi-square goodness-of-fit test is applied to binned data
(i.e., data put into classes). This is actually not a restriction since for non-binned
data you can simply calculate a histogram or frequency table before generating the
chi-square test. However, the value of the chi-square test statistic is dependent on how the
data is binned
The chi-square test is defined for the hypothesis:
Ho: The data follow a specified distribution.
Ha: The data do not follow the specified distribution.
Test For the chi-square goodness-of-fit computation, the data are divided
Statistic: into k bins and the test statistic is defined as
𝝌𝝌𝝌𝝌 = �(𝑶𝑶𝑶𝑶 − 𝑬𝑬𝑶𝑶) 𝝌𝝌/𝑬𝑬𝑶𝑶𝒌𝒌
𝑶𝑶=𝟏𝟏
25
• Friedman test
The Friedman test is a non-parametric statistical test developed by the U.S. economist
Milton Friedman. Similar to the parametric repeated measures ANOVA, it is used to detect
differences in treatments across multiple test attempts. The procedure involves ranking each
row (or block) together, then considering the values of ranks by columns. Applicable to
complete block designs, it is thus a special case of the Durbin test.
Classic examples of use are:
• n wine judges each rate k different wines. Are any wines ranked consistently higher or
lower than the others?
• n wines are each rated by k different judges. Are the judges' ratings consistent with
each other?
• n welders each use k welding torches, and the ensuing welds were rated on quality.
Do any of the torches produce consistently better or worse welds?
The Friedman test is used for one-way repeated measures analysis of variance by ranks. In its
use of ranks it is similar to the Kruskal-Wallis one-way analysis of variance by ranks.
Friedman test is widely supported by many statistical software packages.
1. Given data , that is, a tableau with n rows (the blocks), k columns (the
treatments) and a single observation at the intersection of each block and treatment,
calculate the ranks within each block. If there are tied values, assign to each tied value
the average of the ranks that would have been assigned without ties. Replace the data
with a new tableau where the entry rij is the rank of xij within block i.
2. Find the values:
o
o
o ,
o
26
3. The test statistic is given by . Note that the value of Q as computed above
does not need to be adjusted for tied values in the data.
4. Finally, when n or k is large (i.e. n > 15 or k > 4), the probability distribution of Q can
be approximated by that of a chi-square distribution. In this case the p-value is given
by . If n or k is small, the approximation to chi-square becomes poor
and the p-value should be obtained from tables of Q specially prepared for the
Friedman test. If the p-value is significant, appropriate post-hoc multiple comparisons
tests would be performed.
27
1.9 LIMITATIONS
Due to financial situation of the research, the time frames for completion and the
sampling constraints the following are identified:
Financial constraints:
Financial constraints meant that the study could not be conducted on a State scale.
Time constraints:
The study has strict deadline which had to be met in order to fulfill the completion
requirement. If there were no time limit and financial constraints, or time frame in which to
complete the study, the researcher would done a national level survey in order to get a more
effective sample of the population.
28
CHAPTER – II DATA ANALYSIS
AND INTERPRETATION
29
CHAPTER – II
2. DATA ANALYSIS AND INTERPRETATION
2.1 PERCENTAGE ANALYSIS
Table no: 2.1.1 Gender of the respondents:
Gender No of Respondents Percentage of Respondents
Male 133 66.5
Female 67 33.5
Total 200 100
Figure no: 2.1.1 Gender of the respondents:
Interpretation:
It has been identified from the above the table that (66.5%) of respondents were males and 33.5% were females.
66%
34%
Gender of the Respondents
MaleFemale
30
Table no: 2.1.2 Age of the respondents:
Age No. of Respondents Percentage of Respondents
Below 20 37 18.5
21 – 30 117 58.5
31- 40 28 14.0
41 - 50 10 5.0
Above 50 8 4.0
Total 200 100.0
Figure no: 2.1.2 Age of the respondents:
Interpretation:
From the table shows that majority (58.5%) of the respondents are between the age
group of 21-30, 18.5% are the age of below 20, 14% of the respondents are between the age
31-40, 4% of the respondents are 41-50, 4% of the candidates are more than 50 years.
37
117
28
10 8
Below 20 21 – 30 31- 40 41 - 50 Above 50
Age of the Respondents
31
Table no: 2.1.3 Qualification of the respondents:
Qualification No. of Respondents Percentage of Respondents
SSLC 17 8.5
HSC 26 13.0
University Graduate 79 39.5
Post Graduate 68 34.0
Others 10 5.0
Total 200 100.0
Figure no: 2.1.3 Qualification of the respondents:
Interpretation:
It has been identified from the above the table that (39.5%) of the respondents
qualification were University Graduate, 34% of candidates qualification were Post Graduate,
18.5% of respondents were have HSC qualification, 8.5% of respondents have SSLC
qualification, and 5% of respondents only uneducated.
SSLC HSC University Graduate
Post Graduate Others
No. of Respondents 17 26 79 68 10
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
No.
of R
espo
nden
ts
Qualification of the Respondents
32
Table no: 2.1.4 Occupation of the respondents:
Occupation No. of Respondents Percentage of Respondents
Govt. Employee 18 9.0 Professional 13 6.5 Business 34 17.0 Student 115 57.5 Unemployed 4 2.0 Others 16 8.0 Total 200 100.0
Figure no: 2.1.4 Occupation of the respondents:
Interpretation:
Out of the 200 respondents 115 respondents are student. 17% of the respondents are
doing Business. 9% of the respondents are Govt. Employees. 6.5% of the respondents are
professionals. 8% of the respondents are comes under Others Category. Others include house
wife, Stock market etc. Only 2% of the respondents are unemployed.
Govt. Employee9% Professtional
6%
Business17%
Student58%
Unemloyed2%
Others8%
Occupation of the respondents
33
Table no: 2.1.5 Type of mobile service:
Connection Mode No. of Respondents Percentage of Respondents
Post Paid 39 19.5 Prepaid 161 80.5 Total 200 100.0
Figure no: 2.1.5 Type of mobile service:
Interpretation:
It has been identified from above the table that 80.5% of the respondents are using
prepaid mobile service and remaining 19.5 % of the respondents are using postpaid.
39
161
Post Paid Prepaid
Type of mobile service
34
Table no: 2.1.6 Service provider for the respondents:
Service Provider No. of Respondents Percentage of Respondents
Aircel 143 52.2
Airtel 66 24.1
Vodafone 18 6.6
TATA Docomo 18 6.6
Reliance 12 4.4
BSNL 17 6.2
Total 274 100.0
Figure no: 2.1.6 Service provider for the respondents:
Interpretation:
It has been identified from the above table that 52.2% of the respondents are using
Aircel. 24.1% of the respondents are using Airtel. 6.6% of the respondents are using
Vodafone, TATA Docomo. 6.2% of the respondents are using BSNL. Only 4.4% of the
respondents are using Reliance.
