Upload
citizen-stewart
View
25
Download
2
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
2015 academic results
Citation preview
Addendum 2015-2016 RAP Slides:
Leading and Lagging Indicators
•Perception • Sense of Belonging •Motivation •Relationships
Structure Culture and Climate
Leadership Teacher Quality
Schedule Grade configuration
•Behavior •Attendance •Grades •Extra-curricular • Formative •Diagnostic
Structure • Interim • Summative
Structure
2
#10: Student Persistence Rating
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
African African American American Indian Asian Hispanic White EL SPED
District Average
3
Persistence Profiles
Persistence Category Total n
Average Persist. Score
Average Reading
MCA Scale Score
Average Math MCA Scale Score
Average Reading
Growth Z-Score
Average Math
Growth Z-Score
Average Percent Attend.
Average GPA
Average Number of Behavior
Infractions
Average Number of
Suspensions
Near the top 0 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
More than most 1,377 7.3 50.2 50.1 0.01 0.01 95% 3.00 0.5 0.06
In the middle 11,353 6.3 50.9 50.9 -0.01 -0.02 95% 2.58 0.6 0.05
Less than most 3,147 4.7 42.8 43.1 -0.15 -0.21 93% 2.42 1.3 0.11
Near the bottom 349 3.5 40.2 41.2 -0.30 -0.52 93% 2.06 1.5 0.11
DISTRICT 16,226 6.0 49.3 49.3 -0.04 -0.06 95% 2.58 0.7 0.07
4
STUDENT TRACKER – FALL ENROLLMENT Pct MPS Students Enrolled in College the Fall Immediately Following
Graduation from HS
5
STUDENT TRACKER – FIRST YEAR ENROLLMENT Pct Students Enrolled in College at Any Time During the First Year After High
School
6
STUDENT TRACKER – TWO YEAR ENROLLMENT Pct Students Enrolled in College at Any Time During the First Two Years After
HS Graduation
7
STUDENT TRACKER – RETENTION Pct Students Enrolled in College the First Year After HS Grad who Returned
the Second Year (Freshman to Sophomore Persistence)
8
STUDENT TRACKER – INSTITUTION TYPE Pct Students Enrolled in College Within First Year of Graduation from HS
Class of 2014 by Institutional Level (2-year vs. 4-year)
9
STUDENT TRACKER – INSTITUTION TYPE by SPECIAL POPULATIONS Pct Students Enrolled in College within the First Year of Graduation from HS 2014 by
Institutional Level (2-year vs. 4-year)
10
STUDENT TRACKER – TOP PLACEMENT SITES Most common Institution of Initial Enrollment
MPS RANK EDISON HENRY NORTH ROOSEVELT SOUTH SOUTHWEST WASHBURN ALL
1 MCTC MCTC MCTC MCTC MCTC MCTC MCTC MCTC (1996)
2 U of M - Twin Cities
U of M – Twin Cities
U of M - Twin Cities
U of M - Twin Cities
U of M - Twin Cities
U of M - Twin Cities
U of M – Twin Cities
U of M - Twin Cities (1156)
3 MN State – Mankato Augsburg Col Augsburg Col St. Paul
College Augsburg Col U of WI – Madison
Normandale CC
Normandale CC (302)
4 St. Catherine U
MN State – Mankato
St. Cloud State
MN State – Mankato
U of WI - Madison
Normandale CC
MN State – Mankato
Augsburg Col (300)
5 St. Paul Col North Hennepin CC
MN State - Mankato
Normandale CC
St. Catherine U Augsburg Col St. Cloud
State
MN State – Mankato (271)
6 Augsburg Col St. Catherine U
St. Catherine U Augsburg Col Normandale
CC U of MN - Duluth Hamiline U St. Catherine
U (217)
7 Normandale CC
Dunwoody Col
U of St. Thomas
St. Catherine U
U of MN - Duluth St. Olaf Col Augsburg Col St. Paul Col
(166)
8 North Hennepin CC St. Olaf Col St. Paul Col Dunwoody
College Hamline U U of WI - Milwaukee St. Paul Col
U of WI – Madison (184)
9 U of MN – Duluth
U of St. Thomas
North Hennepin CC
St. Cloud State
MN State - Mankato
U of St. Thomas
St. Catherine U
U of St. Thomas (157)
10 St. Cloud State U
St. Cloud State U
Dunwoody College
Gustavus Adolphus Col St. Paul Col Hamline U U of St.
