51
& Reactive vs. Proactive Approaches to Obsolescence Management Managing Electronic Component Obsolescence Jan 2014

Managing Electronic Component Obsolescence ·  · 2014-01-24• Dr. Peter Sandborn “Managing Electronic Component Obsolescence ... medical electronics, telecom infrastructure,

  • Upload
    lydan

  • View
    216

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

&

Reactive vs. Proactive Approaches to Obsolescence Management

Managing Electronic Component Obsolescence

Jan 2014

Asking Questions

• Ask questions during the webinar by using the Questions window

• Questions will be addressed at the end of the presentations

• Any question we do not get to will be answered individually by email

• The presentation will be sent to you after the webinar

• Please respond to the survey questions at the end of the webinar

Roya Ansari

Sales Associate

(408) 813 3048

[email protected]

SiliconExpert Panelist

Agenda

Agenda

• SiliconExpert Introduction 5 minutes

• Dr. Peter Sandborn “Managing Electronic Component Obsolescence” 25 minutes

• Roya Ansari “SiliconExpert & Lifecycle Solutions” 25 minutes

• Questions & Answers 5 minutes

• Leading OEMs, Distributors, Suppliers &

EMSs use SiliconExpert Daily

• Our Electronic Component Database of

over 250 million components powers our:

o Comprehensive software tools

o Integrated solutions

o Professional services

About Us

Reactive vs. Proactive Approaches to Obsolescence Management

250 Million+ Orderable Part Numbers

Up to 42 Parametric values/product line

Risk Analysis & Obsolescence

Forecasting Algorithms developed

with CALCE

Regulation Data tracked: EU & China

RoHS, REACH, Conflict Minerals,

compliance & Material Declarations

Parametrically-derived cross-references

for millions of parts

Our Database

Reactive vs. Proactive Approaches to Obsolescence Management CALCE & Obsolescence

• Today’s climate requires companies to be

proactive.

• Reacting to obsolescence, without plan = Costly

• CALCE & SiliconExpert have developed

algorithms to forecast obsolescence risk

• Analytics seamlessly integrated into

SiliconExpert’s solutions

Reactive vs. Proactive Approaches to Obsolescence Management Today’s Expert Panelist

Dr. Peter Sandborn Center for Advanced Life Cycle Engineering,

University of Maryland

University of Maryland Copyright © 2013 CALCE

1 Center for Advanced Life Cycle Engineering

Managing Electronic Component Obsolescence

Peter Sandborn

CALCE, Department of Mechanical Engineering

University of Maryland

[email protected]

(301) 405-3167

http://www.enme.umd.edu/ESCML/obsolescence.htm

Electronic Systems Cost

Modeling Laboratory

May 28, 2013

University of Maryland Copyright © 2013 CALCE

2 Center for Advanced Life Cycle Engineering

Obsolescence Definition

Obsolescence is defined as the loss or impending loss

of original manufacturers of items or suppliers of

items or raw materials.

… in particular, most folks are concerned with

electronic part obsolescence.

The military community refers to this problem as: Diminishing

Manufacturing Sources and Material Shortages (DMSMS)

University of Maryland Copyright © 2013 CALCE

3 Center for Advanced Life Cycle Engineering

• Sustainment-dominated products – long-term sustainment (support) costs

significant exceed procurement costs

• Example products: avionics, military, medical electronics, telecom

infrastructure, large networks

• These types of products are manufactured and have to be supported for

long periods of time (20+ years)

Understanding the Problem

• These types of products are often subject to stringent qualification,

certification and configuration control requirements making even the most

minor design change prohibitively expensive

• DMSMS type obsolescence occurs because these products have no

control over the supply chain for key components due to their low

production volumes

• DMSMS is involuntary obsolescence – products are forced to change to

remain manufacturable and supportable even though the manufacturer and

customer do not want to change

University of Maryland Copyright © 2013 CALCE

4 Center for Advanced Life Cycle Engineering

Mean

Pro

cu

rem

en

t L

ife (

Years

)

1990 1992 1994 1996 1998 2000 2002 2004 2006 20080

5

10

15

20

25

Censored - Weibull (2-P)

Uncensored - Weibull (2-P)

Uncensored - Normal Dist.

Procurement Life Shrinkage (Linear Regulators)

Part Introduction Date

Procurement life = length of time the part is available from

its original manufacturer

University of Maryland Copyright © 2013 CALCE

5 Center for Advanced Life Cycle Engineering

Over 70% of the

electronic parts are

obsolete before the first

system is installed!