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
160
Aircel Airtel Vodafone TATA Docomo Reliance
Service provider for the respondents
35
Table no: 2.1.7 Years if using service provider by the Respondents:
Years of Using No. of Respondents Percentage of Respondents
1 20 10.0 2 33 16.5 3 25 12.5 4 19 9.5 5 40 20.0 6 19 9.5 7 17 8.5 8 9 4.5 9 2 1.0 10 14 7.0 12 1 .5 15 1 .5 Total 200 100.0
Figure no: 2.1.7 Years if using service provider by the Respondents:
Interpretation:
It has been identified that majority 20% of the respondents are using their service
provider past 5 Years. 36
Table no: 2.1.8 Way by which service provider is chosen:
Method of choosing No. of Respondents Percentage of Respondents
Reference 49 24.5 Prior Experience 17 8.5 Network 59 29.5 Provide clear voice 1 .5 Excellent Service 34 17.0 Price promise 16 8.0 Availability 15 7.5 Others 9 4.5 Total 200 100.0
Figure no: 2.1.8 Way by which service provider is chosen:
Interpretation:
From the above table it has been identified that majority 29.5% of the respondents are
said that they chosen their service provider by Network. 24.5% of the respondents are said
that they chosen by Reference.
24%
8%
29%
1%
17%
8%8% 5%
Way by which service provider is chosen
Reference Prior Experience Network Provide clear voice
Excellent Service Price promise Availability Others
37
Table no: 2.1.9 Expenditure for Mobile Recharge or Mobile Bill (Per Month):
Amount No. of Respondents Percentage of Respondents
Below 200 75 37.5 201 - 300 74 37.0 501 - 800 20 10.0 801 - 1000 21 10.5 Above 1000 10 5.0 Total 200 100.0
Figure no: 2.1.9 Expenditure for Mobile Recharge or Mobile Bill (Per Month):
Interpretation:
It has been identified that majority 37.5% of the respondents are spending below Rs.
200 for monthly mobile recharge or mobile bill. 37% of the respondents are spending Rs. 201
to Rs. 300 for monthly mobile recharge or mobile bill.
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
Below 200 201 - 300 501 - 800 801 - 1000 Above 1000
Expenditure for Mobile Recharge or Mobile Bill (Per Month)
38
Table no: 2.1.10 Likeness features in Aircel:
Features of Aircel No. of Respondents Percentage of Respondents
Pocket Internet 57 39.9 3G 32 22.4 SMS Pack 10 7.0 VAS 6 4.2 Nothing 38 26.6 Total 143 100.0
Figure no: 2.1.10 Likeness features in Aircel:
Interpretation:
It has been identified that majority 39.9% of the respondents are like Aircel’s Pocket
Internet. 26.6% of the respondents are don’t like any features in Aircel.
0 10 20 30 40 50 60
Pocket Internet
3G
SMS Pack
VAS
Nothing
Pocket Internet 3G SMS Pack VAS Nothing
No. of Respondents 57 32 10 6 38
Likeness features in Aircel
39
Table no: 2.1.11 Preference in Aircel Connection:
Preference No. of Respondents Percentage of Respondents
Low Call rate 69 48.3 Full Take time 65 45.5 Nothing 9 6.3 Total 143 100.0
Figure no: 2.1.11 Preference in Aircel Connection:
Interpretation:
From the above table it has been identified that majority 48.3% of the respondents are
prefers Low Call Rate in Aircel connection.
Low Call rate Full Take time Nothing
69 65
9
Preference in Aircel Connection
40
Table no: 2.1.12 Satisfaction level of Aircel Rate cutters:
Satisfaction level No. of Respondents Percentage of Respondents
Very dissatisfied 15 10.5 Dissatisfied 31 21.7 Neutral 37 25.9 Satisfied 47 32.9 Very Satisfied 13 9.1 Total 143 100.0
Figure no: 2.1.12 Satisfaction level of Aircel Rate cutters:
Interpretation:
It has been identified that only 9.1% of the respondents are Very Satisfied with Aircel
Rate Cutters. Majority 32.9% of the respondents are Satisfied with Aircel Rate Cutters.
05
101520253035404550
Very dissatisfied
Dissatisfied Neutral Satisfied Very Satisfied
Satisfaction level of Aircel Rate cutters
No. of Respondents
41
Table no: 2.1.13 Services used in Aircel – Pocket Internet:
Response No. of Respondents Percentage of Respondents
No 91 63.6 Yes 52 36.4 Total 143 100.0
Figure no: 2.1.13 Services used in Aircel – Pocket Internet:
Interpretation:
It has been identified that majority 63.6% of the respondents are does not using the
Pocket Internet Service.
64%
36%
Services used in Aircel – Pocket Internet
NoYes
42
Table no: 2.1.14 Services used in Aircel – Blyk on Aircel:
Response No. of Respondents Percentage of Respondents
No 127 88.8 Yes 16 11.2 Total 143 100.0
Figure no: 2.1.14 Services used in Aircel – Blyk on Aircel:
Interpretation:
From the above table has been identified that only 11.2% of the respondents are using
the Blyk on Aircel service.
89%
11%
Services used in Aircel – Blyk on Aircel
NoYes
43
Table no: 2.1.15 Services used in Aircel – Dialer Tune:
Response No. of Respondents Percentage of Respondents
No 122 85.3 Yes 21 14.7 Total 143 100.0
Figure no: 2.1.15 Services used in Aircel – Dialer Tune:
Interpretation:
From the above table has been identified that only 14.7% of the respondents are using
the Dialer Tune service.
85%
15%
Services used in Aircel – Dialer Tune
NoYes
44
Table no: 2.1.16 Services used in Aircel – 3G:
Response No. of Respondents Percentage of Respondents
No 129 90.2 Yes 14 9.8 Total 143 100.0
Figure no: 2.1.16 Services used in Aircel – 3G:
Interpretation:
From the above table has been identified that only 9.8% of the respondents are using
the 3G service in Aircel.
90%
10%
Services used in Aircel – 3G
NoYes
45
Table no: 2.1.17 Services used in Aircel – Missed call:
Response No. of Respondents Percentage of Respondents
No 124 86.7 Yes 19 13.3 Total 143 100.0
Figure no: 2.1.17 Services used in Aircel – Missed call:
Interpretation:
From the above table has been identified that only 13.3% of the respondents are using
the Missed Call Alert service.
87%
13%
Services used in Aircel – Missed call
No Yes
46
Table no: 2.1.18 Services used in Aircel – SMS Pack:
Response No. of Respondents Percentage of Respondents
No 76 53.1 Yes 67 46.9 Total 143 100.0
Figure no: 2.1.18 Services used in Aircel – SMS Pack:
Interpretation:
From the above table has been identified that majority 46.9% of the respondents are
using the SMS Pack service. In all above services Aircel customers are using SMS Pack
Service mostly.