Thomas U of MN – Duluth (150) 11
Percent Attendance by Ethnicity
12
Percent Attendance by English Learner Status
13
Percent Attendance by Special Education Status
14
Percent Attendance by Free/Reduced-Price Lunch Status
15
GPA and Proficiency
16
Avg. GPA and Suspensions
AMER INDIAN AFRICAN AMER(ENG HL)
AFRICAN AMER(NON ENG HL) ASIAN HISPANIC WHITE TOT GR9-12
NO SUSP 1.79 1.98 2.54 3.01 2.24 3.10 2.521 OR MORE SUSP 1.16 1.55 1.89 2.33 1.56 1.88 1.59
0.00
0.50
1.00
1.50
2.00
2.50
3.00
3.50
AVG
GPA
17
Reading Proficiency and Suspensions
AMER INDIANAFRICAN
AMER (ENGHL)
AFRICANAMER (NON
ENG HL)ASIAN HISPANIC WHITE TOTAL
NO SUSP 23.1% 25.8% 22.9% 40.3% 26.2% 77.6% 44.1%1 OR MORE SUSP 12.2% 7.3% 10.4% 54.5% 5.5% 30.4% 10.1%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
Perc
ent P
rofic
ient
MCA Reading 2015 - Proficiency by Suspensions vs. No Suspensions
18
Math Proficiency and Suspensions
AMER INDIAN AFRICAN AMER(ENG HL)
AFRICAN AMER(NON ENG HL) ASIAN HISPANIC WHITE TOTAL
NO SUSP 21.5% 25.6% 27.0% 50.7% 33.2% 78.4% 46.7%1 OR MORE SUSP 14.7% 6.7% 2.5% 44.4% 7.4% 35.7% 9.3%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
Perc
ent P
rofic
ient
MCA Math 2015 - Proficiency by Suspensions vs. No Suspensions
19
Reading Growth and Suspensions MCA READ GROWTH BY NO SUSPENSIONS VS. ONE OR MORE
GROWTH LEVEL AMER INDIAN
AFRICAN AMER (ENG HL)
AFRICAN AMER (NON ENG HL) ASIAN HISPANIC WHITE Total
SUSP COUNT CAT N PCT N PCT N PCT N PCT N PCT N PCT N PCT NO SUSP LOW 158 31.8% 1086 39.0% 452 36.3% 259 29.3% 766 32.1% 957 22.9% 3678 30.7%
MED 199 40.0% 1042 37.4% 451 36.3% 340 38.5% 966 40.5% 1583 37.8% 4581 38.2%
HIGH 140 28.2% 658 23.6% 341 27.4% 285 32.2% 656 27.5% 1647 39.3% 3727 31.1% 1 OR MORE SUSP
LOW 26 43.3% 192 46.5% 35 41.2% 2 22.2% 28 45.2% 20 41.7% 303 44.8%
MED 19 31.7% 147 35.6% 31 36.5% 6 66.7% 24 38.7% 18 37.5% 245 36.2%
HIGH 15 25.0% 74 17.9% 19 22.4% 1 11.1% 10 16.1% 10 20.8% 129 19.1%
20
Math Growth and Suspensions MCA MATH GROWTH BY NO SUSPENSIONS VS. ONE OR MORE
GROWTH LEVEL AMER INDIAN
AFRICAN AMER (ENG HL)
AFRICAN AMER (NON ENG HL) ASIAN HISPANIC WHITE Total
SUSP COUNT CAT N PCT N PCT N PCT N PCT N PCT N PCT N PCT NO SUSP LOW 185 40.7% 951 38.1% 380 32.6% 200 26.8% 709 32.2% 838 21.6% 3263 29.8%
MED 169 37.1% 1017 40.7% 450 38.6% 315 42.2% 879 39.9% 1606 41.3% 4436 40.5%
HIGH 101 22.2% 529 21.2% 337 28.9% 232 31.1% 617 28.0% 1444 37.1% 3260 29.7% 1 OR MORE SUSP
LOW 24 46.2% 180 55.7% 46 58.2% 4 57.1% 22 43.1% 17 41.5% 293 53.0%
MED 20 38.5% 101 31.3% 23 29.1% 2 28.6% 18 35.3% 14 34.1% 178 32.2%
HIGH 8 15.4% 42 13.0% 10 12.7% 1 14.3% 11 21.6% 10 24.4% 82 14.8%
21
Long Version
22
Percent of Students who Met or Exceeded the Standards on 2013-2015 MCA-III Reading by Tested Grade (MPS vs. State)
Grade 3 Grade 4 Grade 5 Grade 6 Grade 7 Grade 8 Grade 10 TotalMPS 2013 (MCA-III) 42% 39% 44% 41% 40% 38% 49% 42%MPS 2014 (MCA-III) 41% 39% 48% 41% 41% 44% 43% 42%MPS 2015 (MCA-III) 41% 41% 49% 46% 37% 42% 30% 42%
State 2013 (MCA-III) 57% 54% 64% 59% 54% 54% 62% 58%State 2014 (MCA-III) 58% 55% 68% 61% 56% 56% 60% 59%State 2015 (MCA-III) 59% 58% 67% 64% 56% 56% 57% 59%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
Perc
ent P
rofic
ient
23
#1: Reading proficiency by race/ethnicity
AMER INDIANAFRICAN
AMER (ENGHL)
AFRICANAMER (NON
ENG HL)ASIAN HISPANIC WHITE DIST TOTAL
2012 MCA-II 42% 40% 44% 53% 40% 87% 57%2013 MCA-III 22% 21% 22% 40% 22% 75% 42%2014 MCA-III 21% 21% 23% 41% 23% 78% 42%2015 MCA-III 20% 21% 22% 40% 25% 77% 42%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
Perc
ent P
rofic
ient
24
#1: Reading proficiency by student group
ELL Students Non-ELL Students Special Education Non Special Ed. F/R Price Lunch Not Eligible for F/RPrice Lunch