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

System Installation date

% o

f E

lec

tro

nic

Pa

rts

Un

av

ail

ab

le

Year

1996

1997

1998

1999

2000

2001

2002

2003

2004

2005

2006

2007

A Common Situation

Percent of COTS products out of

production (un-procurable) vs.

first 10-year life cycle of a surface

ship sonar system.

(NSWC Crane)

System must be sustained until ??

University of Maryland Copyright © 2013 CALCE

6 Center for Advanced Life Cycle Engineering

System Life Cycles are Increasing

R. Stogdill, “Dealing with Obsolete Parts,” IEEE Design& Test of Computers, pp. 17-25, April-June 1999

• Boeing 737 -

introduced in 1968 – 7 system-wide

redesigns to date

• Boeing 747 -

introduced in 1969 – 4 system-wide

redesigns to date

– The last major

redesign involved

addition of digital

avionics controls,

winglets, and a new

flight deck

University of Maryland Copyright © 2013 CALCE

7 Center for Advanced Life Cycle Engineering

The Magnitude of the Obsolescence

Problem

Relays and I/O Modules 8229

Resistor 179132

RF and Microwave 1110

Sensors and Transducers 2650

Standard and Specialty Logic 7058

Switches 1452

Thermal Management 374

Tools and Supplies 3898

Transformers 111

Wires and Cables 16640

Total 554605

Category Count of Parts

Amplifiers and Comparators 2700

Audio Components 111

Batteries and Power Supplies 1343

Capacitor 64348

Circuit Protection 1890

Clock and Timing 1627

Communication 982

Computer Products 106

Connectors 122043

Custom Parts 277

Data Acquisition 1254

Discrete 31080

Displays 96

Embedded Systems 78

EMI/RFI Suppression 206

Encoders 680

Fasteners and Hardware 436

Filter 652

Fluid Transfer 140

Inductor 5707

Interface 1814

Materials, Chemicals and Adhesives 311

Memory 43547

Microcontroller and Processor 11253

Motors 9

Optoelectronics 3697

Oscillators and Crystals 4290

Peripheral and Multimedia 14533

Power Management 15031

Programmable Logic 3710

2010: 693,379 2011: 554,605 2012: 322,742 2013: 275,400 (through May 1)

Category 2012 2013 (through May 1st)

Grand Total 322,742 275,400

Connector 58,411 110,372

Frequency Controls 55,596 14,096

Discrete 48,525 15,170

Capacitor 35,518 73,503

Memory 22,145 5,917

Electromechanical 16,834 3,399

Power Management 14,608 4,825

Resistor 13,962 14,135

Wire and Cables 9,734 2,287

Standard and Specialty Logic 6,434 1,525

Optoelectronics 6,345 2,603

Linear 5,720 2,096

Microcontroller and Processor 5,362 4,686

Magnetic 4,417 2,440

Tools and Supplies 3,259 1,463

RF and Microwave 1,872 1,562

Circuit Protection and Thermal Management 1,779 6,282

Communication 1,621 399

Clock and Timing 1,411 2,552

Programmable Logic 1,359 1,962

Fasteners and Hardware 1,154 1,277

Batteries and Power Supplies 1,083 363

Sensors and Transducers 947 611

Kits and Tools 822 238

EMI/RFI Suppression 759 464

Multimedia 710 177

Materials 664 222

Peripheral 573 37

Displays 485 253

Computer Products 264 176

Fluid Transfer 234 206

Embedded Systems 130 56

2011

University of Maryland Copyright © 2013 CALCE

8 Center for Advanced Life Cycle Engineering

Reactive

Strategic Proactive

Mitigations applied Mitigation

approach

strategy and

refresh plans

Refresh plans

Forecasts

System health measurement

Mitigations applied

Obsolescence Management Strategies

University of Maryland Copyright © 2013 CALCE

9 Center for Advanced Life Cycle Engineering

• Forecasting – predicting obsolescence risk or dates

(frequency of obsolescence)

• Mitigation – minimizing the impact of the problem

after it occurs using a set of reactive firefighting

approaches

• Planning - planning design refreshes based on

forecasted obsolescence dates and technology

insertion roadmaps in order to minimize life cycle

costs

Activities in Managing the DMSMS Obsolescence Problem

University of Maryland Copyright © 2013 CALCE

10 Center for Advanced Life Cycle Engineering

1) Accurately provide the current status a item,

i.e., have discontinuance or last-order

notices been issued?