53%47%
Services used in Aircel – SMS Pack
No Yes
47
Table no: 2.1.19 Services used in Aircel – Rate Cutters:
Response No. of Respondents Percentage of Respondents
No 95 66.4 Yes 48 33.6 Total 143 100.0
Figure no: 2.1.19 Services used in Aircel – Rate Cutters:
Interpretation:
From the above table has been identified that 33.6% of the respondents are using the
Rate Cutters. After SMS Pack service most of the customers are using Rate Cutters.
66%
34%
Services used in Aircel – Rate Cutters
No Yes
48
Table no: 2.1.20 Services used in Aircel – Nothing:
Response No. of Respondents Percentage of Respondents
No 126 88.1 Yes 17 11.9 Total 143 100.0
Figure no: 2.1.20 Services used in Aircel – Nothing:
Interpretation:
From the above table has been identified that only 11.9% of the respondents are not
using any of the Aircel service.
88%
12%
Services used in Aircel – Nothing
No Yes
49
Table no: 2.1.21 Problems faced in Aircel - Network Coverage:
Satisfaction Level No. of Respondents Percentage of Respondents
Highly Dissatisfied 8 5.6 Dissatisfied 22 15.4 Neutral 20 14.0 Satisfied 74 51.7 Highly Satisfied 19 13.3 Total 143 100.0
Figure no: 2.1.21 Problems faced in Aircel - Network Coverage:
Interpretation:
From the above table has been identified that majority 51.7% of the respondents are
Satisfied with Aircel’s Network Coverage. Only 5.6% of the respondents are Highly
Dissatisfied with Aircel’s Network Coverage.
6%
15%
14%
52%
13%
Problems faced in Aircel - Network Coverage
Highly DissatisfiedDissatisfiedNeutralSatisfiedHighly Satisfied
50
Table no: 2.1.22 Problems faced in Aircel - Value Added Services:
Satisfaction Level No. of Respondents Percentage of Respondents
Highly Dissatisfied 34 23.8 Dissatisfied 40 28.0 Neutral 27 18.9 Satisfied 33 23.1 Highly Satisfied 9 6.3 Total 143 100.0
Figure no: 2.1.22 Problems faced in Aircel - Value Added Services:
Interpretation:
From the above table has been identified that 28% of the respondents are Dissatisfied
with Unnecessary VAS Activation. Only 6.3% of the respondents are not affected by
Unnecessary VAS Activation.
24%
28%19%
23%
6%
Problems faced in Aircel - Value Added Services
Highly DissatisfiedDissatisfiedNeutralSatisfiedHighly Satisfied
51
Table no: 2.1.23 Problems faced in Aircel - Network Clarity:
Satisfaction Level No. of Respondents Percentage of Respondents
Highly Dissatisfied 5 3.5 Dissatisfied 22 15.4 Neutral 32 22.4 Satisfied 56 39.2 Highly Satisfied 28 19.6 Total 143 100.0
Figure no: 2.1.23 Problems faced in Aircel - Network Clarity:
Interpretation:
From the above table has been identified that majority 39.2% of the respondents are
Satisfied with Aircel’s Network Clarity. Only 3.5% of the respondents are Highly
Dissatisfied with Aircel’s Network Clarity.
4%
15%
22%
39%
20%
Problems faced in Aircel - Network Clarity
Highly Dissatisfied Dissatisfied Neutral Satisfied Highly Satisfied
52
Table no: 2.1.24 Problems faced in Aircel - Changing Tariff:
Satisfaction Level No. of Respondents Percentage of Respondents
Highly Dissatisfied 7 4.9 Dissatisfied 27 18.9 Neutral 53 37.1 Satisfied 28 19.6 Highly Satisfied 28 19.6 Total 143 100.0
Figure no: 2.1.24 Problems faced in Aircel - Changing Tariff:
Interpretation:
From the above table has been identified that majority 37.1% of the respondents are
Neutral Level Satisfaction with Aircel’s Tariff Changing. Only 4.9% of the respondents are
Highly Dissatisfied with Changing Tariff.
5%
19%
37%
19%
20%
Problems faced in Aircel - Changing Tariff
Highly Dissatisfied Dissatisfied Neutral Satisfied Highly Satisfied
53
Table no: 2.1.25 Problems faced in Aircel - Customer Service:
Satisfaction Level No. of Respondents Percentage of Respondents
Highly Dissatisfied 23 16.1 Dissatisfied 29 20.3 Neutral 29 20.3 Satisfied 49 34.3 Highly Satisfied 13 9.1 Total 143 100.0
Figure no: 2.1.25 Problems faced in Aircel - Customer Service:
Interpretation:
From the above table has been identified that majority 34.3% of the respondents are
Satisfied with Aircel’s Customer Service. Only 9.1% of the respondents are Highly Satisfied
with Aircel’s Customer Service.
16%
21%
20%
34%
9%
Problems faced in Aircel - Customer Service
Highly Dissatisfied Dissatisfied Neutral Satisfied Highly Satisfied
54
Table no: 2.1.26 Satisfaction with Customer Care service:
Response No. of Respondents Percentage of Respondents
Yes 87 60.8 No 56 39.2 Total 143 100.0
Figure no: 2.1.26 Satisfaction with Customer Care service:
Interpretation:
It has been identified that majority 60.8% of the respondents are Satisfied with
Aircel’s Customer Care service.
Yes No
87
56
Satisfaction with Customer Care service
55
Table no: 2.1.27 Likeness of Ads by Respondents:
Types of Ads No. of Respondents Percentage of Respondents
TV Commercials 108 54.0 Print ads 30 15.0 Internet 33 16.5 Radio 17 8.5 Bill Boards 12 6.0 Total 200 100.0
Figure no: 2.1.27 Likeness of Ads by Respondents:
Interpretation:
From the above table it has been identified that majority 54% of the respondents are
like TV Commercial Ads. Only 6% of the respondents are like Bill Boards.
0
50
100
150
Likeness of Ads by Respondents
56
Table no: 2.1.28 Services used other than call:
Services No. of Respondents Percentage of Respondents
SMS 103 51.5 MMS 8 4.0 Internet 15 7.5 Games 18 9.0 Downloading 26 13.0 Others (Only Call) 30 15.0 Total 200 100.0
Figure no: 2.1.28 Services used other than call:
Interpretation:
It has been identified that majority 51.5% of the respondents are using the SMS
Service other than Call. 15% of the respondents are using mobile only for Calling.
