Upload
lydan
View
216
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
&
Reactive vs. Proactive Approaches to Obsolescence Management
Managing Electronic Component Obsolescence
Jan 2014
Asking Questions
• Ask questions during the webinar by using the Questions window
• Questions will be addressed at the end of the presentations
• Any question we do not get to will be answered individually by email
• The presentation will be sent to you after the webinar
• Please respond to the survey questions at the end of the webinar
Roya Ansari
Sales Associate
(408) 813 3048
SiliconExpert Panelist
Agenda
Agenda
• SiliconExpert Introduction 5 minutes
• Dr. Peter Sandborn “Managing Electronic Component Obsolescence” 25 minutes
• Roya Ansari “SiliconExpert & Lifecycle Solutions” 25 minutes
• Questions & Answers 5 minutes
• Leading OEMs, Distributors, Suppliers &
EMSs use SiliconExpert Daily
• Our Electronic Component Database of
over 250 million components powers our:
o Comprehensive software tools
o Integrated solutions
o Professional services
About Us
Reactive vs. Proactive Approaches to Obsolescence Management
250 Million+ Orderable Part Numbers
Up to 42 Parametric values/product line
Risk Analysis & Obsolescence
Forecasting Algorithms developed
with CALCE
Regulation Data tracked: EU & China
RoHS, REACH, Conflict Minerals,
compliance & Material Declarations
Parametrically-derived cross-references
for millions of parts
Our Database
Reactive vs. Proactive Approaches to Obsolescence Management CALCE & Obsolescence
• Today’s climate requires companies to be
proactive.
• Reacting to obsolescence, without plan = Costly
• CALCE & SiliconExpert have developed
algorithms to forecast obsolescence risk
• Analytics seamlessly integrated into
SiliconExpert’s solutions
Reactive vs. Proactive Approaches to Obsolescence Management Today’s Expert Panelist
Dr. Peter Sandborn Center for Advanced Life Cycle Engineering,
University of Maryland
University of Maryland Copyright © 2013 CALCE
1 Center for Advanced Life Cycle Engineering
Managing Electronic Component Obsolescence
Peter Sandborn
CALCE, Department of Mechanical Engineering
University of Maryland
(301) 405-3167
http://www.enme.umd.edu/ESCML/obsolescence.htm
Electronic Systems Cost
Modeling Laboratory
May 28, 2013
University of Maryland Copyright © 2013 CALCE
2 Center for Advanced Life Cycle Engineering
Obsolescence Definition
Obsolescence is defined as the loss or impending loss
of original manufacturers of items or suppliers of
items or raw materials.
… in particular, most folks are concerned with
electronic part obsolescence.
The military community refers to this problem as: Diminishing
Manufacturing Sources and Material Shortages (DMSMS)
University of Maryland Copyright © 2013 CALCE
3 Center for Advanced Life Cycle Engineering
• Sustainment-dominated products – long-term sustainment (support) costs
significant exceed procurement costs
• Example products: avionics, military, medical electronics, telecom
infrastructure, large networks
• These types of products are manufactured and have to be supported for
long periods of time (20+ years)
Understanding the Problem
• These types of products are often subject to stringent qualification,
certification and configuration control requirements making even the most
minor design change prohibitively expensive
• DMSMS type obsolescence occurs because these products have no
control over the supply chain for key components due to their low
production volumes
• DMSMS is involuntary obsolescence – products are forced to change to
remain manufacturable and supportable even though the manufacturer and
customer do not want to change
University of Maryland Copyright © 2013 CALCE
4 Center for Advanced Life Cycle Engineering
Mean
Pro
cu
rem
en
t L
ife (
Years
)
1990 1992 1994 1996 1998 2000 2002 2004 2006 20080
5
10
15
20
25
Censored - Weibull (2-P)
Uncensored - Weibull (2-P)
Uncensored - Normal Dist.
Procurement Life Shrinkage (Linear Regulators)
Part Introduction Date
Procurement life = length of time the part is available from
its original manufacturer
University of Maryland Copyright © 2013 CALCE
5 Center for Advanced Life Cycle Engineering
Over 70% of the
electronic parts are
obsolete before the first
system is installed!
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
System Installation date
% o
f E
lec
tro
nic
Pa
rts
Un
av
ail
ab
le
Year
1996
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
A Common Situation
Percent of COTS products out of
production (un-procurable) vs.
first 10-year life cycle of a surface
ship sonar system.
(NSWC Crane)
System must be sustained until ??
