54
KUESIONER PENELITIAN TESIS “ANALISIS PERILAKU PEMELIHARAAN KESEHATAN GIGI DAN MULUT TERHADAP STATUS ORAL HIGIENE DAN PERIODONTAL PASIEN KOMPROMIS MEDIS RAWAT INAP DI RSUP H. ADAM MALIK MEDAN” Petunjuk pengisian : Data Responden Untuk pertanyaan no. 1 s/d 5, berilah tanda lingkaran (O) pada salah satu pilihan jawaban dan isilah titik-titik dengan tulisan tangan. Untuk pertanyaan no. 6, diisi oleh peneliti (dari catatan medis pasien). 1. Usia : .............. Tahun 2. Jenis Kelamin : 1. Laki-laki 2. Perempuan 3. Status Pendidikan : 1. Tidak Sekolah 2. SD 3. SMP 4. SMA 5. Perguruan Tinggi 4. Lama Dirawat Inap : .............. Hari 5. Riwayat Penyakit Diagnosis penyakit : 1. Hipertensi dan PJK 2. DM tipe 2 3. THT 4. Mata Lama menderita penyakit : 1. ≤ 1 tahun 2. > 1 tahun 6. Status Metabolik Berat Badan : .............. kg Tekanan Darah : .............. mmHg Kadar Gula Darah puasa : .............. mg/dL Kadar Gula Darah 2 jam pp : .............. mg/dL HbA1c : .............. % Lampiran 1

KUESIONER PENELITIAN TESIS Lampiran 1

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: KUESIONER PENELITIAN TESIS Lampiran 1

KUESIONER PENELITIAN TESIS “ANALISIS PERILAKU PEMELIHARAAN KESEHATAN GIGI DAN MULUT TERHADAP

STATUS ORAL HIGIENE DAN PERIODONTAL PASIEN KOMPROMIS MEDIS RAWAT INAP DI RSUP H. ADAM MALIK MEDAN”

Petunjuk pengisian :

Data Responden

Untuk pertanyaan no. 1 s/d 5, berilah tanda lingkaran (O) pada salah satu pilihan jawaban

dan isilah titik-titik dengan tulisan tangan. Untuk pertanyaan no. 6, diisi oleh peneliti (dari

catatan medis pasien).

1. Usia : .............. Tahun

2. Jenis Kelamin : 1. Laki-laki

2. Perempuan

3. Status Pendidikan : 1. Tidak Sekolah

2. SD

3. SMP

4. SMA

5. Perguruan Tinggi

4. Lama Dirawat Inap : .............. Hari

5. Riwayat Penyakit

Diagnosis penyakit : 1. Hipertensi dan PJK

2. DM tipe 2

3. THT

4. Mata

Lama menderita penyakit : 1. ≤ 1 tahun

2. > 1 tahun

6. Status Metabolik

Berat Badan : .............. kg

Tekanan Darah : .............. mmHg

Kadar Gula Darah puasa : .............. mg/dL

Kadar Gula Darah 2 jam pp : .............. mg/dL

HbA1c : .............. %

Lampiran 1

Page 2: KUESIONER PENELITIAN TESIS Lampiran 1

Petunjuk pengisian :

Perilaku Pemeliharaan Kesehatan Gigi dan Mulut

Untuk pertanyaan no. 8 s/d 12, berilah tanda silang (X) pada salah satu jawaban dengan kode

jawaban dan bobot nilai yaitu :

S = Selalu Bobot nilai = 2

K = Kadang-kadang Bobot nilai = 1

T = Tidak pernah Bobot nilai = 0

No. Pertanyaan Pilihan Jawaban S K T

1. Menyikat Gigi

1.1 Apakah Anda menyikat gigi setiap hari?

1.2 Apakah Anda menyikat gigi pada pagi hari sesudah sarapan?

1.3 Apakah Anda menyikat gigi pada malam hari sebelum tidur?

1.4 Apakah Anda menggunakan pasta gigi saat menyikat gigi?

1.5 Apakah Anda mengganti sikat gigi yang telah digunakan bila sikat gigi sudah rusak?

1.6 Apakah Anda membawa perlengkapan menyikat gigi pada saat harus menginap di tempat lain atau saat dirawat inap di RS?

Total skor perilaku menyikat gigi

Kategori perilaku menyikat gigi

Baik : > 7 Tidak Baik : ≤ 7

2. Berkumur-kumur

2.1 Apakah Anda berkumur-kumur setelah menyikat gigi untuk membersihkan sisa-sisa pasta gigi yang digunakan?

2.2 Apakah Anda berkumur-kumur setelah selesai makan untuk membersihkan sisa-sisa makanan di rongga mulut?

2.3 Apakah Anda menggunakan air biasa untuk berkumur-kumur?

2.4 Apakah Anda menggunakan larutan antiseptik untuk berkumur-kumur?

2.5 Apakah dengan berkumur- kumur Anda merasa bahwa mulut Anda lebih bersih?

2.6 Apakah Anda berkumur-kumur setiap hari?

Total skor perilaku berkumur-kumur

Kategori perilaku berkumur-kumur

Baik : > 7 Tidak Baik : ≤ 7

Page 3: KUESIONER PENELITIAN TESIS Lampiran 1

No. Pertanyaan Pilihan Jawaban S K T

3. Pemakaian Benang Gigi

3.1 Apakah Anda membersihkan sisa-sisa makanan yang tersangkut di antara gigi setiap selesai makan?

3.2 Apakah Anda menggunakan tusuk gigi untuk membersihkan sisa-sisa makanan yang tersangkut di antara gigi?

3.3 Apakah Anda menggunakan benang gigi untuk membersihkan sisa-sisa makanan yang tersangkut di antara gigi?

3.4 Apakah benang gigi yang Anda gunakan masih baru atau belum pernah digunakan sebelumnya?

3.5 Apakah Anda langsung membuang benang gigi yang telah digunakan?

3.6 Apakah Anda selalu membawa benang gigi setiap bepergian?

Total skor perilaku pemakaian benang gigi

Kategori perilaku pemakaian benang gigi

Baik : > 7 Tidak Baik : ≤ 7

4. Pembersihan Lidah

4.1 Apakah Anda membersihkan lidah dari penumpukan sisa makanan yang melekat di lidah dan tidak dapat dibersihkan dengan berkumur-kumur?

4.2 Apakah Anda menggunakan pembersih lidah untuk membersihkan lidah?

4.3 Apakah Anda mencuci pembersih lidah setelah digunakan untuk membersihkan lidah?

4.4 Apakah Anda mengganti pembersih lidah secara teratur?

4.5 Apakah Anda merasa mulut Anda tidak berbau dan lebih bersih setelah lidah dibersihkan?

4.6 Apakah Anda membersihkan lidah setiap hari?

Total skor perilaku membersihkan lidah

Kategori perilaku membersihkan lidah

Baik : > 7 Tidak Baik : ≤ 7

Page 4: KUESIONER PENELITIAN TESIS Lampiran 1

(diisi oleh peneliti) Status Oral Higiene

Oral Hygiene Index Simplified (OHI-S) oleh Green dan Vermilion

Skor Kriteria Indeks Debris (DI) Indeks Kalkulus (CI)

0 Tidak dijumpai debris atau stein Tidak ada kalkulus 1 Debris lunak menutupi tidak lebih dari 1/3

permukaan gigi, atau adanya stein ekstrinsik tanpa debris lain pada daerah tersebut

Kalkulus supragingiva menutupi tidak lebih dari 1/3 permukaan gigi

2 Debris lunak menutupi lebih dari 1/3, tetapi tidak lebih dari 2/3 dari permukaan gigi

Kalkulus supragingiva menutupi lebih dari 1/3, tetapi tidak lebih dari 2/3 permukaan gigi atau adanya kalkulus subgingiva berupa flek di sekeliling leher gigi

3 Debris lunak menutupi lebih dari 2/3 permukaan gigi

Kalkulus supragingiva menutupi lebih dari 2/3 permukaan gigi atau adanya kalkulus subgingivaberupa pita yang tidak terputus di sekeliling leher gigi

1 1

2 2

3 3

4 4

5 5

6 6

1 2 3

DI

CI

16 11 26

46 31 36

CI

DI

4 5 6

7. Skor DI = Jumlah skor debris

=

= Jumlah gigi yang diperiksa

8. Skor CI = Jumlah skor kalkulus

=

= Jumlah gigi yang diperiksa

9. OHI-S = DI + CI = =

10. Kategori OHI-S : a. Skor 0,1–3,0 dikategorikan baik b. Skor 3,1–6,0 dikategorikan buruk

7

DI CI

8

9

10

Page 5: KUESIONER PENELITIAN TESIS Lampiran 1

(diisi oleh peneliti) Status Periodontal

Periodontal Disease Index (PDI) oleh Ramfjord

Skor Kriteria

Gingivitis 0 Tidak ada tanda-tanda peradangan 1 Perubahan peradangan gingiva ringan sampai sedang tetapi belum mengelilingi gigi 2 Gingivitis ringan sampai sedang yang sudah mengelilingi gigi 3 Gingivitis parah ditandai dengan warna kemerahan, pembengkakan, mudah berdarah dan

adanya ulserasi Penyakit Periodontal

4 Kedalaman poket pada 2 atau lebih permukaan gigi diukur tidak lebih 3 mm dari apikal ke batas sementoenamel (CEJ)

5 Kedalaman poket pada 2 atau lebih permukaan gigi diukur 3–6 mm dari apikal ke batas sementoenamel (CEJ)

6 Kedalaman poket pada 2 atau lebih permukaan gigi diukur lebih 6 mm dari apikal ke batas sementoenamel (CEJ)

1

2

3

4

5

6

1 2 3

16 21 24

44 41 36

4 5 6

7. Skor PDI = Jumlah skor periodontal

=

= Jumlah gigi yang diperiksa

7

Page 6: KUESIONER PENELITIAN TESIS Lampiran 1

LEMBAR PENJELASAN KEPADA CALON SUBJEK PENELITIAN

Bapak/Ibu yang terhormat, izinkanlah saya Herniza Yusdani dari Program S-2 Ilmu

Kedokteran Gigi Fakultas Kedokteran Gigi Universitas Sumatera Utara untuk melakukan

penelitian Tesis tentang “Analisis perilaku pemeliharaan kesehatan gigi dan mulut

terhadap status oral higiene dan periodontal pasien kompromis medis rawat inap di

RSUP H. Adam Malik Medan”.

Tujuan penelitian ini untuk menganalisis hubungan status oral higiene dan periodontal

dengan perilaku pemeliharaan kesehatan gigi mulut pada pasien kompromis dan non

kompromis medis sindrom metabolik yang dirawat inap di rumah sakit.

Manfaat penelitian ini untuk menambah pengetahuan dan memberikan wawasan baru

mengenai kesehatan gigi mulut serta hubungannya dengan penyakit sistemik sehingga dapat

meningkatkan perilaku dalam melaksanakan pemeliharaan kesehatan gigi mulut.

Bapak/Ibu yang terhormat, penelitian ini dilakukan oleh saya sendiri dan dibantu oleh

beberapa teman saya dan saya meminta Bapak/Ibu untuk mengisi kuesioner yang berisi

nama, umur, jenis kelamin, pendidikan, lama perawatan di rumah sakit, riwayat penyakit

jantung dan DM, dan kebiasaan sehari-hari yang berkaitan dengan pemeliharaan kesehatan

gigi mulut. Selanjutnya saya akan melakukan pemeriksaan kondisi oral higiene dan

periodontal Bapak/Ibu dengan menggunakan kaca mulut, pewarna plak, probe periodontal,

dan sonde yang hanya membutuhkan waktu kira-kira 10 menit.