51%
4%8% 9%
13%
15%
28%
Services used other than call
SMS MMS Internet Games Downloading Others
57
Table no: 2.1.29 Rating of Network Providers - Aircel:
Rating No. of Respondents Percentage of Respondents
Very Bad 6 3.0 Bad 17 8.5 Good 85 42.5 Very Good 54 27.0 Excellent 38 19.0 Total 200 100.0
Figure no: 2.1.29 Rating of Network Providers - Aircel:
Interpretation:
From the above table we interpret that 42.5% of the respondents have rated Aircel
Network as Good. 27% of the respondents have rated Aircel Network as Very Good.
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
Very Bad Bad Good Very Good Excellent
Rating of Network Providers - Aircel
58
Table no: 2.1.30 Rating of Network Providers - Airtel:
Rating No. of Respondents Percentage of Respondents
Very Bad 3 1.5 Bad 9 4.5 Good 38 19.0 Very Good 105 52.5 Excellent 45 22.5 Total 200 100.0
Figure no: 2.1.30 Rating of Network Providers - Airtel:
Interpretation:
From the above table we interpret that 52.5% of the respondents have rated Airtel
Network as Very Good. 22.5% of the respondents have rated Airtel Network as Excellent.
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
Very Bad Bad Good Very Good Excellent
Rating of Network Providers - Airtel
59
Table no: 2.1.31 Rating of Network Providers - Vodafone:
Rating No. of Respondents Percentage of Respondents
Very Bad 6 3.0 Bad 35 17.5 Good 94 47.0 Very Good 40 20.0 Excellent 25 12.5 Total 200 100.0
Figure no: 2.1.31 Rating of Network Providers - Vodafone:
Interpretation:
From the above table we interpret that 47% of the respondents have rated Vodafone
Network as Good. 20% of the respondents have rated Vodafone Network as Very Good.
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
Very Bad Bad Good Very Good Excellent
Rating of Network Providers - Vodafone
No. of Respondents
60
Table no: 2.1.32 Rating of Network Providers - TATA Docomo:
Rating No. of Respondents Percentage of Respondents
Very Bad 15 7.5 Bad 65 32.5 Good 76 38.0 Very Good 26 13.0 Excellent 18 9.0 Total 200 100.0
Figure no: 2.1.32 Rating of Network Providers - TATA Docomo:
Interpretation:
From the above table we interpret that 38% of the respondents have rated TATA
Docomo Network as Good. 32.5% of the respondents have rated TATA Docomo Network as
Bad.
01020304050607080
Rating of Network Providers - TATA Docomo
No. of Respondents
61
Table no: 2.1.33 Rating of Network Providers - Reliance:
Rating No. of Respondents Percentage of Respondents
Very Bad 31 15.5 Bad 90 45.0 Good 40 20.0 Very Good 35 17.5 Excellent 4 2.0 Total 200 100.0
Figure no: 2.1.23 Rating of Network Providers - Reliance:
Interpretation:
From the above table we interpret that majority 45% of the respondents have rated
Reliance Network as Bad. Only 2% of the respondents have rated Reliance Network as
Excellent.
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
Very Bad Bad Good Very Good Excellent
Rating of Network Providers - Reliance
62
Table no: 2.1.34 Rating of Network Providers - MTS:
Rating No. of Respondents Percentage of Respondents
Very Bad 49 24.5 Bad 80 40.0 Good 34 17.0 Very Good 31 15.5 Excellent 6 3.0 Total 200 100.0
Figure no: 2.1.34 Rating of Network Providers - MTS:
Interpretation:
From the above table we interpret that 40% of the respondents have rated MTS
Network as Bad. 24.5% of the respondents have rated MTS Network as Very Bad.
01020304050607080
Very Bad BadGood
Very GoodExcellent
Rating of Network Providers - MTS
63
Table no: 2.1.35 Rating of Network Providers - BSNL:
Rating No. of Respondents Percentage of Respondents
Very Bad 80 40.0 Bad 50 25.0 Good 32 16.0 Very Good 25 12.5 Excellent 13 6.5 Total 200 100.0
Figure no: 2.1.35 Rating of Network Providers - BSNL:
Interpretation:
From the above table we interpret that majority 40% of the respondents have rated
BSNL Network as Very Bad. 25% of the respondents have rated BSNL Network as Bad.
01020304050607080
Very Bad BadGood
Very GoodExcellent
Rating of Network Providers - BSNL
64
Table no: 2.1.36 Rating of 3G Service – Aircel:
Rating No. of Respondents Percentage of Respondents
Very Bad 4 2.0 Bad 30 15.0 Good 76 38.0 Very Good 67 33.5 Excellent 23 11.5 Total 200 100.0
Figure no: 2.1.36 Rating of 3G Service – Aircel:
Interpretation:
It has been identified that majority 38% of the respondents have rated Aircel’s 3G
service as Good.
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
Very Bad Bad Good Very Good
Excellent
Rating of 3G Service – Aircel
No. of Respondents
65
Table no: 2.1.37 Rating of 3G Service – Airtel:
Rating No. of Respondents Percentage of Respondents
Very Bad 5 2.5 Bad 25 12.5 Good 26 13.0 Very Good 73 36.5 Excellent 71 35.5 Total 200 100.0
Figure no: 2.1.37 Rating of 3G Service – Airtel:
Interpretation:
It has been identified that majority 36.5% of the respondents have rated Airtel’s 3G
services as Very Good. 35.5% of the respondents have rated Airtel’s 3G services as
Excellent.
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80
Very Bad
Bad
Good
Very Good
Excellent
Rating of 3G Service – Airtel
66
Table no: 2.1.38 Rating of 3G Service – Vodafone:
Rating No. of Respondents Percentage of Respondents
Very Bad 2 1.0 Bad 26 13.0 Good 32 16.0 Very Good 63 31.5 Excellent 77 38.5 Total 200 100.0
Figure no: 2.1.38 Rating of 3G Service – Vodafone:
Interpretation:
It has been identified that majority 38.5% of the respondents have rated Vodafone’s
3G service as Excellent. 31.5% of the respondents have rated Vodafone’s 3G service as Very
Good.
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90
Very Bad
Bad
Good
Very Good
Excellent
Rating of 3G Service – Vodafone
67
Table no: 2.1.39 Rating of 3G Service – TATA Docomo:
Rating No. of Respondents Percentage of Respondents
Very Bad 9 4.5 Bad 60 30.0 Good 92 46.0 Very Good 26 13.0 Excellent 13 6.5 Total 200 100.0
Figure no: 2.1.39 Rating of 3G Service – TATA Docomo:
Interpretation:
It has been identified that majority 46% of the respondents have rated TATA
Docomo’s 3G service as Good. 30% of the respondents have rated TATA Docomo’s 3g
service as Bad.
