55
Addendum 2015-2016 RAP Slides:

MPS Academic Progress Report

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

2015 academic results

Citation preview

Page 1: MPS Academic Progress Report

Addendum 2015-2016 RAP Slides:

Page 2: MPS Academic Progress Report

Leading and Lagging Indicators

•Perception • Sense of Belonging •Motivation •Relationships

Structure Culture and Climate

Leadership Teacher Quality

Schedule Grade configuration

•Behavior •Attendance •Grades •Extra-curricular • Formative •Diagnostic

Structure • Interim • Summative

Structure

2

Page 3: MPS Academic Progress Report

#10: Student Persistence Rating

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

African African American American Indian Asian Hispanic White EL SPED

District Average

3

Page 4: MPS Academic Progress Report

Persistence Profiles

Persistence Category Total n

Average Persist. Score

Average Reading

MCA Scale Score

Average Math MCA Scale Score

Average Reading

Growth Z-Score

Average Math

Growth Z-Score

Average Percent Attend.

Average GPA

Average Number of Behavior

Infractions

Average Number of

Suspensions

Near the top 0 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A

More than most 1,377 7.3 50.2 50.1 0.01 0.01 95% 3.00 0.5 0.06

In the middle 11,353 6.3 50.9 50.9 -0.01 -0.02 95% 2.58 0.6 0.05

Less than most 3,147 4.7 42.8 43.1 -0.15 -0.21 93% 2.42 1.3 0.11

Near the bottom 349 3.5 40.2 41.2 -0.30 -0.52 93% 2.06 1.5 0.11

DISTRICT 16,226 6.0 49.3 49.3 -0.04 -0.06 95% 2.58 0.7 0.07

4

Page 5: MPS Academic Progress Report

STUDENT TRACKER – FALL ENROLLMENT Pct MPS Students Enrolled in College the Fall Immediately Following

Graduation from HS

5

Page 6: MPS Academic Progress Report

STUDENT TRACKER – FIRST YEAR ENROLLMENT Pct Students Enrolled in College at Any Time During the First Year After High

School

6

Page 7: MPS Academic Progress Report

STUDENT TRACKER – TWO YEAR ENROLLMENT Pct Students Enrolled in College at Any Time During the First Two Years After

HS Graduation

7

Page 8: MPS Academic Progress Report

STUDENT TRACKER – RETENTION Pct Students Enrolled in College the First Year After HS Grad who Returned

the Second Year (Freshman to Sophomore Persistence)

8

Page 9: MPS Academic Progress Report

STUDENT TRACKER – INSTITUTION TYPE Pct Students Enrolled in College Within First Year of Graduation from HS

Class of 2014 by Institutional Level (2-year vs. 4-year)

9

Page 10: MPS Academic Progress Report

STUDENT TRACKER – INSTITUTION TYPE by SPECIAL POPULATIONS Pct Students Enrolled in College within the First Year of Graduation from HS 2014 by

Institutional Level (2-year vs. 4-year)

10

Page 11: MPS Academic Progress Report

STUDENT TRACKER – TOP PLACEMENT SITES Most common Institution of Initial Enrollment

MPS RANK EDISON HENRY NORTH ROOSEVELT SOUTH SOUTHWEST WASHBURN ALL

1 MCTC MCTC MCTC MCTC MCTC MCTC MCTC MCTC (1996)

2 U of M - Twin Cities

U of M – Twin Cities

U of M - Twin Cities

U of M - Twin Cities

U of M - Twin Cities

U of M - Twin Cities

U of M – Twin Cities

U of M - Twin Cities (1156)

3 MN State – Mankato Augsburg Col Augsburg Col St. Paul

College Augsburg Col U of WI – Madison

Normandale CC

Normandale CC (302)

4 St. Catherine U

MN State – Mankato

St. Cloud State

MN State – Mankato

U of WI - Madison

Normandale CC

MN State – Mankato

Augsburg Col (300)

5 St. Paul Col North Hennepin CC

MN State - Mankato

Normandale CC

St. Catherine U Augsburg Col St. Cloud

State

MN State – Mankato (271)

6 Augsburg Col St. Catherine U

St. Catherine U Augsburg Col Normandale

CC U of MN - Duluth Hamiline U St. Catherine

U (217)

7 Normandale CC

Dunwoody Col

U of St. Thomas

St. Catherine U

U of MN - Duluth St. Olaf Col Augsburg Col St. Paul Col

(166)

8 North Hennepin CC St. Olaf Col St. Paul Col Dunwoody

College Hamline U U of WI - Milwaukee St. Paul Col

U of WI – Madison (184)

9 U of MN – Duluth

U of St. Thomas

North Hennepin CC

St. Cloud State

MN State - Mankato

U of St. Thomas

St. Catherine U

U of St. Thomas (157)

10 St. Cloud State U

St. Cloud State U

Dunwoody College

Gustavus Adolphus Col St. Paul Col Hamline U U of St.