Identitas Bapak/Ibu akan disamarkan, hanya dosen pembimbing peneliti, anggota peneliti,

dan anggota komisi etik yang dapat melihat datanya. Apabila data ini dipublikasikan maka

kerahasiaan akan tetap dijaga. Partisipasi Bapak/Ibu dalam penelitian ini tidak dipungut biaya

serta tidak akan menimbulkan masalah atau komplikasi yang serius. Apabila selama

penelitian ada keluhan yang Bapak/Ibu alami, silahkan menghubungi saya.

Demikian penjelasan dari saya, atas partisipasi dan kesediaan waktu Bapak/Ibu, saya ucapkan

terima kasih.

Peneliti,

Herniza Yusdani (No. HP. 081375379939)

Lampiran 2

Page 7: KUESIONER PENELITIAN TESIS Lampiran 1

KEMENTERIAN KESEHATAN RI

DIREKTORAT JENDERAL BINA UPAYA KESEHATAN

RUMAH SAKIT UMUM PUSAT H. ADAM MALIK

Jl. Bunga Lau No. 17 Telp. (061) 8360381 Medan 20136 8360405

LEMBAR PERSETUJUAN SETELAH PENJELASAN

(INFORMED CONSENT)

Saya yang bertanda tangan di bawah ini:

Nama : ………………………………………………………

Umur : ………………………………………………………

Alamat : ………………………………………………………

No. Telp/HP : ………………………………………………………

Setelah mendapat keterangan dan penjelasan tentang keuntungan, risiko dan hak-hak saya

sebagai responden penelitian yang berjudul: “Analisis perilaku pemeliharaan kesehatan

gigi dan mulut terhadap status oral higiene dan periodontal pasien kompromis medis

rawat inap di RSUP H. Adam Malik Medan”, maka dengan penuh kesadaran dan tanpa

paksaan, saya menyatakan bersedia berpartisipasi dalam penelitian ini dan bersedia

menandatangani lembar persetujuan.

Medan, ..............................................

Yang menyetujui,

Peneliti Subyek Penelitian

Herniza Yusdani ___________________________

Lampiran 3

Page 8: KUESIONER PENELITIAN TESIS Lampiran 1

110

Lampiran 4

Page 9: KUESIONER PENELITIAN TESIS Lampiran 1

111

Lampiran 5

Page 10: KUESIONER PENELITIAN TESIS Lampiran 1

112

Lampiran 6

Page 11: KUESIONER PENELITIAN TESIS Lampiran 1

113

Lampiran 7

Page 12: KUESIONER PENELITIAN TESIS Lampiran 1

114

Lampiran 8

Page 13: KUESIONER PENELITIAN TESIS Lampiran 1

115

Lampiran 9

Page 14: KUESIONER PENELITIAN TESIS Lampiran 1

116

Lampiran 10

Page 15: KUESIONER PENELITIAN TESIS Lampiran 1

117

Lampiran 11

Page 16: KUESIONER PENELITIAN TESIS Lampiran 1

118 Lampiran 12

Page 17: KUESIONER PENELITIAN TESIS Lampiran 1

99

MASTER DATA KUESIONER

No. M1 M2 M3 M4 M5 M6 B1 B2 B3 B4 B5 B6 K1 K2 K3 K4 K5 K6 L1 L2 L3 L4 L5 L6 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 0.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 0.0 1.0 0.0 1.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 1.0 0.0 1.0 1.0

2 1.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 0.0 2.0 1.0 2.0 1.0 2.0 1.0 2.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 2.0 1.0

3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 0.0 2.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 0.0 2.0 1.0 2.0 1.0 2.0 1.0 2.0 1.0 2.0 1.0 2.0 1.0

4 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 0.0 2.0 1.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 1.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0

5 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 1.0 2.0 1.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 1.0 2.0 1.0 2.0 2.0

6 2.0 2.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 1.0 2.0 1.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 1.0 2.0 1.0 2.0 2.0

7 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 0.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 0.0 1.0 0.0 1.0 2.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 1.0 2.0 1.0 1.0

8 2.0 0.0 2.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 1.0 2.0 1.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 1.0 2.0 1.0 2.0 2.0

9 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 2.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 2.0 1.0 2.0 1.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 1.0 2.0 1.0 2.0 2.0

10 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 2.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 2.0 1.0 2.0 1.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 1.0 2.0 1.0 2.0 2.0

11 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 1.0 2.0 1.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 2.0 2.0

12 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0

13 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 1.0 2.0 1.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 1.0 2.0 1.0 2.0 2.0

14 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 1.0 2.0 1.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 1.0 2.0 1.0 2.0 2.0

15 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 0.0 1.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 1.0 0.0 1.0 1.0

16 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 1.0 2.0 1.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 1.0 2.0 1.0 2.0 2.0

17 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 1.0 2.0 1.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 1.0 2.0 1.0 2.0 2.0

18 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0

19 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 1.0 2.0 1.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 1.0 2.0 1.0 2.0 2.0

20 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0

21 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 2.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 2.0 1.0 2.0 1.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 2.0 2.0

22 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 1.0 2.0 1.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 1.0 2.0 1.0 2.0 2.0

23 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 1.0 2.0 1.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 1.0 2.0 1.0 2.0 2.0

24 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 0.0 1.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 1.0 0.0 1.0 2.0

25 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 1.0 2.0 1.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 1.0 2.0 1.0 2.0 2.0

26 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 1.0 2.0 1.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 1.0 2.0 1.0 2.0 2.0

27 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 2.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0

28 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 1.0 2.0 1.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 1.0 2.0 1.0 1.0 2.0

29 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 1.0 2.0 1.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 1.0 2.0 1.0 2.0 2.0

30 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 1.0 2.0 1.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 1.0 2.0 1.0 2.0 2.0