0 20 40 60 80 100
Very Bad
Bad
Good
Very Good
Excellent
Rating of 3G Service – TATA Docomo
No. of Respondents
68
Table no: 2.1.40 Rating of 3G Service – Reliance:
Rating No. of Respondents Percentage of Respondents
Very Bad 45 22.5 Bad 74 37.0 Good 23 11.5 Very Good 42 21.0 Excellent 16 8.0 Total 200 100.0
Figure no: 2.1.40 Rating of 3G Service – Reliance:
Interpretation:
It has been identified that majority 37% of the respondents have rated Reliance’s 3G
service as Bad. 22.5% of the respondents have rated Reliance’s 3G services as Very Bad.
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80
Very Bad
Bad
Good
Very Good
Excellent
Rating of 3G Service – Reliance
69
Table no: 2.1.41 Rating of 3G Service – BSNL:
Rating No. of Respondents Percentage of Respondents
Very Bad 38 19.0 Bad 80 40.0 Good 37 18.5 Very Good 30 15.0 Excellent 15 7.5 Total 200 100.0
Figure no: 2.1.41 Rating of 3G Service – BSNL:
Interpretation:
It has been identified that majority 40% of the respondents have rated BSNL’s 3G
service as Bad. 18.5% of the respondents have rated BSNL’s 3G services as Good.
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90
Very Bad
Bad
Good
Very Good
Excellent
Rating of 3G Service – BSNL
70
Table no: 2.1.42 Awareness of Aircel Dongle:
Response No. of Respondents Percentage of Respondents
Yes 80 40.0 No 120 60.0 Total 200 100.0
Figure no: 2.1.42 Awareness of Aircel Dongle:
Interpretation:
From the above table it has been identified that majority 60% of the respondents are
not aware about Aircel Dongle Product.
40%
60%
Awareness of Aircel Dongle
YesNo
71
Table no: 2.1.43 Awareness of iPhone:
Response No. of Respondents Percentage of Respondents
Yes 116 58.0 No 84 42.0 Total 200 100.0
Figure no: 2.1.43 Awareness of iPhone:
Interpretation:
From the above table it has been identified that majority 58% of the respondents are
aware about Apple iPhone from Aircel.
58%
42%
Awareness of iPhone
YesNo
72
Table no: 2.1.44 Awareness of Blackberry:
Rating No. of Respondents Percentage of Respondents
Yes 52 26.0 No 148 74.0 Total 200 100.0
Figure no: 2.1.44 Awareness of Blackberry:
Interpretation:
From the above table it has been identified that majority 74% of the respondents are
not aware about Blackberry from Aircel.
26%
74%
Awareness of Blackberry
YesNo
73
Table no: 2.1.45 Awareness of Other Handset offers:
Response No. of Respondents Percentage of Respondents
Yes 42 21.0 No 158 79.0 Total 200 100.0
Figure no: 2.1.45 Awareness of Other Handset offers:
Interpretation:
From the above table it has been identified that only 21% of the respondents are
aware about Other Handset offers from Aircel.
21%
79%
Awareness of Other Handset offers
YesNo
74
Table no: 2.1.46 Rating of Data cards - Aircel:
Rating No. of Respondents Percentage of Respondents
Very Bad 1 1.3 Bad 3 3.8 Good 25 31.3 Very Good 28 35.0 Excellent 23 28.8 Total 80 100.0
Figure no: 2.1.46 Rating of Data cards - Aircel:
Interpretation:
From the above table it has been identified that majority 35% of the respondents are
rated the Aircel’s Data Card as Good. 31.3% of the respondents are rated the Aircel’s Data
Card as Excellent.
41%
22%
13%
20%4%
Rating of Data cards - Aircel
Very BadBadGoodVery GoodExcellent
75
Table no: 2.1.47 Rating of Data cards - Airtel:
Rating No. of Respondents Percentage of Respondents
Very Bad 0 0 Bad 6 7.5 Good 17 21.3 Very Good 38 47.5 Excellent 19 23.8 Total 80 100.0
Figure no: 2.1.47 Rating of Data cards - Airtel:
Interpretation:
From the above table it has been identified that majority 47.5% of the respondents are
rated the Airtel’s Data Card as Very Good. 23.8% of the respondents are rated the Airtel’s
Data Card as Excellent.
0%7%
21%
48%
24%
Rating of Data cards - Airtel
Very BadBadGoodVery GoodExcellent
76
Table no: 2.1.48 Rating of Data cards - Vodafone:
Rating No. of Respondents Percentage of Respondents
Very Bad 0 0 Bad 15 18.8 Good 43 53.8 Very Good 14 17.5 Excellent 8 10.0 Total 80 100.0
Figure no: 2.1.48 Rating of Data cards - Vodafone:
Interpretation:
From the above table it has been identified that majority 54% of the respondents are
rated the Vodafone’s Data Card as Good. 18.8% of the respondents are rated the Vodafone’s
Data Card as Bad.
Very Bad0%
Bad19%
Good54%
Very Good17%
Excellent10%
Rating of Data cards - Vodafone
77
Table no: 2.1.49 Rating of Data cards – TATA Docomo or TATA Photon:
Rating No. of Respondents Percentage of Respondents
Very Bad 0 0 Bad 12 15.0 Good 16 20.0 Very Good 14 17.5 Excellent 38 47.5 Total 80 100.0
Figure no: 2.1.49 Rating of Data cards – TATA Docomo or TATA Photon:
Interpretation:
From the above table it has been identified that majority 47.5% of the respondents are
rated the TATA Docomo or TATA Photon’s Data Card as Excellent.
0%
15%
20%
17%
48%
No. of Respondents
Very BadBadGoodVery GoodExcellent
78
Table no: 2.1.50 Rating of Data cards - Reliance:
Rating No. of Respondents Percentage of Respondents
Very Bad 6 7.5 Bad 33 41.3 Good 21 26.3 Very Good 9 11.3 Excellent 11 13.8 Total 80 100.0
Figure no: 2.1.50 Rating of Data cards - Reliance:
Interpretation:
From the above table it has been identified that majority 41.3% of the respondents are
rated the Reliance’s Data Card as Bad. 26.3% of the respondents are rated the Reliance’s
Data Card as Good.
8%
41%
26%
11%
14%
Rating of Data cards - Reliance
Very BadBadGoodVery GoodExcellent
79
Table no: 2.1.51 Rating of Data cards - MTS:
Rating No. of Respondents Percentage of Respondents
Very Bad 3 3.8 Bad 16 20.0 Good 15 18.8 Very Good 29 36.3 Excellent 17 21.3 Total 80 100.0
Figure no: 2.1.51 Rating of Data cards - MTS:
Interpretation:
From the above table it has been identified that majority 36.3% of the respondents are
rated the MTS’s Data Card as Very Good. 21.3% of the respondents are rated the MTS’s
Data Card as Excellent.