University of Maryland Copyright © 2013 CALCE
6 Center for Advanced Life Cycle Engineering
System Life Cycles are Increasing
R. Stogdill, “Dealing with Obsolete Parts,” IEEE Design& Test of Computers, pp. 17-25, April-June 1999
• Boeing 737 -
introduced in 1968 – 7 system-wide
redesigns to date
• Boeing 747 -
introduced in 1969 – 4 system-wide
redesigns to date
– The last major
redesign involved
addition of digital
avionics controls,
winglets, and a new
flight deck
University of Maryland Copyright © 2013 CALCE
7 Center for Advanced Life Cycle Engineering
The Magnitude of the Obsolescence
Problem
Relays and I/O Modules 8229
Resistor 179132
RF and Microwave 1110
Sensors and Transducers 2650
Standard and Specialty Logic 7058
Switches 1452
Thermal Management 374
Tools and Supplies 3898
Transformers 111
Wires and Cables 16640
Total 554605
Category Count of Parts
Amplifiers and Comparators 2700
Audio Components 111
Batteries and Power Supplies 1343
Capacitor 64348
Circuit Protection 1890
Clock and Timing 1627
Communication 982
Computer Products 106
Connectors 122043
Custom Parts 277
Data Acquisition 1254
Discrete 31080
Displays 96
Embedded Systems 78
EMI/RFI Suppression 206
Encoders 680
Fasteners and Hardware 436
Filter 652
Fluid Transfer 140
Inductor 5707
Interface 1814
Materials, Chemicals and Adhesives 311
Memory 43547
Microcontroller and Processor 11253
Motors 9
Optoelectronics 3697
Oscillators and Crystals 4290
Peripheral and Multimedia 14533
Power Management 15031
Programmable Logic 3710
2010: 693,379 2011: 554,605 2012: 322,742 2013: 275,400 (through May 1)
Category 2012 2013 (through May 1st)
Grand Total 322,742 275,400
Connector 58,411 110,372
Frequency Controls 55,596 14,096
Discrete 48,525 15,170
Capacitor 35,518 73,503
Memory 22,145 5,917
Electromechanical 16,834 3,399
Power Management 14,608 4,825
Resistor 13,962 14,135
Wire and Cables 9,734 2,287
Standard and Specialty Logic 6,434 1,525
Optoelectronics 6,345 2,603
Linear 5,720 2,096
Microcontroller and Processor 5,362 4,686
Magnetic 4,417 2,440
Tools and Supplies 3,259 1,463
RF and Microwave 1,872 1,562
Circuit Protection and Thermal Management 1,779 6,282
Communication 1,621 399
Clock and Timing 1,411 2,552
Programmable Logic 1,359 1,962
Fasteners and Hardware 1,154 1,277
Batteries and Power Supplies 1,083 363
Sensors and Transducers 947 611
Kits and Tools 822 238
EMI/RFI Suppression 759 464
Multimedia 710 177
Materials 664 222
Peripheral 573 37
Displays 485 253
Computer Products 264 176
Fluid Transfer 234 206
Embedded Systems 130 56
2011
University of Maryland Copyright © 2013 CALCE
8 Center for Advanced Life Cycle Engineering
Reactive
Strategic Proactive
Mitigations applied Mitigation
approach
strategy and
refresh plans
Refresh plans
Forecasts
System health measurement
Mitigations applied
Obsolescence Management Strategies
University of Maryland Copyright © 2013 CALCE
9 Center for Advanced Life Cycle Engineering
• Forecasting – predicting obsolescence risk or dates
(frequency of obsolescence)
• Mitigation – minimizing the impact of the problem
after it occurs using a set of reactive firefighting
approaches
• Planning - planning design refreshes based on
forecasted obsolescence dates and technology
insertion roadmaps in order to minimize life cycle
costs
Activities in Managing the DMSMS Obsolescence Problem
University of Maryland Copyright © 2013 CALCE
10 Center for Advanced Life Cycle Engineering
1) Accurately provide the current status a item,
i.e., have discontinuance or last-order
notices been issued?
2) Identify alternative or substitute parts
3) Forecast the date of obsolescence
“Part Chasing”
University of Maryland Copyright © 2013 CALCE
11 Center for Advanced Life Cycle Engineering
Obsolescence Forecasting
• Short-Term: Observe the supply chain for precursors to the
part’s discontinuance including:
• Reduction in the number of sources
• Reduction in inventory levels
• Part price increases
• Announcements made by the part manufacturer that indicate either
directly or indirectly that the part is being phased out
• + other precursors
• Long-Term: Forecasting based on part attributes and/or data
mining of the historical record performed prior to the
appearance of any precursors to discontinuance
Strategy: Use long-term forecasting while continuously
monitoring the supply chain for precursors. Abandon the
long-term forecast when precursors appear.