Lampiran 13

Page 18: KUESIONER PENELITIAN TESIS Lampiran 1

100

MASTER DATA PENELITIAN

No. Usia J/K Pddk Inap M1 M2 M3 M4 M5 M6 M tot

M kat B1 B2 B3 B4 B5 B6 B

tot B

kat K1 K2 K3 K4 K5 K6 K tot

K kat L1 L2 L3 L4 L5 L6 L

tot L

kat OH tot

OH kat

PR tot

PR kat

PY kat

1 50 2 1 5 2 0 0 2 1 2 7 0 2 2 0 0 1 0 5 0 2 0 2 0 2 2 8 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3.3 0 5,2 0 0 2 51 2 1 3 2 0 0 2 2 2 8 1 1 1 1 2 2 1 8 1 2 1 1 1 1 1 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2.5 1 2,5 1 0 3 55 2 4 3 2 1 1 2 2 2 10 1 2 2 0 0 1 0 5 0 2 1 1 1 1 1 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2.6 1 2,5 1 0 4 58 1 1 7 1 0 0 2 1 1 5 0 2 2 0 0 1 0 5 0 1 0 2 0 1 1 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4.5 0 5,2 0 0 5 43 1 3 6 2 0 0 2 1 2 7 0 1 1 1 2 2 1 8 1 2 0 2 0 2 1 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3.6 0 4,3 0 0 6 38 1 1 5 2 0 0 2 1 1 6 0 2 2 0 1 0 0 5 0 2 0 2 0 2 2 8 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3.1 0 3,7 1 0 7 75 2 1 4 2 1 1 2 2 1 9 1 2 2 0 0 0 0 4 0 2 0 2 0 1 2 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3.8 0 3,7 1 0 8 52 2 1 7 2 1 0 2 2 2 9 1 1 1 1 2 2 1 8 1 2 0 2 0 2 2 8 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3.8 0 3,7 1 0 9 62 1 1 8 2 0 0 2 1 2 7 0 2 2 0 1 0 0 5 0 2 0 2 0 1 2 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4.0 0 5,5 0 0 10 59 1 1 7 2 1 1 2 2 2 10 1 2 2 0 0 2 0 6 0 2 2 1 1 2 2 10 1 1 1 2 2 1 1 8 1 3.8 0 3,7 1 0 11 71 1 3 8 2 0 0 2 1 2 7 0 1 1 1 2 2 1 8 1 2 1 1 0 1 2 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3.6 0 3,7 1 0 12 57 1 3 6 2 0 0 2 1 1 6 0 1 1 1 2 2 1 8 1 2 0 2 0 1 2 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4.0 0 4,3 0 0 13 34 1 2 6 1 0 0 1 2 0 4 0 2 1 0 1 0 0 4 0 1 1 2 0 2 1 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3.1 0 5,2 0 0 14 55 1 3 3 2 1 1 2 2 2 10 1 1 1 1 2 2 1 8 1 2 2 1 1 2 2 10 1 1 1 2 2 1 1 8 1 2.8 1 2,5 1 0 15 47 1 3 7 2 0 0 2 1 1 6 0 2 2 0 0 2 0 6 0 2 0 2 0 1 2 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3.5 0 4,3 0 0 16 66 2 3 3 1 0 0 1 2 0 4 0 1 1 1 2 2 1 8 1 1 2 2 0 1 1 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3.0 1 3,7 1 0 17 47 2 3 6 2 1 0 2 2 1 8 1 2 2 0 0 2 0 6 0 2 2 2 0 2 2 10 1 1 1 2 2 1 1 8 1 3.8 0 3,7 1 0 18 53 1 1 7 2 0 0 2 2 2 8 1 1 1 1 2 2 1 8 1 2 2 2 0 2 2 10 1 1 1 2 2 1 1 8 1 3.8 0 4,3 0 0 19 45 2 3 8 1 0 0 2 1 1 5 0 2 2 0 0 2 0 6 0 1 1 2 0 1 1 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4.6 0 5,3 0 0 20 30 1 3 14 2 0 0 2 1 1 6 0 1 1 1 2 2 1 8 1 2 0 2 0 1 2 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4.0 0 5,3 0 0 21 36 2 2 3 2 0 0 2 2 1 7 0 1 1 1 2 2 1 8 1 2 1 1 0 1 2 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2.0 1 1,8 1 0 22 65 1 3 3 2 1 1 2 2 1 9 1 2 2 0 0 2 0 6 0 2 0 2 0 1 2 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2.1 1 1,8 1 0 23 53 2 2 6 2 0 0 2 2 2 8 1 2 1 0 2 2 1 8 1 2 2 2 0 1 2 9 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3.8 0 1,8 1 0 24 68 1 3 10 2 0 0 2 2 1 7 0 2 2 0 0 2 0 6 0 2 0 2 0 1 2 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4.6 0 5,2 0 0 25 53 1 2 8 2 0 0 2 2 1 7 0 2 1 0 2 2 1 8 1 2 1 2 0 2 2 9 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4.0 0 4,3 0 0 26 51 1 4 3 2 1 1 2 2 2 10 1 2 2 0 0 2 0 6 0 2 2 2 1 2 2 11 1 1 1 2 2 1 2 9 1 2.3 1 1,8 1 0 27 60 1 3 3 1 0 0 1 2 1 5 0 1 1 1 2 2 1 8 1 1 1 2 0 1 1 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4.1 0 5,3 0 0 28 29 1 3 3 2 1 1 2 2 2 10 1 2 2 0 0 2 0 6 0 2 2 2 1 2 2 11 1 1 1 2 2 1 1 8 1 2.3 1 4,3 0 0 29 40 1 3 4 2 1 1 2 2 2 10 1 1 1 1 2 2 1 8 1 2 1 1 0 1 2 7 0 1 1 2 2 1 1 8 1 4.3 0 5,3 0 0 30 40 1 3 5 2 0 0 2 2 2 8 1 2 2 0 0 2 0 6 0 2 2 2 0 1 2 9 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4.3 0 5,3 0 0 31 70 1 2 3 2 0 0 1 2 1 6 0 2 2 0 0 2 0 6 0 1 1 2 0 1 1 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2.0 1 4,3 0 0 32 50 1 3 7 1 1 0 1 1 1 5 0 2 2 0 0 2 0 6 0 1 1 2 0 1 1 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3.8 0 5,5 0 0 33 44 1 2 8 1 0 1 1 1 0 4 0 2 1 0 0 1 0 4 0 1 0 2 0 1 1 5 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 2 0 4.0 0 5,5 0 0 34 60 2 2 6 2 0 0 2 2 2 8 1 2 2 0 0 2 0 6 0 2 2 2 0 2 2 10 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3.8 0 3,7 1 0 35 60 2 1 4 2 0 0 2 2 2 8 1 2 2 0 0 1 0 5 0 2 0 2 0 2 2 8 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4.0 0 4,3 0 0 36 55 2 2 3 1 0 0 1 2 1 5 0 1 1 1 2 2 1 8 1 2 1 2 0 1 2 8 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2.5 1 4,3 0 0 37 44 2 3 14 2 1 1 2 2 2 10 1 2 2 0 0 2 0 6 0 2 2 2 0 2 2 10 1 1 1 2 2 1 2 9 1 4.3 0 2,5 1 0 38 72 2 3 3 1 1 0 1 1 0 4 0 2 2 0 0 1 0 5 0 1 0 2 0 1 1 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2.3 1 4,3 0 0 39 42 2 3 3 2 2 2 2 2 2 12 1 2 2 0 0 2 0 6 0 2 2 1 2 2 2 11 1 2 1 2 2 1 2 10 1 3.0 1 4,3 0 0 40 54 2 2 3 2 0 0 2 2 2 8 1 2 2 0 0 2 0 6 0 2 1 2 0 2 2 9 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2.5 1 3,7 1 0 41 36 2 2 7 2 0 0 2 2 2 8 1 2 2 0 0 2 0 6 0 2 1 2 0 2 2 9 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3.6 0 3,7 1 0 42 61 1 4 10 2 1 1 2 2 2 10 1 1 1 1 2 2 1 8 0 2 0 2 0 1 2 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4.6 0 2,5 1 0 43 56 1 3 4 1 0 1 1 1 1 5 0 2 1 0 2 2 1 8 1 1 1 2 0 1 1 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3.6 0 5,5 0 0 44 33 1 3 6 1 0 1 1 2 0 5 0 2 2 0 0 1 0 5 0 1 0 2 0 1 1 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4.5 0 4,3 0 0 45 50 1 3 8 2 2 2 2 2 2 12 1 2 2 0 0 1 0 5 0 2 2 1 2 2 2 11 1 2 1 2 2 1 2 10 1 4.6 0 4,3 0 0 46 46 2 1 3 2 0 0 2 2 2 8 1 2 2 0 0 1 0 5 0 1 0 2 0 2 2 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3.0 1 3,7 1 0 47 70 1 2 8 2 0 0 2 1 0 5 0 2 2 0 0 2 0 6 0 1 1 2 0 1 2 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4.5 0 2,5 1 0 48 57 1 4 3 2 1 1 2 2 2 10 1 2 2 0 0 1 0 5 0 2 2 2 1 2 2 11 1 1 1 2 2 1 1 8 1 2.6 1 3,7 1 0 49 53 1 3 5 2 0 0 2 1 2 7 0 2 2 0 0 1 0 5 0 2 2 2 0 2 2 10 1 1 1 2 2 1 1 8 1 4.0 0 5,3 0 0 50 53 1 4 6 2 1 0 2 1 1 7 0 2 2 0 0 1 0 5 0 1 1 1 1 1 2 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3.8 0 3,7 1 0 51 66 1 3 3 2 0 0 2 2 2 8 1 2 2 0 0 2 0 6 0 2 2 2 0 1 2 9 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2.5 1 2,5 1 0 52 45 1 2 6 2 0 0 2 2 2 8 1 2 2 0 0 2 0 6 0 2 1 2 0 1 1 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4.3 0 4,3 0 0 53 72 1 3 3 2 0 0 2 1 2 7 0 2 2 0 0 2 0 6 0 2 2 2 0 1 2 9 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3.6 0 2,5 1 0 54 61 1 3 14 2 0 0 1 2 1 6 0 2 2 0 0 2 0 6 0 1 0 2 0 1 2 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3.8 0 2,5 1 0 55 51 1 2 7 2 0 0 2 2 2 8 1 2 2 0 0 0 0 4 0 2 2 2 0 2 2 10 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3.8 0 2,5 1 0 56 51 2 1 3 2 1 1 2 2 1 9 1 2 2 0 0 1 0 5 0 2 0 2 0 1 2 7 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 2 0 3.5 0 5,2 0 0 57 55 2 4 3 2 1 0 2 2 2 9 1 2 2 0 0 1 0 5 0 2 0 2 0 1 1 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5.0 0 5,2 0 0 58 58 1 1 7 1 0 0 1 2 1 5 0 2 2 0 0 2 0 6 0 1 0 2 0 1 1 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4.6 0 5,5 0 0 59 52 2 1 7 2 0 0 2 2 2 8 1 2 2 0 0 2 0 6 0 2 1 1 0 1 2 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4.0 0 4,3 0 0 60 75 2 1 4 1 0 1 1 2 0 5 0 2 2 0 0 0 0 4 0 2 0 2 0 1 1 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3.6 0 4,3 0 0