Thomas U of MN – Duluth (150) 11

Page 12: MPS Academic Progress Report

Percent Attendance by Ethnicity

12

Page 13: MPS Academic Progress Report

Percent Attendance by English Learner Status

13

Page 14: MPS Academic Progress Report

Percent Attendance by Special Education Status

14

Page 15: MPS Academic Progress Report

Percent Attendance by Free/Reduced-Price Lunch Status

15

Page 16: MPS Academic Progress Report

GPA and Proficiency

16

Page 17: MPS Academic Progress Report

Avg. GPA and Suspensions

AMER INDIAN AFRICAN AMER(ENG HL)

AFRICAN AMER(NON ENG HL) ASIAN HISPANIC WHITE TOT GR9-12

NO SUSP 1.79 1.98 2.54 3.01 2.24 3.10 2.521 OR MORE SUSP 1.16 1.55 1.89 2.33 1.56 1.88 1.59

0.00

0.50

1.00

1.50

2.00

2.50

3.00

3.50

AVG

GPA

17

Page 18: MPS Academic Progress Report

Reading Proficiency and Suspensions

AMER INDIANAFRICAN

AMER (ENGHL)

AFRICANAMER (NON

ENG HL)ASIAN HISPANIC WHITE TOTAL

NO SUSP 23.1% 25.8% 22.9% 40.3% 26.2% 77.6% 44.1%1 OR MORE SUSP 12.2% 7.3% 10.4% 54.5% 5.5% 30.4% 10.1%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

Perc

ent P

rofic

ient

MCA Reading 2015 - Proficiency by Suspensions vs. No Suspensions

18

Page 19: MPS Academic Progress Report

Math Proficiency and Suspensions

AMER INDIAN AFRICAN AMER(ENG HL)

AFRICAN AMER(NON ENG HL) ASIAN HISPANIC WHITE TOTAL

NO SUSP 21.5% 25.6% 27.0% 50.7% 33.2% 78.4% 46.7%1 OR MORE SUSP 14.7% 6.7% 2.5% 44.4% 7.4% 35.7% 9.3%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

Perc

ent P

rofic

ient

MCA Math 2015 - Proficiency by Suspensions vs. No Suspensions

19

Page 20: MPS Academic Progress Report

Reading Growth and Suspensions MCA READ GROWTH BY NO SUSPENSIONS VS. ONE OR MORE

GROWTH LEVEL AMER INDIAN

AFRICAN AMER (ENG HL)

AFRICAN AMER (NON ENG HL) ASIAN HISPANIC WHITE Total

SUSP COUNT CAT N PCT N PCT N PCT N PCT N PCT N PCT N PCT NO SUSP LOW 158 31.8% 1086 39.0% 452 36.3% 259 29.3% 766 32.1% 957 22.9% 3678 30.7%

MED 199 40.0% 1042 37.4% 451 36.3% 340 38.5% 966 40.5% 1583 37.8% 4581 38.2%

HIGH 140 28.2% 658 23.6% 341 27.4% 285 32.2% 656 27.5% 1647 39.3% 3727 31.1% 1 OR MORE SUSP

LOW 26 43.3% 192 46.5% 35 41.2% 2 22.2% 28 45.2% 20 41.7% 303 44.8%

MED 19 31.7% 147 35.6% 31 36.5% 6 66.7% 24 38.7% 18 37.5% 245 36.2%

HIGH 15 25.0% 74 17.9% 19 22.4% 1 11.1% 10 16.1% 10 20.8% 129 19.1%

20

Page 21: MPS Academic Progress Report

Math Growth and Suspensions MCA MATH GROWTH BY NO SUSPENSIONS VS. ONE OR MORE

GROWTH LEVEL AMER INDIAN

AFRICAN AMER (ENG HL)

AFRICAN AMER (NON ENG HL) ASIAN HISPANIC WHITE Total

SUSP COUNT CAT N PCT N PCT N PCT N PCT N PCT N PCT N PCT NO SUSP LOW 185 40.7% 951 38.1% 380 32.6% 200 26.8% 709 32.2% 838 21.6% 3263 29.8%

MED 169 37.1% 1017 40.7% 450 38.6% 315 42.2% 879 39.9% 1606 41.3% 4436 40.5%

HIGH 101 22.2% 529 21.2% 337 28.9% 232 31.1% 617 28.0% 1444 37.1% 3260 29.7% 1 OR MORE SUSP

LOW 24 46.2% 180 55.7% 46 58.2% 4 57.1% 22 43.1% 17 41.5% 293 53.0%

MED 20 38.5% 101 31.3% 23 29.1% 2 28.6% 18 35.3% 14 34.1% 178 32.2%

HIGH 8 15.4% 42 13.0% 10 12.7% 1 14.3% 11 21.6% 10 24.4% 82 14.8%

21

Page 22: MPS Academic Progress Report

Long Version

22

Page 23: MPS Academic Progress Report

Percent of Students who Met or Exceeded the Standards on 2013-2015 MCA-III Reading by Tested Grade (MPS vs. State)

Grade 3 Grade 4 Grade 5 Grade 6 Grade 7 Grade 8 Grade 10 TotalMPS 2013 (MCA-III) 42% 39% 44% 41% 40% 38% 49% 42%MPS 2014 (MCA-III) 41% 39% 48% 41% 41% 44% 43% 42%MPS 2015 (MCA-III) 41% 41% 49% 46% 37% 42% 30% 42%

State 2013 (MCA-III) 57% 54% 64% 59% 54% 54% 62% 58%State 2014 (MCA-III) 58% 55% 68% 61% 56% 56% 60% 59%State 2015 (MCA-III) 59% 58% 67% 64% 56% 56% 57% 59%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

Perc

ent P

rofic

ient

23

Page 24: MPS Academic Progress Report

#1: Reading proficiency by race/ethnicity

AMER INDIANAFRICAN

AMER (ENGHL)

AFRICANAMER (NON

ENG HL)ASIAN HISPANIC WHITE DIST TOTAL

2012 MCA-II 42% 40% 44% 53% 40% 87% 57%2013 MCA-III 22% 21% 22% 40% 22% 75% 42%2014 MCA-III 21% 21% 23% 41% 23% 78% 42%2015 MCA-III 20% 21% 22% 40% 25% 77% 42%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

Perc

ent P

rofic

ient

24

Page 25: MPS Academic Progress Report

#1: Reading proficiency by student group

ELL Students Non-ELL Students Special Education Non Special Ed. F/R Price Lunch Not Eligible for F/RPrice Lunch