4%
20%
19%36%
21%
Rating of Data cards - MTS
Very BadBadGoodVery GoodExcellent
80
Table no: 2.1.52 Rating of Data cards - BSNL:
Rating No. of Respondents Percentage of Respondents
Very Bad 33 41.25 Bad 18 22.5 Good 10 12.5 Very Good 16 20.0 Excellent 3 3.75 Total 80 100.0
Figure no: 2.1.52 Rating of Data cards - BSNL:
Interpretation:
From the above table it has been identified that majority 41.25% of the respondents
are rated the BSNL’s Data Card as Very Bad. Only 3.75% of the respondents are rated the
BSNL’s Data Card as Excellent.
41%
22%
13%
20%
4%
Rating of Data cards - BSNL
Very BadBadGoodVery GoodExcellent
81
Table no: 2.1.53 Likeness to change service provider:
Response No. of Respondents Percentage of Respondents
Yes 45 22.5 No 155 77.5 Total 200 100.0
Figure no: 2.1.53 Likeness to change service provider:
Interpretation:
From the above table it has been identified that only 22.5% of the respondents are
willing to change their service provider.
0 50 100 150 200
Yes
No
Likeness to change service provider
No. of Respondents
82
Table no: 2.1.54 Reason to change the Service Provider:
Reasons No. of Respondents Percentage of Respondents
New Technology 11 24.4 Change tariff 7 15.6 Network Change 16 35.6 Lost 2 4.4 Others 9 20.0 Total 45 100.0
Figure no: 2.1.54 Reason to change the Service Provider:
Interpretation:
From the above table it has been identified that majority 35.6% of the respondents are
change their Service provider because of Change the Network.
No. of Respondents, 9
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
18
New Technology
Change tariff Change network Lost Others
Reason to change the Service Provider
83
Table no: 2.1.55 Change of Service Provider:
Service Providers No. of Respondents Percentage of Respondents
Aircel 11 24.4 Airtel 12 26.7 Vodafone 10 22.2 TATA Docomo 2 4.4 Videocon 4 8.9 Reliance 1 2.2 MTS 2 4.4 BSNL 3 6.7 Total 45 100.0
Figure no: 2.1.55 Change of Service Provider:
Interpretation:
Above table shows that 24.4% of the respondents are willing to come Aircel. Other
75.6% of the respondents are willing to move from Aircel to various service providers.
1112
10
2
4
12
3
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
Aircel Airtel Vodafone TATA Docomo
Videocon Reliance MTS BSNL
Change of Service Provider
No. of Respondents
84
Table no: 2.1.56 Reason for non use of the Aircel services:
Reasons No. of Respondents Percentage of Respondents
Lack of awareness 10 17.5 High price 3 5.3 Poor Service 7 12.3 Poor Network 5 8.8 Poor Technology 3 5.3 Satisfied with present service provider
29 50.9
Total 57 100.0
Figure no: 2.1.56 Reason for non use of the Aircel services:
Interpretation:
It has been identified that majority 50.9% of the respondents are Satisfied with present
service provider. So that only they are not using Aircel service.
10
37 5 3
29
05
101520253035
Lack of awareness
High price Poor Service
Poor Network
Poor Technology
Satisfied with
present service
provider
Reason for non use of the Aircel services
No. of Respondents
85
2.2 STATISTICAL ANALYSIS
2.2.1 CHI SQUARE TEST
HYPOTHESIS:
H0: There is no relationship between Respondents’ Age & Their Spending for Mobile
Recharge/ Mobile Bill.
H1: There is a relationship between Respondents’ Age & Their Spending for Mobile
Recharge/ Mobile Bill.
Case Processing Summary
Cases
Valid Missing Total
N Percent N Percent N Percent
Age * How much your
are spending 200 100.0% 0 .0% 200 100.0%
Age * How much your are spending Crosstabulation
Count
How much your are spending
Below 200 201 - 300 501 - 800 801 – 1000 Above 1000 Total
Age
Below 20 23 14 0 0 0 37
21 - 30 47 40 12 12 6 117
31- 40 4 11 8 4 1 28
41 - 50 2 5 0 3 0 10
Above 50 0 5 0 2 1 8
Total 76 75 20 21 8 200
86
Chi-Square Tests
Value Df Asymp. Sig. (2-sided)
Pearson Chi-Square 44.355a 16 .000
Likelihood Ratio 53.437 16 .000
Linear-by-Linear Association 19.715 1 .000
N of Valid Cases 200
a. 17 cells (68.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is .32.
Interpretation:
We accept H1. There is a relationship between Respondents’ Age & Their Spending
for Mobile Recharge/ Mobile Bill (0.05>0.000).
87
HYPOTHESIS:
H0: There is no relationship between Amount spending Mobile Recharge/Mobile Bill
and Mobile Service.
H1: There is a relationship between Amount spending Mobile Recharge/Mobile Bill
and Mobile Service.
Case Processing Summary
Cases
Valid Missing Total
N Percent N Percent N Percent
Presently u are in to *
How much your are
spending
200 100.0% 0 .0% 200 100.0%
Presently u are in to * How much your are spending Cross tabulation
Count
How much your are spending
Below 200 201 - 300 501 - 800 801 – 1000
Presently u are in to Post Paid 3 18 7 4
Prepaid 72 56 13 17
Total 75 74 20 21
88
Presently u are in to * How much your are spending Cross tabulation
Count
How much your are
spending
Above 1000 Total
Presently u are in to Post Paid 7 39
Prepaid 3 161
Total 10 200
Chi-Square Tests
Value df Asymp. Sig. (2-sided)
Pearson Chi-Square 31.886a 4 .000
Likelihood Ratio 31.491 4 .000
Linear-by-Linear Association 20.876 1 .000
N of Valid Cases 200
a. 3 cells (30.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 1.95.
Interpretation:
We accept H1. There is a relationship between Amount spending Mobile
Recharge/Mobile Bill and Mobile Service (0.05>0.000).
89
HYPOTHESIS:
H0: There is no relationship between Amount spending for Mobile Recharge/ Mobile
Bill and Respondents Occupation.
H1: There is a relationship between Amount spending Mobile Recharge/ Mobile Bill
and Respondents Occupation.