Lampiran 14

Page 19: KUESIONER PENELITIAN TESIS Lampiran 1

101

No. Usia J/K Pddk Inap M1 M2 M3 M4 M5 M6 M tot

M kat B1 B2 B3 B4 B5 B6 B

tot B

kat K1 K2 K3 K4 K5 K6 K tot

K kat L1 L2 L3 L4 L5 L6 L

tot L

kat OH tot

OH kat

PR tot

PR kat

PY kat

61 46 1 3 3 2 2 2 2 2 2 12 1 2 2 0 0 0 0 4 0 2 0 1 1 2 2 8 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2.8 1 2,5 1 1 62 31 2 2 3 2 0 0 2 2 2 8 1 2 2 0 0 0 0 4 0 2 2 2 0 2 2 10 1 1 1 2 2 1 1 8 1 2.1 1 3,7 1 1 63 56 2 1 3 1 0 0 1 2 1 5 0 2 1 0 2 2 1 8 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2.6 1 2,5 1 1 64 43 2 2 10 2 0 0 2 1 0 5 0 2 2 0 0 0 0 4 0 1 1 2 0 1 1 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4.6 0 5,5 0 1 65 55 1 2 5 2 0 1 2 2 1 8 1 2 2 0 0 0 0 4 0 2 2 1 1 2 2 10 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2.3 1 3,7 1 1 66 48 1 2 14 2 1 1 2 2 2 10 1 2 2 1 0 2 1 8 1 2 2 1 1 2 2 10 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4.3 0 2,5 1 1 67 60 1 3 14 2 1 0 2 2 2 9 1 1 2 0 0 0 0 3 0 2 0 2 0 2 2 8 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3.5 0 4,3 0 1 68 60 1 3 8 2 1 0 2 2 2 9 1 2 2 0 0 0 0 4 0 2 0 2 0 2 1 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3.0 1 3,7 1 1 69 35 1 3 3 2 0 0 2 2 2 8 1 2 2 0 2 2 0 8 1 2 1 2 0 2 2 9 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2.6 1 4,3 0 1 70 60 1 3 14 2 0 0 2 2 2 8 1 2 1 0 0 0 0 3 0 2 1 2 0 2 2 9 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3.5 0 4,3 0 1 71 60 1 2 3 2 0 0 2 2 2 8 1 2 2 0 0 0 0 4 0 2 1 2 0 2 2 9 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2.6 1 4,3 0 1 72 61 1 2 10 2 0 0 2 1 1 6 0 2 2 0 0 0 0 4 0 2 0 2 0 2 1 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4.0 0 4,3 0 1 73 45 1 2 10 2 0 0 2 1 0 5 0 1 1 1 2 2 1 8 1 2 0 2 0 2 2 8 1 1 1 2 2 1 1 8 1 3.8 0 2,5 1 1 74 31 1 3 14 2 1 0 2 1 1 7 0 2 2 0 0 0 0 4 0 2 1 2 0 2 2 9 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3.5 0 2,5 1 1 75 40 2 3 14 2 1 1 2 2 2 10 1 2 2 0 0 0 0 4 0 1 0 2 0 2 1 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4.0 0 3,7 1 1 76 46 2 3 14 2 1 0 2 2 2 9 1 2 2 1 0 2 1 8 1 2 0 2 0 1 1 6 0 1 1 2 2 1 1 8 1 4.6 0 4,3 0 1 77 29 2 3 14 2 0 0 2 2 2 8 1 2 2 0 0 0 0 4 0 2 1 2 0 2 2 9 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4.5 0 2,5 1 1 78 52 1 4 7 2 2 1 2 2 2 11 1 2 2 0 0 0 0 4 0 2 2 1 1 2 2 10 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2.5 1 4,3 0 1 79 52 1 4 3 2 0 0 2 2 2 8 1 1 2 0 0 0 0 3 0 2 2 1 1 2 2 10 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2.6 1 2,5 1 1 80 42 1 3 10 2 0 0 2 2 2 8 1 2 2 0 0 0 0 4 0 2 0 2 0 1 2 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4.0 0 4,3 0 1 81 50 1 4 5 2 0 0 2 2 2 8 1 1 2 1 2 2 0 8 1 2 1 2 0 2 2 9 1 1 1 2 2 1 1 8 1 2.6 1 2,5 1 1 82 38 1 3 7 2 1 1 2 2 2 10 1 2 2 0 0 0 0 4 0 1 0 2 0 2 1 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2.8 1 2,5 1 1 83 42 1 3 8 2 0 0 2 2 2 8 1 2 2 1 2 0 1 8 1 2 1 2 0 2 2 9 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2.8 1 2,5 1 1 84 46 1 3 8 2 0 0 2 2 2 8 1 2 1 1 2 2 1 9 1 2 1 2 0 2 2 9 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3.0 1 3,7 1 1 85 45 1 3 8 2 0 0 2 2 2 8 1 1 1 1 2 2 1 8 1 2 2 1 0 2 2 9 1 1 0 0 0 0 1 2 0 2.8 1 2,5 1 1 86 57 1 2 7 2 1 0 2 2 2 9 1 2 1 0 0 0 0 3 0 2 1 2 0 2 2 9 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3.0 1 3,7 1 1 87 42 2 1 7 2 0 0 2 1 0 5 0 1 1 1 2 2 1 8 1 1 0 2 0 1 2 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2.8 1 5,3 0 1 88 61 1 1 7 2 0 0 2 2 2 8 1 2 1 0 0 0 0 3 0 2 1 2 0 2 2 9 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3.0 1 3,7 1 1 89 45 1 3 8 2 0 0 2 2 2 8 1 2 2 0 0 0 0 4 0 2 0 1 2 2 2 9 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2.8 1 2,5 1 1 90 55 1 2 14 2 0 0 2 2 2 8 1 2 2 0 0 0 0 4 0 2 1 2 0 2 2 9 1 1 1 2 2 1 1 8 1 4.3 0 4,3 0 1 91 32 1 2 7 2 0 0 2 2 2 8 1 1 1 1 2 2 1 8 1 2 1 2 0 2 2 9 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2.8 1 2,5 1 1 92 32 1 2 8 2 0 0 2 2 2 8 1 2 1 0 0 0 0 3 0 2 2 1 2 2 2 11 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2.8 1 2,5 1 1 93 30 1 3 4 2 0 0 2 2 2 8 1 1 1 1 2 2 1 8 1 2 2 2 0 1 2 9 1 1 1 2 2 1 1 8 1 2.6 1 2,5 1 1 94 45 1 2 7 2 0 0 2 1 1 6 0 2 2 0 0 0 0 4 0 2 0 2 0 1 2 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3.0 1 3,7 1 1 95 34 1 3 3 2 1 1 2 2 2 10 1 1 2 1 2 2 1 9 1 2 2 2 0 2 2 10 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2.3 1 1,8 1 1 96 54 1 3 4 1 0 0 1 2 1 5 0 2 2 0 0 0 0 4 0 2 0 2 0 1 1 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2.3 1 5,5 0 1 97 38 1 3 14 2 0 0 2 2 1 7 0 2 2 0 0 0 0 4 0 2 1 2 0 2 2 9 1 1 1 2 2 1 1 8 1 4.3 0 3,7 1 1 98 54 1 2 14 2 2 2 2 2 2 12 1 2 2 0 0 0 0 4 0 2 2 2 0 2 2 10 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4.0 0 2,5 1 1 99 30 2 2 3 2 1 1 2 2 2 10 1 1 1 1 2 2 1 8 1 2 2 1 0 2 2 9 1 1 1 2 2 1 1 8 1 2.1 1 1,8 1 1 100 47 1 2 3 2 1 1 2 2 2 10 1 2 2 0 0 0 0 4 0 2 2 1 0 2 2 9 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2.5 1 1,8 1 1 101 29 1 2 5 1 0 0 1 2 1 5 0 2 2 0 0 0 0 4 0 2 0 2 0 1 2 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2.3 1 3,7 1 1 102 54 1 1 8 2 1 1 2 2 2 10 1 2 2 1 2 2 0 9 1 1 0 2 0 1 1 5 0 1 1 2 2 1 1 8 1 3.0 1 2,5 1 1 103 53 1 3 3 2 0 0 2 2 2 8 1 2 2 0 0 0 0 4 0 2 1 2 0 1 2 8 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2.3 1 1,8 1 1 104 62 1 2 3 1 1 0 1 1 1 5 0 2 2 1 2 0 1 8 1 1 0 2 0 1 2 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2.6 1 4,3 0 1 105 53 1 2 3 2 0 0 2 2 2 8 1 2 2 0 0 0 0 4 0 2 1 2 0 2 2 9 1 1 1 2 2 1 1 8 1 2.8 1 2,5 1 1 106 55 1 1 3 2 1 0 2 2 2 9 1 2 2 0 0 0 0 4 0 2 1 1 0 2 2 8 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2.5 1 1,8 1 1 107 40 2 1 6 2 2 2 2 2 2 12 1 2 2 1 2 2 0 9 1 2 2 1 2 2 2 11 1 1 1 2 2 1 1 8 1 2.8 1 2,5 1 1 108 36 1 3 3 2 0 0 2 2 2 8 1 1 2 0 0 0 0 3 0 2 1 1 1 1 2 8 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2.8 1 4,3 0 1 109 54 1 4 4 2 0 2 2 2 2 10 1 2 1 0 0 0 0 3 0 2 1 1 1 1 2 8 1 2 1 1 1 1 2 8 1 2.0 1 1,8 1 1 110 48 1 3 4 2 1 1 2 2 2 10 1 1 2 0 0 0 0 3 0 2 2 2 0 1 2 9 1 2 1 1 1 1 2 8 1 2.1 1 1,8 1 1 111 36 2 2 4 2 0 0 2 2 2 8 1 2 2 0 0 0 0 4 0 1 0 2 0 1 1 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2.3 1 4,3 0 1 112 43 2 3 10 2 1 1 2 2 2 10 1 2 2 0 0 0 0 4 0 2 2 1 1 1 1 8 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4.0 0 1,8 1 1 113 50 1 2 10 1 1 0 1 2 1 6 0 2 1 0 0 0 0 3 0 2 1 1 1 1 2 8 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4.1 0 4,3 0 1 114 43 2 3 14 2 1 1 2 2 2 10 1 2 2 0 0 0 0 4 0 2 1 2 0 2 2 9 1 2 1 1 1 1 2 8 1 4.3 0 2,5 1 1 115 64 1 4 3 2 0 0 2 2 2 8 1 2 2 0 0 0 0 4 0 2 1 1 1 1 2 8 1 2 1 1 1 1 2 8 1 2.0 1 1,8 1 1 116 36 2 2 3 2 0 0 2 2 2 8 1 2 2 0 0 0 0 4 0 2 1 2 0 2 2 9 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2.3 1 1,8 1 1 117 50 2 1 6 2 0 0 2 2 1 7 0 1 2 0 0 0 0 3 0 1 1 2 0 1 2 7 0 2 1 1 1 1 2 8 1 3.0 1 4,3 0 1 118 42 2 2 5 2 2 2 2 2 2 12 1 2 2 0 0 0 0 4 0 2 2 1 2 2 2 11 1 1 0 0 0 0 1 2 0 2.5 1 1,8 1 1 119 39 1 3 5 2 0 0 2 2 2 8 1 2 2 0 0 0 0 4 0 2 2 2 0 1 2 9 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2.1 1 4,3 0 1 120 30 1 3 14 2 1 1 2 2 2 10 1 2 1 1 2 2 0 8 1 2 1 1 1 1 2 8 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4.0 0 2,5 1 1

Page 20: KUESIONER PENELITIAN TESIS Lampiran 1

102

HASIL UJI VALIDITAS DAN RELIABILITAS Reliability Scale: ALL VARIABLES

Case Processing Summary

N %

Cases Valid 30 100.0

Excludeda 0 .0

Total 30 100.0 a. Listwise deletion based on all variables in the procedure.

Reliability Statistics

Cronbach's Alpha N of Items

.850 6

Item Statistics

Mean Std. Deviation N

Menyikat1 .2667 .58329 30 Menyikat2 .1667 .46113 30 Menyikat3 .2000 .48423 30 Menyikat4 .2000 .40684 30 Menyikat5 .3333 .54667 30 Menyikat6 .1333 .34575 30

Item-Total Statistics

Scale Mean if Item Deleted

Scale Variance if Item

Deleted

Corrected Item-Total

Correlation

Cronbach's Alpha if Item Deleted

Menyikat1 1.0333 2.861 .760 .800 Menyikat2 1.1333 3.292 .714 .810 Menyikat3 1.1000 3.403 .594 .832 Menyikat4 1.1000 3.334 .808 .798 Menyikat5 .9667 3.413 .489 .857 Menyikat6 1.1667 3.868 .524 .845

Scale Statistics

Mean Variance Std. Deviation N of Items

1.3000 4.700 2.16795 6

Lampiran 15

Page 21: KUESIONER PENELITIAN TESIS Lampiran 1

103

Reliability Scale: ALL VARIABLES

Case Processing Summary

N %

Cases Valid 30 100.0

Excludeda 0 .0

Total 30 100.0 a. Listwise deletion based on all variables in the procedure.

Reliability Statistics

Cronbach's Alpha N of Items

.852 6

Item Statistics

Mean Std. Deviation N

Benang1 1.4000 .49827 30 Benang2 .1000 .30513 30 Benang3 .1000 .30513 30 Benang4 .1000 .30513 30 Benang5 .3000 .53498 30 Benang6 .1333 .34575 30

Item-Total Statistics

Scale Mean if Item Deleted

Scale Variance if Item

Deleted

Corrected Item-Total

Correlation

Cronbach's Alpha if Item Deleted

Benang1 .7333 2.340 .416 .884 Benang2 2.0333 2.309 .885 .795 Benang3 2.0333 2.309 .885 .795 Benang4 2.0333 2.309 .885 .795 Benang5 1.8333 2.282 .405 .895 Benang6 2.0000 2.276 .793 .803

Scale Statistics

Mean Variance Std. Deviation N of Items

2.1333 3.223 1.79527 6

Page 22: KUESIONER PENELITIAN TESIS Lampiran 1

104

Reliability Scale: ALL VARIABLES

Case Processing Summary

N %

Cases Valid 30 100.0

Excludeda 0 .0

Total 30 100.0 a. Listwise deletion based on all variables in the procedure.

Reliability Statistics

Cronbach's Alpha N of Items

.917 6

Item Statistics

Mean Std. Deviation N

Kumur1 1.8667 .34575 30 Kumur2 1.0000 .52523 30 Kumur3 1.8667 .34575 30 Kumur4 1.1000 .54772 30 Kumur5 1.8667 .34575 30 Kumur6 1.8000 .40684 30

Item-Total Statistics

Scale Mean if Item Deleted

Scale Variance if Item

Deleted

Corrected Item-Total

Correlation

Cronbach's Alpha if Item Deleted

Kumur1 7.6333 3.413 .893 .891 Kumur2 8.5000 2.879 .851 .892 Kumur3 7.6333 3.413 .893 .891 Kumur4 8.4000 3.283 .549 .945 Kumur5 7.6333 3.413 .893 .891 Kumur6 7.7000 3.390 .746 .905

Scale Statistics

Mean Variance Std. Deviation N of Items

9.5000 4.672 2.16158 6

Page 23: KUESIONER PENELITIAN TESIS Lampiran 1

105

Reliability Scale: ALL VARIABLES

Case Processing Summary

N %

Cases Valid 30 100.0

Excludeda 0 .0

Total 30 100.0 a. Listwise deletion based on all variables in the procedure.

Reliability Statistics

Cronbach's Alpha N of Items

.881 6

Item Statistics

Mean Std. Deviation N

Lidah1 1.8667 .34575 30 Lidah2 1.0000 .52523 30 Lidah3 1.7667 .43018 30 Lidah4 1.1000 .54772 30 Lidah5 1.8333 .37905 30 Lidah6 1.8333 .37905 30

Item-Total Statistics

Scale Mean if Item Deleted

Scale Variance if Item

Deleted

Corrected Item-Total

Correlation

Cronbach's Alpha if Item Deleted

Lidah1 7.5333 3.223 .841 .843 Lidah2 8.4000 2.662 .845 .831 Lidah3 7.6333 3.137 .698 .858 Lidah4 8.3000 3.045 .545 .894 Lidah5 7.5667 3.220 .752 .852 Lidah6 7.5667 3.426 .582 .876

Scale Statistics

Mean Variance Std. Deviation N of Items

9.4000 4.386 2.09433 6

Page 24: KUESIONER PENELITIAN TESIS Lampiran 1

106

HASIL UJI STATISTIK NORMALITAS One-Sample Kolmogorov-Smirnov Test umur jenis kelamin pendidikan rawat inap

N 120 120 120 120

Normal Parametersa Mean .6250 1.3167 2.4333 .5417

Std. Deviation .48615 .46713 .89568 .50035 Most Extreme

Differences Absolute .405 .434 .262 .362

Positive .276 .434 .172 .319 Negative -.405 -.249 -.262 -.362

Kolmogorov-Smirnov Z 4.434 4.759 2.865 3.964

Asymp. Sig. (2-tailed) .000 .000 .000 .000

a. Test distribution is Normal.