MPS 2013 12% 51% 14% 46% 22% 78%MPS 2014 10% 52% 15% 46% 23% 72%MPS 2015 10% 52% 14% 47% 23% 77%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
Perc
ent P
rofic
ient
25
Percent of Students Met or Exceeded the Standards on 2013-2015 MCA-II & MCA-III Math by Tested Grade (MPS vs. State)
Grade 3 Grade 4 Grade 5 Grade 6 Grade 7 Grade 8 Grade 11 TotalMPS 2013 (MCA-II & MCA-III) 52% 50% 40% 38% 40% 39% 35% 43%MPS 2014 (MCA-III) 52% 49% 46% 38% 39% 44% 25% 44%MPS 2015 (MCA-III) 52% 52% 45% 41% 36% 44% 28% 44%
State 2013 (MCA-II & MCA-III) 72% 71% 60% 57% 56% 59% 52% 61%State 2014 (MCA-III) 72% 70% 62% 57% 57% 60% 51% 61%State 2015 (MCA-III) 71% 70% 60% 58% 55% 58% 49% 60%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
Perc
ent P
rofic
ient
26
#2: Math proficiency by race/ethnicity
*Note: In 2013, grades 3-8 Math figures are based on the MCA-III Math Standards, Grade 11 figures are based on the MCA-II. 2014 and beyond, all grades were assessed on the MCA-III standards
AMER INDIANAFRICAN
AMER (ENGHL)
AFRICANAMER (NON
ENG HL)ASIAN HISPANIC WHITE DIST TOTAL
2012 MCA-II/III 19% 18% 20% 43% 27% 70% 40%2013 MCA-II/III 23% 22% 25% 46% 29% 73% 43%2014 MCA-III 23% 21% 24% 48% 31% 77% 44%2015 MCA-III 19% 21% 25% 51% 32% 78% 44%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
Perc
ent P
rofic
ient
27
#2: Math proficiency by student group
ELL Students Non-ELL Students Special Education Non Special Ed. F/R Price Lunch Not Eligible forF/R Price Lunch
MPS 2013 (MCA-II & MCA-III) 20% 50% 17% 47% 25% 76%MPS 2014 (MCA-III) 20% 51% 16% 47% 26% 69%MPS 2015 (MCA-III) 20% 53% 15% 49% 26% 78%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
Perc
ent P
rofic
ient
28
29
Four-Year Graduation Rate Trends
25.0
%
34.8
% 48
.7%
67.2
%
36.8
%
69.8
%
35.6
%
19.1
%
41.5
%
50.1
%
32.6
%
39.3
%
50.4
% 67
.2%
40.5
%
69.7
%
44.3
%
23.6
% 43
.1%
52.5
%
29.2
% 42
.7%
58.8
% 77
.6%
45.0
%
77.3
%
52.4
%
22.8
%
49.0
%
58.7
%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
AMERINDIAN
AFRICANAMER (ENG
HL)
AFRICANAMER (NON
ENG HL)
ASIAN HISPANIC WHITE ELL SPEC ED FRL DIST TOTAL
Class of 2012 (AYP Year 2013) Class of 2013 (AYP Year 2014) Class of 2014 (AYP Year 2015)
#7: % of students attending school 95% of the time
30
26 absences
9 absences
17 absences
75%
80%
85%
90%
95%
100%
KIND GR1 GR2 GR3 GR4 GR5 GR6 GR7 GR8 GR9 GR10 GR11 GR12
Aver
age
Dai
ly A
ttend
ance
AMER INDIAN
AFRICAN AMER (ENG HL)
AFRICAN AMER (NON ENGHL)ASIAN
HISPANIC
2015 MCA-III Math Proficiency by Attendance Grade
AMER INDIANAFRICAN
AMER (ENGHL)
AFRICANAMER (NON
ENG HL)ASIAN HISPANIC WHITE DIST TOT
A - 95-100% 32.4% 30.2% 29.6% 53.0% 37.2% 82.9% 52.5%B - 90-94% 19.6% 19.7% 22.0% 47.2% 24.4% 71.2% 39.2%C - 85-89% 14.4% 13.4% 15.7% 38.7% 22.1% 60.2% 25.5%D 85 or BELOW 5.8% 7.4% 9.4% 28.6% 11.3% 37.6% 11.9%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
Perc
ent P
rofic
ient
TOT N 647 3886 1941 1069 3057 5302 15902
31
#8: % of Advanced Placement (AP) and International Baccalaureate (IB) exams taken by MPS students for which a
potential college-credit eligible score was earned
Total Exams Taken 50 190 362 499 333 2516 4019
AmericanIndian African African
American Asian Hispanic White District Total
IB Exams 24% 30% 31% 41% 35% 64% 52%AP Exams 17% 18% 29% 83% 31% 46% 43%Combined (IB & AP) 18% 17% 24% 39% 29% 60% 48%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
Perc
ent o
f Exa
ms
Earn
ing
a C
redi
t-Elig
ible
Sco
re
32
#9: % of students scoring a 21 or higher on the ACT - overall and by student group
23%
15%
5% 24
%
10%
74%
1%
10%
13%
35%
13%
11%
8% 24
%
14%
68%
1%
6%
12%
33%
14%
11%
8%
28%
11%
71%