Case Processing Summary
Cases
Valid Missing Total
N Percent N Percent N Percent
Occupation * How much
your are spending 200 100.0% 0 .0% 200 100.0%
Occupation * How much your are spending Cross tabulation
Count
How much your are spending
Below 200 201 - 300 501 - 800 801 - 1000
Occupation
Govt. Employee 2 10 2 3
Professional 3 7 0 2
Business 5 13 7 4
Student 64 39 7 5
Unemployed 2 2 0 0
Others 0 4 4 7
Total 76 75 20 21
90
Occupation * How much your are spending Cross tabulation
Count
How much your are
spending
Above 1000 Total
Occupation
Govt. Employee 1 18
Professional 1 13
Business 5 34
Student 0 115
Unemployed 0 4
Others 1 16
Total 8 200
Chi-Square Tests
Value df Asymp. Sig. (2-sided)
Pearson Chi-Square 76.990a 20 .000
Likelihood Ratio 79.186 20 .000
Linear-by-Linear Association .718 1 .397
N of Valid Cases 200
a. 20 cells (66.7%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is .16.
Interpretation:
We accept H1. There is a relationship between Amount spending Mobile Recharge/
Mobile Bill and Respondents Occupation (0.05>0.000).
91
2.2.2 FRIEDMAN TEST
Source of Information:
Descriptive Statistics
Sources of
Information N Mean Std. Deviation Minimum Maximum
Newspapers 143 3.69 2.117 1 8
Magazines 143 4.17 1.524 2 8
TV Ads 143 3.11 1.918 1 8
Friends 143 3.97 2.083 1 8
Colleagues 143 5.29 1.942 1 8
Online 143 4.95 2.228 1 8
Leaflets 143 6.04 2.198 1 8
Retailers 143 4.82 2.700 1 8
Friedman Test
Ranks
Sources of Information Mean Rank
Newspapers 3.69
Magazines 4.17
TV Ads 3.11
Friends 3.97
Colleagues 5.27
Online/ Service Messages 4.93
Leaflets 6.04
Retailers 4.82
Interpretation:
The above table shows that the respondents are gets information about the
Product/Service from TV Ads. 92
Ranks of Company Advertisement:
Descriptive Statistics
Service Provider N Mean Std. Deviation Minimum Maximum
Aircel 200 3.52 1.967 1 7
Airtel 200 2.92 1.611 1 7
Vodafone 200 2.95 1.648 1 7
TATA Docomo 200 3.31 1.580 1 7
Reliance 200 4.45 1.756 1 7
MTS 200 5.27 1.658 1 7
BSNL 200 5.57 1.828 1 7
Friedman Test
Ranks
Service Provider Mean Rank
Aircel 3.53
Airtel 2.93
Vodafone 2.95
TATA Docomo 3.32
Reliance 4.45
MTS 5.26
BSNL 5.58
Interpretation:
From the above table it has been identified that respondents have ranked Airtel’s
Advertisement as 1st Place. Aircel ranked 4th Place.
93
CHAPTER – III SUMMERY OF
FINDINGS
94
CHAPTER – III
3. SUMMARY OF FINDINGS
3.1 FINDINGS
• Majority (66.5%) of respondents were males.
• Majority (58.5%) of the respondents are between the age group of 21-30 years.
• Majority (39.5%) of the respondents’ qualification were University Graduate.
• Majority (57.5%) of the respondents are Student.
• Majority (80.5%) of the respondents are using prepaid mobile service.
• Majority (52.2%) of the respondents are using Aircel.
• Majority (20.0%) of the respondents are using their service provider past 5 Years.
• Majority (29.5%) of the respondents are said that they chosen their service provider
by Network.
• Majority (37.5%) of the respondents are spending below Rs. 200 for monthly mobile
recharge or mobile bill.
• Majority (39.9%) of the respondents are like Aircel’s Pocket Internet.
• Majority (48.3%) of the respondents are prefers Low Call Rate in Aircel connection.
• Majority (32.9%) of the respondents are Satisfied with Aircel Rate Cutters.
• Majority (63.6%) of the respondents are does not using the Pocket Internet Service.
• Majority (85.3%) of the respondents are does not using the Dialer Tune.
• Majority (90.2%) of the respondents are does not using the 3G.
• Majority (86.7%) of the respondents are does not using the Missed Call Alert Service.
• Majority (46.9%) of the respondents are using the SMS Pack service.
• Majority (33.6%) of the respondents are using the Rate Cutters.
• Majority (88.1%) of the respondents are using any one the Aircel Service.
• Majority (51.7%) of the respondents are Satisfied with Aircel’s Network Coverage.
• Majority (28.0%) of the respondents are Dissatisfied with Unnecessary VAS
Activation.
• Majority (39.2%) of the respondents are Satisfied with Aircel’s Network Clarity.
• Majority (37.1%) of the respondents are Neutral Level Satisfaction with Aircel’s
Tariff Changing.
• Majority (34.3%) of the respondents are Satisfied with Aircel’s Customer Service.
95
• Majority (60.8%) of the respondents are Satisfied with Aircel’s Customer Care
service.
• Majority (54.0%) of the respondents are like TV Commercial Ads.
• Majority (51.5%) of the respondents are using the SMS Service other than Call.
• Majority (42.5%) of the respondents have rated Aircel Network as Good.
• Majority (52.5%) of the respondents have rated Airtel Network as Very Good.
• Majority (47.0%) of the respondents have rated Vodafone Network as Good.
• Majority (38.0%) of the respondents have rated TATA Docomo Network as Good.
• Majority (45.0%) of the respondents have rated Reliance Network as Bad.
• Majority (40.0%) of the respondents have rated MTS Network as Bad.
• Majority (40.0%) of the respondents have rated BSNL Network as Very Bad.
• Majority (38.0%) of the respondents have rated Aircel’s 3G service as Good.
• Majority (36.5%) of the respondents have rated Airtel’s 3G services as Very Good.
• Majority (38.5%) of the respondents have rated Vodafone’s 3G service as Excellent.
• Majority (46.0%) of the respondents have rated TATA Docomo’s 3G service as
Good.
• Majority (37.0%) of the respondents have rated Reliance’s 3G service as Bad.
• Majority (40.0%) of the respondents have rated BSNL’s 3G service as Bad.
• Majority (60.0%) of the respondents are not aware about Aircel Dongle Product.
• Majority (58.0%) of the respondents are aware about Apple iPhone from Aircel.
• Majority (74.0%) of the respondents are not aware about Blackberry from Aircel.
• Majority (79.0%) of the respondents are not aware about Other Handset offers from
Aircel.
• Majority (35.0%) of the respondents are rated the Aircel’s Data Card as Good.
• Majority (47.5%) of the respondents are rated the Airtel’s Data Card as Very Good.
• Majority (54.0%) of the respondents are rated the Vodafone’s Data Card as Good.
• Majority (47.5%) of the respondents are rated the TATA Docomo or TATA Photon’s
Data Card as Excellent.
• Majority (41.3%) of the respondents are rated the Reliance’s Data Card as Bad.
• Majority (36.3%) of the respondents are rated the MTS’s Data Card as Very Good.
• Majority (41.25%) of the respondents are rated the BSNL’s Data Card as Very Bad.