University of Maryland Copyright © 2013 CALCE
12 Center for Advanced Life Cycle Engineering
Long-Term Obsolescence Forecasting Approaches
Two general methods for forecasting obsolescence exist:
1) Ordinal scale approaches – weighted accumulation of
“scores” assigned to a set of predetermined part type,
technology and supply-chain attributes. • Accuracy increases as you get closer to the obsolescence event
• Historical basis for the forecast is subjective
• Confidence levels and uncertainties are subjective if available at all
2) Data mining approaches – analyzing known part
obsolescence dates to build vendor-specific (and vendor-
independent) forecasting algorithms. • Based on the historical record – Can produce very accurate part-type and
vendor-specific forecasts
• Forecasts can include valid confidence levels and/or uncertainties
• You have to have a large historical database to do this
University of Maryland Copyright © 2013 CALCE
13 Center for Advanced Life Cycle Engineering
0
5
10
15
20
25
1990 1995 2000 2005 2010
Introduction Date
Pro
cu
rem
en
t L
ife
(y
ea
rs)
Introduction Date (DI)
Pro
cu
rem
en
t L
ife (
LP)
in Y
ears
Obsolescence Forecasting
(Linear Regulator Example)
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 400
0.02
0.04
0.06
0.08
0.1
0.12
0.14
0.16
Pro
babili
ty D
ensity D
istr
ibution
Procurement Life
Censored
Uncensored
Procurement Life (LP) in Years
Pro
bab
ilit
y D
en
sit
y D
istr
ibu
tio
n,
f(t)
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 400
0.02
0.04
0.06
0.08
0.1
0.12
0.14
0.16
Pro
babili
ty D
ensity D
istr
ibution
Procurement Life
Censored
Uncensored
Procurement Life (LP) in Years
Pro
bab
ilit
y D
en
sit
y D
istr
ibu
tio
n,
f(t)
Worst Case
University of Maryland Copyright © 2013 CALCE
14 Center for Advanced Life Cycle Engineering
Mean
Pro
cu
rem
en
t L
ife (
Years
)
Introduction Date (DI)
1990 1992 1994 1996 1998 2000 2002 2004 2006 20080
5
10
15
20
25
Censored - Weibull (2-P)
Uncensored - Weibull (2-P)
Uncensored - Normal Dist.
Time-Dependent Mean Procurement Lifetimes (Linear Regulator Example)
No parts introduced in 1993
If I select a linear regulator introduced
in 2004, its mean procurement lifetime
is 6 years, which tells me that the part
(if it follows the historical record for
linear regulators) will be discontinued
in 2010, it can even tell you what the
uncertainty in that forecast is.
University of Maryland Copyright © 2013 CALCE
15 Center for Advanced Life Cycle Engineering
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
18
20
1993 1995 1997 1999 2001 2003 2005
Introduction Date
Pro
cu
rem
en
t L
ife
(y
ea
rs)
y = -0.1014x + 206.77
y = -1.0702x + 2149.1
0
5
10
15
20
25
1990 1995 2000 2005 2010
Introduction DateP
rocu
rem
en
t L
ife (
years
)
Linear Regulator
Upper Bound
Low er Bound
Linear (Low er Bound)
Linear (Upper Bound)
Example: Vendor-Specific Linear Regulators (National Semiconductor)
University of Maryland Copyright © 2013 CALCE
16 Center for Advanced Life Cycle Engineering
Mitigation = making the consequences of
obsolescence less severe, mitigation does
not stop obsolescence from taking place,
it only manages it when it happens.