NPar Tests Mann-Whitney Test

Ranks Penyakit N Mean Rank Sum of Ranks

Umur kompromis medis 60 65.00 3900.00

non kompromis medis 60 56.00 3360.00

Total 120 Jenis Kelamin kompromis medis 60 64.50 3870.00

non kompromis medis 60 56.50 3390.00 Total 120

pendidikan kompromis medis 60 59.22 3553.50 non kompromis medis 60 61.78 3706.50 Total 120

Rawat inap kompromis medis 60 59.00 3540.00 non kompromis medis 60 62.00 3720.00 Total 120

Test Statisticsa

Umur jenis kelamin pendidikan rawat inap

Mann-Whitney U 1.530E3 1560.000 1723.500 1710.000 Wilcoxon W 3.360E3 3390.000 3553.500 3540.000 Z -1.690 -1.563 -.426 -.547 Asymp. Sig. (2-tailed) .091 .118 .670 .584 a. Grouping Variable: penyakit

Lampiran 16

Page 25: KUESIONER PENELITIAN TESIS Lampiran 1

107

UNIVARIAT Kelompok Kasus

Umur Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent

Valid < 50 tahun 18 30.0 30.0 30.0

>= 50 tahun 42 70.0 70.0 100.0

Total 60 100.0 100.0

Jenis Kelamin Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent

Valid laki-laki 37 61.7 61.7 61.7

perempuan 23 38.3 38.3 100.0

Total 60 100.0 100.0

Pendidikan Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent

Valid SD 15 25.0 25.0 25.0

SMP 13 21.7 21.7 46.7

SMA 26 43.3 43.3 90.0

PT 6 10.0 10.0 100.0

Total 60 100.0 100.0

Lama inap kategori Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent

Valid < 6 hari 29 48.3 48.3 48.3

>= 6 hari 31 51.7 51.7 100.0

Total 60 100.0 100.0

Descriptive Statistics

N Minimum Maximum Mean Std. Deviation

Umur 60 29.00 75.00 53.2500 11.25908 Lama Inap 60 3.00 14.00 5.7000 2.79406 Indeks Debris 60 1.00 2.33 1.5248 .30044 Indeks Kalkulus 60 1.00 2.67 2.0833 .54457 OHIS 60 2.00 5.00 3.6082 .77205 Indeks Periodontal 60 1.80 5.50 3.9933 1.12368 Valid N (listwise) 60

Page 26: KUESIONER PENELITIAN TESIS Lampiran 1

108

Menyikat gigi Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent

Valid tidak baik 32 53.3 53.3 53.3

Baik 28 46.7 46.7 100.0

Total 60 100.0 100.0

Pemakaian benang gigi Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent

Valid tidak baik 44 73.3 73.3 73.3

Baik 16 26.7 26.7 100.0

Total 60 100.0 100.0

Berkumur-kumur Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent

Valid tidak baik 33 55.0 55.0 55.0

Baik 27 45.0 45.0 100.0

Total 60 100.0 100.0

Pembersihan lidah Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent

Valid tidak baik 48 80.0 80.0 80.0

Baik 12 20.0 20.0 100.0

Total 60 100.0 100.0

Status oral higiene Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent

Valid Buruk 44 73.3 73.3 73.3

Baik 16 26.7 26.7 100.0

Total 60 100.0 100.0

Status periodontal

Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent

Valid periodontitis 33 55.0 55.0 55.0

tidak 27 45.0 45.0 100.0

Total 60 100.0 100.0

Page 27: KUESIONER PENELITIAN TESIS Lampiran 1

109

Menyikat gigi * status oral higiene Crosstab

status oral higiene

Total buruk baik

Menyikat gigi tidak baik Count 28 4 32

% within Menyikat gigi 87.5% 12.5% 100.0%

% within status oral higiene 63.6% 25.0% 53.3%

% of Total 46.7% 6.7% 53.3%

baik Count 16 12 28

% within Menyikat gigi 57.1% 42.9% 100.0%

% within status oral higiene 36.4% 75.0% 46.7%

% of Total 26.7% 20.0% 46.7% Total Count 44 16 60

% within Menyikat gigi 73.3% 26.7% 100.0% % within status oral higiene 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% % of Total 73.3% 26.7% 100.0%

Chi-Square Tests

Value df

Asymp. Sig. (2-sided)

Exact Sig. (2-sided)

Exact Sig. (1-sided)

Pearson Chi-Square 7.037a 1 .008 Continuity Correctionb 5.571 1 .018 Likelihood Ratio 7.234 1 .007 Fisher's Exact Test .010 .009 Linear-by-Linear Association 6.920 1 .009 N of Valid Casesb 60 a. 0 cells (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 7.47. b. Computed only for a 2x2 table

Risk Estimate

Value

95% Confidence Interval

Lower Upper

Odds Ratio for Menyikat gigi (tidak baik / baik) 5.250 1.449 19.025

For cohort status oral higiene = buruk 1.531 1.083 2.165

For cohort status oral higiene = baik .292 .106 .802

N of Valid Cases 60

Page 28: KUESIONER PENELITIAN TESIS Lampiran 1

110

Berkumur-kumur * status oral higiene

Crosstab status oral higiene

Total buruk baik

berkumur-kumur tidak baik Count 28 5 33

% within berkumur-kumur 84.8% 15.2% 100.0%

% within status oral higiene 63.6% 31.2% 55.0%

% of Total 46.7% 8.3% 55.0%

baik Count 16 11 27

% within berkumur-kumur 59.3% 40.7% 100.0%

% within status oral higiene 36.4% 68.8% 45.0%

% of Total 26.7% 18.3% 45.0% Total Count 44 16 60

% within berkumur-kumur 73.3% 26.7% 100.0% % within status oral higiene 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% % of Total 73.3% 26.7% 100.0%

Chi-Square Tests

Value df

Asymp. Sig. (2-sided)

Exact Sig. (2-sided)

Exact Sig. (1-sided)

Pearson Chi-Square 4.972a 1 .026 Continuity Correctionb 3.750 1 .053 Likelihood Ratio 5.019 1 .025 Fisher's Exact Test .040 .026 Linear-by-Linear Association 4.890 1 .027 N of Valid Casesb 60 a. 0 cells (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 7.20. b. Computed only for a 2x2 table

Risk Estimate

Value

95% Confidence Interval

Lower Upper

Odds Ratio for berkumur-kumur (tidak baik / baik) 3.850 1.134 13.075

For cohort status oral higiene = buruk 1.432 1.015 2.020

For cohort status oral higiene = baik .372 .147 .940

N of Valid Cases 60

Page 29: KUESIONER PENELITIAN TESIS Lampiran 1

111

Pemakaian benang gigi * status oral higiene

Crosstab status oral higiene

Total buruk baik

Pemakaian benang gigi

tidak baik

Count 33 11 44

% within Pemakaian benang gigi 75.0% 25.0% 100.0%

% within status oral higiene 75.0% 68.8% 73.3%

% of Total 55.0% 18.3% 73.3%

Baik Count 11 5 16

% within Pemakaian benang gigi 68.8% 31.2% 100.0%

% within status oral higiene 25.0% 31.2% 26.7%

% of Total 18.3% 8.3% 26.7% Total Count 44 16 60

% within Pemakaian benang gigi 73.3% 26.7% 100.0% % within status oral higiene 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% % of Total 73.3% 26.7% 100.0%

Chi-Square Tests

Value df

Asymp. Sig. (2-sided)

Exact Sig. (2-sided)

Exact Sig. (1-sided)

Pearson Chi-Square .234a 1 .628 Continuity Correctionb .024 1 .878 Likelihood Ratio .230 1 .632 Fisher's Exact Test .743 .430 Linear-by-Linear Association .230 1 .631 N of Valid Casesb 60 a. 1 cells (25.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 4.27. b. Computed only for a 2x2 table

Risk Estimate

Value

95% Confidence Interval

Lower Upper

Odds Ratio for Pemakaian benang gigi (tidak baik / baik) 1.364 .387 4.799

For cohort status oral higiene = buruk 1.091 .752 1.582

For cohort status oral higiene = baik .800 .329 1.946

N of Valid Cases 60

Page 30: KUESIONER PENELITIAN TESIS Lampiran 1

112

Pembersihan lidah * status oral higiene

Crosstab status oral higiene

Total buruk baik

pembersihan lidah tidak baik Count 37 11 48

% within pembersihan lidah 77.1% 22.9% 100.0%

% within status oral higiene 84.1% 68.8% 80.0%

% of Total 61.7% 18.3% 80.0%

baik Count 7 5 12

% within pembersihan lidah 58.3% 41.7% 100.0%

% within status oral higiene 15.9% 31.2% 20.0%

% of Total 11.7% 8.3% 20.0% Total Count 44 16 60

% within pembersihan lidah 73.3% 26.7% 100.0% % within status oral higiene 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% % of Total 73.3% 26.7% 100.0%

Chi-Square Tests

Value df

Asymp. Sig. (2-sided)

Exact Sig. (2-sided)

Exact Sig. (1-sided)

Pearson Chi-Square 1.726a 1 .189 Continuity Correctionb .900 1 .343 Likelihood Ratio 1.616 1 .204 Fisher's Exact Test .273 .170 Linear-by-Linear Association 1.697 1 .193 N of Valid Casesb 60 a. 1 cells (25.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 3.20. b. Computed only for a 2x2 table

Risk Estimate

Value

95% Confidence Interval

Lower Upper

Odds Ratio for pembersihan lidah (tidak baik / baik) 2.403 .635 9.088

For cohort status oral higiene = buruk 1.321 .800 2.184

For cohort status oral higiene = baik .550 .236 1.283

N of Valid Cases 60

Page 31: KUESIONER PENELITIAN TESIS Lampiran 1

113

Menyikat gigi * Status periodontal

Crosstab

Status periodontal

Total periodontitis tidak

Menyikat gigi tidak baik Count 22 8 30

% within Menyikat gigi 73.3% 26.7% 100.0%

% within Status periodontal 66.7% 29.6% 50.0%

% of Total 36.7% 13.3% 50.0%

baik Count 11 19 30

% within Menyikat gigi 36.7% 63.3% 100.0%

% within Status periodontal 33.3% 70.4% 50.0%

% of Total 18.3% 31.7% 50.0% Total Count 33 27 60

% within Menyikat gigi 55.0% 45.0% 100.0% % within Status periodontal 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% % of Total 55.0% 45.0% 100.0%

Chi-Square Tests

Value df

Asymp. Sig. (2-sided)

Exact Sig. (2-sided)

Exact Sig. (1-sided)

Pearson Chi-Square 8.148a 1 .004 Continuity Correctionb 6.734 1 .009 Likelihood Ratio 8.352 1 .004 Fisher's Exact Test .009 .004 Linear-by-Linear Association 8.012 1 .005 N of Valid Casesb 60 a. 0 cells (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 13.50. b. Computed only for a 2x2 table