1%
11%
13%
33%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
AMER INDIAN AFRICANAMER (ENG
HL)
AFRICANAMER (NON
ENG HL)
ASIAN HISPANIC WHITE ELL SPEC ED FRL DIST TOTAL
SY2013 SY2014 SY2015
33
MCA-III Math and Reading District wide Proficiency 2015 – Metro Comparison with Relative Achievement Gaps by Ethnic
AMER
IND
AMER
IND
AMER
IND AM
ER IN
D
AFRI
CAN
AM
ER
AFRI
CAN
AM
ER
AFRI
CAN
AM
ER
AFRI
CAN
AM
ER
HISP
ANIC
HISP
ANIC
HISP
ANIC
HISP
ANIC
ASIA
N
ASIA
N
ASIA
N
ASIA
N
WHI
TE
WHI
TE
WHI
TE
WHI
TE
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
STATE MPS SPPS ANOKA-HENN
AMER
IND
AMER
IND
AMER
IND
AMER
IND
AFR
ICAN
AM
ER
AFR
ICAN
AM
ER
AFR
ICAN
AM
ER
AFR
ICAN
AM
ER
HIS
PAN
IC
HIS
PAN
IC
HIS
PAN
IC
HIS
PAN
IC
ASIA
N
ASIA
N
ASIA
N
ASIA
N
WH
ITE
WH
ITE
WH
ITE
WH
ITE
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
STATE MPS SPPS ANOKA-HENN
2015 MCA-III Math 2015 MCA-III Reading
34
#16 & #17: % of students meeting or exceeding expected growth targets in reading and math
67%
60% 63%
71% 68%
77%
64%
57%
64% 69%
57% 60%
63%
75%
67%
77%
64% 59%
63% 68%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
AMERINDIAN
AFRICANAMER (ENG
HL)
AFRICANAMER (NON
ENG HL)
ASIAN HISPANIC WHITE ELL SPEC ED FRL DIST TOTAL
Reading Math
35
#18: Percent of Students who enrolled in at least one advanced course and received a “C” or above (AP, IB, CIS, PSEO)
AmericanIndian
AfricanAmerican Asian Hispanic White EL Special
Education District Total
SY14 28% 39% 60% 42% 73% 30% 26% 53%SY15 28% 36% 59% 38% 76% 30% 21% 52%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
Perc
ent o
f Stu
dent
s Ea
rnin
g a
"C"
or a
bove
36
#19 & #20: % of English learners meeting language growth and proficiency targets
47%
52% 51%
14% 15% 17%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
SY13 SY14 SY15
% meeting language growthtargets% meeting language proficiencytargets
37
MCA Math Summary
Growth Category
Well Below (<-0.5)
Below (-0.5 to 0)
Above (Above 0
to 0.5)
Well Above (>0.5)
Achi
evem
ent C
ateg
ory
Exceeds (≥ X60) 156 (2%) 341 (3%) 519 (5%) 1,292 (13%)
Meets (X50 to X
60) 485 (5%) 502 (5%) 635 (6%) 1,001 (10%)
Partially (X40 to X50) 588 (6%) 486 (5%) 466 (5%) 502 (5%)
Does Not (<X40) 1,856 (18%) 711 (7%) 440 (4%) 234 (2%)
District-wide – Growth Students Only
Moving Ahead
Ahead, but below average growth Borderline
Behind, but above average growth
Falling Behind
34% 5% 20% 6% 36%
Growth Category
Well Below (<-0.5)
Below (-0.5 to 0)
Above (Above 0
to 0.5)
Well Above (>0.5)
Prof
icie
ncy
Cat
egor
y
Exceeds (≥ X60) 190 (2%) 417 (3%) 585 (5%) 1,352 (11%)
Meets (X50 to X
60) 708 (6%) 619 (5%) 700 (6%) 973 (8%)
Partially (X40 to X50) 783 (6%) 567 (5%) 463 (4%) 551 (5%)
Does Not (<X40) 2,481 (20%) 835 (7%) 615 (5%) 345 (3%)
Moving Ahead
Ahead, but below average growth Borderline
Behind, but above average growth
Falling Behind
30% 5% 19% 8% 38%
2014 2015
38
MCA Reading Summary
Growth Category
Well Below (<-0.5)
Below (-0.5 to 0)
Above (Above 0
to 0.5)
Well Above (>0.5)
Achi
evem
ent C
ateg
ory
Exceeds (≥ X60) 141 (1%) 322 (3%) 521 (4%) 1343 (10%)
Meets (X50 to X
60) 787 (6%) 786 (6%) 803 (6%) 1169 (9%)
Partially (X40 to X50) 741 (6%) 541(4%) 578 (4%) 613 (5%)
Does Not (<X40) 2592(20%) 948 (7%) 670 (5%) 469 (4%)
District-wide – Growth Students Only
Moving Ahead
Ahead, but below average growth Borderline
Behind, but above average growth
Falling Behind
29% 4% 21% 9% 37%
Growth Category
Well Below (<-0.5)
Below (-0.5 to 0)
Above (Above 0
to 0.5)
Well Above (>0.5)
Prof
icie
ncy
Cat
egor
y
Exceeds (≥ X60) 91 (1%) 273 (2%) 469 (4%) 1,285 (11%)
Meets (X50 to X
60) 769 (6%) 687 (6%) 735 (6%) 1,110 (9%)
Partially (X40 to X50) 683 (6%) 495 (4%) 505 (4%) 629 (5%)