Mitigation of Part Obsolescence
• Existing stock
• Negotiate with manufacturer
• Last time buy (Bridge buy)
• Lifetime buy (LOT - Life of type buy)
• Substitute part (inferior to original) - Uprate (usually thermal)
• Alternate part (equal or better than original)
• Buy from aftermarket sources
• Reclaim (salvage)
• Remanufacturing (retargeting)
• Emulate
• Redefine requirements
• Redesign
• Reverse engineer
Emulation
1%
Part substitution
67%
Lifetime buy
20%
Redesign
12%
(Boeing)
U.S. Navy Aging Aircraft IPT
University of Maryland Copyright © 2013 CALCE
17 Center for Advanced Life Cycle Engineering
Buying Shoes
University of Maryland Copyright © 2013 CALCE
18 Center for Advanced Life Cycle Engineering
Lifetime Buy Cost
Inventory
Cost
Penalty
Cost
Disposition
Cost
Procurement
Cost + + + = Lifetime
Buy Cost
Financial Costs
Inventory
LTB Purchase
Cost
Excess
Inventory
Holding Cost
Equal Run - Out
Inventory of
Other Parts
Actual Demand
Mgmt/Budget/
Contractual
Constraints
Inventory
Shortage
Quantity
Purchased
Forecasted
Demand
Available
Stock
Spares
Forecasting
New Order
Forecasting Degradation
in Storage
Pilfering
Book Keeping
Errors
Other Programs
Using Part
Loss of parts in inventory
Disposal Cost Resale Revenue
Liability Cost
Alternative
Source Avail. & Cost
System
Unavailability
Aftermarket
Avail. and Cost
Existing
Commitments
Forecasted Obs
Date
Supplier/Distributor
Committed Stock
Stock on hand
Stock on order
or in route
University of Maryland Copyright © 2013 CALCE
19 Center for Advanced Life Cycle Engineering
“If I knew I was going to live
this long, I’d have taken better
care of myself.”
Mickey Mantle
Famous U.S. Baseball Player
Strategic Management
University of Maryland Copyright © 2013 CALCE
20 Center for Advanced Life Cycle Engineering
Cost Avoidance
No refresh solution – all lifetime buys
Optimum refresh plan
“Cost Avoidance” = $33.1M
Each data point represents a unique combination of refresh dates and content
GTR8000 RF base station communications system Mean Refresh Date
Me
an
Life
cycle
Co
st
($)
University of Maryland Copyright © 2013 CALCE
21 Center for Advanced Life Cycle Engineering
Uncertainties
Every input to the analysis on the
previous slide was uncertain. So
what does a cost avoidance of
$33M really mean?
Lifecycle Cost Difference ($)
Pro
babili
ty
84% confidence that the difference will be greater
than $30.17M
University of Maryland Copyright © 2013 CALCE
22 Center for Advanced Life Cycle Engineering
Ultimately, obsolescence (DMSMS)
management comes down to two things:
1) Understanding the cost ramifications of the
sustainment decisions you make: • What parts you pick
• How you source the parts
• Mix of reactive, proactive and strategic management
2) Understanding the state of management of
your system
University of Maryland Copyright © 2013 CALCE
23 Center for Advanced Life Cycle Engineering
Total Ownership Cost
Total Ownership Cost (for electronic parts) =
Purchase price
+ Part selection
+ Part approval and adoption costs (including supplier qual)
+ Part qualification (general and/or product specific)
+ Part- and product- specific NRE costs
+ Assembly, test and rework (manufacturing)
+ Cost of failure in the field
+ Obsolescence and other supply chain problem resolutions
Let’s broaden our view a bit, what we would really like to know is
the total ownership cost of the decisions we make …
University of Maryland Copyright © 2013 CALCE
24 Center for Advanced Life Cycle Engineering
SMT (Surface Mount) Capacitors
University of Maryland Copyright © 2013 CALCE
25 Center for Advanced Life Cycle Engineering
• SMT (surface mount) capacitor
• $0.015/part (-2%/year change)
• 5%/year fielded product
retirement rate
• 10% after-tax discount rate
• Sustainment period = 20 years
Manufacturing
Cost (less parts)
58%
Maintenance
Cost
38%
Procurment and
Inventory Cost
4%
Field Use Cost
0%Volume = 12,910,500 parts
Effective cost = $0.225/part
Procurement and Inventory Cost 4%
Support
Manufacturing
Cost (less parts)
0%
Maintenance
Cost
100%
Procurment and
Inventory Cost
0%
Field Use Cost
0%
Volume = 12,910 parts
Effective cost = $71.4/part
Support
Problem
Resolution
0%
Manufacturing
Cost (less parts)
0%
Maintenance
Cost
100%
Procurment and
Inventory Cost
0%
Field Use Cost
0%
Volume = 1290 parts
Effective cost = $712/part
Support
University of Maryland Copyright © 2013 CALCE
26 Center for Advanced Life Cycle Engineering
How Well Are You Managing Your Electronic Parts Supply Chain?