Risk Estimate

Value

95% Confidence Interval

Lower Upper

Odds Ratio for Menyikat gigi (tidak baik / baik) 4.750 1.584 14.245

For cohort Status periodontal = periodontitis 2.000 1.192 3.355

For cohort Status periodontal = tidak .421 .219 .809

N of Valid Cases 60

Page 32: KUESIONER PENELITIAN TESIS Lampiran 1

114

Berkumur-kumur * Status periodontal

Crosstab

Status periodontal

Total periodontitis tidak

Berkumur-kumur tidak baik Count 23 12 35

% within Berkumur-kumur 65.7% 34.3% 100.0%

% within Status periodontal 69.7% 44.4% 58.3%

% of Total 38.3% 20.0% 58.3%

baik Count 10 15 25

% within Berkumur-kumur 40.0% 60.0% 100.0%

% within Status periodontal 30.3% 55.6% 41.7%

% of Total 16.7% 25.0% 41.7% Total Count 33 27 60

% within Berkumur-kumur 55.0% 45.0% 100.0% % within Status periodontal 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% % of Total 55.0% 45.0% 100.0%

Chi-Square Tests

Value df

Asymp. Sig. (2-sided)

Exact Sig. (2-sided)

Exact Sig. (1-sided)

Pearson Chi-Square 3.896a 1 .048 Continuity Correctionb 2.926 1 .087 Likelihood Ratio 3.922 1 .048 Fisher's Exact Test .067 .043 Linear-by-Linear Association 3.831 1 .050 N of Valid Casesb 60 a. 0 cells (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 11.25. b. Computed only for a 2x2 table

Risk Estimate

Value

95% Confidence Interval

Lower Upper

Odds Ratio for Berkumur-kumur (tidak baik / baik) 2.875 .994 8.313

For cohort Status periodontal = periodontitis 1.643 .961 2.809

For cohort Status periodontal = tidak .571 .327 1.000

N of Valid Cases 60

Page 33: KUESIONER PENELITIAN TESIS Lampiran 1

115

Pemakaian benang gigi * Status periodontal

Crosstab

Status periodontal

Total periodontitis tidak

Pemakaian benang gigi

tidak baik Count 24 20 44

% within Pemakaian benang gigi 54.5% 45.5% 100.0%

% within Status periodontal 72.7% 74.1% 73.3%

% of Total 40.0% 33.3% 73.3%

baik Count 9 7 16

% within Pemakaian benang gigi 56.2% 43.8% 100.0%

% within Status periodontal 27.3% 25.9% 26.7%

% of Total 15.0% 11.7% 26.7% Total Count 33 27 60

% within Pemakaian benang gigi 55.0% 45.0% 100.0% % within Status periodontal 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% % of Total 55.0% 45.0% 100.0%

Chi-Square Tests

Value df

Asymp. Sig. (2-sided)

Exact Sig. (2-sided)

Exact Sig. (1-sided)

Pearson Chi-Square .014a 1 .907 Continuity Correctionb .000 1 1.000 Likelihood Ratio .014 1 .907 Fisher's Exact Test 1.000 .571 Linear-by-Linear Association .014 1 .907 N of Valid Casesb 60 a. 0 cells (,0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 7,20. b. Computed only for a 2x2 table

Risk Estimate

Value

95% Confidence Interval

Lower Upper

Odds Ratio for Pemakaian benang gigi (tidak baik / baik) .933 .295 2.954

For cohort Status periodontal = periodontitis .970 .583 1.614

For cohort Status periodontal = tidak 1.039 .546 1.976

N of Valid Cases 60

Page 34: KUESIONER PENELITIAN TESIS Lampiran 1

116

Pembersihan lidah * Status periodontal

Crosstab

Status periodontal

Total periodontitis tidak

Pembersihan lidah tidak baik Count 27 21 48

% within Pembersihan lidah 56.2% 43.8% 100.0%

% within Status periodontal 81.8% 77.8% 80.0%

% of Total 45.0% 35.0% 80.0%

baik Count 6 6 12

% within Pembersihan lidah 50.0% 50.0% 100.0%

% within Status periodontal 18.2% 22.2% 20.0%

% of Total 10.0% 10.0% 20.0% Total Count 33 27 60

% within Pembersihan lidah 55.0% 45.0% 100.0% % within Status periodontal 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% % of Total 55.0% 45.0% 100.0%

Chi-Square Tests

Value df

Asymp. Sig. (2-sided)

Exact Sig. (2-sided)

Exact Sig. (1-sided)

Pearson Chi-Square .152a 1 .697 Continuity Correctionb .004 1 .948 Likelihood Ratio .151 1 .698 Fisher's Exact Test .754 .472 Linear-by-Linear Association .149 1 .700 N of Valid Casesb 60 a. 0 cells (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 5.40. b. Computed only for a 2x2 table

Risk Estimate

Value

95% Confidence Interval

Lower Upper

Odds Ratio for Pembersihan lidah (tidak baik / baik) 1.286 .362 4.565

For cohort Status periodontal = periodontitis 1.125 .606 2.088

For cohort Status periodontal = tidak .875 .457 1.677

N of Valid Cases 60

Page 35: KUESIONER PENELITIAN TESIS Lampiran 1

117

Kelompok Kontrol

Umur Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent

Valid < 50 tahun 27 45.0 45.0 45.0

>= 50 tahun 33 55.0 55.0 100.0

Total 60 100.0 100.0

Jenis Kelamin Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent

Valid laki-laki 45 75.0 75.0 75.0

perempuan 15 25.0 25.0 100.0

Total 60 100.0 100.0

Pendidikan Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent

Valid SD 7 11.7 11.7 11.7

SMP 22 36.7 36.7 48.3

SMA 26 43.3 43.3 91.7

PT 5 8.3 8.3 100.0

Total 60 100.0 100.0

Lama inap kategori Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent

Valid < 6 hari 26 43.3 43.3 43.3

>= 6 hari 34 56.7 56.7 100.0

Total 60 100.0 100.0

Descriptive Statistics N Minimum Maximum Mean Std. Deviation

Umur 60 29.00 64.00 45.7667 9.96156 Lama Inap 60 3.00 14.00 7.3000 4.04760 Indeks Debris 60 1.00 2.67 1.3283 .35405 Indeks kalkulus 60 1.00 2.67 1.7278 .49912 OHIS 60 2.00 4.67 3.0552 .75629 Indeks Periodontal 60 1.80 5.50 3.1683 1.06905 Valid N (listwise) 60

Page 36: KUESIONER PENELITIAN TESIS Lampiran 1

118

Menyikat gigi Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent

Valid tidak baik 11 18.3 18.3 18.3

Baik 49 81.7 81.7 100.0

Total 60 100.0 100.0

Pemakaian benang gigi Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent

Valid tidak baik 42 70.0 70.0 70.0

Baik 18 30.0 30.0 100.0

Total 60 100.0 100.0

Berkumur-kumur Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent

Valid tidak baik 12 20.0 20.0 20.0

Baik 48 80.0 80.0 100.0

Total 60 100.0 100.0

Pembersihan lidah Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent

Valid tidak baik 44 73.3 73.3 73.3

Baik 16 26.7 26.7 100.0

Total 60 100.0 100.0

Status higiene oral Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent

Valid Buruk 18 30.0 30.0 30.0

Baik 42 70.0 70.0 100.0

Total 60 100.0 100.0

Status periodontal

Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent

Valid periodontitis 18 30.0 30.0 30.0

tidak 42 70.0 70.0 100.0

Total 60 100.0 100.0

Page 37: KUESIONER PENELITIAN TESIS Lampiran 1

119

Menyikat gigi * status oral higiene

Crosstab status oral higiene

Total buruk baik

Menyikat gigi tidak baik Count 8 3 11

% within Menyikat gigi 72.7% 27.3% 100.0%

% within status oral higiene 44.4% 7.1% 18.3%

% of Total 13.3% 5.0% 18.3%

baik Count 10 39 49

% within Menyikat gigi 20.4% 79.6% 100.0%

% within status oral higiene 55.6% 92.9% 81.7%

% of Total 16.7% 65.0% 81.7% Total Count 18 42 60

% within Menyikat gigi 30.0% 70.0% 100.0% % within status oral higiene 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% % of Total 30.0% 70.0% 100.0%

Chi-Square Tests

Value df

Asymp. Sig. (2-sided)

Exact Sig. (2-sided)

Exact Sig. (1-sided)

Pearson Chi-Square 11.710a 1 .001 Continuity Correctionb 9.351 1 .002 Likelihood Ratio 10.824 1 .001 Fisher's Exact Test .002 .002 Linear-by-Linear Association 11.514 1 .001 N of Valid Casesb 60 a. 1 cells (25.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 3.30. b. Computed only for a 2x2 table

Risk Estimate

Value

95% Confidence Interval

Lower Upper

Odds Ratio for Menyikat gigi (tidak baik / baik) 10.400 2.326 46.506

For cohort status oral higiene = buruk 3.564 1.840 6.901

For cohort status oral higiene = baik .343 .129 .909

N of Valid Cases 60

Page 38: KUESIONER PENELITIAN TESIS Lampiran 1

120

Berkumur-kumur * status oral higiene

Crosstab status oral higiene

Total buruk baik

berkumur-kumur tidak baik Count 8 4 12

% within berkumur-kumur 66.7% 33.3% 100.0%

% within status oral higiene 44.4% 9.5% 20.0%

% of Total 13.3% 6.7% 20.0%

baik Count 10 38 48

% within berkumur-kumur 20.8% 79.2% 100.0%

% within status oral higiene 55.6% 90.5% 80.0%

% of Total 16.7% 63.3% 80.0% Total Count 18 42 60

% within berkumur-kumur 30.0% 70.0% 100.0% % within status oral higiene 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% % of Total 30.0% 70.0% 100.0%

Chi-Square Tests

Value df

Asymp. Sig. (2-sided)

Exact Sig. (2-sided)

Exact Sig. (1-sided)

Pearson Chi-Square 9.603a 1 .002 Continuity Correctionb 7.545 1 .006 Likelihood Ratio 8.900 1 .003 Fisher's Exact Test .004 .004 Linear-by-Linear Association 9.443 1 .002 N of Valid Casesb 60 a. 1 cells (25.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 3.60. b. Computed only for a 2x2 table

Risk Estimate

Value

95% Confidence Interval

Lower Upper

Odds Ratio for berkumur-kumur (tidak baik / baik) 7.600 1.897 30.444

For cohort status oral higiene = buruk 3.200 1.619 6.325

For cohort status oral higiene = baik .421 .187 .950

N of Valid Cases 60

Page 39: KUESIONER PENELITIAN TESIS Lampiran 1

121

Pemakaian benang gigi * status oral higiene

Crosstab status oral higiene

Total buruk baik

Pemakaian benang gigi

tidak baik

Count 14 28 42

% within Pemakaian benang gigi 33.3% 66.7% 100.0%

% within status oral higiene 77.8% 66.7% 70.0%

% of Total 23.3% 46.7% 70.0%

Baik Count 4 14 18

% within Pemakaian benang gigi 22.2% 77.8% 100.0%

% within status oral higiene 22.2% 33.3% 30.0%

% of Total 6.7% 23.3% 30.0% Total Count 18 42 60

% within Pemakaian benang gigi 30.0% 70.0% 100.0% % within status oral higiene 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% % of Total 30.0% 70.0% 100.0%

Chi-Square Tests

Value df

Asymp. Sig. (2-sided)

Exact Sig. (2-sided)

Exact Sig. (1-sided)

Pearson Chi-Square .741a 1 .389 Continuity Correctionb .306 1 .580 Likelihood Ratio .767 1 .381 Fisher's Exact Test .542 .295 Linear-by-Linear Association .728 1 .393 N of Valid Casesb 60 a. 0 cells (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 5.40. b. Computed only for a 2x2 table