MPS 2013 12% 51% 14% 46% 22% 78%MPS 2014 10% 52% 15% 46% 23% 72%MPS 2015 10% 52% 14% 47% 23% 77%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

Perc

ent P

rofic

ient

25

Page 26: MPS Academic Progress Report

Percent of Students Met or Exceeded the Standards on 2013-2015 MCA-II & MCA-III Math by Tested Grade (MPS vs. State)

Grade 3 Grade 4 Grade 5 Grade 6 Grade 7 Grade 8 Grade 11 TotalMPS 2013 (MCA-II & MCA-III) 52% 50% 40% 38% 40% 39% 35% 43%MPS 2014 (MCA-III) 52% 49% 46% 38% 39% 44% 25% 44%MPS 2015 (MCA-III) 52% 52% 45% 41% 36% 44% 28% 44%

State 2013 (MCA-II & MCA-III) 72% 71% 60% 57% 56% 59% 52% 61%State 2014 (MCA-III) 72% 70% 62% 57% 57% 60% 51% 61%State 2015 (MCA-III) 71% 70% 60% 58% 55% 58% 49% 60%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

Perc

ent P

rofic

ient

26

Page 27: MPS Academic Progress Report

#2: Math proficiency by race/ethnicity

*Note: In 2013, grades 3-8 Math figures are based on the MCA-III Math Standards, Grade 11 figures are based on the MCA-II. 2014 and beyond, all grades were assessed on the MCA-III standards

AMER INDIANAFRICAN

AMER (ENGHL)

AFRICANAMER (NON

ENG HL)ASIAN HISPANIC WHITE DIST TOTAL

2012 MCA-II/III 19% 18% 20% 43% 27% 70% 40%2013 MCA-II/III 23% 22% 25% 46% 29% 73% 43%2014 MCA-III 23% 21% 24% 48% 31% 77% 44%2015 MCA-III 19% 21% 25% 51% 32% 78% 44%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

Perc

ent P

rofic

ient

27

Page 28: MPS Academic Progress Report

#2: Math proficiency by student group

ELL Students Non-ELL Students Special Education Non Special Ed. F/R Price Lunch Not Eligible forF/R Price Lunch

MPS 2013 (MCA-II & MCA-III) 20% 50% 17% 47% 25% 76%MPS 2014 (MCA-III) 20% 51% 16% 47% 26% 69%MPS 2015 (MCA-III) 20% 53% 15% 49% 26% 78%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

Perc

ent P

rofic

ient

28

Page 29: MPS Academic Progress Report

29

Four-Year Graduation Rate Trends

25.0

%

34.8

% 48

.7%

67.2

%

36.8

%

69.8

%

35.6

%

19.1

%

41.5

%

50.1

%

32.6

%

39.3

%

50.4

% 67

.2%

40.5

%

69.7

%

44.3

%

23.6

% 43

.1%

52.5

%

29.2

% 42

.7%

58.8

% 77

.6%

45.0

%

77.3

%

52.4

%

22.8

%

49.0

%

58.7

%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

AMERINDIAN

AFRICANAMER (ENG

HL)

AFRICANAMER (NON

ENG HL)

ASIAN HISPANIC WHITE ELL SPEC ED FRL DIST TOTAL

Class of 2012 (AYP Year 2013) Class of 2013 (AYP Year 2014) Class of 2014 (AYP Year 2015)

Page 30: MPS Academic Progress Report

#7: % of students attending school 95% of the time

30

26 absences

9 absences

17 absences

75%

80%

85%

90%

95%

100%

KIND GR1 GR2 GR3 GR4 GR5 GR6 GR7 GR8 GR9 GR10 GR11 GR12

Aver

age

Dai

ly A

ttend

ance

AMER INDIAN

AFRICAN AMER (ENG HL)

AFRICAN AMER (NON ENGHL)ASIAN

HISPANIC

Page 31: MPS Academic Progress Report

2015 MCA-III Math Proficiency by Attendance Grade

AMER INDIANAFRICAN

AMER (ENGHL)

AFRICANAMER (NON

ENG HL)ASIAN HISPANIC WHITE DIST TOT

A - 95-100% 32.4% 30.2% 29.6% 53.0% 37.2% 82.9% 52.5%B - 90-94% 19.6% 19.7% 22.0% 47.2% 24.4% 71.2% 39.2%C - 85-89% 14.4% 13.4% 15.7% 38.7% 22.1% 60.2% 25.5%D 85 or BELOW 5.8% 7.4% 9.4% 28.6% 11.3% 37.6% 11.9%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

Perc

ent P

rofic

ient

TOT N 647 3886 1941 1069 3057 5302 15902

31

Page 32: MPS Academic Progress Report

#8: % of Advanced Placement (AP) and International Baccalaureate (IB) exams taken by MPS students for which a

potential college-credit eligible score was earned

Total Exams Taken 50 190 362 499 333 2516 4019

AmericanIndian African African

American Asian Hispanic White District Total

IB Exams 24% 30% 31% 41% 35% 64% 52%AP Exams 17% 18% 29% 83% 31% 46% 43%Combined (IB & AP) 18% 17% 24% 39% 29% 60% 48%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

Perc

ent o

f Exa

ms

Earn

ing

a C

redi

t-Elig

ible

Sco

re

32

Page 33: MPS Academic Progress Report

#9: % of students scoring a 21 or higher on the ACT - overall and by student group

23%

15%

5% 24

%

10%

74%

1%

10%

13%

35%

13%

11%

8% 24

%

14%

68%

1%

6%

12%

33%

14%

11%

8%

28%

11%

71%

1%

11%

13%

33%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

AMER INDIAN AFRICANAMER (ENG

HL)

AFRICANAMER (NON

ENG HL)