Does Not (<X40) 2,469 (20%) 813 (7%) 668 (6%) 443 (4%)
Moving Ahead
Ahead, but below average growth Borderline
Behind, but above average growth
Falling Behind
30% 3% 21% 9% 37%
2014 2015
39
2015 MCA Summary - African
Growth Category
Well Below (<-0.5)
Below (-0.5 to 0)
Above (Above 0
to 0.5)
Well Above (>0.5)
Achi
evem
ent C
ateg
ory
Exceeds (≥ X60) 6 (0%) 8 (1%) 16 (1%) 45 (3%)
Meets (X50 to X
60) 63 (5%) 52 (4%) 59 (4%) 122 (9%)
Partially (X40 to X50) 75 (5%) 74 (5%) 63 (5%) 99 (7%)
Does Not (<X40) 383 (28%) 128 (9%) 94 (7%) 78 (6%)
District-wide – Growth Students Only
Moving Ahead
Ahead, but below average growth Borderline
Behind, but above average growth
Falling Behind
18% 1% 20% 13% 48%
Growth Category
Well Below (<-0.5)
Below (-0.5 to 0)
Above (Above 0
to 0.5)
Well Above (>0.5)
Prof
icie
ncy
Cat
egor
y
Exceeds (≥ X60) 0 (0%) 1 (0%) 9 (1%) 29 (2%)
Meets (X50 to X
60) 45 (4%) 57 (5%) 63 (5%) 118 (9%)
Partially (X40 to X50) 73 (6%) 63 (5%) 52 (4%) 86 (7%)
Does Not (<X40) 348 (28%) 98 (8%) 117 (9%) 88 (7%)
Moving Ahead
Ahead, but below average growth Borderline
Behind, but above average growth
Falling Behind
18% 0% 19% 16% 47%
Math Reading
40
2014 MCA Summary - African
Growth Category
Well Below (<-0.5)
Below (-0.5 to 0)
Above (Above 0
to 0.5)
Well Above (>0.5)
Achi
evem
ent C
ateg
ory
Exceeds (≥ X60) 0% 1% 1% 4%
Meets (X50 to X
60) 3% 3% 5% 9%
Partially (X40 to X50) 6% 6% 5% 8%
Does Not (<X40) 27% 11% 7% 4%
District-wide – Growth Students Only
Moving Ahead
Ahead, but below average growth Borderline
Behind, but above average growth
Falling Behind
19% 1% 19% 11% 50%
Growth Category
Well Below (<-0.5)
Below (-0.5 to 0)
Above (Above 0
to 0.5)
Well Above (>0.5)
Prof
icie
ncy
Cat
egor
y
Exceeds (≥ X60) 0% 0% 1% 2%
Meets (X50 to X
60) 3% 4% 7% 11%
Partially (X40 to X50) 6% 5% 6% 9%
Does Not (<X40) 25% 8% 8% 6%
Moving Ahead
Ahead, but below average growth Borderline
Behind, but above average growth
Falling Behind
20% 0% 22% 14% 44%
Math Reading
41
2015 MCA Summary – African American
Growth Category
Well Below (<-0.5)
Below (-0.5 to 0)
Above (Above 0
to 0.5)
Well Above (>0.5)
Achi
evem
ent C
ateg
ory
Exceeds (≥ X60) 12 (0%) 18 (1%) 38 (1%) 96 (3%)
Meets (X50 to X
60) 100 (3%) 105 (4%) 109 (4%) 169 (6%)
Partially (X40 to X50) 194 (7%) 157 (5%) 118 (4%) 139 (5%)
Does Not (<X40) 995 (34%) 321 (11%) 246 (8%) 134 (5%)
District-wide – Growth Students Only
Moving Ahead
Ahead, but below average growth Borderline
Behind, but above average growth
Falling Behind
14% 1% 16% 13% 56%
Growth Category
Well Below (<-0.5)
Below (-0.5 to 0)
Above (Above 0
to 0.5)
Well Above (>0.5)
Prof
icie
ncy
Cat
egor
y
Exceeds (≥ X60) 4 (0%) 18 (1%) 27 (1%) 79 (3%)
Meets (X50 to X
60) 99 (3%) 115 (4%) 142 (5%) 216 (7%)
Partially (X40 to X50) 195 (6%) 125 (4%) 133 (4%) 179 (6%)
Does Not (<X40) 995 (33%) 325 (11%) 214 (7%) 148 (5%)
Moving Ahead
Ahead, but below average growth Borderline
Behind, but above average growth
Falling Behind
15% 1% 17% 12% 54%
Math Reading
42
2014 MCA Summary – African American
Growth Category
Well Below (<-0.5)
Below (-0.5 to 0)
Above (Above 0
to 0.5)
Well Above (>0.5)
Achi
evem
ent C
ateg
ory
Exceeds (≥ X60) 0% 1% 1% 3%
Meets (X50 to X
60) 3% 3% 4% 6%
Partially (X40 to X50) 6% 5% 5% 5%
Does Not (<X40) 35% 12% 7% 4%
District-wide – Growth Students Only
Moving Ahead
Ahead, but below average growth Borderline
Behind, but above average growth
Falling Behind
14% 1% 16% 11% 58%
Growth Category
Well Below (<-0.5)
Below (-0.5 to 0)
Above (Above 0
to 0.5)
Well Above (>0.5)
Prof
icie
ncy
Cat
egor
y
Exceeds (≥ X60) 0% 1% 1% 3%
Meets (X50 to X
60) 3% 3% 5% 7%
Partially (X40 to X50) 6% 5% 5% 6%