Risk Estimate

Value

95% Confidence Interval

Lower Upper

Odds Ratio for Pemakaian benang gigi (tidak baik / baik) 1.750 .485 6.314

For cohort status oral higiene = buruk 1.500 .572 3.934

For cohort status oral higiene = baik .857 .618 1.188

N of Valid Cases 60

Page 40: KUESIONER PENELITIAN TESIS Lampiran 1

122

Pembersihan lidah * status oral higiene

Crosstab status oral higiene

Total buruk baik

pembersihan lidah tidak baik Count 13 31 44

% within pembersihan lidah 29.5% 70.5% 100.0%

% within status oral higiene 72.2% 73.8% 73.3%

% of Total 21.7% 51.7% 73.3%

baik Count 5 11 16

% within pembersihan lidah 31.2% 68.8% 100.0%

% within status oral higiene 27.8% 26.2% 26.7%

% of Total 8.3% 18.3% 26.7% Total Count 18 42 60

% within pembersihan lidah 30.0% 70.0% 100.0% % within status oral higiene 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% % of Total 30.0% 70.0% 100.0%

Chi-Square Tests

Value df

Asymp. Sig. (2-sided)

Exact Sig. (2-sided)

Exact Sig. (1-sided)

Pearson Chi-Square .016a 1 .899 Continuity Correctionb .000 1 1.000 Likelihood Ratio .016 1 .899 Fisher's Exact Test 1.000 .568 Linear-by-Linear Association .016 1 .899 N of Valid Casesb 60 a. 1 cells (25.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 4.80. b. Computed only for a 2x2 table

Risk Estimate

Value

95% Confidence Interval

Lower Upper

Odds Ratio for pembersihan lidah (tidak baik / baik) .923 .267 3.187

For cohort status oral higiene = buruk .945 .401 2.230

For cohort status oral higiene = baik 1.025 .700 1.501

N of Valid Cases 60

Page 41: KUESIONER PENELITIAN TESIS Lampiran 1

123

Menyikat gigi * Status periodontal

Crosstab

Status periodontal

Total periodontitis tidak

Menyikat gigi tidak baik Count 7 6 13

% within Menyikat gigi 53.8% 46.2% 100.0%

% within Status periodontal 38.9% 14.3% 21.7%

% of Total 11.7% 10.0% 21.7%

baik Count 11 36 47

% within Menyikat gigi 23.4% 76.6% 100.0%

% within Status periodontal 61.1% 85.7% 78.3%

% of Total 18.3% 60.0% 78.3% Total Count 18 42 60

% within Menyikat gigi 30.0% 70.0% 100.0% % within Status periodontal 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% % of Total 30.0% 70.0% 100.0%

Chi-Square Tests

Value df

Asymp. Sig. (2-sided)

Exact Sig. (2-sided)

Exact Sig. (1-sided)

Pearson Chi-Square 4.494a 1 .034 Continuity Correctionb 3.161 1 .075 Likelihood Ratio 4.212 1 .040 Fisher's Exact Test .046 .041 Linear-by-Linear Association 4.419 1 .036 N of Valid Casesb 60 a. 1 cells (25.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 3.90. b. Computed only for a 2x2 table

Risk Estimate

Value

95% Confidence Interval

Lower Upper

Odds Ratio for Menyikat gigi (tidak baik / baik) 3.818 1.059 13.768

For cohort Status periodontal = periodontitis 2.301 1.118 4.734

For cohort Status periodontal = tidak .603 .328 1.107

N of Valid Cases 60

Page 42: KUESIONER PENELITIAN TESIS Lampiran 1

124

Berkumur-kumur * Status periodontal

Crosstab

Status periodontal

Total periodontitis tidak

Berkumur-kumur tidak baik Count 9 7 16

% within Berkumur-kumur 56.2% 43.8% 100.0%

% within Status periodontal 50.0% 16.7% 26.7%

% of Total 15.0% 11.7% 26.7%

baik Count 9 35 44

% within Berkumur-kumur 20.5% 79.5% 100.0%

% within Status periodontal 50.0% 83.3% 73.3%

% of Total 15.0% 58.3% 73.3% Total Count 18 42 60

% within Berkumur-kumur 30.0% 70.0% 100.0% % within Status periodontal 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% % of Total 30.0% 70.0% 100.0%

Chi-Square Tests

Value df

Asymp. Sig. (2-sided)

Exact Sig. (2-sided)

Exact Sig. (1-sided)

Pearson Chi-Square 7.159a 1 .007 Continuity Correctionb 5.556 1 .018 Likelihood Ratio 6.789 1 .009 Fisher's Exact Test .012 .010 Linear-by-Linear Association 7.040 1 .008 N of Valid Casesb 60 a. 1 cells (25.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 4.80. b. Computed only for a 2x2 table

Risk Estimate

Value

95% Confidence Interval

Lower Upper

Odds Ratio for Berkumur-kumur (tidak baik / baik) 5.000 1.462 17.101

For cohort Status periodontal = periodontitis 2.750 1.331 5.680

For cohort Status periodontal = tidak .550 .309 .978

N of Valid Cases 60

Page 43: KUESIONER PENELITIAN TESIS Lampiran 1

125

Pemakaian benang gigi * Status periodontal

Crosstab

Status periodontal

Total periodontitis tidak

Pemakaian benang gigi

tidak baik Count 14 28 42

% within Pemakaian benang gigi 33.3% 66.7% 100.0%

% within Status periodontal 77.8% 66.7% 70.0%

% of Total 23.3% 46.7% 70.0%

baik Count 4 14 18

% within Pemakaian benang gigi 22.2% 77.8% 100.0%

% within Status periodontal 22.2% 33.3% 30.0%

% of Total 6.7% 23.3% 30.0% Total Count 18 42 60

% within Pemakaian benang gigi 30.0% 70.0% 100.0% % within Status periodontal 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% % of Total 30.0% 70.0% 100.0%

Chi-Square Tests

Value df

Asymp. Sig. (2-sided)

Exact Sig. (2-sided)

Exact Sig. (1-sided)

Pearson Chi-Square .741a 1 .389 Continuity Correctionb .306 1 .580 Likelihood Ratio .767 1 .381 Fisher's Exact Test .542 .295 Linear-by-Linear Association .728 1 .393 N of Valid Casesb 60 a. 0 cells (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 5.40. b. Computed only for a 2x2 table

Risk Estimate

Value

95% Confidence Interval

Lower Upper

Odds Ratio for Pemakaian benang gigi (tidak baik / baik) 1.750 .485 6.314

For cohort Status periodontal = periodontitis 1.500 .572 3.934

For cohort Status periodontal = tidak .857 .618 1.188

N of Valid Cases 60

Page 44: KUESIONER PENELITIAN TESIS Lampiran 1

126

Pembersihan lidah * Status periodontal

Crosstab

Status periodontal

Total periodontitis tidak

Pembersihan lidah tidak baik Count 15 29 44

% within Pembersihan lidah 34.1% 65.9% 100.0%

% within Status periodontal 83.3% 69.0% 73.3%

% of Total 25.0% 48.3% 73.3%

baik Count 3 13 16

% within Pembersihan lidah 18.8% 81.2% 100.0%

% within Status periodontal 16.7% 31.0% 26.7%

% of Total 5.0% 21.7% 26.7% Total Count 18 42 60

% within Pembersihan lidah 30.0% 70.0% 100.0% % within Status periodontal 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% % of Total 30.0% 70.0% 100.0%

Chi-Square Tests

Value df

Asymp. Sig. (2-sided)

Exact Sig. (2-sided)

Exact Sig. (1-sided)

Pearson Chi-Square 1.315a 1 .252 Continuity Correctionb .686 1 .408 Likelihood Ratio 1.397 1 .237 Fisher's Exact Test .346 .206 Linear-by-Linear Association 1.293 1 .255 N of Valid Casesb 60 a. 1 cells (25.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 4.80. b. Computed only for a 2x2 table

Risk Estimate

Value

95% Confidence Interval

Lower Upper

Odds Ratio for Pembersihan lidah (tidak baik / baik) 2.241 .552 9.104

For cohort Status periodontal = periodontitis 1.818 .605 5.460

For cohort Status periodontal = tidak .811 .591 1.114

N of Valid Cases 60

Page 45: KUESIONER PENELITIAN TESIS Lampiran 1

127

BIVARIAT Menyikat gigi * Kejadian

Crosstab Kejadian

Total kompromis

medis non kompromis

medis

Menyikat gigi tidak baik Count 32 11 43

% within Menyikat gigi 74.4% 25.6% 100.0%

% within Kejadian 53.3% 18.3% 35.8%

% of Total 26.7% 9.2% 35.8%

baik Count 28 49 77

% within Menyikat gigi 36.4% 63.6% 100.0%

% within Kejadian 46.7% 81.7% 64.2%

% of Total 23.3% 40.8% 64.2% Total Count 60 60 120

% within Menyikat gigi 50.0% 50.0% 100.0% % within Kejadian 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% % of Total 50.0% 50.0% 100.0%

Chi-Square Tests

Value df

Asymp. Sig. (2-sided)

Exact Sig. (2-sided)

Exact Sig. (1-sided)

Pearson Chi-Square 15.983a 1 .000 Continuity Correctionb 14.497 1 .000 Likelihood Ratio 16.509 1 .000 Fisher's Exact Test .000 .000 Linear-by-Linear Association 15.850 1 .000 N of Valid Casesb 120 a. 0 cells (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 21.50. b. Computed only for a 2x2 table

Risk Estimate

Value

95% Confidence Interval

Lower Upper

Odds Ratio for Menyikat gigi (tidak baik / baik) 5.091 2.225 11.647

For cohort Kejadian = kompromis medis 2.047 1.452 2.885

For cohort Kejadian = non kompromis medis .402 .235 .688

N of Valid Cases 120

Page 46: KUESIONER PENELITIAN TESIS Lampiran 1

128

Pemakaian benang gigi * Kejadian Crosstab

Kejadian

Total kompromis

medis non kompromis

medis

Pemakaian benang gigi

tidak baik Count 44 42 86

% within Pemakaian benang gigi 51.2% 48.8% 100.0%

% within Kejadian 73.3% 70.0% 71.7%

% of Total 36.7% 35.0% 71.7%

baik Count 16 18 34

% within Pemakaian benang gigi 47.1% 52.9% 100.0%

% within Kejadian 26.7% 30.0% 28.3%

% of Total 13.3% 15.0% 28.3% Total Count 60 60 120

% within Pemakaian benang gigi 50.0% 50.0% 100.0% % within Kejadian 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% % of Total 50.0% 50.0% 100.0%

Chi-Square Tests

Value df

Asymp. Sig. (2-sided)

Exact Sig. (2-sided)

Exact Sig. (1-sided)

Pearson Chi-Square .164a 1 .685 Continuity Correctionb .041 1 .839 Likelihood Ratio .164 1 .685 Fisher's Exact Test .840 .420 Linear-by-Linear Association .163 1 .687 N of Valid Casesb 120 a. 0 cells (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 17.00. b. Computed only for a 2x2 table