2) Identify alternative or substitute parts

3) Forecast the date of obsolescence

“Part Chasing”

University of Maryland Copyright © 2013 CALCE

11 Center for Advanced Life Cycle Engineering

Obsolescence Forecasting

• Short-Term: Observe the supply chain for precursors to the

part’s discontinuance including:

• Reduction in the number of sources

• Reduction in inventory levels

• Part price increases

• Announcements made by the part manufacturer that indicate either

directly or indirectly that the part is being phased out

• + other precursors

• Long-Term: Forecasting based on part attributes and/or data

mining of the historical record performed prior to the

appearance of any precursors to discontinuance

Strategy: Use long-term forecasting while continuously

monitoring the supply chain for precursors. Abandon the

long-term forecast when precursors appear.

University of Maryland Copyright © 2013 CALCE

12 Center for Advanced Life Cycle Engineering

Long-Term Obsolescence Forecasting Approaches

Two general methods for forecasting obsolescence exist:

1) Ordinal scale approaches – weighted accumulation of

“scores” assigned to a set of predetermined part type,

technology and supply-chain attributes. • Accuracy increases as you get closer to the obsolescence event

• Historical basis for the forecast is subjective

• Confidence levels and uncertainties are subjective if available at all

2) Data mining approaches – analyzing known part

obsolescence dates to build vendor-specific (and vendor-

independent) forecasting algorithms. • Based on the historical record – Can produce very accurate part-type and

vendor-specific forecasts

• Forecasts can include valid confidence levels and/or uncertainties

• You have to have a large historical database to do this

University of Maryland Copyright © 2013 CALCE

13 Center for Advanced Life Cycle Engineering

0

5

10

15

20

25

1990 1995 2000 2005 2010

Introduction Date

Pro

cu

rem

en

t L

ife

(y

ea

rs)

Introduction Date (DI)

Pro

cu

rem

en

t L

ife (

LP)

in Y

ears

Obsolescence Forecasting

(Linear Regulator Example)

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 400

0.02

0.04

0.06

0.08

0.1

0.12

0.14

0.16

Pro

babili

ty D

ensity D

istr

ibution

Procurement Life

Censored

Uncensored

Procurement Life (LP) in Years

Pro

bab

ilit

y D

en

sit

y D

istr

ibu

tio

n,

f(t)

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 400

0.02

0.04

0.06

0.08

0.1

0.12

0.14

0.16

Pro

babili

ty D

ensity D

istr

ibution

Procurement Life

Censored

Uncensored

Procurement Life (LP) in Years

Pro

bab

ilit

y D

en

sit

y D

istr

ibu

tio

n,

f(t)

Worst Case

University of Maryland Copyright © 2013 CALCE

14 Center for Advanced Life Cycle Engineering

Mean

Pro

cu

rem

en

t L

ife (

Years

)

Introduction Date (DI)

1990 1992 1994 1996 1998 2000 2002 2004 2006 20080

5

10

15

20

25

Censored - Weibull (2-P)

Uncensored - Weibull (2-P)

Uncensored - Normal Dist.

Time-Dependent Mean Procurement Lifetimes (Linear Regulator Example)

No parts introduced in 1993

If I select a linear regulator introduced

in 2004, its mean procurement lifetime

is 6 years, which tells me that the part

(if it follows the historical record for

linear regulators) will be discontinued

in 2010, it can even tell you what the

uncertainty in that forecast is.

University of Maryland Copyright © 2013 CALCE

15 Center for Advanced Life Cycle Engineering

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

14

16

18

20

1993 1995 1997 1999 2001 2003 2005

Introduction Date

Pro

cu

rem

en

t L

ife

(y

ea

rs)

y = -0.1014x + 206.77

y = -1.0702x + 2149.1

0

5

10

15

20

25

1990 1995 2000 2005 2010

Introduction DateP

rocu

rem

en

t L

ife (

years

)

Linear Regulator

Upper Bound

Low er Bound

Linear (Low er Bound)

Linear (Upper Bound)

Example: Vendor-Specific Linear Regulators (National Semiconductor)

University of Maryland Copyright © 2013 CALCE

16 Center for Advanced Life Cycle Engineering

Mitigation = making the consequences of

obsolescence less severe, mitigation does

not stop obsolescence from taking place,

it only manages it when it happens.