Does Not (<X40) 32% 11% 7% 5%
Moving Ahead
Ahead, but below average growth Borderline
Behind, but above average growth
Falling Behind
15% 1% 17% 12% 54%
Math Reading
43
2015 MCA Summary – American Indian
Growth Category
Well Below (<-0.5)
Below (-0.5 to 0)
Above (Above 0
to 0.5)
Well Above (>0.5)
Achi
evem
ent C
ateg
ory
Exceeds (≥ X60) 2 (0%) 3 (1%) 3 (1%) 13 (2%)
Meets (X50 to X
60) 19 (4%) 17 (3%) 18 (3%) 27 (5%)
Partially (X40 to X50) 49 (9%) 24 (5%) 17 (3%) 27 (5%)
Does Not (<X40) 170 (32%) 60 (11%) 45 (9%) 32 (6%)
District-wide – Growth Students Only
Moving Ahead
Ahead, but below average growth Borderline
Behind, but above average growth
Falling Behind
12% 1% 15% 15% 58%
Growth Category
Well Below (<-0.5)
Below (-0.5 to 0)
Above (Above 0
to 0.5)
Well Above (>0.5)
Prof
icie
ncy
Cat
egor
y
Exceeds (≥ X60) 1 (0%) 3 (1%) 8 (2%) 17 (3%)
Meets (X50 to X
60) 12 (2%) 18 (3%) 15 (3%) 42 (8%)
Partially (X40 to X50) 36 (7%) 30 (6%) 32 (6%) 48 (9%)
Does Not (<X40) 133 (25%) 50 (10%) 49 (9%) 32 (6%)
Moving Ahead
Ahead, but below average growth Borderline
Behind, but above average growth
Falling Behind
16% 1% 21% 15% 47%
Math Reading
44
2014 MCA Summary – American Indian
Growth Category
Well Below (<-0.5)
Below (-0.5 to 0)
Above (Above 0
to 0.5)
Well Above (>0.5)
Achi
evem
ent C
ateg
ory
Exceeds (≥ X60) 0% 1% 1% 3%
Meets (X50 to X
60) 2% 3% 3% 9%
Partially (X40 to X50) 8% 5% 4% 4%
Does Not (<X40) 34% 11% 8% 4%
District-wide – Growth Students Only
Moving Ahead
Ahead, but below average growth Borderline
Behind, but above average growth
Falling Behind
16% 1% 14% 12% 58%
Growth Category
Well Below (<-0.5)
Below (-0.5 to 0)
Above (Above 0
to 0.5)
Well Above (>0.5)
Prof
icie
ncy
Cat
egor
y
Exceeds (≥ X60) 1% 2% 1% 2%
Meets (X50 to X
60) 3% 4% 3% 7%
Partially (X40 to X50) 6% 5% 5% 5%
Does Not (<X40) 34% 9% 7% 5%
Moving Ahead
Ahead, but below average growth Borderline
Behind, but above average growth
Falling Behind
14% 2% 17% 12% 54%
Math Reading
45
2015 MCA Summary – Asian
Growth Category
Well Below (<-0.5)
Below (-0.5 to 0)
Above (Above 0
to 0.5)
Well Above (>0.5)
Achi
evem
ent C
ateg
ory
Exceeds (≥ X60) 9 (1%) 28 (3%) 40 (5%) 106 (12%)
Meets (X50 to X
60) 42 (5%) 57 (7%) 57 (7%) 98 (11%)
Partially (X40 to X50) 55 (6%) 41 (5%) 53 (6%) 48 (6%)
Does Not (<X40) 121 (14%) 51 (6%) 37 (4%) 12 (1%)
District-wide – Growth Students Only
Moving Ahead
Ahead, but below average growth Borderline
Behind, but above average growth
Falling Behind
35% 4% 23% 6% 31%
Growth Category
Well Below (<-0.5)
Below (-0.5 to 0)
Above (Above 0
to 0.5)
Well Above (>0.5)
Prof
icie
ncy
Cat
egor
y
Exceeds (≥ X60) 5 (1%) 11 (1%) 20 (2%) 75 (9%)
Meets (X50 to X
60) 48 (6%) 58 (7%) 51 (6%) 93 (11%)
Partially (X40 to X50) 48 (6%) 50 (6%) 53 (6%) 67 (8%)
Does Not (<X40) 159 (19%) 54 (6%) 41 (5%) 24 (3%)
Moving Ahead
Ahead, but below average growth Borderline
Behind, but above average growth
Falling Behind
28% 2% 26% 8% 36%
Math Reading
46
2014 MCA Summary – Asian
Growth Category
Well Below (<-0.5)
Below (-0.5 to 0)
Above (Above 0
to 0.5)
Well Above (>0.5)
Achi
evem
ent C
ateg
ory
Exceeds (≥ X60) 1% 2% 4% 12%
Meets (X50 to X
60) 5% 5% 6% 12%
Partially (X40 to X50) 7% 6% 5% 7%
Does Not (<X40) 16% 6% 4% 2%
District-wide – Growth Students Only
Moving Ahead
Ahead, but below average growth Borderline
Behind, but above average growth
Falling Behind
35% 3% 22% 6% 35%
Growth Category
Well Below (<-0.5)
Below (-0.5 to 0)
Above (Above 0
to 0.5)
Well Above (>0.5)
Prof
icie
ncy
Cat
egor
y
Exceeds (≥ X60) 1% 2% 3% 8%
Meets (X50 to X
60) 6% 5% 7% 10%
Partially (X40 to X50) 8% 5% 5% 7%
Does Not (<X40) 15% 7% 6% 5%
Moving Ahead
Ahead, but below average growth Borderline
