13
Face In action in Intercultural Communication and Face-Negotiation Theory

Language And Culture Final Presentation

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

This is a presentation on intercultural communication and conflict that I recently gave in my Language and Culture Class.

Citation preview

Page 1: Language And Culture Final Presentation

FaceIn action in

Intercultural Communication and

Face-Negotiation Theory

Page 2: Language And Culture Final Presentation

What it means to ‘Save Face’

Face: Self-image presented to world

- Identity Respect Self-Construal: independent vs interdependent self

Facework: Restoring Face Protect from Judgment

Page 3: Language And Culture Final Presentation

Cultural CharacteristicsChina and Japan:

- Collectivist- High context- Complacent, Indirect, likely to Avoid

US and Germany - Individualist- Low Context - Dominant, Direct, likely to Conflict

Page 4: Language And Culture Final Presentation

Cross-Cultural Conflicts

Appropriate Conflict Conduct in Cultural Environment

Use of face can result in CONFLICTIncompatibility over substantial

issues Miscommunication, Face is not savedConflict Management Style Leads to Face Negotiation Theory

Page 5: Language And Culture Final Presentation

Face Negotiation TheoryFace is mechanism for conflict

managementNegotiate face in all communication Situated Identities questionable Cultural, Individual, or Situational

variablesFive Conflict Styles:

- Avoidance - Compromise - Integration - Oblige - Domination

Page 6: Language And Culture Final Presentation

Specific Studies

US and Germany vs China and JapanPurpose: FACE is the explanation for

culture’s influence on conflict behaviorProcess

- Hypothesis, QuestionnaireResults

- Cultural features had direct effect - Situational Scenarios low impact

Page 7: Language And Culture Final Presentation

Specific Studies China vs Japan Purpose: To test

shared face, social debt, and independence

•Results:Cultural conflict recognized for integration

•Method: Qualitative Data from structured interviews

Page 8: Language And Culture Final Presentation

What does it all mean?Results not conclusive

Identity Based Goals- Confirmation/Rejection- Respect/Disrespect- Approval/Disapproval

Unresolved Identity Conflicts

Page 9: Language And Culture Final Presentation

Solutions?Face Identity Respect Knowledge of Facework

Taxonomies- Face Concerns - Face Movements or Patterns - Facework Interaction Strategies

Change in Tendencies - Conflict Communication Styles - Face Content Domains

Page 10: Language And Culture Final Presentation

Implications for Modern World

SocietiesPolitics WorkforceWar and Conflict EconomyIdentities of Countries in Global Market

Page 11: Language And Culture Final Presentation

Conclusion

“God had given you one face, and you make yourself another.”

-Hamlet, William Shakespeare

Page 12: Language And Culture Final Presentation

BibliographyGudykunst, William B. Theorizing about intercultural communication . Thousand

Oaks, CA : Sage, 2005. Print.

Matsudaira, Tomomi "Cultural Influences on the Use of Social Support by Chinese

Immigrants in Japan: 'Face' as a Keyword." Qualitative Health Research

13.3 (2003): 343. Academic Search Premier. EBSCO. Web. 12 Nov.

2009.

Oetzel, John G., and Stella Ting-Toomey "Face Concerns in Interpersonal Conflict:

A Cross-Cultural Empirical Test of the Face Negotiation Theory."

Communication Research 30.6 (2003): 599-624. Academic Search Premier.

EBSCO. Web. 12 Nov. 2009.

Page 13: Language And Culture Final Presentation

Questions?