Risk Estimate

Value

95% Confidence Interval

Lower Upper

Odds Ratio for Pemakaian benang gigi (tidak baik / baik) 1.179 .532 2.610

For cohort Kejadian = kompromis medis 1.087 .720 1.642

For cohort Kejadian = non kompromis medis .922 .629 1.354

N of Valid Cases 120

Page 47: KUESIONER PENELITIAN TESIS Lampiran 1

129

Berkumur-kumur * Kejadian

Crosstab Kejadian

Total kompromis

medis non kompromis

medis

berkumur-kumur tidak baik Count 33 12 45

% within berkumur-kumur 73.3% 26.7% 100.0%

% within Kejadian 55.0% 20.0% 37.5%

% of Total 27.5% 10.0% 37.5%

baik Count 27 48 75

% within berkumur-kumur 36.0% 64.0% 100.0%

% within Kejadian 45.0% 80.0% 62.5%

% of Total 22.5% 40.0% 62.5% Total Count 60 60 120

% within berkumur-kumur 50.0% 50.0% 100.0% % within Kejadian 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% % of Total 50.0% 50.0% 100.0%

Chi-Square Tests

Value df

Asymp. Sig. (2-sided)

Exact Sig. (2-sided)

Exact Sig. (1-sided)

Pearson Chi-Square 15.680a 1 .000 Continuity Correctionb 14.222 1 .000 Likelihood Ratio 16.150 1 .000 Fisher's Exact Test .000 .000 Linear-by-Linear Association 15.549 1 .000 N of Valid Casesb 120 a. 0 cells (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 22.50. b. Computed only for a 2x2 table

Risk Estimate

Value

95% Confidence Interval

Lower Upper

Odds Ratio for berkumur-kumur (tidak baik / baik) 4.889 2.171 11.008

For cohort Kejadian = kompromis medis 2.037 1.436 2.889

For cohort Kejadian = non kompromis medis .417 .249 .696

N of Valid Cases 120

Page 48: KUESIONER PENELITIAN TESIS Lampiran 1

130

Pembersihan lidah * Kejadian

Crosstab Kejadian

Total kompromis

medis non kompromis

medis

pembersihan lidah tidak baik Count 48 44 92

% within pembersihan lidah 52.2% 47.8% 100.0%

% within Kejadian 80.0% 73.3% 76.7%

% of Total 40.0% 36.7% 76.7%

baik Count 12 16 28

% within pembersihan lidah 42.9% 57.1% 100.0%

% within Kejadian 20.0% 26.7% 23.3%

% of Total 10.0% 13.3% 23.3% Total Count 60 60 120

% within pembersihan lidah 50.0% 50.0% 100.0% % within Kejadian 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% % of Total 50.0% 50.0% 100.0%

Chi-Square Tests

Value df

Asymp. Sig. (2-sided)

Exact Sig. (2-sided)

Exact Sig. (1-sided)

Pearson Chi-Square .745a 1 .388 Continuity Correctionb .419 1 .517 Likelihood Ratio .747 1 .387 Fisher's Exact Test .518 .259 Linear-by-Linear Association .739 1 .390 N of Valid Casesb 120 a. 0 cells (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 14.00. b. Computed only for a 2x2 table

Risk Estimate

Value

95% Confidence Interval

Lower Upper

Odds Ratio for pembersihan lidah (tidak baik / baik) 1.455 .620 3.413

For cohort Kejadian = kompromis medis 1.217 .761 1.948

For cohort Kejadian = non kompromis medis .837 .569 1.230

N of Valid Cases 120

Page 49: KUESIONER PENELITIAN TESIS Lampiran 1

131

Status oral higiene * Kejadian

Crosstab Kejadian

Total kompromis

medis non kompromis

medis

status oral higiene Buruk Count 44 18 62

% within status oral higiene 71.0% 29.0% 100.0%

% within Kejadian 73.3% 30.0% 51.7%

% of Total 36.7% 15.0% 51.7%

Baik Count 16 42 58

% within status oral higiene 27.6% 72.4% 100.0%

% within Kejadian 26.7% 70.0% 48.3%

% of Total 13.3% 35.0% 48.3% Total Count 60 60 120

% within status oral higiene 50.0% 50.0% 100.0% % within Kejadian 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% % of Total 50.0% 50.0% 100.0%

Chi-Square Tests

Value df

Asymp. Sig. (2-sided)

Exact Sig. (2-sided)

Exact Sig. (1-sided)

Pearson Chi-Square 22.558a 1 .000 Continuity Correctionb 20.857 1 .000 Likelihood Ratio 23.328 1 .000 Fisher's Exact Test .000 .000 Linear-by-Linear Association 22.370 1 .000 N of Valid Casesb 120 a. 0 cells (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 29.00. b. Computed only for a 2x2 table

Risk Estimate

Value

95% Confidence Interval

Lower Upper

Odds Ratio for status oral higiene (buruk / baik) 6.417 2.897 14.212

For cohort Kejadian = kompromis medis 2.573 1.646 4.020

For cohort Kejadian = non kompromis medis .401 .263 .610

N of Valid Cases 120

Page 50: KUESIONER PENELITIAN TESIS Lampiran 1

132

Status periodontal * Kejadian

Crosstab

Kejadian

Total kompromis

medis non kompromis

medis

Status periodontal periodontitis Count 33 18 51

% within Status periodontal 64.7% 35.3% 100.0%

% within Kejadian 55.0% 30.0% 42.5%

% of Total 27.5% 15.0% 42.5%

tidak Count 27 42 69

% within Status periodontal 39.1% 60.9% 100.0%

% within Kejadian 45.0% 70.0% 57.5%

% of Total 22.5% 35.0% 57.5% Total Count 60 60 120

% within Status periodontal 50.0% 50.0% 100.0% % within Kejadian 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% % of Total 50.0% 50.0% 100.0%

Chi-Square Tests

Value df

Asymp. Sig. (2-sided)

Exact Sig. (2-sided)

Exact Sig. (1-sided)

Pearson Chi-Square 7.673a 1 .006 Continuity Correctionb 6.684 1 .010 Likelihood Ratio 7.765 1 .005 Fisher's Exact Test .009 .005 Linear-by-Linear Association 7.609 1 .006 N of Valid Casesb 120 a. 0 cells (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 25.50. b. Computed only for a 2x2 table

Risk Estimate

Value

95% Confidence Interval

Lower Upper

Odds Ratio for Status periodontal (periodontitis / tidak)

2.852 1.346 6.042

For cohort Kejadian = kompromis medis 1.654 1.157 2.364

For cohort Kejadian = non kompromis medis .580 .382 .880

N of Valid Cases 120

Page 51: KUESIONER PENELITIAN TESIS Lampiran 1

133

MULTIVARIAT Logistic Regression

Case Processing Summary Unweighted Casesa N Percent

Selected Cases Included in Analysis 120 100.0

Missing Cases 0 .0

Total 120 100.0 Unselected Cases 0 .0 Total 120 100.0 a. If weight is in effect, see classification table for the total number of cases.

Dependent Variable Encoding Original Value Internal Value

kompromis medis 0 non kompromis medis 1 Block 0: Beginning Block

Classification Tablea,b

Observed

Predicted

Kejadian

Percentage Correct

kompromis medis

non kompromis medis

Step 0 Kejadian kompromis medis 0 60 .0

non kompromis medis 0 60 100.0

Overall Percentage 50.0 a. Constant is included in the model. b. The cut value is .500

Variables in the Equation B S.E. Wald df Sig. Exp(B)

Step 0 Constant .000 .183 .000 1 1.000 1.000

Variables not in the Equation Score df Sig.

Step 0 Variables Oral Higiene 22.558 1 .000

Periodontal 11.760 1 .001

Overall Statistics 26.230 2 .000

Page 52: KUESIONER PENELITIAN TESIS Lampiran 1

134

Block 1: Method = Enter

Omnibus Tests of Model Coefficients Chi-square df Sig.

Step 1 Step 28.161 2 .000

Block 28.161 2 .000

Model 28.161 2 .000

Model Summary Step -2 Log likelihood Cox & Snell R Square Nagelkerke R Square

1 138.194a .209 .279 a. Estimation terminated at iteration number 4 because parameter estimates

changed by less than .001.

Classification Tablea

Observed

Predicted

Kejadian

Percentage Correct

kompromis medis

non kompromis medis

Step 1 Kejadian kompromis medis 44 16 73.3

non kompromis medis 20 40 66.7

Overall Percentage 70.0 a. The cut value is .500

Variables in the Equation B S.E. Wald df Sig. Exp(B)

Step 1a Oral Higiene 1.601 .421 14.436 1 .000 4.956

Periodontal 1.400 .694 4.073 1 .044 4.057

Constant -1.978 .651 9.249 1 .002 .138 a. Variable(s) entered on step 1: Oral Higiene, Periodontal.

Dependent Variable Encoding Original Value Internal Value

kompromis medis 0 non kompromis medis 1

Page 53: KUESIONER PENELITIAN TESIS Lampiran 1

135

Block 0: Beginning Block Classification Tablea,b

Observed

Predicted

Kejadian Percentage Correct kompromis medis non kompromis medis

Step 0 Kejadian kompromis medis 0 60 .0

non kompromis medis 0 60 100.0

Overall Percentage 50.0 a. Constant is included in the model. b. The cut value is .500

Variables in the Equation B S.E. Wald df Sig. Exp(B)

Step 0 Constant .000 .183 .000 1 1.000 1.000

Variables not in the Equation Score df Sig.

Step 0 Variables Menyikat 15.983 1 .000

Benang .164 1 .685

Berkumur 15.680 1 .000

Lidah .745 1 .388

Overall Statistics 22.058 4 .000 Block 0: Beginning Block

Classification Tablea

Observed

Predicted

Kejadian Percentage Correct kompromis medis non kompromis medis

Step 1 Kejadian kompromis medis 42 18 70.0

non kompromis medis 17 43 71.7

Overall Percentage 70.8 Step 2 Kejadian kompromis medis 42 18 70.0

non kompromis medis 17 43 71.7 Overall Percentage 70.8

Step 3 Kejadian kompromis medis 42 18 70.0 non kompromis medis 17 43 71.7

Overall Percentage 70.8 a. The cut value is .500

Page 54: KUESIONER PENELITIAN TESIS Lampiran 1

136

Variables in the Equation B S.E. Wald df Sig. Exp(B)

Step 1a Menyikat 1.240 .470 6.971 1 .008 3.454

Benang .230 .459 .251 1 .617 1.258

Berkumur 1.160 .465 6.222 1 .013 3.191

Lidah -.256 .489 .273 1 .601 .774

Constant -1.560 .435 12.858 1 .000 .210 Step 2a Menyikat 1.207 .463 6.786 1 .009 3.345

Berkumur 1.182 .463 6.507 1 .011 3.261 Lidah -.234 .487 .230 1 .631 .792 Constant -1.494 .412 13.120 1 .000 .224

Step 3a Menyikat 1.182 .460 6.616 1 .010 3.262 Berkumur 1.136 .452 6.312 1 .012 3.113 Constant -1.504 .412 13.352 1 .000 .222

a. Variable(s) entered on step 1: Menyikat, Benang, Berkumur, Lidah.

Model if Term Removed

Variable Model Log Likelihood Change in -2 Log Likelihood Df Sig. of the Change

Step 1 Menyikat -75.069 7.167 1 .007

Benang -71.611 .252 1 .616

Berkumur -74.647 6.324 1 .012

Lidah -71.622 .274 1 .601 Step 2 Menyikat -75.082 6.942 1 .008

Berkumur -74.923 6.623 1 .010 Lidah -71.726 .230 1 .631

Step 3 Menyikat -75.103 6.753 1 .009 Berkumur -74.923 6.394 1 .011