Behind, but above average growth
Falling Behind
28% 3% 23% 11% 35%
Math Reading
47
2015 MCA Summary – Hispanic
Growth Category
Well Below (<-0.5)
Below (-0.5 to 0)
Above (Above 0
to 0.5)
Well Above (>0.5)
Achi
evem
ent C
ateg
ory
Exceeds (≥ X60) 12 (1%) 24 (1%) 46 (2%) 121 (5%)
Meets (X50 to X
60) 84 (4%) 99 (4%) 139 (6%) 235 (10%)
Partially (X40 to X50) 162 (7%) 139 (6%) 127 (5%) 166 (7%)
Does Not (<X40) 573 (25%) 203 (9%) 143 (6%) 65 (3%)
District-wide – Growth Students Only
Moving Ahead
Ahead, but below average growth Borderline
Behind, but above average growth
Falling Behind
23% 2% 20% 9% 46%
Growth Category
Well Below (<-0.5)
Below (-0.5 to 0)
Above (Above 0
to 0.5)
Well Above (>0.5)
Prof
icie
ncy
Cat
egor
y
Exceeds (≥ X60) 4 (0%) 7 (0%) 38 (2%) 73 (3%)
Meets (X50 to X
60) 71 (3%) 89 (4%) 114 (5%) 239 (10%)
Partially (X40 to X50) 125 (5%) 122 (5%) 151 (6%) 159 (7%)
Does Not (<X40) 594 (26%) 222 (10%) 203 (9%) 117 (5%)
Moving Ahead
Ahead, but below average growth Borderline
Behind, but above average growth
Falling Behind
20% 0% 20% 14% 46%
Math Reading
48
2014 MCA Summary – Hispanic
Growth Category
Well Below (<-0.5)
Below (-0.5 to 0)
Above (Above 0
to 0.5)
Well Above (>0.5)
Achi
evem
ent C
ateg
ory
Exceeds (≥ X60) 0% 1% 1% 5%
Meets (X50 to X
60) 3% 4% 5% 11%
Partially (X40 to X50) 7% 7% 6% 7%
Does Not (<X40) 24% 9% 6% 4%
District-wide – Growth Students Only
Moving Ahead
Ahead, but below average growth Borderline
Behind, but above average growth
Falling Behind
23% 1% 20% 10% 46%
Growth Category
Well Below (<-0.5)
Below (-0.5 to 0)
Above (Above 0
to 0.5)
Well Above (>0.5)
Prof
icie
ncy
Cat
egor
y
Exceeds (≥ X60) 0% 1% 1% 3%
Meets (X50 to X
60) 3% 4% 4% 9%
Partially (X40 to X50) 6% 5% 7% 7%
Does Not (<X40) 26% 11% 8% 6%
Moving Ahead
Ahead, but below average growth Borderline
Behind, but above average growth
Falling Behind
17% 1% 21% 14% 48%
Math Reading
49
2015 MCA Summary – White
Growth Category
Well Below (<-0.5)
Below (-0.5 to 0)
Above (Above 0
to 0.5)
Well Above (>0.5)
Achi
evem
ent C
ateg
ory
Exceeds (≥ X60) 149 (4%) 336 (8%) 442 (11%) 971 (23%)
Meets (X50 to X
60) 400 (10%) 289 (7%) 318 (8%) 322 (8%)
Partially (X40 to X50) 247 (6%) 132 (3%) 84 (2%) 72 (2%)
Does Not (<X40) 239 (6%) 72 (2%) 50 (1%) 24 (1%)
District-wide – Growth Students Only
Moving Ahead
Ahead, but below average growth Borderline
Behind, but above average growth
Falling Behind
50% 12% 20% 2% 17%
Growth Category
Well Below (<-0.5)
Below (-0.5 to 0)
Above (Above 0
to 0.5)
Well Above (>0.5)
Prof
icie
ncy
Cat
egor
y
Exceeds (≥ X60) 77 (2%) 233 (6%) 367 (9%) 1012 (24%)
Meets (X50 to X
60) 493 (12%) 350 (8%) 350 (8%) 402 (10%)
Partially (X40 to X50) 206 (5%) 105 (3%) 84 (2%) 90 (2%)
Does Not (<X40) 240 (6%) 64 (2%) 44 (1%) 34 (1%)
Moving Ahead
Ahead, but below average growth Borderline
Behind, but above average growth
Falling Behind
51% 7% 25% 2% 15%
Math Reading
50
2014 MCA Summary – White
Growth Category
Well Below (<-0.5)
Below (-0.5 to 0)
Above (Above 0
to 0.5)
Well Above (>0.5)
Achi
evem
ent C
ateg
ory
Exceeds (≥ X60) 3% 7% 10% 24%
Meets (X50 to X
60) 8% 6% 8% 10%
Partially (X40 to X50) 5% 3% 3% 2%
Does Not (<X40) 7% 2% 1% 1%
District-wide – Growth Students Only
Moving Ahead
Ahead, but below average growth Borderline
Behind, but above average growth
Falling Behind
52% 10% 19% 2% 17%
Growth Category
Well Below (<-0.5)
Below (-0.5 to 0)
Above (Above 0
to 0.5)
Well Above (>0.5)
Prof
icie
ncy
Cat
egor
y
Exceeds (≥ X60) 3% 6% 9% 23%
Meets (X50 to X
60) 11% 10% 8% 10%
Partially (X40 to X50) 5% 2% 2% 1%
Does Not (<X40) 6% 2% 1% 1%
Moving Ahead
Ahead, but below average growth Borderline
Behind, but above average growth
Falling Behind