Mitigation of Part Obsolescence

• Existing stock

• Negotiate with manufacturer

• Last time buy (Bridge buy)

• Lifetime buy (LOT - Life of type buy)

• Substitute part (inferior to original) - Uprate (usually thermal)

• Alternate part (equal or better than original)

• Buy from aftermarket sources

• Reclaim (salvage)

• Remanufacturing (retargeting)

• Emulate

• Redefine requirements

• Redesign

• Reverse engineer

Emulation

1%

Part substitution

67%

Lifetime buy

20%

Redesign

12%

(Boeing)

U.S. Navy Aging Aircraft IPT

University of Maryland Copyright © 2013 CALCE

17 Center for Advanced Life Cycle Engineering

Buying Shoes

University of Maryland Copyright © 2013 CALCE

18 Center for Advanced Life Cycle Engineering

Lifetime Buy Cost

Inventory

Cost

Penalty

Cost

Disposition

Cost

Procurement

Cost + + + = Lifetime

Buy Cost

Financial Costs

Inventory

LTB Purchase

Cost

Excess

Inventory

Holding Cost

Equal Run - Out

Inventory of

Other Parts

Actual Demand

Mgmt/Budget/

Contractual

Constraints

Inventory

Shortage

Quantity

Purchased

Forecasted

Demand

Available

Stock

Spares

Forecasting

New Order

Forecasting Degradation

in Storage

Pilfering

Book Keeping

Errors

Other Programs

Using Part

Loss of parts in inventory

Disposal Cost Resale Revenue

Liability Cost

Alternative

Source Avail. & Cost

System

Unavailability

Aftermarket

Avail. and Cost

Existing

Commitments

Forecasted Obs

Date

Supplier/Distributor

Committed Stock

Stock on hand

Stock on order

or in route

University of Maryland Copyright © 2013 CALCE

19 Center for Advanced Life Cycle Engineering

“If I knew I was going to live

this long, I’d have taken better

care of myself.”

Mickey Mantle

Famous U.S. Baseball Player

Strategic Management

University of Maryland Copyright © 2013 CALCE

20 Center for Advanced Life Cycle Engineering

Cost Avoidance

No refresh solution – all lifetime buys

Optimum refresh plan

“Cost Avoidance” = $33.1M

Each data point represents a unique combination of refresh dates and content

GTR8000 RF base station communications system Mean Refresh Date

Me

an

Life

cycle

Co

st

($)

University of Maryland Copyright © 2013 CALCE

21 Center for Advanced Life Cycle Engineering

Uncertainties

Every input to the analysis on the

previous slide was uncertain. So

what does a cost avoidance of

$33M really mean?

Lifecycle Cost Difference ($)

Pro

babili

ty

84% confidence that the difference will be greater

than $30.17M

University of Maryland Copyright © 2013 CALCE

22 Center for Advanced Life Cycle Engineering

Ultimately, obsolescence (DMSMS)

management comes down to two things:

1) Understanding the cost ramifications of the

sustainment decisions you make: • What parts you pick

• How you source the parts

• Mix of reactive, proactive and strategic management

2) Understanding the state of management of

your system

University of Maryland Copyright © 2013 CALCE

23 Center for Advanced Life Cycle Engineering

Total Ownership Cost

Total Ownership Cost (for electronic parts) =

Purchase price

+ Part selection

+ Part approval and adoption costs (including supplier qual)

+ Part qualification (general and/or product specific)

+ Part- and product- specific NRE costs

+ Assembly, test and rework (manufacturing)

+ Cost of failure in the field

+ Obsolescence and other supply chain problem resolutions

Let’s broaden our view a bit, what we would really like to know is

the total ownership cost of the decisions we make …

University of Maryland Copyright © 2013 CALCE

24 Center for Advanced Life Cycle Engineering

SMT (Surface Mount) Capacitors

University of Maryland Copyright © 2013 CALCE

25 Center for Advanced Life Cycle Engineering

• SMT (surface mount) capacitor

• $0.015/part (-2%/year change)

• 5%/year fielded product

retirement rate

• 10% after-tax discount rate

• Sustainment period = 20 years

Manufacturing

Cost (less parts)

58%

Maintenance

Cost

38%

Procurment and

Inventory Cost

4%

Field Use Cost

0%Volume = 12,910,500 parts

Effective cost = $0.225/part

Procurement and Inventory Cost 4%

Support

Manufacturing

Cost (less parts)

0%

Maintenance

Cost

100%

Procurment and

Inventory Cost

0%

Field Use Cost

0%

Volume = 12,910 parts

Effective cost = $71.4/part

Support

Problem

Resolution

0%

Manufacturing

Cost (less parts)

0%

Maintenance

Cost

100%

Procurment and

Inventory Cost

0%

Field Use Cost

0%

Volume = 1290 parts

Effective cost = $712/part

Support

University of Maryland Copyright © 2013 CALCE

26 Center for Advanced Life Cycle Engineering

How Well Are You Managing Your Electronic Parts Supply Chain?