G = multiple qualified suppliers, no problems on the horizon
V1 = single supplier and/or suspected problems - solution in place
V2 = single supplier and/or suspected problems - no solution
R = problem parts - no solution
B = unmanaged parts
BVRVG
VG100IndexMgmt Chain Supply
21
1
(SD-22, September 2010)
(G+V1+V2+R+B)
(G+V1)
Non-problems and problems with
solutions
Total potential problems
University of Maryland Copyright © 2013 CALCE
27 Center for Advanced Life Cycle Engineering
Interpreting the Score
90-100 = Electronic parts supply chain management Best
Practice program
80-89 = Solid management program
70-79 = Probably haven’t figured out how to research the
blues (unmanaged parts) yet
55-69 = Starting to actively engage the available resources
40-54 = You know you have a problem
<40 = Learn to say: “would you like fries with that?”
University of Maryland Copyright © 2013 CALCE
28 Center for Advanced Life Cycle Engineering
Supplementary Information Electronic Part Obsolescence: P. Sandborn, "Trapped on Technology’s Trailing Edge,” IEEE Spectrum, April 2008. Design Refresh Planning: P. Singh and P. Sandborn, "Obsolescence Driven Design Refresh Planning for Sustainment-Dominated Systems," The Engineering Economist, Vol. 51, No. 2, pp. 115-139, April-June 2006.
R. Nelson III and P. Sandborn, “Strategic Management of Component Obsolescence Using Constraint-Driven Design Refresh Planning,” International Journal of Product Life Cycle Management, 2012. Human Skills Obsolescence: P. Sandborn, V. J. Prabhakar, and A. Kusimo, "Modeling the Obsolescence of Critical Human Skills Necessary for Supporting Legacy Systems," ASME International Design Engineering Conferences & Computers and Information in Engineering Conference, August 2012. Electronic Part Total Ownership Cost Modeling and Sourcing: V. Prabhakar and P. Sandborn, “A Part Total Ownership Cost Model for Long-Life Cycle Electronic Systems,” International J. of Computer Integrated Manufacturing, 2011
V. Prabhakar and P. Sandborn, “Part Sourcing Decisions of Long Life Cycle Products,” Proceedings of the ASME International Design Engineering Conferences & Computers and Information in Engineering Conference, Washington DC, 2011. General Electronic Systems Cost Modeling: P. Sandborn, Cost Analysis of Electronic Systems, World Scientific, Singapore, 2012.
All are available at: http://www.enme.umd.edu/ESCML
University of Maryland Copyright © 2013 CALCE
29 Center for Advanced Life Cycle Engineering
Human Skills Obsolescence
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65
Fre
qu
en
cy
Age (years)
Age distribution of people capable of supporting a legacy control
system for a major chemical company
$0
$50,000,000
$100,000,000
$150,000,000
$200,000,000
$250,000,000
2010 2012 2014 2016 2018 2020 2022 2024 2026 2028 2030
An
nu
al C
ost
(2
01
2 D
olla
rs)
Year
Human skills obsolescence included (pool size based)
No human skills obsolescence
Human skills obsolescence included (pool-experience based), 4% annual hiring rate
Year
An
nu
al C
ost
$50MA
nn
ual C
ost
of S
up
po
rtin
g th
e S
yste
m
Year
University of Maryland Copyright © 2013 CALCE
30 Center for Advanced Life Cycle Engineering
AVX Capacitors
• These are counterfeit parts!
• AVX - 1210 size capacitors with Class II (X5R) dielectric caused equipment failures after a few months in the field
• Capacitance changed from 22 µF to 18.1 µF over time
• Ceramic material was missing critical rare earth elements
Roya Ansari
Sales Associate
(408) 813 3048
SiliconExpert Panelist
SiliconExpert
Risk Analysis &
Obsolescence
Forecast Algorithm
Lifecycle
Multi-
Sourcing
Market
Availability
Environmental
Ris
k A
naly
sis
Facto
rs
Managing Electronic Component Obsolescence
How many parts were
obsoleted in 2013 alone?
Managing Electronic Component Obsolescence
According to the SiliconExpert Database
over
350,000 parts
Roya Ansari
Director of Sales Email: [email protected]
Tel: (408) 813 3048
www.siliconexpert.com
Q&A Session
For webinar attendees:
Demos of SiliconExpert’s
Part Search &
BOM Manager tools
Obsolescence Webinar
Please fill out the survey at the end of the webinar.
Your feedback is greatly appreciated.