ASIAN HISPANIC WHITE ELL SPEC ED FRL DIST TOTAL

SY2013 SY2014 SY2015

33

Page 34: MPS Academic Progress Report

MCA-III Math and Reading District wide Proficiency 2015 – Metro Comparison with Relative Achievement Gaps by Ethnic

AMER

IND

AMER

IND

AMER

IND AM

ER IN

D

AFRI

CAN

AM

ER

AFRI

CAN

AM

ER

AFRI

CAN

AM

ER

AFRI

CAN

AM

ER

HISP

ANIC

HISP

ANIC

HISP

ANIC

HISP

ANIC

ASIA

N

ASIA

N

ASIA

N

ASIA

N

WHI

TE

WHI

TE

WHI

TE

WHI

TE

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

STATE MPS SPPS ANOKA-HENN

AMER

IND

AMER

IND

AMER

IND

AMER

IND

AFR

ICAN

AM

ER

AFR

ICAN

AM

ER

AFR

ICAN

AM

ER

AFR

ICAN

AM

ER

HIS

PAN

IC

HIS

PAN

IC

HIS

PAN

IC

HIS

PAN

IC

ASIA

N

ASIA

N

ASIA

N

ASIA

N

WH

ITE

WH

ITE

WH

ITE

WH

ITE

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

STATE MPS SPPS ANOKA-HENN

2015 MCA-III Math 2015 MCA-III Reading

34

Page 35: MPS Academic Progress Report

#16 & #17: % of students meeting or exceeding expected growth targets in reading and math

67%

60% 63%

71% 68%

77%

64%

57%

64% 69%

57% 60%

63%

75%

67%

77%

64% 59%

63% 68%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

AMERINDIAN

AFRICANAMER (ENG

HL)

AFRICANAMER (NON

ENG HL)

ASIAN HISPANIC WHITE ELL SPEC ED FRL DIST TOTAL

Reading Math

35

Page 36: MPS Academic Progress Report

#18: Percent of Students who enrolled in at least one advanced course and received a “C” or above (AP, IB, CIS, PSEO)

AmericanIndian

AfricanAmerican Asian Hispanic White EL Special

Education District Total

SY14 28% 39% 60% 42% 73% 30% 26% 53%SY15 28% 36% 59% 38% 76% 30% 21% 52%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

Perc

ent o

f Stu

dent

s Ea

rnin

g a

"C"

or a

bove

36

Page 37: MPS Academic Progress Report

#19 & #20: % of English learners meeting language growth and proficiency targets

47%

52% 51%

14% 15% 17%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

SY13 SY14 SY15

% meeting language growthtargets% meeting language proficiencytargets

37

Page 38: MPS Academic Progress Report

MCA Math Summary

Growth Category

Well Below (<-0.5)

Below (-0.5 to 0)

Above (Above 0

to 0.5)

Well Above (>0.5)

Achi

evem

ent C

ateg

ory

Exceeds (≥ X60) 156 (2%) 341 (3%) 519 (5%) 1,292 (13%)

Meets (X50 to X

60) 485 (5%) 502 (5%) 635 (6%) 1,001 (10%)

Partially (X40 to X50) 588 (6%) 486 (5%) 466 (5%) 502 (5%)

Does Not (<X40) 1,856 (18%) 711 (7%) 440 (4%) 234 (2%)

District-wide – Growth Students Only

Moving Ahead

Ahead, but below average growth Borderline

Behind, but above average growth

Falling Behind

34% 5% 20% 6% 36%

Growth Category

Well Below (<-0.5)

Below (-0.5 to 0)

Above (Above 0

to 0.5)

Well Above (>0.5)

Prof

icie

ncy

Cat

egor

y

Exceeds (≥ X60) 190 (2%) 417 (3%) 585 (5%) 1,352 (11%)

Meets (X50 to X

60) 708 (6%) 619 (5%) 700 (6%) 973 (8%)

Partially (X40 to X50) 783 (6%) 567 (5%) 463 (4%) 551 (5%)

Does Not (<X40) 2,481 (20%) 835 (7%) 615 (5%) 345 (3%)

Moving Ahead

Ahead, but below average growth Borderline

Behind, but above average growth

Falling Behind

30% 5% 19% 8% 38%

2014 2015

38

Page 39: MPS Academic Progress Report

MCA Reading Summary

Growth Category

Well Below (<-0.5)

Below (-0.5 to 0)

Above (Above 0

to 0.5)

Well Above (>0.5)

Achi

evem

ent C

ateg

ory

Exceeds (≥ X60) 141 (1%) 322 (3%) 521 (4%) 1343 (10%)

Meets (X50 to X

60) 787 (6%) 786 (6%) 803 (6%) 1169 (9%)

Partially (X40 to X50) 741 (6%) 541(4%) 578 (4%) 613 (5%)

Does Not (<X40) 2592(20%) 948 (7%) 670 (5%) 469 (4%)

District-wide – Growth Students Only

Moving Ahead

Ahead, but below average growth Borderline

Behind, but above average growth

Falling Behind

29% 4% 21% 9% 37%

Growth Category

Well Below (<-0.5)

Below (-0.5 to 0)

Above (Above 0

to 0.5)

Well Above (>0.5)

Prof

icie

ncy

Cat

egor

y

Exceeds (≥ X60) 91 (1%) 273 (2%) 469 (4%) 1,285 (11%)

Meets (X50 to X

60) 769 (6%) 687 (6%) 735 (6%) 1,110 (9%)

Partially (X40 to X50) 683 (6%) 495 (4%) 505 (4%) 629 (5%)

Does Not (<X40) 2,469 (20%) 813 (7%) 668 (6%) 443 (4%)