G = multiple qualified suppliers, no problems on the horizon

V1 = single supplier and/or suspected problems - solution in place

V2 = single supplier and/or suspected problems - no solution

R = problem parts - no solution

B = unmanaged parts

BVRVG

VG100IndexMgmt Chain Supply

21

1

(SD-22, September 2010)

(G+V1+V2+R+B)

(G+V1)

Non-problems and problems with

solutions

Total potential problems

University of Maryland Copyright © 2013 CALCE

27 Center for Advanced Life Cycle Engineering

Interpreting the Score

90-100 = Electronic parts supply chain management Best

Practice program

80-89 = Solid management program

70-79 = Probably haven’t figured out how to research the

blues (unmanaged parts) yet

55-69 = Starting to actively engage the available resources

40-54 = You know you have a problem

<40 = Learn to say: “would you like fries with that?”

University of Maryland Copyright © 2013 CALCE

28 Center for Advanced Life Cycle Engineering

Supplementary Information Electronic Part Obsolescence: P. Sandborn, "Trapped on Technology’s Trailing Edge,” IEEE Spectrum, April 2008. Design Refresh Planning: P. Singh and P. Sandborn, "Obsolescence Driven Design Refresh Planning for Sustainment-Dominated Systems," The Engineering Economist, Vol. 51, No. 2, pp. 115-139, April-June 2006.

R. Nelson III and P. Sandborn, “Strategic Management of Component Obsolescence Using Constraint-Driven Design Refresh Planning,” International Journal of Product Life Cycle Management, 2012. Human Skills Obsolescence: P. Sandborn, V. J. Prabhakar, and A. Kusimo, "Modeling the Obsolescence of Critical Human Skills Necessary for Supporting Legacy Systems," ASME International Design Engineering Conferences & Computers and Information in Engineering Conference, August 2012. Electronic Part Total Ownership Cost Modeling and Sourcing: V. Prabhakar and P. Sandborn, “A Part Total Ownership Cost Model for Long-Life Cycle Electronic Systems,” International J. of Computer Integrated Manufacturing, 2011

V. Prabhakar and P. Sandborn, “Part Sourcing Decisions of Long Life Cycle Products,” Proceedings of the ASME International Design Engineering Conferences & Computers and Information in Engineering Conference, Washington DC, 2011. General Electronic Systems Cost Modeling: P. Sandborn, Cost Analysis of Electronic Systems, World Scientific, Singapore, 2012.

All are available at: http://www.enme.umd.edu/ESCML

University of Maryland Copyright © 2013 CALCE

29 Center for Advanced Life Cycle Engineering

Human Skills Obsolescence

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

45

20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65

Fre

qu

en

cy

Age (years)

Age distribution of people capable of supporting a legacy control

system for a major chemical company

$0

$50,000,000

$100,000,000

$150,000,000

$200,000,000

$250,000,000

2010 2012 2014 2016 2018 2020 2022 2024 2026 2028 2030

An

nu

al C

ost

(2

01

2 D

olla

rs)

Year

Human skills obsolescence included (pool size based)

No human skills obsolescence

Human skills obsolescence included (pool-experience based), 4% annual hiring rate

Year

An

nu

al C

ost

$50MA

nn

ual C

ost

of S

up

po

rtin

g th

e S

yste

m

Year

University of Maryland Copyright © 2013 CALCE

30 Center for Advanced Life Cycle Engineering

AVX Capacitors

• These are counterfeit parts!

• AVX - 1210 size capacitors with Class II (X5R) dielectric caused equipment failures after a few months in the field

• Capacitance changed from 22 µF to 18.1 µF over time

• Ceramic material was missing critical rare earth elements

Roya Ansari

Sales Associate

(408) 813 3048

[email protected]

SiliconExpert Panelist

SiliconExpert

Risk Analysis &

Obsolescence

Forecast Algorithm

Lifecycle

Multi-

Sourcing

Market

Availability

Environmental

Ris

k A

naly

sis

Facto

rs

Managing Electronic Component Obsolescence

How many parts were

obsoleted in 2013 alone?

Managing Electronic Component Obsolescence

According to the SiliconExpert Database

over

350,000 parts

Demo Portion

Mitigate Risk & Manage Obsolescence

Roya Ansari

Director of Sales Email: [email protected]

Tel: (408) 813 3048

www.siliconexpert.com

Q&A Session

For webinar attendees:

Demos of SiliconExpert’s

Part Search &

BOM Manager tools

Obsolescence Webinar

Please fill out the survey at the end of the webinar.

Your feedback is greatly appreciated.