50% 8% 24% 2% 15%
Math Reading
51
2015 MCA Summary – English Learners
Growth Category
Well Below (<-0.5)
Below (-0.5 to 0)
Above (Above 0
to 0.5)
Well Above (>0.5)
Achi
evem
ent C
ateg
ory
Exceeds (≥ X60) 2 (0%) 4 (0%) 12 (0%) 35 (1%)
Meets (X50 to X
60) 37 (1%) 71 (3%) 102 (4%) 249 (9%)
Partially (X40 to X50) 166 (6%) 154 (6%) 156 (6%) 232 (8%)
Does Not (<X40) 880 (31%) 325 (12%) 233 (8%) 136 (5%)
District-wide – Growth Students Only
Moving Ahead
Ahead, but below average growth Borderline
Behind, but above average growth
Falling Behind
14% 0% 18% 13% 55%
Growth Category
Well Below (<-0.5)
Below (-0.5 to 0)
Above (Above 0
to 0.5)
Well Above (>0.5)
Prof
icie
ncy
Cat
egor
y
Exceeds (≥ X60) 0 (0%) 2 (0%) 1 (0%) 11 (0%)
Meets (X50 to X
60) 5 (0%) 28 (1%) 49 (2%) 171 (6%)
Partially (X40 to X50) 107 (4%) 137 (5%) 160 (6%) 235 (9%)
Does Not (<X40) 904 (34%) 334 (12%) 324 (12%) 215 (8%)
Moving Ahead
Ahead, but below average growth Borderline
Behind, but above average growth
Falling Behind
9% 0% 16% 20% 55%
Math Reading
52
2014 MCA Summary – English Learners
Growth Category
Well Below (<-0.5)
Below (-0.5 to 0)
Above (Above 0
to 0.5)
Well Above (>0.5)
Achi
evem
ent C
ateg
ory
Exceeds (≥ X60) 0% 0% 0% 2%
Meets (X50 to X
60) 1% 2% 4% 9%
Partially (X40 to X50) 5% 6% 6% 9%
Does Not (<X40) 30% 12% 8% 5%
District-wide – Growth Students Only
Moving Ahead
Ahead, but below average growth Borderline
Behind, but above average growth
Falling Behind
15% 0% 18% 13% 53%
Growth Category
Well Below (<-0.5)
Below (-0.5 to 0)
Above (Above 0
to 0.5)
Well Above (>0.5)
Prof
icie
ncy
Cat
egor
y
Exceeds (≥ X60) 0% 0% 0% 0%
Meets (X50 to X
60) 1% 1% 3% 5%
Partially (X40 to X50) 3% 4% 7% 9%
Does Not (<X40) 32% 14% 11% 9%
Moving Ahead
Ahead, but below average growth Borderline
Behind, but above average growth
Falling Behind
8% 0% 18% 21% 54%
Math Reading
53
2015 MCA Summary – Special Education
Growth Category
Well Below (<-0.5)
Below (-0.5 to 0)
Above (Above 0
to 0.5)
Well Above (>0.5)
Achi
evem
ent C
ateg
ory
Exceeds (≥ X60) 4 (0%) 21 (1%) 26 (2%) 50 (3%)
Meets (X50 to X
60) 50 (3%) 34 (2%) 32 (2%) 57 (4%)
Partially (X40 to X50) 54 (3%) 40 (3%) 42 (3%) 54 (3%)
Does Not (<X40) 635 (41%) 184 (12%) 164 (11%) 101 (7%)
District-wide – Growth Students Only
Moving Ahead
Ahead, but below average growth Borderline
Behind, but above average growth
Falling Behind
11% 2% 12% 17% 59%
Growth Category
Well Below (<-0.5)
Below (-0.5 to 0)
Above (Above 0
to 0.5)
Well Above (>0.5)
Prof
icie
ncy
Cat
egor
y
Exceeds (≥ X60) 2 (0%) 14 (1%) 14 (1%) 45 (3%)
Meets (X50 to X
60) 34 (2%) 35 (2%) 45 (3%) 83 (5%)
Partially (X40 to X50) 57 (4%) 38 (2%) 37 (2%) 74 (5%)
Does Not (<X40) 647 (42%) 181 (12%) 143 (9%) 110 (7%)
Moving Ahead
Ahead, but below average growth Borderline
Behind, but above average growth
Falling Behind
12% 1% 12% 16% 59%
Math Reading
54
2014 MCA Summary – Special Education
Growth Category
Well Below (<-0.5)
Below (-0.5 to 0)
Above (Above 0
to 0.5)
Well Above (>0.5)
Achi
evem
ent C
ateg
ory
Exceeds (≥ X60) 1% 1% 2% 4%
Meets (X50 to X
60) 2% 2% 2% 5%
Partially (X40 to X50) 4% 2% 2% 4%
Does Not (<X40) 45% 13% 8% 5%
District-wide – Growth Students Only
Moving Ahead
Ahead, but below average growth Borderline
Behind, but above average growth
Falling Behind
12% 1% 10% 13% 63%
Growth Category
Well Below (<-0.5)
Below (-0.5 to 0)
Above (Above 0
to 0.5)
Well Above (>0.5)
Prof
icie
ncy
Cat
egor
y
Exceeds (≥ X60) 1% 0% 1% 3%
Meets (X50 to X
60) 2% 3% 2% 5%
Partially (X40 to X50) 3% 2% 3% 5%
Does Not (<X40) 39% 14% 9% 7%
Moving Ahead
Ahead, but below average growth Borderline
Behind, but above average growth
Falling Behind
12% 1% 13% 16% 58%
Math Reading
55