Moving Ahead

Ahead, but below average growth Borderline

Behind, but above average growth

Falling Behind

30% 3% 21% 9% 37%

2014 2015

39

Page 40: MPS Academic Progress Report

2015 MCA Summary - African

Growth Category

Well Below (<-0.5)

Below (-0.5 to 0)

Above (Above 0

to 0.5)

Well Above (>0.5)

Achi

evem

ent C

ateg

ory

Exceeds (≥ X60) 6 (0%) 8 (1%) 16 (1%) 45 (3%)

Meets (X50 to X

60) 63 (5%) 52 (4%) 59 (4%) 122 (9%)

Partially (X40 to X50) 75 (5%) 74 (5%) 63 (5%) 99 (7%)

Does Not (<X40) 383 (28%) 128 (9%) 94 (7%) 78 (6%)

District-wide – Growth Students Only

Moving Ahead

Ahead, but below average growth Borderline

Behind, but above average growth

Falling Behind

18% 1% 20% 13% 48%

Growth Category

Well Below (<-0.5)

Below (-0.5 to 0)

Above (Above 0

to 0.5)

Well Above (>0.5)

Prof

icie

ncy

Cat

egor

y

Exceeds (≥ X60) 0 (0%) 1 (0%) 9 (1%) 29 (2%)

Meets (X50 to X

60) 45 (4%) 57 (5%) 63 (5%) 118 (9%)

Partially (X40 to X50) 73 (6%) 63 (5%) 52 (4%) 86 (7%)

Does Not (<X40) 348 (28%) 98 (8%) 117 (9%) 88 (7%)

Moving Ahead

Ahead, but below average growth Borderline

Behind, but above average growth

Falling Behind

18% 0% 19% 16% 47%

Math Reading

40

Page 41: MPS Academic Progress Report

2014 MCA Summary - African

Growth Category

Well Below (<-0.5)

Below (-0.5 to 0)

Above (Above 0

to 0.5)

Well Above (>0.5)

Achi

evem

ent C

ateg

ory

Exceeds (≥ X60) 0% 1% 1% 4%

Meets (X50 to X

60) 3% 3% 5% 9%

Partially (X40 to X50) 6% 6% 5% 8%

Does Not (<X40) 27% 11% 7% 4%

District-wide – Growth Students Only

Moving Ahead

Ahead, but below average growth Borderline

Behind, but above average growth

Falling Behind

19% 1% 19% 11% 50%

Growth Category

Well Below (<-0.5)

Below (-0.5 to 0)

Above (Above 0

to 0.5)

Well Above (>0.5)

Prof

icie

ncy

Cat

egor

y

Exceeds (≥ X60) 0% 0% 1% 2%

Meets (X50 to X

60) 3% 4% 7% 11%

Partially (X40 to X50) 6% 5% 6% 9%

Does Not (<X40) 25% 8% 8% 6%

Moving Ahead

Ahead, but below average growth Borderline

Behind, but above average growth

Falling Behind

20% 0% 22% 14% 44%

Math Reading

41

Page 42: MPS Academic Progress Report

2015 MCA Summary – African American

Growth Category

Well Below (<-0.5)

Below (-0.5 to 0)

Above (Above 0

to 0.5)

Well Above (>0.5)

Achi

evem

ent C

ateg

ory

Exceeds (≥ X60) 12 (0%) 18 (1%) 38 (1%) 96 (3%)

Meets (X50 to X

60) 100 (3%) 105 (4%) 109 (4%) 169 (6%)

Partially (X40 to X50) 194 (7%) 157 (5%) 118 (4%) 139 (5%)

Does Not (<X40) 995 (34%) 321 (11%) 246 (8%) 134 (5%)

District-wide – Growth Students Only

Moving Ahead

Ahead, but below average growth Borderline

Behind, but above average growth

Falling Behind

14% 1% 16% 13% 56%

Growth Category

Well Below (<-0.5)

Below (-0.5 to 0)

Above (Above 0

to 0.5)

Well Above (>0.5)

Prof

icie

ncy

Cat

egor

y

Exceeds (≥ X60) 4 (0%) 18 (1%) 27 (1%) 79 (3%)

Meets (X50 to X

60) 99 (3%) 115 (4%) 142 (5%) 216 (7%)

Partially (X40 to X50) 195 (6%) 125 (4%) 133 (4%) 179 (6%)

Does Not (<X40) 995 (33%) 325 (11%) 214 (7%) 148 (5%)

Moving Ahead

Ahead, but below average growth Borderline

Behind, but above average growth

Falling Behind

15% 1% 17% 12% 54%

Math Reading

42

Page 43: MPS Academic Progress Report

2014 MCA Summary – African American

Growth Category

Well Below (<-0.5)

Below (-0.5 to 0)

Above (Above 0

to 0.5)

Well Above (>0.5)

Achi

evem

ent C

ateg

ory

Exceeds (≥ X60) 0% 1% 1% 3%

Meets (X50 to X

60) 3% 3% 4% 6%

Partially (X40 to X50) 6% 5% 5% 5%

Does Not (<X40) 35% 12% 7% 4%

District-wide – Growth Students Only

Moving Ahead

Ahead, but below average growth Borderline

Behind, but above average growth

Falling Behind

14% 1% 16% 11% 58%

Growth Category

Well Below (<-0.5)

Below (-0.5 to 0)

Above (Above 0

to 0.5)

Well Above (>0.5)

Prof

icie

ncy

Cat

egor

y

Exceeds (≥ X60) 0% 1% 1% 3%

Meets (X50 to X

60) 3% 3% 5% 7%

Partially (X40 to X50) 6% 5% 5% 6%

Does Not (<X40) 32% 11% 7% 5%

Moving Ahead

Ahead, but below average growth Borderline

Behind, but above average growth

Falling Behind

15% 1% 17% 12% 54%

Math Reading

43

Page 44: MPS Academic Progress Report

2015 MCA Summary – American Indian

Growth Category

Well Below (<-0.5)