• Majority (77.5%) of the respondents are not willing to change their service provider.
96
• Majority (35.6%) of the respondents are changing their Service provider because of
Change the Network.
• Majority (26.7%) of the respondents are willing to move on Airtel.
• Majority (50.9%) of the respondents are Satisfied with present service provider. So
that only they are not using Aircel service.
• There is a relationship between Respondents’ Age & Their Spending for Mobile
Recharge/ Mobile Bill (0.05>0.000).
• There is a relationship between Amount spending Mobile Recharge/Mobile Bill and
Mobile Service (0.05>0.000).
• There is a relationship between Amount spending Mobile Recharge/ Mobile Bill and
Respondents Occupation (0.05>0.000).
• Majority of the respondents are gets information about the Product/Service from TV
Ads.
• Majority of the respondents have ranked Airtel’s Advertisement as 1st Place.
97
3.2 SUGGESTIONS
Much number of competitors is in the market for Aircel. So Consumers compare the
customer care services. Many of the Aircel customers feel that Customer Care
Services are poor in Aircel. Aircel must improve those services.
More consumers are highly disturbed and irritated with unnecessary VAS Activation.
Aircel needs to avoid these things.
Awareness about the Aircel Dongle is very less. Aircel must create awareness about
this by way of advertisements.
Most of the consumers are attracted by TV Commercial ads. Respondents ranked the
Aircel TV Ads as Fourth Rank. Creative and attractive advertisements will attract the
consumer towards Aircel products.
More consumers need 3 Months Rate Cutters, 3 Months SMS Packs.
To attract the Students Aircel need introduce some new offers or packages.
98
3.3 CONCLUSION
This research was useful for the organization to find out the consumers opinion
towards the Aircel and to know the attributes of the selection process.
As results from this research indicate, Aircel need to offer more than an attractive
service and products to entice qualified customers. With number of service providers
currently available, Consumers can be choosy when searching for their ideal one. They are
more prone towards various attractive services.
Thus, it is important for organization to know exactly what they have to offer
potential consumers, and then highlight their best features. Once organizations have
successfully find candidates, they will become a loyal consumer.
99
APPENDIX
100
BIBLIOGRAPHY
Website sources:
www.wikipedia.org
www.aircel.com
www.hotdocuments.com
www.scribd.com
www.trai.gov.in
Books referred:
Philp Kotler, Principles of Marketing, Sultan Chand and Company Limited, New
Delhi, 2002.
D. Aaker, V. Kumar and G. Day, Marketing Research, John Wiley & Sons (ASIA)
Pvt. Limited, Seventh Edition, 2003.
Pillai. R.S.N and Bhagavathy, Modern Marketing, Sulthan Chand and Sons, Second
Edition.
Balu. V, Marketing Research of Consumer Behaviour, Sri Venkadeswaran
Publications, Second Edition, 2001.
Ramaswamy and Namakumari, Marketing Management, Macmillan Publishers India
Ltd, Fourth Edition.
101
A STUDY ON IMPACT OF MARKETING STRATEGY ON CONSUMERS
BEHAVIOUR WITH REFERENCE TO AIRCEL
Questionnaire
Name:
Mobile No:
Gender: Male Female
Age:
Below 20 21 – 30 31-40 41-50 51-60 61 and above
Qualification:
SSLC HSC Under Graduate Post Graduate Others
Occupation:
Govt. Employee Professional Business Student
Home Maker Others__________
1. What do you use at present?__________
Postpaid Prepaid
2. Which mobile service provider do you use? (Multiple Choice)
(P-Primary, S-Secondary Just tick it)
Aircel P/S Airtel P/S Vodafone P/S TATA Docomo
Reliance P/S BSNL P/S (If not Aircel then go to 13)
3. How many years are you using the service provider?
_____________
4. How have you chosen your service provider?
Reference Prior experience Network Provide clear voice
Excellent service Price promise Availability Others _________
5. How much do you spend for Mobile recharge per month?
<200 201 – 500 501 – 800 801 – 1000 >1000
6. Which feature do you like in Aircel service?
Pocket Internet 3G Aircel Apps VAS Nothing
7. Which do you prefer most in Aircel connection?
Low call rate Full take time Nothing
8. Your satisfaction level with Aircel Rate Cutters?
Very dissatisfied Dissatisfied Neutral Satisfied Very satisfied
102
9. In following what are the services do you use in Aircel? (Multiple Choice)
Pocket Internet Blyk on Aircel Dialer Tune 3G
Missed Call Alert SMS Pack Rate Cutters
Nothing
10. Where did you get information about the product/service/offers? (Rank It)
Source Rank
Newspapers
Magazines
TV Ads
Friends
Colleagues
Online
Leaflets
Retailers
11. In following what kind of problems do you face in Aircel services?
Problems Highly
dissatisfied Dissatisfied Neutral Satisfied
Highly
Satisfied
Network coverage
Value Added Service
Activation (Unnecessary)
Network Clarity
Changing Tariff
Customer Service
12. Are you satisfied with customer care service when the problem occurs?
Yes No
If No: Why are not satisfied with customer care service?
_____________________________________________________________
13. Which type of ads do you like most?
TV commercials Print ads Internet Radio Bill Boards
103
14. Rank the following companies advertisements?
Network Provider Rank
Aircel
Airtel
Vodafone
TATA Docomo
Reliance
MTS
BSNL
15. Which of the following services do you use other than calls?
SMS MMS Internet Games Download
Only Call
16. Give your rating for the following Network providers?
Network Provider Very Bad Bad Good Very Good Excellent
Aircel
Airtel
Vodafone
TATA Docomo
Reliance
MTS
BSNL
17. Give your rating for the 3G service?
Network Provider Very Bad Bad Good Very Good Excellent
Aircel
Airtel
Vodafone
TATA Docomo
Reliance
BSNL
104
18. Are you aware of the following Aircel products/services?
Product Yes No
Aircel Dongle (Data Card)
iPhone
Blackberry
Other Handset offers
19. If Yes, give your rating for the following data cards
Data card Very Bad Bad Good Very Good Excellent
Aircel
Airtel
Vodafone
TATA Docomo/ Photon
Reliance
MTS
BSNL
20. Do you like to change your service provider?
Yes No
21. If Yes - Why do you want to change your mobile product/service?
New Technology Tariff Change Network Change Lost
Others _______________________
22. If Yes - Which mobile service do you want to move on?
Aircel Airtel Vodafone TATA Docomo Videocon
Reliance MTS BSNL
23. Why you don’t use Aircel services? (If you are not Aircel users)
Lack of awareness High price Poor Service Poor network
Poor Technology Satisfied with present service provider
24. Any suggestions to Aircel?
_____________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________
THANKING FOR SPARING TIME TO FILL THE QUESTIONNAIRE
105