Below (-0.5 to 0)

Above (Above 0

to 0.5)

Well Above (>0.5)

Achi

evem

ent C

ateg

ory

Exceeds (≥ X60) 2 (0%) 3 (1%) 3 (1%) 13 (2%)

Meets (X50 to X

60) 19 (4%) 17 (3%) 18 (3%) 27 (5%)

Partially (X40 to X50) 49 (9%) 24 (5%) 17 (3%) 27 (5%)

Does Not (<X40) 170 (32%) 60 (11%) 45 (9%) 32 (6%)

District-wide – Growth Students Only

Moving Ahead

Ahead, but below average growth Borderline

Behind, but above average growth

Falling Behind

12% 1% 15% 15% 58%

Growth Category

Well Below (<-0.5)

Below (-0.5 to 0)

Above (Above 0

to 0.5)

Well Above (>0.5)

Prof

icie

ncy

Cat

egor

y

Exceeds (≥ X60) 1 (0%) 3 (1%) 8 (2%) 17 (3%)

Meets (X50 to X

60) 12 (2%) 18 (3%) 15 (3%) 42 (8%)

Partially (X40 to X50) 36 (7%) 30 (6%) 32 (6%) 48 (9%)

Does Not (<X40) 133 (25%) 50 (10%) 49 (9%) 32 (6%)

Moving Ahead

Ahead, but below average growth Borderline

Behind, but above average growth

Falling Behind

16% 1% 21% 15% 47%

Math Reading

44

Page 45: MPS Academic Progress Report

2014 MCA Summary – American Indian

Growth Category

Well Below (<-0.5)

Below (-0.5 to 0)

Above (Above 0

to 0.5)

Well Above (>0.5)

Achi

evem

ent C

ateg

ory

Exceeds (≥ X60) 0% 1% 1% 3%

Meets (X50 to X

60) 2% 3% 3% 9%

Partially (X40 to X50) 8% 5% 4% 4%

Does Not (<X40) 34% 11% 8% 4%

District-wide – Growth Students Only

Moving Ahead

Ahead, but below average growth Borderline

Behind, but above average growth

Falling Behind

16% 1% 14% 12% 58%

Growth Category

Well Below (<-0.5)

Below (-0.5 to 0)

Above (Above 0

to 0.5)

Well Above (>0.5)

Prof

icie

ncy

Cat

egor

y

Exceeds (≥ X60) 1% 2% 1% 2%

Meets (X50 to X

60) 3% 4% 3% 7%

Partially (X40 to X50) 6% 5% 5% 5%

Does Not (<X40) 34% 9% 7% 5%

Moving Ahead

Ahead, but below average growth Borderline

Behind, but above average growth

Falling Behind

14% 2% 17% 12% 54%

Math Reading

45

Page 46: MPS Academic Progress Report

2015 MCA Summary – Asian

Growth Category

Well Below (<-0.5)

Below (-0.5 to 0)

Above (Above 0

to 0.5)

Well Above (>0.5)

Achi

evem

ent C

ateg

ory

Exceeds (≥ X60) 9 (1%) 28 (3%) 40 (5%) 106 (12%)

Meets (X50 to X

60) 42 (5%) 57 (7%) 57 (7%) 98 (11%)

Partially (X40 to X50) 55 (6%) 41 (5%) 53 (6%) 48 (6%)

Does Not (<X40) 121 (14%) 51 (6%) 37 (4%) 12 (1%)

District-wide – Growth Students Only

Moving Ahead

Ahead, but below average growth Borderline

Behind, but above average growth

Falling Behind

35% 4% 23% 6% 31%

Growth Category

Well Below (<-0.5)

Below (-0.5 to 0)

Above (Above 0

to 0.5)

Well Above (>0.5)

Prof

icie

ncy

Cat

egor

y

Exceeds (≥ X60) 5 (1%) 11 (1%) 20 (2%) 75 (9%)

Meets (X50 to X

60) 48 (6%) 58 (7%) 51 (6%) 93 (11%)

Partially (X40 to X50) 48 (6%) 50 (6%) 53 (6%) 67 (8%)

Does Not (<X40) 159 (19%) 54 (6%) 41 (5%) 24 (3%)

Moving Ahead

Ahead, but below average growth Borderline

Behind, but above average growth

Falling Behind

28% 2% 26% 8% 36%

Math Reading

46

Page 47: MPS Academic Progress Report

2014 MCA Summary – Asian

Growth Category

Well Below (<-0.5)

Below (-0.5 to 0)

Above (Above 0

to 0.5)

Well Above (>0.5)

Achi

evem

ent C

ateg

ory

Exceeds (≥ X60) 1% 2% 4% 12%

Meets (X50 to X

60) 5% 5% 6% 12%

Partially (X40 to X50) 7% 6% 5% 7%

Does Not (<X40) 16% 6% 4% 2%

District-wide – Growth Students Only

Moving Ahead

Ahead, but below average growth Borderline

Behind, but above average growth

Falling Behind

35% 3% 22% 6% 35%

Growth Category

Well Below (<-0.5)

Below (-0.5 to 0)

Above (Above 0

to 0.5)

Well Above (>0.5)

Prof

icie

ncy

Cat

egor

y

Exceeds (≥ X60) 1% 2% 3% 8%

Meets (X50 to X

60) 6% 5% 7% 10%

Partially (X40 to X50) 8% 5% 5% 7%

Does Not (<X40) 15% 7% 6% 5%

Moving Ahead

Ahead, but below average growth Borderline

Behind, but above average growth

Falling Behind

28% 3% 23% 11% 35%

Math Reading

47

Page 48: MPS Academic Progress Report

2015 MCA Summary – Hispanic

Growth Category

Well Below (<-0.5)

Below (-0.5 to 0)

Above (Above 0

to 0.5)

Well Above (>0.5)

Achi

evem

ent C

ateg

ory

Exceeds (≥ X60) 12 (1%) 24 (1%) 46 (2%) 121 (5%)

Meets (X50 to X

60) 84 (4%) 99 (4%) 139 (6%) 235 (10%)

Partially (X40 to X50) 162 (7%) 139 (6%) 127 (5%) 166 (7%)

Does Not (<X40) 573 (25%) 203 (9%) 143 (6%) 65 (3%)

District-wide – Growth Students Only

Moving Ahead

Ahead, but below average growth Borderline

Behind, but above average growth

Falling Behind

23% 2% 20% 9% 46%

Growth Category

Well Below (<-0.5)

Below (-0.5 to 0)

Above (Above 0

to 0.5)

Well Above (>0.5)

Prof

icie

ncy

Cat

egor

y

Exceeds (≥ X60) 4 (0%) 7 (0%) 38 (2%) 73 (3%)

Meets (X50 to X

60) 71 (3%) 89 (4%) 114 (5%) 239 (10%)

Partially (X40 to X50) 125 (5%) 122 (5%) 151 (6%) 159 (7%)

Does Not (<X40) 594 (26%) 222 (10%) 203 (9%) 117 (5%)

Moving Ahead

Ahead, but below average growth Borderline

Behind, but above average growth

Falling Behind

20% 0% 20% 14% 46%

Math Reading

48

Page 49: MPS Academic Progress Report

2014 MCA Summary – Hispanic

Growth Category

Well Below (<-0.5)

Below (-0.5 to 0)

Above (Above 0

to 0.5)

Well Above (>0.5)

Achi

evem

ent C

ateg

ory

Exceeds (≥ X60) 0% 1% 1% 5%

Meets (X50 to X

60) 3% 4% 5% 11%

Partially (X40 to X50) 7% 7% 6% 7%

Does Not (<X40) 24% 9% 6% 4%

District-wide – Growth Students Only

Moving Ahead

Ahead, but below average growth Borderline

Behind, but above average growth

Falling Behind

23% 1% 20% 10% 46%

Growth Category

Well Below (<-0.5)

Below (-0.5 to 0)

Above (Above 0

to 0.5)

Well Above (>0.5)

Prof

icie

ncy

Cat

egor

y

Exceeds (≥ X60) 0% 1% 1% 3%

Meets (X50 to X

60) 3% 4% 4% 9%

Partially (X40 to X50) 6% 5% 7% 7%

Does Not (<X40) 26% 11% 8% 6%

Moving Ahead

Ahead, but below average growth Borderline

Behind, but above average growth

Falling Behind

17% 1% 21% 14% 48%

Math Reading

49

Page 50: MPS Academic Progress Report

2015 MCA Summary – White

Growth Category

Well Below (<-0.5)

Below (-0.5 to 0)

Above (Above 0

to 0.5)

Well Above (>0.5)

Achi

evem

ent C

ateg

ory

Exceeds (≥ X60) 149 (4%) 336 (8%) 442 (11%) 971 (23%)

Meets (X50 to X

60) 400 (10%) 289 (7%) 318 (8%) 322 (8%)

Partially (X40 to X50) 247 (6%) 132 (3%) 84 (2%) 72 (2%)

Does Not (<X40) 239 (6%) 72 (2%) 50 (1%) 24 (1%)

District-wide – Growth Students Only

Moving Ahead

Ahead, but below average growth Borderline

Behind, but above average growth

Falling Behind

50% 12% 20% 2% 17%

Growth Category

Well Below (<-0.5)

Below (-0.5 to 0)

Above (Above 0

to 0.5)

Well Above (>0.5)

Prof

icie

ncy

Cat

egor

y

Exceeds (≥ X60) 77 (2%) 233 (6%) 367 (9%) 1012 (24%)

Meets (X50 to X

60) 493 (12%) 350 (8%) 350 (8%) 402 (10%)

Partially (X40 to X50) 206 (5%) 105 (3%) 84 (2%) 90 (2%)

Does Not (<X40) 240 (6%) 64 (2%) 44 (1%) 34 (1%)

Moving Ahead

Ahead, but below average growth Borderline

Behind, but above average growth

Falling Behind

51% 7% 25% 2% 15%

Math Reading

50

Page 51: MPS Academic Progress Report

2014 MCA Summary – White

Growth Category

Well Below (<-0.5)

Below (-0.5 to 0)

Above (Above 0

to 0.5)

Well Above (>0.5)

Achi

evem

ent C

ateg

ory

Exceeds (≥ X60) 3% 7% 10% 24%

Meets (X50 to X

60) 8% 6% 8% 10%

Partially (X40 to X50) 5% 3% 3% 2%

Does Not (<X40) 7% 2% 1% 1%

District-wide – Growth Students Only

Moving Ahead

Ahead, but below average growth Borderline

Behind, but above average growth

Falling Behind

52% 10% 19% 2% 17%

Growth Category

Well Below (<-0.5)

Below (-0.5 to 0)

Above (Above 0

to 0.5)

Well Above (>0.5)

Prof

icie

ncy

Cat

egor

y

Exceeds (≥ X60) 3% 6% 9% 23%

Meets (X50 to X

60) 11% 10% 8% 10%

Partially (X40 to X50) 5% 2% 2% 1%

Does Not (<X40) 6% 2% 1% 1%

Moving Ahead

Ahead, but below average growth Borderline

Behind, but above average growth

Falling Behind

50% 8% 24% 2% 15%

Math Reading

51

Page 52: MPS Academic Progress Report

2015 MCA Summary – English Learners

Growth Category

Well Below (<-0.5)

Below (-0.5 to 0)

Above (Above 0

to 0.5)

Well Above (>0.5)

Achi

evem

ent C

ateg

ory

Exceeds (≥ X60) 2 (0%) 4 (0%) 12 (0%) 35 (1%)

Meets (X50 to X

60) 37 (1%) 71 (3%) 102 (4%) 249 (9%)

Partially (X40 to X50) 166 (6%) 154 (6%) 156 (6%) 232 (8%)

Does Not (<X40) 880 (31%) 325 (12%) 233 (8%) 136 (5%)

District-wide – Growth Students Only

Moving Ahead

Ahead, but below average growth Borderline

Behind, but above average growth

Falling Behind

14% 0% 18% 13% 55%

Growth Category

Well Below (<-0.5)

Below (-0.5 to 0)

Above (Above 0

to 0.5)

Well Above (>0.5)

Prof

icie

ncy

Cat

egor

y

Exceeds (≥ X60) 0 (0%) 2 (0%) 1 (0%) 11 (0%)

Meets (X50 to X

60) 5 (0%) 28 (1%) 49 (2%) 171 (6%)

Partially (X40 to X50) 107 (4%) 137 (5%) 160 (6%) 235 (9%)

Does Not (<X40) 904 (34%) 334 (12%) 324 (12%) 215 (8%)

Moving Ahead

Ahead, but below average growth Borderline

Behind, but above average growth

Falling Behind

9% 0% 16% 20% 55%

Math Reading

52

Page 53: MPS Academic Progress Report

2014 MCA Summary – English Learners

Growth Category

Well Below (<-0.5)

Below (-0.5 to 0)

Above (Above 0

to 0.5)

Well Above (>0.5)

Achi

evem

ent C

ateg

ory

Exceeds (≥ X60) 0% 0% 0% 2%

Meets (X50 to X

60) 1% 2% 4% 9%

Partially (X40 to X50) 5% 6% 6% 9%

Does Not (<X40) 30% 12% 8% 5%

District-wide – Growth Students Only

Moving Ahead

Ahead, but below average growth Borderline

Behind, but above average growth

Falling Behind

15% 0% 18% 13% 53%

Growth Category

Well Below (<-0.5)

Below (-0.5 to 0)

Above (Above 0

to 0.5)

Well Above (>0.5)

Prof

icie

ncy

Cat

egor

y

Exceeds (≥ X60) 0% 0% 0% 0%

Meets (X50 to X

60) 1% 1% 3% 5%

Partially (X40 to X50) 3% 4% 7% 9%

Does Not (<X40) 32% 14% 11% 9%

Moving Ahead

Ahead, but below average growth Borderline

Behind, but above average growth

Falling Behind

8% 0% 18% 21% 54%

Math Reading

53

Page 54: MPS Academic Progress Report

2015 MCA Summary – Special Education

Growth Category

Well Below (<-0.5)

Below (-0.5 to 0)

Above (Above 0

to 0.5)

Well Above (>0.5)

Achi

evem

ent C

ateg

ory

Exceeds (≥ X60) 4 (0%) 21 (1%) 26 (2%) 50 (3%)

Meets (X50 to X

60) 50 (3%) 34 (2%) 32 (2%) 57 (4%)

Partially (X40 to X50) 54 (3%) 40 (3%) 42 (3%) 54 (3%)

Does Not (<X40) 635 (41%) 184 (12%) 164 (11%) 101 (7%)

District-wide – Growth Students Only

Moving Ahead

Ahead, but below average growth Borderline

Behind, but above average growth

Falling Behind

11% 2% 12% 17% 59%

Growth Category

Well Below (<-0.5)

Below (-0.5 to 0)

Above (Above 0

to 0.5)

Well Above (>0.5)

Prof

icie

ncy

Cat

egor

y

Exceeds (≥ X60) 2 (0%) 14 (1%) 14 (1%) 45 (3%)

Meets (X50 to X

60) 34 (2%) 35 (2%) 45 (3%) 83 (5%)

Partially (X40 to X50) 57 (4%) 38 (2%) 37 (2%) 74 (5%)

Does Not (<X40) 647 (42%) 181 (12%) 143 (9%) 110 (7%)

Moving Ahead

Ahead, but below average growth Borderline

Behind, but above average growth

Falling Behind

12% 1% 12% 16% 59%

Math Reading

54

Page 55: MPS Academic Progress Report

2014 MCA Summary – Special Education

Growth Category

Well Below (<-0.5)

Below (-0.5 to 0)

Above (Above 0

to 0.5)

Well Above (>0.5)

Achi

evem

ent C

ateg

ory

Exceeds (≥ X60) 1% 1% 2% 4%

Meets (X50 to X

60) 2% 2% 2% 5%

Partially (X40 to X50) 4% 2% 2% 4%

Does Not (<X40) 45% 13% 8% 5%

District-wide – Growth Students Only

Moving Ahead

Ahead, but below average growth Borderline

Behind, but above average growth

Falling Behind

12% 1% 10% 13% 63%

Growth Category

Well Below (<-0.5)

Below (-0.5 to 0)

Above (Above 0

to 0.5)

Well Above (>0.5)

Prof

icie

ncy

Cat

egor

y

Exceeds (≥ X60) 1% 0% 1% 3%

Meets (X50 to X

60) 2% 3% 2% 5%

Partially (X40 to X50) 3% 2% 3% 5%

Does Not (<X40) 39% 14% 9% 7%

Moving Ahead

Ahead, but below average growth Borderline

Behind, but above average growth

Falling Behind

12% 1% 13% 16% 58%

Math Reading

55